毛细管区带电泳法测定复方马来酸依那普利片中两组分含量

用毛细管区带电泳法同时测定复方马来酸依那普利片中两组分含量。以咖啡因为内标，２０ｍｍｏｌ／Ｌ硼砂—２０ｍｍｏｌ／Ｌ磷酸二氢钠（４９∶５１，ｐＨ８６）为运行缓冲液，在７ｍｉｎ内完成分离。马来酸依那普利和氢氯噻嗪的线性范围分别为８０～６４０μｇ／ｍＬ（ｒ＝０９９９９）和５０～４００μｇ／ｍＬ（ｒ＝０９９９３）。平均回收率分别为１０１０％和１０１１％，ＲＳＤ分别为１０％和１７％，ｎ＝５。     

复方卡托普利片中氢氯噻嗪的含量及均匀度测定

用紫外分光度法直接溯定复方卡托普利片中氢氯噻嗪的含量及均匀度。测定波长为272±1nm,平均回收率100.2%,变异系数0.3%,吸收度与氢氯噻嗪的浓度在1～10μg/ml 范围内具有线性关系。     

A comparison of labetalol and prazosin combined with atenolol in non-responders to atenolol plus hydrochlorothiazide in uncomplicated hypertension

Summary After screening two local populations in the northern part of The Netherlands for hypertension, patients with a diastolic pressure (DP) between 95 and 120 mmHg were treated daily either with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide or 100 mg atenolol. Non-responders were given the combination and if necessary the dose of atenolol was increased to 200 mg. Non-responders to the latter combination were randomized and treated either with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide and labetalol or with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide, 200 mg atenolol and prazosin. If after 1 month a DP90 mmHg had been reached the patient was reassessed after a further 3 months. If a DP>90 mmHg was found the dose of labetalol or prazosin was increased and the patient was re-examined after 1 month.This protocol was followed until the maximum dose was reached or adverse reactions prevented a further increase in dosage.During 6 months of treatment there was a further drop in systolic and diastolic blood pressures under both regimens of, respectively, 8.6 and 2.4 mmHg for labetalol, and 7.7 and 5.0 mmHg for the prazosin group. At the end of the period the average daily doses of labetalol and prazosin were 1256 mg and 4.3 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the average number of complaints between the labetalol and the prazosin group.     

Efficacy and safety of carvedilol in comparison with atenolol in hypertensive patients pretreated with hydrochlorothiazide

Carvedilol [25 mg once daily] (o. d.) was compared to atenolol (50 mg o. d.) as an adjunct to pre-existing hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP),100–115 mm Hg]. After a placebo run-in phase of 2 weeks, 131 patients received 25 mg HCTZ o. d. for 4 weeks. In all, 122 patients were transferred to the double-blind phase, in which 25 mg carvedilol or 50 mg atenolol was randomly added to HCTZ. After an additional 6 weeks of treatment, 112 patients were evaluable for efficacy (C/HCTZ group,n = 54; A/HCTZ group,n = 58). Blood pressure was measured and the heart rate was counted before medication, at 2-week intervals throughout the trial, and 2 h after medication on the 1st and the last day of the combination treatment period. Serum lipids were measured in addition to routine laboratory variables. A therapeutic response was defined as a reduction in supine and standing diastolic blood pressure to values of < 90=" mmhg.=" in=" a=" relatively=" low=" number=" of=" patients=" (6=" of=" 131),=" a=" response=" as=" defined=" above=" was=" achieved=" with=" hctz=" alone.=" this=" may=" be=" accounted=" for=" by=" the=" fact=" that=" patients=" were=" required=" to=" have=" a=" diastolic=" blood=" pressure=" of=" at=" least=" 100=" mghg=" and=" by=" the=" relatively=" short=" period=" of=" monotherapy.=" the=" two=" groups=" of=" patients=" receiving=" different=" combination=" treatments=" were=" well=" matched=" for=" demographic=" data=" and=" blood=" pressure=" values=" before=" the=" adjunct=" was=" added.=" in=" both=" groups=" there=" was=" a=" marked=" additional=" blood=" pressure=" decrease=" on=" the=" initiation=" of=" combined=" treatment.=" at=" the=" end=" of=" the=" study=" the=" medians=" of=" all=" blood=" pressure=" values=" were=" well=" within=" normal=" ranges,=" which=" was=" not=" the=" case=" with=" hctz=" alone.=" on=" the=" last=" day=" of=" the=" trial,=" the=" responders=" comprised=" 67%=" of=" the=" c/hctz=" group=" and=" 71%=" of=" the=" a/hctz=" group.=" no=" relevant=" changes=" in=" lipid=" values=" were=" observed=" with=" combination=" treatment=" vs=" diuretic=" monotherapy.=" no=" serious=" adverse=" event=" attributable=" to=" one=" of=" the=" study=" drugs=" was=" reported.=" the=" results=" of=" the=" present=" trial=" suggest=" that=" the=" antihypertensive=" efficacy=" of=" both=" combinations=" is=" superior=" to=" that=" of=" hctz=" alone=" and=" that=" there=" is=" no=" difference=" in=" efficacy=" between=" the=" two=" combinations.=" adding=" carvedilol=" or=" atenolol=" to=" pre-existing=" hctz=" appears=" to=" be=" safe.=" the=" tolerability=" of=" the=" antihypertensive=" treatment=" does=" not=" seem=" to=" decline,=" despite=" considerable=" additional=" decreases=" in=" blood=">     

