Incidence of Liver Injury After Beginning Antiretroviral Therapy with Efavirenz or Nevirapine

Abstract

Objective: To compare the incidence and define the risk factors associated with liver toxicity in patients beginning treatment with nevirapine (NVP) and efavirenz (EFZ). Method: This was a retrospective chart review of all HIV-infected patients starting any antiretroviral regimen containing at least two nucleoside analogues plus either NVP or EFZ between January 1998 and January 2000. Liver toxicity was defined as an increase in transaminase levels 5-fold above the upper limits of normal if they were normal at baseline or 3.5-fold above baseline levels if they werepreviously elevated. Results: Out of 298 patients included in the study, 162 received NVP and 136 EFZ. Overall, 75% were men, and 45% were coinfected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Median (interquartile range) time on follow-up was 10 (6-12) months. Liver toxicity was more frequently associated with NVP (12%) than with EFZ (4%) (p = .016). Overall, it was first recognized at a median time of 5.5 months (2.7-9.2) on therapy, with no differences between treatment arms. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified the use of NVP, HCV coinfection, alcohol abuse, and female gender as independent risk factors for liver toxicity. Conclusion: Liver damage is three times more common in patients receiving NVP than in those taking EFZ. In both groups of patients, it is recognized late, after an average of 5.5 months on therapy. Coinfection with HCV, alcohol abuse, and female gender increase the risk for developing liver toxicity with both drugs.     

Lipid Changes in Patients Initiating Efavirenz- and Indinavir-Based Antiretroviral Regimens

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate nonfasting lipid levels in a large cohort of patients on three HAART regimens: efavirenz + zidovudine + lamivudine (EFV+ZDV+3TC), efavirenz + indinavir (EFV+IDV), and indinavir + zidovudine + lamivudine (IDV+ZDV+3TC). Method: Nonfasting lipid levels were analyzed from a large randomized multicenter treatment trial for HIV-infected patients initiating HAART. Treatment evaluations were carried out at prescribed intervals, and data were recorded and analyzed. Assessment was limited to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol. Results: The results demonstrate an increase in the total cholesterol, ranging from 23 to 57 mg/dL, in the three combinations of HAART therapy. The increase was most significant in the EFV+IDV arm where the effects appear to be additive. HDL cholesterol also increased in all three arms, but the greatest increase was in the two groups containing EFV. In all three arms, the HDL cholesterol increased significantly in women while increases in men were seen only in the EFV-containing arms. Men taking either IDV-containing regimen had a greater increase in total cholesterol, and therefore the total/HDL cholesterol ratio rose significantly. Conclusion: EFV and IDV independently elevate lipid levels. Alterations in the lipid levels may lead to increased cardiovascular risk in men, possibly mitigated by elevations in HDL cholesterol. In addition, changes in HDL cholesterol were significantly different between men and women.     

依非韦仑在妊娠早期的安全性评价

目的 评价非核苷逆转录酶抑制剂依非韦仑（efavirenz,EFV）在妊娠早期抗逆转录病毒治疗（antiretroviral therapy,ART）中的安全性。方法 以代表性meta分析为依据,介绍EFV用于妊娠早期的文献资料及各国指南修订变化,对比各指南中妊娠期ART方案中EFV的推荐级别,阐述EFV的药动学和妊娠期用法。结果 EFV对HIV-1病毒有显著抑制作用,早期动物实验和少量人类临床数据显示EFV会导致胎儿神经管畸形,被列为妊娠早期禁用药物。随着样本量增加,数据显示妊娠早期使用EFV不增加整体出生缺陷风险,神经管缺陷风险概率不高于一般人群。但由于人类数据较为有限,仅部分指南推荐妊娠早期使用EFV。结论 针对不同个体的妊娠早期ART方案,仍需针对具体问题进行分析评估。     

Structure–Activity Studies Reveal the Oxazinone Ring Is a Determinant of Cytochrome P450 2B6 Activity Toward Efavirenz

相似文献   

Efavirenz-associated gynecomastia: report of five cases and review of the literature

The prognosis of HIV infection has improved dramatically since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). However, numerous adverse effects and limitations regarding tolerability remain a concern. Lipomastia (pseudogynecomastia), a breast enlargement due to central adiposity, may occur as part of a fat redistribution syndrome which has been associated with HAART regimens and several pathogenic mechanisms have been advocated in its development. Here we report an observational longitudinal study of five patients diagnosed of gynecomastia associated with efavirenz-based HAART regimens. All cases reached successful immunologic and virologic responses to HAART. The delay of appearance of gynecomastia from the beginning of HAART ranged between 4 to 15 months. In all five cases, gynecomastia regressed after efavirenz withdrawal (mean period of 5 months). In summary, we think that HAART induced gynecomastia should be suspected in HIV patients receiving efavirenz-containing regimens. Although pathogenesis is unclear, this study and a review of the English literature implicates two possible mechanisms: (a) immune restoration processes and (b) efavirenz mediated estradiol-like effects.     

Effect of efavirenz treatment on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir boosted by ritonavir in healthy volunteers

AIMS: A once-daily (q.d.) nucleoside-sparing regimen can prevent mitochondrial toxicity, overcome viral resistance and improve compliance. In the present study the effect of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of once-daily nelfinavir/ritonavir was evaluated in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study in 24 healthy subjects. Each received from days 1-10 (period 1): 1875 mg nelfinavir plus 200 mg ritonavir q.d. with a 300-kcal snack. During days 11-20 (period 2) efavirenz 600 mg q.d. was added to the regimen. Blood samples were collected up to 24 h after dosing on days 10 (period 1) and 20 (period 2). High-performance liquid chromatography methods were used for the determination of the concentrations of all compounds. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. After the first period mean nelfinavir AUC(0-24 h), C(max) and C(24) were 49.6 mg h(-1) l(-1), 5.0 mg l(-1) and 0.37 mg l(-1), and the sum of nelfinavir plus its active metabolite M8 C(24) was 0.83 mg l(-1). The relative bioavailability, expressed as a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for nelfinavir AUC(0-24 h), C(max) and C(24) of period 2 compared with period 1 was: 1.30 (1.21, 1.40), 1.29 (1.19, 1.40) and 1.48 (1.32, 1.66). The sum of nelfinavir and M8 C(24) in period 2 was 0.99 mg l(-1), an increase of 19%. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The studied regimens were well tolerated. Nelfinavir/ritonavir given together with efavirenz resulted in a 48% higher mean C(24) concentration for nelfinavir, and the sum of nelfinavir and M8 C(24) concentrations was 0.99 mg l(-1). Efavirenz exposure in this study was similar to that reported previously, and therefore can be used effectively in combination with ritonavir and nelfinavir.