Apheresis Technologies: An International Perspective

Abstract: The developments in apheresis techniques and their clinical applications world-wide are technologically driven. In the past, apheresis survey statistics have highlighted both the differences by region in clinical practice and in the types of technologies utilized. Such differences have provided a basis for the scientific and clinical assessments of these apheresis technologies and their clinical outcomes and have stimulated the marketing and business development of new technologies world-wide. A review of the regional practices and technologies utilized provides a perspective on the future role of apheresis and its developments in clinical practice. While technology is a driving force for the development of new techniques for clinical practice, it is not the only market force. For technology introduction, several other important issues need to be considered. Regulations at the local and, most importantly, the federal level impact the timing for new technology introduction. Reimbursement by healthcare payers is critically important from the initiation of the development of a technology through its clinical use. Clinical trials are critically important to show the safety and clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the technology in order for payers to provide reimbursement for its use, but these trials are sometimes long and costly. Research funding availability at the governmental and commercial levels critically impacts new technology investigation and its introduction. Apheresis technology developments offer new hopes and promises for the clinical team; however, their development, introduction, and utilization will be influenced by the prevailing market forces.     

Risks of leukapheresis and how to manage them—A non-systematic review

Leukapheresis is like any other preparative apheresis, except it isn’t: Leukapheresis typically takes much longer, larger blood volumes are processed and, consequently, larger ACD-A volumes are administered. Blood component donors and leukapheresis subjects are also quite different populations. Allogeneic donors tend to be younger and many are first-time donors, both of which are risk factors for adverse reactions during blood donation. Moreover, more than half of all leukapheresis collections are performed in patients. Here it is the age distribution, including patients at the extremes of age, as well as the underlying disease and co-morbidities which may expose them to higher, or different, risks compared to donors. Both groups thus have good reasons why adverse effects to leukapheresis might be more frequent, more severe, or even different in nature altogether. Compared to other preparative apheresis types like platelet or plasma apheresis, the risks of leukapheresis have been studied less extensively, as it is in comparison a relatively low-frequency intervention. Often leukapheresis remains a domain of hematologists who have a different sense of procedural safety than transfusionists. Furthermore, G-CSF mobilized “stem cell” aphereses by a wide margin outnumber unmobilized aphereses, so that the very strong signal from adverse reactions to G-CSF all but drowns out signals from the apheresis proper. This focused review assesses observations from leukapheresis as well as extrapolation of observations from other forms of preparative apheresis in an attempt to gauge the safety of leukapheresis and identify potential approaches to its further improvement. In short, the overall impression is one of a very satisfactory safety record of leukapheresis, with occasional issues with venous access or vasovagal problems, and frequent, but highly responsive and rarely limiting ACD-A toxicity.     

Development of apheresis techniques and equipment designed for patients weighing less than 10 kg

The procedure of apheresis in pediatric patients, particularly in those with low weight (body weight<10?kg) presents an important challenge due to particularities of this group. There are no specific guidelines or enough scientific evidence to standardize the practice in this group of patients. In addition to the psychological aspect, the correct calculation of the total blood volume, the extracorporeal volume of the cell separator and an estimated decrease in hematocrit must be considered. Personalized protocols for priming of the apheresis equipment, sufficient blood flow and adequate anticoagulation are essential for patient comfort and therapeutic success. The purpose of this article is to present the results of the national study of apheresis practices in low weight group of children conducted from 2012 to 2018.Protocols and patients’ data collected from various apheresis centers in Argentina were compared with the apheresis protocols around the world. Our protocols and data were similar to those in other countries; however, no detailed and specific guidelines for apheresis practices in this population of patients with unique requirements have been developed to date.     

Treatment cost of ulcerative colitis: Is apheresis with Adacolumn® cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Scarce data are available in Europe on the cost of treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM: To assess the cost of illness of moderate-to-severe UC in two scenarios: traditional treatment versus alternative treatment incorporating granulocyte, monocyte adsorption - apheresis (GMA-Apheresis; Adacolumn). To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of both options in steroid-dependent patients. METHODS: One-year cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness analysis from the third-payer perspective using a decision tree model was carried out. Probabilities of each event were derived from the literature and an expert panel. Direct medical costs were obtained from official sources (euro2004). Effectiveness was measured by the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission. RESULTS: The average annual cost per patient treated with traditional treatment was estimated to be euro6740; with GMA-Apheresis, the cost was estimated to be euro6959. In steroid-dependent patients, the average annual cost was euro6059 and euro11,436, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving clinical remission with GMA-Apheresis was 22.5% higher. As second- and third-line therapy, a new course of corticosteroids and surgery was avoided in 18.5 and 4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating GMA-Apheresis (Adacolumn) in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe UC patients is cost-effective and implies savings related to the reduction of adverse effects derived from corticosteroid use and to the decreased number of surgical interventions.     

