D1 Dopamine receptor-mediated substance P depletion in the striatonigral neurons of rats subjected to neonatal dopaminergic denervation: implications for self-injurious behavior

The present study examined the influences of dopamine (DA) receptor stimulation on enkephalin (Met5-enkephalin; ME) and tachykinin (substance P; SP) systems of basal ganglia of Sprague-Dawley rats, lesioned as neonates with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). It has been proposed that the neonatal 6-OHDA-lesioned rat could serve as a model for the DA deficiency and self-injurious behavior (SIB) observed in the childhood neurological disorder. Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. In agreement with earlier work, the present study found that the neonatal 6-OHDA treatment at 3 days of age, reduced DA and caused an increase in ME and a decrease in SP content in the striatum and substantia nigra, when tested as adults. Administration of the DA precursor, L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), to lesioned animals, induced SIB; increased DA and DOPAC levels; produced a greater decrease (-64%) in SP levels in the striatum and substantia nigra than was observed with lesion alone (-28%). The L-DOPA-induced decrease in SP levels and the SIB observed in the lesioned animals were blocked by pretreatment with the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH-23390. Moreover, administration of the D1 receptor agonist, SKF-38393, but not the D2 agonist, LY-171555, to lesioned animals mimicked the L-DOPA responses in all respects, except that the agonists did not alter DA or DOPAC levels. None of the DA agonists or antagonists treatments affected lesion-induced increase in ME levels in the striatum. These results indicate for the first time, that SIB precipitated by DA agonists in neonatal dopaminergic denervated animals, is associated with a marked and selective decrease in SP in the striatonigral SP neurons. This process has two components: (a) a retarded development of the SP system due to neonatal dopaminergic denervation: and (b) a depletion of the remaining SP, presumably by enhanced release due to D1 DA receptor-mediated activation of striatonigral SP neurons.     

D1 and D2 receptor antagonists differently affect cocaine-induced locomotor hyperactivity in the mouse

Pretreament with small, per se ineffective doses of the selective D1 antagonist SCH 23390 inhibited hyperactivity induced by cocaine. On the other hand, the classic neuroleptic haloperidol and the selective D2 antagonist metoclopramide prevented the stimulatory effects of cocaine on locomotion only at hypokinetic doses, while the atypical neuroleptic (–)-sulpiride, a selective D2 antagonist, did not produce significant effects when administered at the hypokinetic dose of 12 mg/kg. Finally, at low doses (–)-sulpiride dose-dependently potentiated the locomotor-stimulating effects of cocaine, an effect that is not shared either with haloperidol or with metoclopramide. These results are discussed in terms of different roles of DA receptor subtypes in the modulation of the stimulant effects of cocaine on locomotion.     

In vivo receptor binding,neurochemical and functional studies with the dopamine D-1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390

Summary A series of in vivo experiments were undertaken, relating functional (motor activity, body temperature), dopamine (DA) receptor binding and neurochemical (catecholamine synthesis and utilization, DA release) aspects of the pharmacology of SCH 23390 in the rat.The compound inhibited the locomotor hyperactivity, but not the hypothermia, induced by the potent DA stimulant DP-5,6-ADTN. Interstingly, SCH 23390 simultaneously failed to displace DP-5,6-ADTN from its binding sites in the rat striatum—used as a direct in vivo biochemical index of DA (D-2) receptor interaction. The spontaneous locomotion in non-pretreated rats was likewise inhibited by SCH 23390. The locomotor-suppressive action, but not the DP-5,6-ADTN-displacing capcity of the D-2 blocker haloperidol was significantly enhanced by SCH 23390, suggesting that motility can be suppressed by either enhanced D-1 or D-2 (postsynaptic) receptor blockade, but also that the D-1 and D-2 sites involved may be physically distinct.SCH 23390 only slightly altered in vivo neurochemical of DA synthesis, release and nerve-impulse flow, indicating that, while similar in suppressing dopaminergic behaviour, the D-1 antagonist is less effective than traditional neuroleptics as an activator of DA neuronal feedback mechanisms. The weak increases of DA synthesis and release nonetheless obtained were equal in magnitude (30–40%) in the limbic vs. striatal brain areas; also in this respect, SCH 23390 thus differs from classical neuroleptics, which generally display more marked effects in the striatum than in limbic tissue.No major changes in the in vivo indices of NA synthesis and utilization (or in 5-HT synthesis) were found after SCH 23390 administration, by and large supporting the DA receptor specificity of the compound.In summary, the studies demonstrated that SCH 23390 can offset and accentuate, respectively, behavioural consequences of D-2 receptor stimulation and blockade. Importantly, at the same time no direct interaction at the level of D-2 DA receptor sites in the striatum was detected. Only slight, D-2 antagonist-like, changes in neurochemical indices of dopaminergic activity were observed after D-1 receptor blockade by means of SCH 23390. With regard to DA agonist hypothermia, SCH 23390 was without effect per se, but (at a high dose) attenuated the action of the D-2 antagonist haloperidol. The observations may indicate that the complex interactions between central D-1 and D-2 receptor-controlled mechanisms that influence behaviour, neurochemistry, and possibly autonomic nervous expression, are not identical.     