复方厄贝沙坦片中厄贝沙坦和氢氯噻嗪的HPLC测定

建立同时测定复方厄贝沙坦片中厄贝沙坦和氢氯噻嗪含量的HPLC方法。用Inertsil ODS-3色谱柱，流动相为乙腈-0．08mol／L磷酸溶液(用三乙胺调至pH5．0)(40：60)，检测波长225nm。厄贝沙坦和氢氯噻嗪分别在15～135μg／ml(r=0．9999)和1．2～10．8μg／ml(r=0．9999)浓度范围内线性关系良好，方法平均回收率分别为100．0％(RSD=0．46％)和100．5％(RSD=0．49％)。     

复方卡托普利片中卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪的HPLC测定

建立了HPLC法同时测定复方卡托普利片中卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪的含量。采用C18柱，流动相为0．01mol／L磷酸二氢钠溶液-甲醇-乙腈(65：25：10，pH3．0)，检测波长229nm。卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪分别在48-576μg／ml(r=0．9994)和30～150μg／ml(r=0．9994)范围内浓度与峰面积成线性关系，平均回收率为100．4％(RSD=l.6％)和101．3％(RSD=1．9％)。     

反相高效液相色谱法测定咪康唑氯倍他索乳膏中硝酸咪康唑和丙酸氯倍他索的含量

目的建立咪康唑氯倍他索乳膏中硝酸咪康唑和丙酸氯倍他索的含量测定方法.方法以十八烷基键合硅胶色谱柱,0.5%醋酸铵溶液-乙腈-甲醇(24∶38∶38,v/v/v)为流动相,检测波长为240 nm,用内标法定量,内标为邻苯二甲酸二丁酯.结果丙酸氯倍他索在0.12～1.2 μg呈良好的线性关系(r=0.999 9),平均回收率为99.8%;硝酸咪康唑在4.2～48.8 μg呈良好的线性关系(r=0.999 9),平均回收率为100.8%.结论该方法简便、快速、可靠,可用于该产品的质量控制.     

Carbon‐14 labeling of hydrochlorothiazide via [14C]formaldehyde production from [14C]carbon dioxide at ambient temperature

[¹⁴C]Formaldehyde was synthesized by reducing ¹⁴CO₂ at ambient temperature with Schwartz's reagent. The [¹⁴C]formaldehyde was then used in the radiosynthesis of high specific activity (2.1 GBq/mmol) [¹⁴C]hydrochlorothiazide via cyclization of 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐1,3‐benzenedisulfonamide.     

Efficacy of Initiating Therapy with Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide or Their Combination in Hypertensive Nigerians

In order to evaluate whether amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide would be preferable to initiate therapy, 90 untreated hypertensive Nigerians of both genders aged 31–86 years with blood pressure >160/90 and ≤180/120 mm Hg were recruited into a randomized 48-week study. Patients, 30 each in amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and amlodipine–hydrochlorothiazide groups, were treated, respectively, with amlodipine 5 mg for 6 weeks and the dose increased to 10 mg till week 12, after which hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg was added; hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg till week 6, after which amlodipine 5–10 mg was added; and amlodipine 5–10 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. Body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate, and 24-hour urine volume were evaluated at baseline and at the end of weeks 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary efficacy variables were decreased in mean trough sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure such that blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg was regarded as normalized. At week 48 in the amlodipine group, 27 patients versus 25 patients in the hydrochlorothiazide group had diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (90% vs. 83.3%; P <.03). In the amlodipine group, 23 patients versus 20 patients in the hydrochlorothiazide group had blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg (76.7% vs. 66.7%; P <.01). In the amlodipine–hydrochlorothiazide group, 27 patients (90%) and 15 patients (50%) had diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg, respectively. This study has demonstrated that a regimen of amlodipine to which hydrochlorothiazide is subsequently added provides superior efficacy on blood pressure control when compared with a regimen of hydrochlorothiazide to which amlodipine is subsequently added or with ab initio amlodipine–hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy.