排序方式: 共有70条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Summary In idiopathic recurrent calcium urolithiasis (RCU) in men (n=37) the metabolic effects of oral tripotassium citrate (PC) were investigated in a longitudinal field study. The patients were either normo- (n=22) or hypocitraturic (n=15). Laboratory examinations were performed before, and after 3, 6, and more than 12 months of medication. Acceptance of PC was poor, mainly because of the salty taste of the tablet preparation chosen, and a number of participants dropped out of the study. In the remaining participants, compliance was acceptable when evaluated on the basis of urinary potassium and undesired side effects did not occur. In the short term (up to 3 months), PC evoked compensated metabolic alkalosis (pH and citrate in urine increased; blood gases remained normal), a drop in urinary calcium, together with increasing oxaluria, hydroxyapatite supersaturation, and calcium phosphate crystalluria. In the long term (>12 months) PC urinary pH and citrate dissociated, in that pH returned to pretreatment baseline values, whereas citrate stayed at high levels. In normocitraturics but not in hypocitraturics, urinary urea and sodium in creased with PC. Hypocitraturics appeared to be less sensitive to the effects of PC, as reflected by the relatively small rise in urinary pH and citrate, and they maintained higher mean levels of indicators of bone metabolism (osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, hydroxyproline) despite continuous administration of PC. It was concluded that although the PC tablet preparation was effective it may not be an ideal anti-stone drug treatment in the long term and that, especially in hypocitraturiecs, the intrinsic metabolic defect of RCU may not be sufficiently well controlled. 相似文献
2.
Harutoshi Asakawa Gen Sazaki Ken Nagashima Shunichi Nakatsubo Yoshinori Furukawa 《Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America》2016,113(7):1749-1753
Surfaces of ice are covered with thin liquid water layers, called quasi-liquid layers (QLLs), even below their melting point (0 °C), which govern a wide variety of phenomena in nature. We recently found that two types of QLL phases appear that exhibit different morphologies (droplets and thin layers) [Sazaki G. et al. (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(4):1052−1055]. However, revealing the thermodynamic stabilities of QLLs remains a longstanding elusive problem. Here we show that both types of QLLs are metastable phases that appear only if the water vapor pressure is higher than a certain critical supersaturation. We directly visualized the QLLs on ice crystal surfaces by advanced optical microscopy, which can detect 0.37-nm-thick elementary steps on ice crystal surfaces. At a certain fixed temperature, as the water vapor pressure decreased, thin-layer QLLs first disappeared, and then droplet QLLs vanished next, although elementary steps of ice crystals were still growing. These results clearly demonstrate that both types of QLLs are kinetically formed, not by the melting of ice surfaces, but by the deposition of supersaturated water vapor on ice surfaces. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence that supersaturation of water vapor plays a crucially important role in the formation of QLLs.Ice is one of the most abundant materials on Earth, and its surfaces are covered with thin liquid water layers even below their melting point (0 °C) (1–4). Such thin liquid water layers are called “quasi-liquid layers” (QLLs). Because QLLs govern the surface properties of ice just below the melting point, it is well acknowledged that surface melting of ice governs a wide variety of phenomena, such as electrification of thunderclouds (4, 5), regelation (4, 6), frost heave (4, 7), conservation of foods, ice skating (1, 8), preparation of a snowman (1), and growth of ice crystals (2, 4). Therefore, it is essential to understand the surface melting of ice crystals at the molecular level.After Michael Faraday proposed the existence of QLLs in 1842 (1), many studies experimentally confirmed the formation of QLLs by various methods (Measurement method Reference First author (experimental condition) Proton channeling (24, 25) G (S) Proton backscattering (26, 27) F (U) Ellipsometry (23, 28) F (U), B (E) X-ray diffraction (29) K (E) Glancing-angle X-ray scattering (30, 31) D (U) Quasi-elastic neutron scattering (32) M (E) Photoelectron spectroscopy (33, 34) N (E), B (E) NMR (35, 36) K (E), M (U) Optical microscopy (37, 38) E (S), G (S) Optical displacement sensor (39) K (U) Infrared spectroscopy (40) S (S) Sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy (41, 42) W (E) Atomic force microscopy (43–46) B (S), D (U), S (U, E, S), P (E)