Effects of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists and catecholamine depleting agents on the locomotor stimulation induced by dizocilpine in mice

Low doses of the uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) induce locomotor stimulation in mice, whereas higher doses are associated with ataxia, stereotyped behaviors and catalepsy. We investigated the role of dopamine receptors and presynaptic dopamine neurons in the locomotor effects of dizocilpine. For comparison, we studied several other drugs that induce locomotor stimulation in mice. Pretreatment of male mice with haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) completely prevented the stimulation of normally coordinated locomotion induced by a non-intoxicating dose of dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.); haloperidol also attenuated the locomotor stimulation produced by phencyclidine (PCP, 1 and 2 mg/kg, i.p.), d-amphetamine (2 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) and diazepam (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Haloperidol (doses up to 2.5 mg/kg) did not attenuate the ataxia and decreased locomotion induced by higher doses of dizocilpine (1 and 2 mg/kg). The active cis isomer of flupenthixol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), an antagonist of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors, also diminished the stimulant actions of all of the test drugs, whereas its inactive trans form did not. The selective D1 antagonist R(±)-SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) and the selective D2 antagonist raclopride (1 mg/kg) had little effect on the stimulatory effect of dizocilpine, although they did reduce the stimulation produced by PCP, d-amphetamine and diazepam. However, pretreatment with a combination of R(±)-SCH 23390 and raclopride completely prevented dizocilpine-induced locomotor stimulation. Pretreatment with α-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT, 50 and 250 mg/kg), an inhibitor of tyrosine hydroxylase, or with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OH-DA, 50 μg, i.c.v.), a neurotoxin that destroys brain dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons, did not attenuate the locomotor stimulation induced by dizocilpine, although these treatments did reduce the stimulant effects of d-amphetamine. In AMPT or 6-OH-DA pretreated mice, haloperidol (0.125 mg/kg) prevented the stimulatory effect of dizocilpine. These results support a role for dopamine receptors in the stimulation of normally coordinated locomotion by dizocilpine. However, the locomotor stimulant effect of dizocilpine, unlike that of d-amphetamine, can be expressed in the presence of D1 or D2 dopamine receptor blockade and does not appear to be dependent on intact presynaptic mechanisms.     

Two selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, WAY-100 635 and NDL-249, stimulate locomotion in rats acclimatised to their environment and alter their behaviour: a behavioural analysis

The aim was to study firstly, the motor effects of a new 5-HT_1A antagonist, NDL-249 [(R)-3-(N-cyclopentyl-N-propylamino)-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide hydrochloride] and of the reference 5-HT_1A antagonist WAY-100 635 [N-(2-(1-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazinyl))ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride], in comparison to the 5-HT_1A agonist (±)-8-OH-DPAT [(8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino) tetralin, hereafter 8-OH-DPAT], in rats acclimatised to the automated activity cages; secondly, to study whether the behavioural effects of NDL-249 and 8-OH-DPAT are sensitive to the 5-HT depleting effects of p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA); thirdly, to characterise the nature of the antagonist-induced activation seen in the automatic activity cages with the aid of a behavioural observation analysis; fourthly, to examine the interaction between the 5-HT_1Areceptors mediating the behavioural effects and dopamine (DA) receptors. NDL-249 was found to bind in vitro to rat hippocampal 5-HT_1A receptors with high affinity and selectivity. In second messenger studies, it was devoid of agonist-like effects. In the locomotor activity studies, each antagonist significantly increased the incidence of horizontal activity, peripheral activity and rearing. 8-OH-DPAT, while significantly increasing peripheral and horizontal activities, decreased the incidence of rearing. PCPA blocked the motor effects of NDL-249 but did not affect those of 8-OH-DPAT. Observational analyses indicated that NDL-249 induced significant increases at one or more doses in sniffing, rearing and locomotion together with a significant reduction in stillness. WAY-100 635 significantly increased the incidence of rearing, intense grooming and vacuous chewing. The significant increases in sniffing, grooming and intense grooming and the significant decrease in stillness induced by the DA D₁ agonist, SK&F 38393 [(±)-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride], were not altered by concomitant pre-treatment with NDL-249. Pre-treatment of rats with either the DA D₁ antagonist SCH-23390 (2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol) or the DA D₂ antagonist, raclopride, blocked the reduced stillness and increased sniffing and rearing induced by NDL-249. In conclusion, 5-HT_1A antagonists including the new selective antagonist, NDL-249, induce mild behavioural activation in rats, which is mediated probably indirectly via DA systems. Received: 3 April 1997/Final version: 23 February 1998     

