精神分裂症患者及家属、医生对知情同意具体程序态度的初步分析

目的分析精神科医生、精神分裂症患者及其家属对知情同意具体程序的态度，以指导今后知情同意的实施。方法所有样本均来自中南大学湘雅二医院，共计55名患者，46名家属，61名医生。采用知情同意态度问卷，来调查精神科医生、精神分裂症患者及其家属对知情同意具体程序的态度。结果患者、家属、精神科医生非参数检验结果表明，共计有17项条目存在显著性差异。比如条目4“签写一份接受医疗服务的知情同意书，其目的是”，67．4％的家属，59．2％的患者，90．2％的医生选择第3项“既保护医生又保护患者”，仅21．7％的家属，26．5％的患者，1．6％的医生选择第2项“保护患者”。结论目前精神分裂症患者、家属以及精神科医生对知情同意具体程序的态度存在明显差异。     

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling: A Clinician's Guide

Abstract: Most individuals concerned about hereditary breast cancer risk will neither order nor benefit from genetic testing at the present time. Many will, however, seek information about their risk and testing. Risk assessment services, in addition to providing information about hereditary risk and genetic testing, need also to include assessment of non-hereditary risks, information about how to evaluate risks, early detection modalities, the etiology of cancer, and assistance in devising follow-up health care plans. Psychosocial factors, particularly those pertaining to the individual's past history with illness and beliefs about causes and prognosis, must be taken into account to provide relevant information that is understood. A case history with examples of some of the types of information that lead to informed consent in a cancer risk assessment setting is provided.     

Without Parental Consent: Conducting Research With Homeless Adolescents

ISSUES AND PURPOSE. To identify the ethical and legal implications of conducting research with homeless adolescents and to discuss guidelines for conducting research without parental consent.
CONCLUSIONS. Ethical principles of capacity, risk, postponement, and truthful disclosure within the context of the rights of minors to consent to healthcare treatment form the basis of the argument for allowing adolescents to consent to participate in research without parental consent when there is minimal risk or when such consent could place them at increased risk for harm.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS. Adolescents who are the target population for clinical research or who are intended recipients of nursing care should be involved in setting priorities, purposes, and protocols. Parents and other adults from their communities should be included in developing strategies to protect their confidentiality and privacy while helping them achieve autonomy in making informed health-related decisions.     

Requiring Consent vs. Waiving Consent for Medical Records Research: A Minnesota Law vs. the U.S. (HIPAA) Privacy Rule

The use of medical records in research can yield information that is difficult to obtain by other means. When such records are released to investigators in identifiable form, however, substantial privacy and confidentiality risks may be created. These risks become more common and more serious as medical records move to an electronic format. In 1996, the state of Minnesota enacted legislation with respect to consent requirements for the use of medical records in research. This legislation has been widely criticized because--it is claimed--it creates an unnecessary impediment to research. In this article, we show that these arguments rest upon misinterpretation and/or misrepresentation of the 1996 legislation. A consent requirement had actually been present in Minnesota since 1976 (though codified in a patient rights statute rather than a privacy statute). The 1996 law does not require specific consent, as often claimed, but rather only a general authorization. The campaign against the Minnesota legislation appears to have been motivated by concern with respect to the then impending federal privacy rule. The HIPAA rule, as enacted, is in fact less stringent with respect to consent than the Minnesota consent law. On the other hand, the Minnesota consent law has not been effectively applied or enforced. As we change the way we manage sensitive medical information, new efforts are needed to provide protection against the confidentiality risks in research. Patient consent is an important tool in this regard. New instrumentalities are needed to solicit and document consent.     

Legal issues in contact lens practice with special reference to the practice of orthokeratology

This report aims to encourage optometrists to reflect on the legal implications of clinical contact lens practice, with particular reference to the practice of orthokeratology (ortho-k), which has seen a recent revival of interest. A patient may claim compensation if an optometrist is negligent by breaching his duty to exercise reasonable care and skill in diagnosis, advice or treatment. However, the optometrist will only be liable for reasonably foreseeable harm to the patient, so practitioners need to be fully aware of the foreseeable risks. Failure to adequately inform the patient may lead to a claim for negligence, if disclosure of the risks would have influenced the patient's decision to undergo or forego the procedure. It is important that the professional bodies establish guidelines on acceptable practice, with particular emphasis on the provision of information to patients. Reasonable disclosure, use of appropriate information/consent forms, and proper documentation of cases, should all focus on the needs of, and benefits to, patients.     

Psychological factors influencing the surgical patients' consent to regional anaesthesia

To investigate the preoperative attitude of surgical patients to regional anaesthesia, 162 subjects scheduled for elective surgery were studied. On the day before operation, patients were interviewed by an anaesthesio–logist, using a semi–structured schedule. Topics investigated were sociodemographic variables and clinical correlates, such as past anaesthetic experience, information about anaesthesia and surgery, as well as questions and fears related to anaesthesia. Subjects were assessed for personality characteristics and emotional symptoms by Eysenck's Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), Zung's Self–rating Anxiety and Depression Rating Scales, Schalling–Sifneos' Personality Scale and the 43–item Life Events Inventory of Holmes and Rahe. Seventy–one patients (44%) consented to regional anaesthesia. Consent to regional anaesthesia was associated with advanced age, low neuroticism and high extroversion score in the EPQ, as well as longer duration of illness. The deniers of consent asked more questions and expressed more fears about anaesthesia. It is suggested that the patients' characteristics influence their preference, acceptance or refusal of regional anaesthesia.     

How do clinicians learn to request permission for autopsies?

A postal survey of 434 clinicians at four local hospitals was undertaken in order to identify the methods by which clinicians learn how to request permission for hospital autopsies and to assess the preferred techniques and timing of relevant communication skills training. The majority of 128 responding clinicians had learnt through personal experience with some assistance from senior colleagues and peers. Few clinicians appeared to have learnt through formal training. The preferred methods for the provision of communication skills training were training in small groups (such as seminars or tutorials) and observation of clinicians at work. The most desirable time for the provision of this training was considered to be between the beginning of the final undergraduate year and the end of the pre-registration house officer year. The communication skills training provided within medical education is in need of improvement. More emphasis should be given to clinical-task- or situation-specific applications such as requesting permission for autopsies.     

What should we do with donated embryos that may be genetically affected?

The ethical and legal issues arising from genetic screening in embryo donation are discussed in relation to two recent cases where embryos with uncertain genetic health were offered for donation.     

病人知情同意权的几个辩证法问题

以知情同意为核心的病人自主权是医疗服务和现代医患关系新的支撑点。在人体实验、放弃治疗等领域,充分尊重病人的知情同意权具有极大的现实意义。然而,医生的解释说明、医疗干预和亲属代理同意则构成了对知情同意的限制。因此,必须辩证理解和知情同意的内涵,以最大限度地保障病人利益。