Introduction: First- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib, and afatinib are the standard-of-care for first-line therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations. Unfortunately, after initial activity of an average 9–13 months, disease progression has been reported in the majority of patients. In about 50% of cases the progression is due to the onset of the T790M mutation in exon 20 of the EGFR gene. Third-generation EGFR-TKIs targeting this mutation were investigated, with osimertinib the only reaching clinical practice.
Areas covered: A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meetings using a focused review question addressing osimertinib, was undertaken.
Expert opinion: Osimertinib is the standard-of-care for EGFR-mutated patients progressing to first-line EGFR-TKIs due to the acquired EGFR T790M mutation. Results from the head-to-head first-line trial comparing osimertinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib in activating EGFR mutations might change the front-line approach. Osimertinib in combination regimens, such as immunotherapy, and in adjuvant setting are ongoing. Thus, the strategic approach for the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients will change further in the next few years. 相似文献
With the wide clinical use of the third‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor osimertinib for the treatment of EGFR‐mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance caused by EGFR C797S tertiary mutation has become a concern. Therefore, fourth‐generation EGFR inhibitors that could overcome this mutation have gained increasing attention in recent years. Here, we identified LS‐106 as a novel EGFR inhibitor against C797S mutation and evaluated its antitumor activity both in vitro and in vivo. In cell‐free assay, LS‐106 potently inhibited the kinase activities of EGFR19del/T790M/C797S and EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S with IC50 values of 2.4 nmol/L and 3.1 nmol/L, respectively, which was more potent than osimertinib. Meanwhile, LS‐106 exhibited comparable kinase inhibitory effect to osimertinib on EGFRL858R/T790M and wild‐type EGFR. Results from cellular experiments demonstrated that LS‐106 potently blocked the phosphorylation of EGFR C797S triple mutations in the constructed BaF3 cells that highly expressed EGFR19del/T790M/C797S or EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S, and thus inhibited the proliferation of these cells. We also constructed tumor cells harboring EGFR19del/T790M/C797S (named PC‐9‐OR cells) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and found that LS‐106 markedly suppressed the activation of EGFR19del/T790M/C797S and the proliferation of PC‐9‐OR cells. Moreover, cells harboring EGFR19del/T790M/C797S underwent remarkable apoptosis upon LS‐106 treatment. In vivo experiments further demonstrated that oral administration of LS‐106 caused significant tumor regression in a PC‐9‐OR xenograft model, with a tumor growth inhibition rate (TGI) of 83.5% and 136.6% at doses of 30 and 60 mg/kg, respectively. Taken together, we identified LS‐106 as a novel fourth‐generation EGFR inhibitor against C797S mutation and confirmed its preclinical antitumor effects in C797S–triple‐mutant tumor models. 相似文献
IntroductionThe epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib was recently approved for resected EGFR-mutant stages IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer due to improved disease-free survival (DFS) in this population compared with placebo. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of this strategy.Materials and MethodsWe constructed a Markov model using post-resection health state transitions with digitized DFS data from the ADAURA trial to compare cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo over a 10-year time horizon. An overall survival (OS) benefit of 5% was assumed. Costs and utility values were derived from Medicare reimbursement data and literature. A CE threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product per capita was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for adjuvant osimertinib was $317 119 per QALY-gained versus placebo. Initial costs of osimertinib are higher in years 1-3. Costs due to progressive disease (PD) are higher in the placebo group through the first 6.5 years. Average pre-PD, post-PD, and total costs were $2388, $379 047, and $502 937, respectively, in the placebo group, and $505 775, $255 638, and $800 697, respectively, in the osimertinib group. Sensitivity analysis of OS gains reaches CE with an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70-0.75 benefit of osimertinib over placebo. A 50% discount to osimertinib drug cost yielded an ICER of $115 419.ConclusionsThree-years of adjuvant osimertinib is CE if one is willing to pay $317 119 more per QALY-gained. Considerable OS benefit over placebo or other economic interventions will be needed to reach CE. 相似文献