Presynaptic regulation of the electrically evoked release of endogenous dopamine from the isolated neurointermediate lobe or isolated neural lobe of the rat pituitary gland in vitro

Summary Isolated neurointermediate lobes (NILs) or isolated neural lobes (NLs) of the rat pituitary gland were incubated in Krebs-HEPES solution which contained pargyline and the dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR 12921. The release of endogenous dopamine was determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Electrical stimulation of the pituitary stalk induced a frequency-dependent release of dopamine.The release of dopamine from the combined NIL evoked by stimulation at 15 Hz was increased by 130% in the presence of the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, (–)-sulpiride; the (+)-enantiomer of sulpiride had virtually no effect. When the stimulation frequency was 3 Hz (–)-sulpiride caused an increase in dopamine release by 230%. A similar increase was observed in the presence of domperidone, another dopamine D2 receptor antagonist.The dopamine receptor agonists, apomorphine and quinpirole, had no significant effects on the evoked release of dopamine indicating that under the present incubation conditions endogenous dopamine may have been maximally activating the autoinhibition. However, in the presence of 1 mol/l (–)-sulpiride, apomorphine as well as quinpirole reduced the evoked release of dopamine in a concentration-dependent manner.The dopamine D1 receptor selective antagonist, SCH 23390, had no effect on the evoked release of dopamine at a concentration of 1 mol/1. Only at a concentration of 10 mol/l did SCH 23390 cause a small increase in dopamine release; this effect was, however, abolished in the presence of 1 mol/1(–)-sulpiride.In the presence of 1 mol/l (–)-sulpiride neither clonidine, yohimbine, 5-methoxytryptamine nor metitepine significantly affected the release of dopamine from the NIL evoked by stimulation at 3 Hz.In the NL, the release of dopamine is inhibited by endogenous opioids. For this reason, naloxone 1 or 10 mol/1 was present in the experiments on isolated NLs. Domperidone and (–)-sulpiride, but not (+)-sulpiride, increased the release of dopamine from the NL evoked by electrical stimulation at 15 Hz by about 90%. SCH 23390 caused a significant increase in dopamine release at 10 mol/l, but not at 1 mol/lIn conclusion, the release of endogenous dopamine from the neurons terminating in the intermediate and neural lobe of the pituitary gland is inhibited via dopamine receptors of the D2 type.Abbreviations DOPAC dihydroxyphenylacetic acid - 5-HT 5-hydroxytryptamine - HPLC high performance liquid chromatography - IL intermediate lobe - NIL neurointermediate lobe - NL neurallobe Send offprint requests to K. Racké at the above address     

Effects of D2 dopamine receptor blockade with raclopride on intracranial self-stimulation and food-reinforced operant behaviour

To examine the involvement of D2 dopamine receptors in the neural mechanism of reinforcement, raclopride tartrate, a D2 specific dopamine antagonist with a relatively fast central action, was injected into 32 rats. The D2 antagonist reduced bar-pressing responses reinforced with electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (ED₅₀=0.079 mol/kg) and those reinforced with food (ED₅₀=0.58 mol/kg) in 18–30 min after IP injection. The reduction in response rates could not be attributed to an interference with motor functions. An increase in the frequency of brain-stimulation pulses and a change in the schedule of food reinforcement, which respectively increased the baseline rate of responding, did not alter the effectiveness of raclopride. SCH 23390, a D1-specific dopamine antagonist, was sensitive to similar manipulation of reinforcement. These results seem to suggest that D1 and D2 antagonists may be acting at different locations in the neural mechanism underlying the reinforcement of operant behaviour.     

