An updated review on pathophysiology and management of burning mouth syndrome with endocrinological,psychological and neuropathic perspectives

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic oro‐facial pain disorder of unknown cause. It is more common in peri‐ and post‐menopausal women, and sex hormone dysregulation is believed to be an important causative factor. Psychosocial events often trigger or exacerbate symptoms, and persons with BMS appear to be predisposed towards anxiety and depression. Atrophy of small nerve fibres in the tongue epithelium has been reported, and potential neuropathic mechanisms for BMS are now widely investigated. Historically, BMS was thought to comprise endocrinological, psychosocial and neuropathic components. Neuroprotective steroids and glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor family ligands may have pivotal roles in the peripheral mechanisms associated with atrophy of small nerve fibres. Denervation of chorda tympani nerve fibres that innervate fungiform buds leads to alternative trigeminal innervation, which results in dysgeusia and burning pain when eating hot foods. With regard to the central mechanism of BMS, depletion of neuroprotective steroids alters the brain network–related mood and pain modulation. Peripheral mechanistic studies support the use of topical clonazepam and capsaicin for the management of BMS, and some evidence supports the use of cognitive behavioural therapy. Hormone replacement therapy may address the causes of BMS, although adverse effects prevent its use as a first‐line treatment. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) may have important benefits, and well‐designed controlled studies are expected. Other treatment options to be investigated include brain stimulation and TSPO (translocator protein 18 kDa) ligands.     

阴道镜下高频电灼术联合α-2a干扰素凝膏治疗尖锐湿疣疗效分析

目的探讨阴道镜下高频电灼术联合重组人干扰素α-2a治疗尖锐湿疣（CA）的效果。方法将165例CA分为3组，A组应用阴道镜下高频电灼术联合重组人干扰素α-2a；B组单纯采用阴道镜下高频电灼治疗；C组应用NS-FII型多功能光谱治疗仪联合肌注重组人干扰素α-2a。结果治疗后3-6个月A、B、C组复发率分别为0％、4．4％、65．4％：半年后人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）转阴率分别为93．5％、85．4％、43．8％，A组明显优于B组，B组明显优于C组，3组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论阴道镜下高频电灼术联合重组人干扰素α-2a治疗CA可明显降低CA复发率和提高HPV转阴率。     

STEM DISTRIBUTION IN IRREGULAR FORESTS

The author outlines the fifty years history of national professional forestry education in Canberra by the Australian Forestry School and its successor the Australian National University Department of Forestry.     

鼻内镜下带吸引烧灼器射频治疗鼻出血

目的:探讨鼻内镜下带吸引烧灼器射频治疗鼻出血的临床治疗效果。方法:将本院2009年3月-2011年6月收治的48例鼻出血患者随机分为观察组和对照组各24例。观察组采用鼻内镜下带吸引烧灼器进行射频治疗,对照组采用药物止血,分析对比两组患者的手术治愈率、术后复发率。结果:观察组治愈率为95.83%,对照组为54.17%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后4周内复发率为4.17%,明显好于对照组的25.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对鼻出血患者采用鼻内镜下带吸引烧灼器射频治疗有突出优点,疗效显著,临床治愈率较高,复发率较低,可进一步观察应用。     

Effects of low‐level laser therapy on burning mouth syndrome

To investigate low‐level laser therapy (LLLT) applied to treat burning mouth syndrome (BMS). This prospective, comparative, partially blinded, single‐centre, clinical trial of GaAlAs Laser, with 815 nm wavelength, included 44 BMS patients divided randomly into three groups: Group I (n = 16): GaAlAs laser 815 nm wavelength, 1 W output power, continuous emissions, 4 s, 4 J and fluence rate 133·3 J cm^?2; Group II (n = 16): GaAlAs infrared laser, 815 nm wavelength, 1 W output power, continuous emissions, 6 s, 6 J and fluence rate 200 J cm^?2; Group III (n = 12) placebo group, sham laser. All groups received a weekly dose for 4 weeks. Pain intensity was recorded using a 10‐cm visual analogue scale; patients responded to the oral health impact profile (OHIP‐14), xerostomia severity test and the hospital anxiety–depression scale (HAD). These assessments were performed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks. LLLT decreased pain intensity and improved OHIP‐14 scores significantly from baseline to 2 weeks in groups I and II compared with the placebo group. No statistically significant differences were found from 2 to 4 weeks. Overall improvements in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores from baseline to the end of treatment were as follows: Group I 15·7%; Group II 15·6%; Group III placebo 7·3%. LLLT application reduces symptoms slightly in BMS patients.     

Comparison between burning mouth syndrome patients with and without psychological problems

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and socio-demographic characteristics between burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients with and without psychological problems. Of 644 patients with symptoms of oral burning, 224 with primary BMS were selected on the basis of laboratory testing, medical history, and psychometric tests: 39 with psychological problems (age 62.5 ± 11.5 years) and 185 without psychological problems (age 58.4 ± 11.4 years). Comprehensive clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, including psychological profiles and salivary flow rates, were compared between the two groups. No significant difference in sex ratio, duration and diurnal pattern of symptoms, unstimulated whole saliva flow rate, or marital status was found between the groups. The patients with psychological problems had a significantly higher mean age, reduced stimulated whole saliva flow rate, and lower level of education than those without psychological problems. The patients with psychological problems also displayed higher rates and greater severity of various types of BMS-related symptom in most parts of the oral mucosa, higher rates of stress-related symptoms, and greater difficulties in daily activities. The severity of taste disturbance was the factor most significantly correlated with the level of psychometry. In conclusion, psychological problems in BMS patients are associated with an aggravation of BMS symptoms.