The role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer

The use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has proven to be a successful strategy in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2^-) breast cancer (BC), leading to a strong interest in their possible role in the treatment of early luminal BC. In this review we collect the most relevant and recent information on the use of CDK4/6i for the treatment of early BC in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Specifically, we evaluate the results of the large phase 3 adjuvant trials recently released, which have yielded apparently divergent results. We also examine the relevance of biomarkers as response predictive factors for CDI4/6i, the combination between radiotherapy and CDK4/6i, and provide a critical discussion on the evidence that we have so far and future directions of the role of these drugs in the treatment of early BC.     

Management of Abemaciclib‐Associated Adverse Events in Patients with Hormone Receptor‐Positive,Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2‐Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety Analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3

BackgroundAbemaciclib demonstrated efficacy in hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative advanced breast cancer. Here we provide a comprehensive summary of the most common adverse events (AEs), their management, and whether AEs or dose reductions influenced progression‐free survival (PFS), in the MONARCH 2 and 3 trials.Materials and MethodsIncidence of the most clinically relevant AEs, management, and outcomes were summarized. Time‐dependent covariate analyses examined the impact of dose reductions on PFS. PFS was estimated for patients with and without early onset of diarrhea or neutropenia.ResultsThe most frequently reported AE was diarrhea, with clinically significant diarrhea (grade ≥2) reported for 42.8% of patients taking abemaciclib. Median time to onset was 1 week, and duration ranged from 6 to 12 days, depending on grade and study. Diarrhea was adequately managed by antidiarrheal medication (72.8%), dose omissions (17.3%), and reductions (16.7%). The highest rates of grade ≥2 diarrhea were observed in the first cycles and decreased in subsequent cycles. Neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 25.4% of abemaciclib‐treated patients. Neutropenia resolved with dose omissions (16.8%) and/or dose reductions (11.2%). Incidence of febrile neutropenia (0.7%) or other relevant grade ≥3 hematological events (<9%) was low. Venous thromboembolic events (5.3%) were primarily treated with anticoagulants. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (3.4%) was treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. PFS benefit of abemaciclib was not impacted by dose reductions or early onset of toxicities.ConclusionAbemaciclib was generally well tolerated. The most common AEs were effectively managed by supportive medications, and/or dose adjustments, with no detriment to PFS.Implications for PracticeTreatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant or nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors is generally well tolerated in patients with hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative advanced breast cancer. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3, any‐grade diarrhea and grade ≥3 neutropenia were effectively managed with supportive medication and/or dose adjustment. Venous thromboembolic events were treated with anticoagulants and did not often require treatment discontinuation. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was infrequent and treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of and implement management strategies, including dose adjustments according to local labels, for commonly occurring and serious adverse events to ensure continued treatment and optimize clinical benefit/risk ratio.     

The Role of CDK4/6 Inhibition in Breast Cancer

Imbalance of the cyclin D and cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) pathway in cancer cells may result in diversion away from a pathway to senescence and toward a more proliferative phenotype. Cancer cells may increase cyclin D‐dependent activity through a variety of mechanisms. Therapeutic inhibition of CDKs in tumors to negate their evasion of growth suppressors has been identified as a key anticancer strategy. In this review, we outline the development of CDK inhibitory therapy in breast cancer, including the initial experience with the pan‐CDK inhibitor flavopiridol and the next generation of oral highly selective CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors PD0332991 (palbociclib), LEE011 (ribociclib), and LY2835219 (abemaciclib). Data from phase I and II studies in estrogen receptor‐positive (ER+) breast cancer demonstrate promising efficacy with manageable toxic effects, chiefly neutropenia. We discuss these studies and the phase III studies that are accruing or nearing completion. We describe the application of such therapy to other breast cancer settings, including HER2‐positive breast cancer and the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. We also discuss potential concerns surrounding the combination of CDK inhibitors with chemotherapy and their effects on repair of double‐strand DNA breaks in cancer cells. Oral highly selective CDK inhibitors show great promise in improving the outcomes of patients with ER+ breast cancer, although caution must apply to their combination with other agents and in the early breast cancer setting.     

Current frontline endocrine treatment options for women with hormone receptor-positive,Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced-stage breast cancer

Despite the recent advances in breast cancer early detection and awareness, a significant portion of patients present with an advanced-stage disease and more patients will progress to stage IV despite adequate treatment of their initial early-stage disease. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2)-negative subtype is the commonest among all breast cancer subtypes. The management of the advanced-stage disease of this subtype has evolved significantly over the past few years. The emergence of estrogen receptor down regulators (fulvestrant), mTOR-inhibitors and the recent introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors, like palbociclib, abemaciclib and ribociclib, has resulted in a significant and a historical improvement in treatment outcomes.In this paper, we review many of the recently reported clinical trials that led to the approval of these new drugs in the first-line settings, along with the current international guidelines.     

Simultaneous determination of LY3214996, abemaciclib,and M2 and M20 metabolites in human plasma,cerebrospinal fluid,and brain tumor by LC-MS/MS

A sensitive and rapid liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was established for the quantification of total and unbound concentrations of LY3214996, an extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibitor; abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor; and abemaciclib active metabolites, M2 and M20, in human plasma, brain tumor, and cerebrospinal fluid samples. The method was validated over a concentration range of 0.2–500 nM within a total run time of 3.8 min using isocratic elution on a Kinetex™ F₅ column. Detection was performed on a Sciex QTRAP 6500+ mass spectrometer employing multiple reaction monitoring mode under positive electrospray ionization. The intra- and inter-batch accuracy as well as the precision of the method for all matrices was within ±20% and ≤20% at the lower limit of quantification, and within ±15% and ≤15% for other quality control levels for all analytes. The unbound fractions of drugs and metabolites in spiked and patient samples were determined using an optimized equilibrium dialysis. The validated method was successfully applied in a phase 0/2 clinical trial to assess the central nervous system penetration of LY3214996 and abemaciclib.     

CDK4/6 Inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in breast cancer: palbociclib,ribociclib, and abemaciclib

With 40,920 American women expected to die from breast cancer in 2018 and global health estimates that more than 508,000 women died in 2011 from this disease, the identification of novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of breast cancer cannot be ignored. A breakthrough class of cancer drugs that has emerged in recent years and has had an impact in the treatment of breast cancer are the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, with palbociclib the first in class to have received regulatory approval for breast cancer. In this article we will compare and contrast three CDK4/6 inhibitors - palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib - that have received regulatory approval for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ribociclib and abemaciclib developed after the success of palbociclib represent examples of "me-too" therapies increasingly being deployed in oncology.     

Abemaciclib: safety and effectiveness of a unique cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor

ABSTRACT

Introduction

The discovery and the clinical availability of novel cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors have profoundly changed the therapeutic scenario of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast carcinoma. Among these inhibitors, abemaciclib can induce potent and sustained cell cycle arrest and immune system stimulation.     

New and developing chemical pharmacotherapy for treating hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

Introduction: Endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment for a substantial proportion of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Indeed, patients with metastatic disease not immediately life threatening may experience long disease control across several lines of endocrine therapy. The major limitation of this therapeutic approach is primary or acquired resistance. A better understanding of endocrine resistance has resulted in newer targeted agents to be added to endocrine therapy.

Areas covered: This review highlights new findings in the treatment of HR+/HER2- BC, with a particular focus on new drugs from phase 3 development onwards.

Expert opinion: Combining endocrine therapy with agents targeting putative mechanisms of endocrine resistance is a newer treatment paradigm in HR+ BC. Adding a biologically targeted agent to endocrine therapy results in improved response rate, and clinical benefit rate, and prolonged progression-free survival. A clear advantage in overall survival has not yet been reported. Combination therapy allows to delay chemotherapy but increases toxicities and costs, which are critical factors in decision making in the clinical practice. Moreover, identification and validation of biomarkers of response are needed. Ongoing and future trials should elucidate the role of these compounds in the treatment of HR+/HER2- BC.