Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccines in Beijing: A modeling analysis

BackgroundSince 2007, Beijing has offered a free trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) for residents aged ≥ 60 years and school students. The quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) was administered to school children in 2018 and will be administered to elderly adults in the future. In addition, health care workers (HCWs) who are involved in the prevention and control of COVID-19 were included in the program in 2020. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive list of combined strategies of TIV and QIV for school children, elderly adults, and HCWs to identify the most cost-effective strategy.MethodsA decision tree was developed to compare 1-year outcomes of TIV vs. QIV in three risk groups: school children, elderly adults, and HCWs. The outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were developed to assess the robustness of the results.ResultsFrom the perspective of society, this study found that the introduction of QIVs can be cost-effective for any and all targeted groups with a willingness-to-pay threshold of 3-fold GDP per capita. Among all programs, program H (all school children, elderly adults, and HCWs received the QIV) showed a 79% probability of being cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 13,580 (95% CI: 13,294, 13,867) US$/QALY and was the preferred option in the base case scenario.ConclusionThe introduction of QIVs to school children, elderly adults, or HCWs is likely to be cost-effective, either separately or collectively. The introduction of QIV to school children, elderly adults, and health care workers simultaneously showed the highest probability of being cost-effective and was the preferred option.     

Adjuvant HPV vaccination for anal cancer prevention in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: The time is now

ImportanceOutcomes of treating high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), a precursor to anal cancer, remain uncertain. Emerging evidence shows that post HSIL treatment adjuvant quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccination improves the effectiveness of treatment. However, no recommendations exist regarding the use of qHPV vaccine as an adjuvant form of therapy. Our objective was to determine whether post-treatment adjuvant vaccination should be adopted in HIV-infected MSM (individuals at highest risk for anal cancer) on the basis of cost-effectiveness determined using existing evidence or whether future research is needed.MethodsWe developed a Markov (state-transition) cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of post-treatment adjuvant HPV vaccination of 27 years or older HIV-infected MSM. We first estimated cost-effectiveness and then performed value-of-information (VOI) analysis to determine whether future research is required by estimating the expected value of perfect information (EVPI). We also estimated expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI) to determine what new evidences should have highest priority.ResultsWith the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $71,937/QALY, “treatment plus vaccination” was the most cost-effective HSIL management strategy using the willingness-to-pay threshold of 100,000/QALY. We found that population-level EVPI for conducting future clinical research evaluating HSIL management approaches was US$12 million (range $6–$20 million). The EVPPI associated with adjuvant qHPV vaccination efficacy estimated in terms of hazards of decreasing HSIL recurrence was $0 implying that additional data from a future study evaluating efficacy of adjuvant qHPV vaccination will not change our policy conclusion that “treatment plus vaccination” was cost-effective. Both the ICER and EVPI were sensitive to HSIL treatment compliance.ConclusionPost-treatment adjuvant qHPV vaccination in HIV-infected MSM aged 27 or above is likely to be cost-effective. Use of adjuvant qHPV vaccination could be considered as a potential strategy to reduce rising anal cancer burden among these high-risk individuals.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent inactivated subunit non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine: A randomized,double-blind,active-controlled phase 1 clinical trial

Quadrivalent influenza inactivated vaccine (IIV4) is more likely to provide wider protection against yearly circulating influenza viruses than trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3). In this study, a total of 320 participants were allocated to four age cohorts (6–35 months, 3–8 years, 9–17 years, and ≥ 18 years; 80 participants/cohort) according to their actual date of birth. Participants in each cohort were randomly assigned to two groups to receive intramuscular injection of the trial vaccine or the comparative vaccine in a one-dose (3–8 years, 9–17 years,and ≥ 18 years) schedule on day 0 or two-dose (6–35 months cohort) schedule on day 0 and 28. The first objective is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the full-dose subunit non-adjuvanted IIV4 (FD-subunit NAIIV4) we developed versus an active-control, China-licensed split-virion NAIIV4, in people ≥ 3 years. The second objective is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of FD-subunit NAIIV4 versus the half-dose (HD-subunit NAIIV4) in toddlers aged 6–35 months. Results showed that all adverse reactions noted were rare, mild, and self-limited. In ≥ 3 years cohorts, systemic adverse reactions in FD-subunit NAIIV4 groups were less than the active control split-virion NAIIV4 groups ([Systemic adverse reaction rates (95%CI)], 15.0 (8.6–21.4) versus 19.2(12.1–26.2), p = 0.391). The overall seroprotection efficacy after vaccination were comparable between FD-subunit NAIIV4 and the active control split-virion NAIIV4([Seroprotection rates (95%CI)], H1N1, 99.2(81.3–100.0) versus 94.9(90.9–98.9), p = 0.117; H3N2, 81.7(74.7–88.6) versus 82.1(75.1–89.0), p = 0.939; BV, 75.8(68.2–83.5) versus 74.4(66.4–82.3), p = 0.793; BY, 94.2(90.0–98.4) versus 92.3(87.5–97.1), p = 0.568). Additionally, FD-subunit NAIIV4 has comparable safety and better seroprotection versus that of the half-dose in 6–35 months toddlers groups ([Total adverse reaction rates (95%CI)], 37.5(18.5–56.5) versus 47.5(26.1–68.9), p = 0.366) ([Seroprotection rates (95%CI)], H1N1, 85(56.4–100.0) versus 75.7(47.6–100.0), p = 0.117; H3N2, 50(28.1–71.9) versus 29.7(12.2–47.3), p = 0.070; BV, 75(48.2–100.0) versus 29.7(12.2–47.3), p < 0.001; BY, 75(48.2–100.0) versus 56.8(32.5–81.0), p = 0.091). As a result, the FD-subunit NAIIV4 we developed is safe and effective to provide broader and adequate protection against the circulating influenza viruses during 2018–2019, which could be an essential component of the global preventive strategy for influenza pandemic.     

Safety and immunogenicity of two doses of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine or one dose of meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine,both administered concomitantly with routine immunization to 12- to 18-month-old children

OBJECTIVES:

To describe the immunogenicity and safety of a two-dose series of a quadrivalent meningococcal (serogroups A, C, Y and W) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-D) administered to toddlers.

METHODS:

Children were randomly assigned (1:1) at study entry to receive MenACYW-D at 12 and 18 months of age (group 1; n=61) or meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine (MCC) at 12 months of age (group 2; n=62). All received routine childhood immunizations. A, C, Y and W antibody titres were measured in group 1 before and one month after the 18-month MenACYW-D vaccination and were measured in group 2 at one and seven months post-MCC vaccination. Antibodies elicited by diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis vaccine adsorbed combined with inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate (DTaP-IPV-Hib) vaccine coadministered at the 18-month vaccination were measured one month later. Safety data were collected.

RESULTS:

At 19 months of age, ≥96% in group 1 achieved protective titres for the four meningococcal serogroups after dose 2; 67% in group 2 exhibited protective titres against serogroup C 28 days after MCC vaccination at 12 months of age, declining to 27% seven months later. DTaP-IPV-Hib elicited high antibody concentrations/titres in groups 1 and 2, consistent with historical values. The safety profiles after each dose generated no unexpected safety signals; no serious adverse events were related to vaccination.

DISCUSSION:

A two-dose series of MenACYW-D given concomitantly with a DTaP-IPV-Hib booster dose at 18 months of age demonstrated a good immunogenicity and safety profile. A two-dose series of MenACYW-D can be used as an alternative to one dose of MCC and provides protection against additional serogroups (NCT ID: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01359449","term_id":"NCT01359449"}}NCT01359449).     

The cost-effectiveness of trivalent and quadrivalent influenza vaccination in communities in South Africa,Vietnam and Australia

BackgroundTo inform national healthcare authorities whether quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) provide better value for money than trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs), we assessed the cost-effectiveness of TIV and QIV in low-and-middle income communities based in South Africa and Vietnam and contrasted these findings with those from a high-income community in Australia.MethodsIndividual based dynamic simulation models were interfaced with a health economic analysis model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating 15% of the population with QIV or TIV in each community over the period 2003–2013. Vaccination was prioritized for HIV-infected individuals, before elderly aged 65+ years and young children. Country or region-specific data on influenza-strain circulation, clinical outcomes and costs were obtained from published sources. The societal perspective was used and outcomes were expressed in International$ (I$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.ResultsWhen compared with TIV, we found that QIV would provide a greater reduction in influenza-related morbidity in communities in South Africa and Vietnam as compared with Australia. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of QIV versus TIV was estimated at I$4183/QALY in South Africa, I$1505/QALY in Vietnam and I$80,966/QALY in Australia.ConclusionsThe cost-effectiveness of QIV varied between communities due to differences in influenza epidemiology, comorbidities, and unit costs. Whether TIV or QIV is the most cost-effective alternative heavily depends on influenza B burden among subpopulations targeted for vaccination in addition to country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds and budgetary impact.     

Effectiveness on high-grade cervical abnormalities and long-term safety of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in Japanese women

