Weight gain and antipsychotics: a drug safety review

Introduction: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used in several psychiatric disease entities and exert to a different extent a risk for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). As AIWG is associated with an increase in metabolic syndrome or cardiovascular events, knowledge of these risks is crucial for further monitoring and the initiation of counteractive measures.

Areas covered: We searched PubMed and Web of Sciences for randomized-controlled trials and naturalistic observational studies published between 2010 and 2014 with sample sizes exceeding 100, including all marketed SGAs apart from zotepine, and providing data on weight increase. We also summarized relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses of head-to-head comparisons.

Expert opinion: Recently published data still support the hierarchical ranking of SGAs already proposed in previous reviews ranking clozapine and olanzapine as having the highest risk, followed by amisulpride, asenapine, iloperidone, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone and sertindole in the middle, and aripiprazole, lurasidone and ziprasidone with the lowest risk. Number needed to harm varied considerably in our meta-analysis. Younger patients and patients with a lower baseline body mass index are most vulnerable. The greatest amount of weight gain occurs within the first weeks of treatment. AIWG occurs in all diagnostic groups and is also common in treatment with first-generation antipsychotics; therefore, awareness of this adverse event is essential for anyone prescribing antipsychotics.     

Asenapine for the treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder: from clinical research to clinical practice

The Multidisciplinary Symposium on Head and Neck Cancer focused on the emerging data that underlie optimal treatment for head and neck cancers, with a particular focus on squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In-depth discussions showcased the published Phase II and Phase III data on the treatment of locally advanced disease with both induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Molecular targets of interest and relevance in this tumour type were identified, as were the agents which target these putative proteins or pathways of carcinogenesis. Preliminary results from trials incorporating molecularly-targeted agents have shown a promising role for these compounds in the management of both locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The Symposium brought a clear message. The management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck has evolved considerably, and with the advent of newer chemotherapeutic agents and molecularly targeted therapies, this field will continue to expand over time.     

A 3-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of asenapine in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar mania and mixed states

Objective:  Asenapine is approved for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. This was a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of asenapine for treating acute bipolar mania.
Methods:  After a single-blind placebo run-in period, adults (n = 488) experiencing manic or mixed episodes were randomized to flexible-dose sublingual asenapine (10 mg BID on day 1; 5 or 10 mg BID thereafter; n = 194), placebo (n = 104), or oral olanzapine (15 mg BID on day 1; 5–20 mg QD thereafter; n = 191). Primary efficacy, change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score from baseline to day 21, was assessed using analysis of covariance with last observation carried forward [(LOCF); primary analysis]. A mixed model for repeated measures [(MMRM); prespecified secondary analysis] was also used to assess efficacy. Tolerability and safety assessments included adverse events, physical examinations, extrapyramidal symptom ratings, and laboratory values.
Results:  Mean daily dosages were asenapine 18.2 mg and olanzapine 15.8 mg. Significantly greater least squares (LS) mean ± SE changes in YMRS scores were observed on day 2 with asenapine (−3.0 ± 0.4) and olanzapine (−3.4 ± 0.4) versus placebo (−1.5 ± 0.5, both p < 0.01) and were maintained until day 21 (−10.8 ± 0.8 with asenapine, −12.6 ± 0.8 with olanzapine; both p ≤ 0.0001 versus placebo, −5.5 ± 1.1) with LOCF. The results of MMRM analyses were consistent with those of LOCF. Asenapine had a modest impact on weight and metabolic measures.
Conclusions:  These results indicate that asenapine is rapidly acting, efficacious, and well tolerated for patients with bipolar I disorder experiencing an acute manic episode.     

Glomerular Nephritis; Recognition and Treatment

For general practitioners, who handle more than 85 per cent of all pediatric care, Postgraduate Medicine here presents authoritative, up-to-date summaries by specialists in pediatric problems.     

Asenapine review,part II: clinical efficacy,safety and tolerability

Introduction: Asenapine is a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic currently marketed for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar mania/mixed episodes.

Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to describe the clinical profile of asenapine.

