The c-Met inhibitor capmatinib alleviates acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity

Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced hepatotoxicity comes among the most frequent humans’ toxicities caused by drugs. So far, therapeutic interventions for such type of drug-induced toxicity are still limited. In the current study, we examined the influence of capmatinib (Cap), a novel c-Met inhibitor, on APAP-induced hepatotoxicity in mice when administered 2 h prior, 2 h post and 4 h post APAP-challenge. The results revealed that Cap administration significantly attenuated APAP-induced liver injury when administered only 2 h prior and post APAP-administration. Cap hepatoprotective effect was mediated by lowering the excessive formation of lipid peroxidation and nitrosative stress products caused by APAP. Besides, Cap attenuated APAP-induced overproduction and release of proinflammatory mediators like TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-17A, IL-6, and MCP-1. Cap treatment also led to avoidance of APAP-subsequent repair by abating APAP-induced elevation of hepatic IL-22 and PCNA expressions. In conclusion, c-Met receptor inhibition may be a potential strategy for alleviating APAP-hepatotoxicity, especially when administered in the early phase of intoxication.     

Capmatinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Activation of the MET pathway through MET amplifications or mutations is present in 3–4% of stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). High MET amplifications and exon 14 skipping mutations are associated with poor prognosis: new treatments are needed for these patients. Capmatinib is a highly selective, potent small-molecule MET inhibitor with antitumor activity in NSCLC in vitro and in vivo.

Areas covered: This article provides an overview of the capmatinib clinical development program in NSCLC, both as monotherapy in NSCLC with a dysregulated MET pathway, and in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with MET-based acquired resistance to previous EGFR inhibition.

Expert opinion: In the GEOMETRY Mono-1 study, treatment with capmatinib resulted in high response rates in stage IV NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutations, particularly in first line, supporting testing for this biomarker at the time of diagnosis. Durable responses have been reported and results in MET-amplified NSCLC are eagerly anticipated. In EGFR-mutant NSCLC, notable responses have been observed in combination with an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in case of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs based on high MET amplification.     

A Phase 2 Study of Capmatinib in Patients With MET-Altered Lung Cancer Previously Treated With a MET Inhibitor

IntroductionCapmatinib is approved for MET exon 14–altered NSCLC on the basis of activity in targeted therapy–naive patients. We conducted a phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of capmatinib in patients previously treated with a MET inhibitor.MethodsPatients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET amplification or MET exon 14 skipping alterations received capmatinib 400 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate (DCR), intracranial response rate, and overall survival. Circulating tumor DNA was analyzed to identify capmatinib resistance mechanisms.ResultsA total of 20 patients were enrolled between May 2016 and November 2019, including 15 patients with MET skipping alterations and five patients with MET amplification. All patients had received crizotinib; three had also received other MET-directed therapies. The median interval between crizotinib and capmatinib was 22 days (range: 4–374). Two patients (10%) achieved an objective response to capmatinib and 14 had stable disease, yielding a DCR of 80%. Among five patients who discontinued crizotinib for intolerance, the DCR was 83%, including two patients with the best tumor shrinkage of −25% and −28%. Intracranial DCR among four patients with measurable brain metastases was 100%, with no observed intracranial objective responses. Overall, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.3–11.0) and 11.3 (95% confidence interval: 5.5–not reached) months, respectively. MET D1228 and Y1230 mutations and MAPK alterations were recurrently detected in postcrizotinib, precapmatinib plasma. New and persistent MET mutations and MAPK pathway alterations were detected in plasma at progression on capmatinib.ConclusionsCapmatinib has modest activity in crizotinib-pretreated MET-altered NSCLC, potentially owing to overlapping resistance mechanisms.     

MET alterations in NSCLC—Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment and improved the outcome for oncogene-driven NSCLC and an increasing number of oncogenic driver therapies have become available. For MET-dysregulated NSCLC (especially MET exon 14 skipping mutations and MET-amplifications, which is one of the most common bypass mechanisms of resistance in oncogene-addicted NSCLC), several anti–MET-targeted therapies have been approved recently (MET exon 14 skipping mutation) and multiple others are in development. In this narrative review, we summarize the role of MET as an oncogenic driver in NSCLC, discuss the different testing methods for exon 14 skipping mutations, gene amplification, and protein overexpression, and review the existing data and ongoing clinical trials regarding targeted therapies in MET-altered NSCLC. As immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy has become the standard of care for advanced NSCLC, immunotherapy data for MET-dysregulated NSCLC are put into perspective. Finally, we discuss future challenges in this rapidly evolving landscape.