This study for the first time assessed quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine effectiveness against HPV6/11/16/18-related high-grade cervical disease in Japanese women (16–26 years old), as previously demonstrated in overseas trials, and vaccine safety in a longer term (48-month) open-label study (NCT01544478). Participants received three doses of qHPV vaccine (Day 1, Month 2, Month 6). Effectiveness endpoints, assessed in the per-protocol population, included incidence of HPV6/11/16/18-related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Grade 2 or worse (CIN Grade 2 and 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, and/or cervical cancer) as primary endpoint and incidence of external genital lesions (EGLs). Disease related to other high-risk HPV types was also assessed. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were collected from Days 1–15 after any vaccination; vaccine-related SAEs, deaths, and new medical conditions were collected throughout the study. A total of 1030 women received at least one vaccination. No cases of CIN2 or worse or EGLs were reported in the per-protocol population. Injection site-related AEs were reported in 14.5% of participants; most were mild and resolved within 15 days. Vaccine-related systemic AEs occurred in 8.6% of participants, most commonly headache (2.3%), malaise (1.7%), and pyrexia (1.3%). There were no vaccine-related SAEs; one participant discontinued due to a vaccine-related AE of mild uticaria. Overall, qHPV vaccine effectiveness against HPV6/11/16/18-related high-grade cervical disease and EGLs was indicated in Japanese women. The vaccine was well-tolerated, without new safety signals throughout the 48-month study period. Findings are consistent with overseas qHPV vaccine pivotal trials.Clinical trial registryclinicaltrials.gov; NCT01544478.     

Quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine: clinical outcomes in two influenza seasons,historical cohort study

ObjectivesThe quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) contains two influenza B antigens (one of each B lineage), while the trivalent vaccine (TIV) contains solely one. As a result, a mismatch between the circulating B lineage and the lineage in the TIV occurs frequently. We aimed to compare the frequency of clinically significant outcomes in a large cohort of vaccinees receiving either TIV or QIV.MethodsHistorical cohort study of all inactivated influenza vaccinees (aged 3 years and older) in a Health Maintenance Organization insuring 1.2 million individuals, over two influenza seasons in which both vaccines were provided non-selectively. Primary outcome was hospital admissions during the influenza season. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression to adjust for relevant covariates.ResultsOur cohort included 150 518 and 168 296 vaccinees in the first (S1) and second season (S2), respectively. The two influenza seasons were characterized by high Influenza B activity. Of those vaccinated with QIV, 2074 of 49 726 (4.2%) and 6563 of 121 741 (5.4%) were hospitalized compared with 7378 of 100 792 (7.3%) and 3372 of 46 555 (7.2%) of those vaccinated with TIV (S1 and S2, respectively). After multivariate analysis adjusting for several covariates (gender, age, socioeconomic status, chronic morbidity, timing of vaccination), compared with TIV recipients, QIV vaccinees had lower odds for hospitalization (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.98 and OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.85–0.93) or emergency department visit (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.87–0.95 and OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.81–0.87) in S1 and S2, respectively (p < 0.001). Lower odds of mortality and influenza-like illness were also observed in S2 (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.75 and OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.95, respectively).ConclusionsIn seasons with relatively high influenza B activity, QIV appeared more protective than TIV in Israel.     

The Australian Experience With the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine

Objective

The goal of this study was to review the current human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine program and its outcomes to date in Australia.

Methods

This was a review of the published data relating to the introduction and subsequent measurable outcomes of the quadrivalent vaccine, which became part of the Australian national HPV immunization program in 2007. Australia commenced an ongoing, schoolbased, government-funded, HPV vaccination program using the quadrivalent vaccine from April 2007 for adolescent female subjects aged 12 to 13 years, together with a catch-up program for female subjects 13 to 26 years of age from July 2007 to December 31, 2009.

Results

The Australian community (lay and clinical) have embraced the program, resulting in high coverage with >70% for 3 doses in the 12- to 13-year-old ongoing target population. Vaccine effectiveness (outcomes of vaccination in a real-world setting) is already being seen. This effectiveness has been noted in significant reductions in HPV vaccine–related infections in vaccine eligible age female subjects (77% fall in prevalence), rapid reduction of >90% in genital warts (first marker of disease reduction, as well as herd immunity), and reduction in high-grade cervical lesions in this age group. These remarkable changes so soon after implementation of the vaccine in the country occurred faster, and to a greater extent, than anyone could have predicted.

Conclusions

These findings from Australia should encourage other countries to follow suit, with the ultimate aim of translating treatment into reductions in HPV-related neoplasia globally. The greatest success from such an approach will only be realized when prophylactic vaccines are rolled out effectively, with high coverage and at affordable costs, to those areas of the world with the highest burden of disease. To achieve this outcome requires government endorsement and commitment; education of the community at large; realization of the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of the available prophylactic vaccines in reducing HPV-related infections and disease, especially neoplasia; and governments procuring vaccines at affordable prices through the various options now available (eg, support from the GAVI Alliance to eligible countries, tiered pricing, negotiation with pharmaceutical manufacturers). We have the tools to reach this goal, and it is time these tools were implemented.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 6–59 months of age: A phase 3, randomized,noninferiority study

Background

In the Southern Hemisphere 2010 influenza season, Seqirus’ split-virion, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was associated with increased reports of fevers and febrile reactions in young children. A staged clinical development program of a quadrivalent vaccine (Seqirus IIV4 [S-IIV4]; Afluria® Quadrivalent/Afluria Quad?/Afluria Tetra?), wherein each vaccine strain is split using a higher detergent concentration to reduce lipid content (considered the cause of the increased fevers and febrile reactions), is now complete.