The role of apheresis therapy in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a radical therapy for end-stage liver disease. The severe shortage of transplantable organs is, however, a big problem, not only in liver transplantation but also other organ transplants. Although in Japan, transplantation of organs obtained from brain-dead donors (BDD) has been allowed since October 1997, to date only 27 BDD have been obtained. It has become difficult to procure liver grafts from BDD, therefore we must use liver grafts from living donors. The living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) program started in 1990 in Japan, and is still the major form of liver transplantation because of the scarcity of cadaveric donors. In the Department of Transplant Surgery, Kyoto Hospital (Kyoto, Japan), the accumulated number of LDLT cases exceeded 955 up to October 2003. In order to perform LDLT under safer conditions, apheresis plays a major role in Japan due to the prevalence of LDLT where later retransplantation is difficult. Clinical indications of apheresis for LDLT are mainly use as a bridge before transplantation, and liver support after transplantation. We describe the effect of apheresis therapy for LDLT patients with nephritic and hepatic problems.     

Metabolomics and Proteomics Reveal the Variation of Substances in Apheresis Platelets during Storage and Their Effects on Cancer Cell Proliferation

IntroductionApheresis platelets (APs) are clinically and crucially important in the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia or cancer. However, few researchers have addressed the variation of supernatant metabolites and exosome proteins in APs during storage and their effects on cancer cell proliferation.ObjectiveThis study was designed to explore the change rules of the metabolites and exosomal proteins of APs during storage and their effects on cancer cell proliferation.MethodsMetabolomics and proteomics were separately applied to analyze the variation of AP supernatant metabolites and exosomal proteins between freshly prepared day-0 and day-5 terminal-stored APs. Cell counting kit (CCK)-8 assay was performed to detect the effects of AP supernatants and exosomes on the proliferation of cancer cells.ResultsWe found that the supernatant metabolites and exosomal proteins in APs were significantly different on day 0 and day 5, and that many differential metabolites and exosomal proteins were associated with cancer characteristics. Furthermore, the day-5 AP supernatants had a greater inhibition of the proliferation of K562, HepG2, and HCT116 cancer cells, but the day-5 AP exosomes had no significant effect on the proliferation of these cancer cells.ConclusionThe variant terminal-stored AP supernatants may inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells but the variant terminal AP exosomes have no effect on cancer cell proliferation.     

Artificial Organs 2014: A Year in Review

In this Editor's Review, articles published in 2014 are organized by category and briefly summarized. We aim to provide a brief reflection of the currently available worldwide knowledge that is intended to advance and better human life while providing insight for continued application of technologies and methods of organ Replacement, Recovery, and Regeneration. As the official journal of the International Federation for Artificial Organs, the International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, the International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation, Artificial Organs continues in the original mission of its founders “to foster communications in the field of artificial organs on an international level.” Artificial Organs continues to publish developments and clinical applications of artificial organ technologies in this broad and expanding field of organ Replacement, Recovery, and Regeneration from all over the world. We take this time also to express our gratitude to our authors for offering their work to this journal. We offer our very special thanks to our reviewers who give so generously of time and expertise to review, critique, and especially provide meaningful suggestions to the author's work whether eventually accepted or rejected. Without these excellent and dedicated reviewers, the quality expected from such a journal could not be possible. We also express our special thanks to our Publisher, John Wiley & Sons, for their expert attention and support in the production and marketing of Artificial Organs. We look forward to reporting further advances in the coming years.     

The Role of Low Density Lipoprotein Apheresis in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract: The chief indication for low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a potentially fatal condition that responds poorly to conventional therapy. Dextran sulfate/cellulose adsorption columns (Kaneka) and on-line heparin precipitation (HELP) are the most popular systems used in LDL apheresis. Weekly or biweekly procedures plus concomitant drug therapy enable LDL cholesterol to be maintained at 30–50% of its untreated level, with regression of xanthomas, arrest of progression of coronary atherosclerosis, and improved life expectancy. However, aortic stenosis may progress despite apheresis and necessitate valve replacement. Better control of hypercholesterolemia results from combining apheresis with a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin. LDL apheresis can also be useful in treating drug-resistant FH heterozygotes with coronary disease. However, the FH Regression Study showed no evidence that reduction by apheresis of both LDL and lipoprotein(a), was more advantageous than reduction by combination drug therapy of LDL alone.