首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

微型种植体和横腭杆支抗用于成人正畸的疗效比较
引用本文:张子扬. 微型种植体和横腭杆支抗用于成人正畸的疗效比较[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2007, 15(11): 494-495
作者姓名:张子扬
作者单位:杭州口腔医院正畸科,浙江,杭州,310006
摘    要:目的 比较微型种植体和上颌横腭杆支抗用于成人正畸的效果.方法 选择20例成人上颌前突或双颌前突患者,随机分为两组,全部病例均拔除4个第一前磨牙并采用标准MBT技术矫正,分别使用微型种植体和上颌横腭杆加强支抗. 20例患者治疗前和拔牙间隙关闭后均拍摄头颅侧位片,比较两组磨牙在矢状向和垂直向的稳定性.结果 微型种植体组的磨牙前移量少,和上颌横腭杆组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).两组在垂直方向变化差异无统计学意义.结论 微型种植体支抗可以单独提供临床所需的最强支抗.

关 键 词:微型种植体支抗  上颌横腭杆  错(牙合)  成人
文章编号:1006-5245(2007)11-494-02
修稿时间:2006-11-30

Comparison of Miniscrew and Transpalatal Arch as the Anchorage in Adult Orthodontics
ZHANG Zi-yang. Comparison of Miniscrew and Transpalatal Arch as the Anchorage in Adult Orthodontics[J]. Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment, 2007, 15(11): 494-495
Authors:ZHANG Zi-yang
Affiliation:Department of Orthodontics, Hangzhou Stomatologieal Hospital, Hangzhou 310006, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of miniscrew and transpalatal arch(TPA)as anchorage in adult orthodontics.Methods Twenty adult patients with maxillary protrusion or bialveolar protrusion were included in this study and were randomly divided into two groups.All the patients were treated by classical MBT with four first premolars extracted,and upper posterior anchorage were reinforced with miniscrew or transpalatal arch respectively.Cephalometric were taken before treatment and after the space was closed.Results There were significant difference in the stability in sagittal plane but not in vertical plane.Conclusion Miniscrew could provide better anchorage in clinical consideration.
Keywords:Implant anchorage  Adult orthodontic  Miniscrew  Transpalatal Arch
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号