Three-year outcomes from the CRADLE study in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus with reduced tacrolimus and early steroid withdrawal

CRADLE was a 36-month multicenter study in pediatric (≥1 to <18 years) kidney transplant recipients randomized at 4 to 6 weeks posttransplant to receive everolimus + reduced-exposure tacrolimus (EVR + rTAC; n = 52) with corticosteroid withdrawal at 6-month posttransplant or continue mycophenolate mofetil + standard-exposure TAC (MMF + sTAC; n = 54) with corticosteroids. The incidence of composite efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, or death) at month 36 was 9.8% vs 9.6% (difference: 0.2%; 80% confidence interval: −7.3 to 7.7) for EVR + rTAC and MMF + sTAC, respectively, which was driven by BPARs. Graft loss was low (2.1% vs 3.8%) with no deaths. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 36 was comparable between groups (68.1 vs 67.3 mL/min/1.73 m²). Mean changes (z-score) in height (0.72 vs 0.39; P = .158) and weight (0.61 vs 0.82; P = .453) from randomization to month 36 were comparable, whereas growth in prepubertal patients on EVR + rTAC was better (P = .050) vs MMF + sTAC. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was comparable between groups. Rejection was the leading AE for study drug discontinuation in the EVR + rTAC group. In conclusion, though AE-related study drug discontinuation was higher, an EVR + rTAC regimen represents an alternative treatment option that enables withdrawal of steroids as well as reduction of CNIs for pediatric kidney transplant recipients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01544491.     

Erythema nodosum arising during everolimus therapy for tuberous sclerosis complex

Indications for everolimus and other drugs within the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor class have recently expanded to include tuberous sclerosis complex. Everolimus is generally well tolerated, but it is important for physicians to identify and manage associated cutaneous adverse effects. We report the first case of a child developing erythema nodosum while undergoing everolimus therapy.     

The rationale for mTOR inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer

The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is frequently overexpressed in human epithelial ovarian cancer and an attractive target for therapy. In vivo mouse models were confirmative for in vitro findings, where the administration of mTOR inhibitors in ovarian cancer xenografts showed antitumoral as well as antiangiogenic effects. Phase I – II trials are now ongoing with mTOR inhibitors in ovarian cancer patients, some in combination with conventional cytotoxic agents. If further development of mTOR inhibition in ovarian cancer is pursued, studying combinations of mTOR inhibitors with other new targeted therapies would be of interest. mTOR inhibitors in the adjuvant setting could have potential, since, for the moment, there is no standard maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. A crucial challenge will be to identify strong predictive biomarkers. This review highlights the rationale for the use of mTOR inhibitors in ovarian cancer and summarizes the available preclinical findings.     

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition after solid organ transplantation: can it,and does it,reduce cancer risk?

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus has been increasingly used as immunosuppressants for recipients of solid organ transplants. Over the years, potential advantages unique to this class of immunosuppressants have been recognized, including chemoprevention by virtue of their antiproliferative effects. Prevention of malignancy after transplant through mTOR inhibitor‐based immunosuppression may have a specific practical application in transplant recipients with preexisting malignancy including hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma. This review will reveal how the biochemistry of the mTOR pathway, as it pertains to chemoprevention, can support a clinical role for mTOR inhibitors in the prevention of malignancies, recurrent or de novo, after solid organ transplantation in selected patients.     

Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three‐yr results of a single‐center prospective clinical trial

We compared in kidney transplantation two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (TAC) and everolimus plus low‐dose cyclosporine (EVE). Sixty consecutive patients received TAC (30 patients) or EVE (30 patients) as immunosuppressive regimen; all subjects also received induction with basiliximab and corticosteroids. After three‐yr follow‐up, no difference was found in patient and graft survival (PTS: TAC: 97% vs. EVE: 100%; GS: TAC: 93% vs. EVE: 93%). The incidence of acute rejection was higher in the EVE group but the difference was not statistically significant (17% vs. 23%, p = ns). Patients in EVE showed higher serum cholesterol (205 ± 41 vs. 235 ± 41 mg/dL, p = 0.0012) and lower hemoglobin concentration (13.6 ± 1.4 vs. 12.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.01). Renal function was not significantly different in the two groups (3 Y creatinine: TAC 1.4 ± 0.8 vs. EVE 1.6 ± 0.8 mg/dL, p = ns). Treatment discontinuation was higher in the EVE group (TAC 17 vs. EVE 36%, p = ns). Our data show that in the middle‐term follow‐up, an immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus plus MMF has a similar efficacy and safety profile in comparison with the combination of low‐exposure cyclosporine plus everolimus. Further follow up could evidence the benefits related to the anti‐proliferative effects of everolimus.