Behavioral effects of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists alone and in combination in the squirrel monkey

The effects on schedule-controlled operant behavior of the D₂ receptor agonist, quinpirole, and the D₁ agonist, SKF 38393, were assessed alone and in combination with selective dopamine-receptor antagonists. Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were trained to press a response key under fixed-interval and fixed-ratio schedules of food reinforcement. The fixed-interval schedule maintained relatively low rates of responding that increased up to food presentation. The fixed-ratio schedule maintained relatively constant high rates of responding. Quinpirole increased rates and disrupted the temporal pattern of responding under the fixed-interval schedule at doses (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) that decreased rates of responding under the fixed-ratio schedule. Under the fixed-interval schedule, the D₂ antagonists, spiperone (0.003–0.006 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.003–0.01 mg/kg), and the D₁ antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.03 mg/kg), shifted the quinpirole dose-effect curve to the right. The maximal effects of quinpirole were decreased at the highest doses of the antagonists. However, only spiperone antagonized effects of quinpirole on the rates of responding under the fixed-ratio schedule. The D₁ agonist, SKF 38393, dose-dependently (1.0–10.0 mg/kg) decreased rates of responding under both schedules. Those effects were not antagonized by any doses studied of either spiperone (0.003 mg/kg) or SCH 23390 (0.003–0.3 mg/kg). Rather, both antagonists enhanced the effects of SKF 38393. The present study suggests significant differences between the effects of D₁ and D₂ agonists on schedule-controlled behavior, and differences in the antagonist actions of the D₂ antagonists haloperidol and spiperone. Further, the selective dopamine D₁ agonist, SKF 38393, has behavioral effects that cannot be antagonized by either a D₁ or D₂ antagonist, suggesting that some other mechanism has a significant role in mediating its behavioral effects.     

Renal response to amino acid infusion in rats: effect of dopamine receptor antagonists and benserazide

Previously, we have found that feeding is a dominant factor controlling urinary dopamine excretion (U_DA) in conscious rats (Mühlbauer and Osswald 1992). Since the renal response to feeding is also characterized by an increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), we wanted to investigate in a first step whether the feeding-induced elevations of GFR and U_DA could be causally related phenomena. Therefore, we studied the influence of dopamine synthesis and dopamine receptor blockade on the renal response to amino acid infusion (AA) in thiopental anesthetized rats. AA infusion (n = 7) increased GFR by 33±7% (P<0.001) and U_DA by 87±19% (P<0.001). In the presence of benserazide (BZD, n = 5), an inhibitor of dopamine synthesis, infused i.v. at a dose of 30 g/min/kg, U_DA was suppressed to values below detection limit and the AA-induced GFR increase was abolished. Continuous intravenous infusion of the DA₁ receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (SCH, n = 7) in a dose of 4.0 g/kg/min did not prevent the AA-induced increase in GFR (33±3%, P<0.001) and U_DA (97±12%, P< 0.001). In contrast, S-sulpiride (SUL), a specific DA₂ receptor antagonist, infused continuously i.v. in a dose of 5 g/kg/min, completely abolished the AA-induced GFR increase, while U_DA was increased 1.6-fold (P<0.01). Like BZD, both dopamine receptor antagonists did not affect renal sodium excretion substantially.Our results suggest, that endogenous dopamine could act as a mediator in the renal response to amino acid infusion in the rat, most likely by activation of DA₂ receptors. Correspondence to:B. Mühlbauer at the above address     

Selective attenuation of the antinociceptive effects of μ opioids by the putative dopamine D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT

Rationale: The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the effects of the D₃ agonist (±)-7-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT), various dopamine (DA) agonists and DA antagonists on the antinociceptive effects of μ opioids. Methods: Antinociception was assessed using a warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure in rats. Results: The μ opioids morphine (0.3–10 mg/kg) and dezocine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent increases in antinociception with maximal effects obtained at the higher doses tested. Pretreatment with the putative D₃ agonist 7-OH-DPAT (1.0–10 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent attenuation of the antinociceptive effects of morphine and dezocine. At the highest dose of 7-OH-DPAT tested, the morphine dose-effect curve was shifted rightward by approximately 1.5 log units and the dezocine curve by greater than 2.3 log units. The (+)-isomer of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) also shifted the morphine dose-effect curve to the right in a dose-dependent manner. The DA D₃/D₂ agonist (−)-quinpirole (0.1–10 mg/kg) attenuated the effects of morphine, but these effects were small in magnitude, not dose-dependent and observed only under a limited set of conditions. The DA D₂/D₃ antagonist spiperone failed to alter the morphine dose-effect curve, but reversed the effects of 7-OH-DPAT on morphine antinociception. Pretreatment with the DA D₁ agonist (±)-SKF38393 (1.0 and 10 mg/kg) and the D₁ antagonist (+)-SCH23390 (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) failed to alter the morphine dose-effect curve. Conclusion: The finding that 7-OH-DPAT markedly attenuated the effects of morphine and that these effects were reversed with spiperone suggests that activity at the D₃, and possibly the D₂, receptor can modulate μ agonist-induced antinociception. Received: 30 June 1998/Final version: 12 January 1999