视疲劳综合征的研究概况

视疲劳综合征是以眼部各种不适症状为突出表现的一组症侯群。作者综述了目前对视疲劳的定义、分类、诊断和治疗方面的研究进展。     

689名医学生视疲劳发生现状及其影响因素分析

目的 了解锦州医科大学在读医学专业大学生视疲劳发生现状,并探讨其可能的影响因素。方法 采用随机抽样的方法,利用纸质问卷于2021年5月对该校医学生进行视觉疲劳情况调查,采用χ2检验进行单因素分析,多因素分析采用logistic回归进行。 本次调查医学生689人,其中男生230人(33.38%),女生459人(66.62%)。医学生视疲劳量表得分M(P25～P75)为18(12～24)分,视疲劳总体发生率为61.54%,女生(66.49%)高于男生(55.65%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.054,P<0.05)。logistic回归分析显示,屈光不正(OR=1.875,95%CI:1.228～2.863)、工作学习时用眼姿势、眼与电脑距离、桌前使用手机姿势及时间均是视疲劳的影响因素(P<0.05)。 视疲劳在医学生群体中普遍存在,及时矫正屈光不正,保持良好用眼习惯将可能起到预防和改善视疲劳的作用。     

The effect of vertical gaze position on ocular tear film stability

Background: An enlarged exposed ocular surface area is known to degrade tear film stability. Little is known of how tear film stability alters with vertical gaze and the change of palpebral fissure height Methods: Tear film break‐up time (TBUT; fluorescent dye) and palpebral fissure height were measured in three vertical gaze positions (primary position and 20 degrees up and 20 degrees down) on 23 healthy volunteers. The effect of gaze direction on TBUT was analysed by ANOVA. Results: Gaze had a significant influence on tear film stability [F(2,44) = 27.6, p < 0.001]. In up‐gaze with an enlarged palpebral fissure height (11.1 ± 1.4 mm), TBUT was degraded (17.3 ± 12.7 seconds). In down‐gaze and decreased palpebral fissure height (6.7 ± 1.2 mm) TBUT was extended (43.5 ± 35.4 seconds). Conclusion: Ocular tear film stability alters with vertical gaze. Our hypothesis is that the change of the palpebral fissure height and the exposed ocular surface area alters the thickness of the lipid layer and with it tear film evaporation.     

医学生视力逐渐下降的环境因素探讨

对81级医学生270人的视力及工作和学习环境的照明情况进行了调查。入学四年后,视力下降率达60.4％(163/270),这与照明条件差、用眼习惯不良、学习负担过重、学习与休息调节不当等因素有关,同时也与生长发育有关。     

Interocular Effect During Visual Acuity Measurement With and Without Amblyopia

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if +2.00 D lens reading addition has the same effectiveness as +1.00 D reading addition in the treatment of accommodative insufficiency (AI).

Methods: Initially 22 subjects (mean age 11.8 years, ±3.54 SD) with AI were included in the study. The treatment was given according to a randomization list; 11 subjects were given +1.00 D reading addition and the other 11 were given +2.00 D reading addition, for 8 weeks of treatment. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the subjective degree of asthenopia before and after treatment.

Results: The results showed a statistical significant improvement of the accommodative amplitude with +1.00 D reading addition after 8 weeks of treatment. In the +2.00 D reading addition group the improvement of accommodative amplitude was not significant. The reduction in VAS score was significant in both groups.

Discussion: The results indicate that +2.00 D reading addition does not exercise the accommodative system in the same amount as +1.00 D reading addition to improve the accommodative amplitude. We therefore recommend that +2.00 D reading addition is not used for treatment of AI.