Expert opinion: Asenapine's efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and in the acute management of bipolar manic or mixed episodes, within the recommended therapeutic dose range of 5 – 10 mg twice a day, is evidenced by a broad clinical development program. Asenapine's overall tolerability profile is notable for the potential for sedation (time-limited) and, to a lesser extent, extrapyramidal symptoms/akathisia, dizziness, and oral hypoesthesia. Asenapine's effects on weight and metabolic variables appear modest, as are its effects on the ECG QTc interval and on prolactin.     

Asenapine,iloperidone and lurasidone exposures in young children reported to U.S. poison centers

Context: Asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone are relatively new atypical antipsychotics. There is limited information on toxicity on pediatric exposures to these drugs. The objective of this study was to compare toxicity associated with asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone exposures in young children.

Methods: A retrospective study of U.S. National Poison Data System from 2010 to 2015 of single substance exposures to asenapine, iloperidone or lurasidone in children <6 years of age that were followed to known outcome was performed.

Results: There were 95 asenapine, 64 iloperidone and 124 lurasidone cases that met inclusion criteria. Reason was exploratory for 96% of cases. Drowsiness/lethargy occurred most frequently with iloperidone (45%) and least often with lurasidone (8%). Two iloperidone cases had respiratory depression. For asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone, respectively, management sites were on-site non-health care facility (non-HCF) (32%, 16%, 26%), treated/discharged from emergency department (ED) (46%, 47%, 63%), admitted to noncritical care (9%, 14%, 10%) and admitted to critical care (10%, 22%, 2%). Clinical effect duration was 8?h or less for the majority of non-HCF cases (80%) and for children treated/discharged from the ED (72%). For asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone, coded outcomes were no effect (50%, 41%, 81%), minor effect (43%, 39%, 17%), moderate (6%, 19%, 2%) and major (0, 2%, 0).

Discussion and conclusions: These findings suggest that in children under 6 years of age, lurasidone exposures were least serious and iloperidone exposures were most serious based on clinical effects, management sites and coded outcomes. Observation of symptomatic children in the ED for 8?h should be sufficient to make triage decisions based on persistence or resolution of clinical effects.     

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of asenapine in schizophrenia

Importance of the field: Asenapine is a new atypical antipsychotic medication with high affinity for D₂ and 5HT_2A receptors that has been approved by the FDA in adults for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in the USA. The purpose of this review is to describe the compound and examine whether it addresses some of the unmet clinical needs in treating schizophrenia.

Areas covered in this review: The development of asenapine is described with attention to its chemistry, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile. Preclinical and clinical trials of safety and efficacy are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of asenapine relative to other antipsychotic medications are discussed.

What the reader will gain: Asenapine will be evaluated for whether it: i) causes a reduction in symptoms of schizophrenia; ii) has a side-effect profile minimizing extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain and cardiac effects; and iii) affects negative and/or cognitive symptoms.

Take home message: Asenapine is a recently approved agent with an acceptable cardiometabolic profile and exhibits similar efficacy as other antipsychotic medications, primarily on positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Relatively less weight gain compared with other agents may confer a notable advantage. Sublingual administration may have positive and negative effects on patient compliance. Potential ‘pro-cognitive’ effects of asenapine are preliminary and require more investigation.     

Drugs in development for the treatment of schizophrenia

The overall outcome in schizophrenia is generally poor, despite the undisputed efficacy of antipsychotics in treating the acute symptoms of psychosis. There remains a subset of patients who are refractory to treatment. Also, for most patients treatment is not effective against the full spectrum of symptoms including negative and cognitive symptoms, and severe functional deficits persist. Further, while the newer drugs produce fewer motor side effects, other safety and tolerability concerns have emerged. Since the advent of antipsychotic therapy in the early 1950s, subsequent advances have been modest. While the mechanism of action of the first-generation antipsychotics appears closely linked to D2 antagonism, the second-generation antip-sychotics have broader receptor-binding profiles, particularly 5-HT receptor antagonism. Attempts are now being made to develop antipsychotics with a wider spectrum of efficacy and a more favourable safety and tolerability profile by further exploring the therapeutic potential of D2 and 5-HT2 receptors, as well as investigating other putative mechanisms of action. This article adds to the current literature by providing an up-to-date review of antipsychotic drugs currently in development, focusing on the findings to date for compounds that are presently in Phase III clinical trials. While no exciting breakthroughs appear imminent, several drugs in early development have great potential.