低分子量肝素在肾病综合征中的临床应用

目的　观察低分子量肝素对原发性肾病综合征的治疗作用。方法　将诊断为原发性肾病综合征的 3 2例患者随机分为对照组和观察组 ,对照组予激素标准疗法 ,观察组在对照组用药的基础上加用低分子量肝素 (LMWH )。结果　观察组在降低尿蛋白、血胆固醇、血液粘滞度及升高血清白蛋白方面明显优于对照组。结论　低分子量肝素对原发性肾病综合征有明显的肾脏保护作用。     

Psychopharmacologic Agents in the Prevention of Psychiatric Disorders

The success of psychoactive agents in management of psychoses has directed attention to prevention of psychiatric disorders. A number of substances are said to be effective in prophylaxis, but the claims await substantiation in controlled studies and preventive pharmacotherapy in general awaits a clearer understanding of etiology.     

The TETAMI Trial: The Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin and of Tirofiban versus Placebo in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Patients Not Thrombolyzed: Methods and Design

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who do not receive early reperfusion therapy are at high risk of reinfarction or death, and the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy in this group of patients has not been evaluated. Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) that has previously been shown to reduce the incidence of ischemic events in patients with unstable angina or non–Q-wave MI. The principal aims of the TETAMI study are to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with enoxaparin or tirofiban (a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist) alone or in combination for 2 to 8 days in patients with AMI who are not eligible for early reperfusion therapy. In this 2 by 2 factorial design study approximately 900 patients will be randomly assigned, in a blinded manner, to one of four treatments: enoxaparin alone, enoxaparin plus tirofiban, unfractionated heparin (UFH), or UFH plus tirofiban, with appropriate matched placebos. The primary end point is the composite of death, recurrent AMI, and recurrent angina, analyzed at 30 days after AMI. The design and methods of the TETAMI study are described in this article.     

Degree of Anticoagulation after One Subcutaneous and One Subsequent Intravenous Booster Dose of Enoxaparin: Implications for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Many cardiologists continue to be reluctant to utilize low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome because they are concerned about how to manage such patients if they have received only one dose of subcutaneous enoxaparin and are then taken within hours of such treatment to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although we and others have recommended that such patients who have received only one subcutaneous enoxaparin dose receive an intravenous 0.3 mg/kg enoxaparin "booster" dose immediately prior to PCI, there are little actual data to support this recommendation. METHODS: 20 middle-aged subjects were treated with 1 mg/kg subcutaneously-administered enoxaparin and then 6 hours later with a "booster" dose of 0.3 mg/kg intravenously-administered enoxaparin. Anti-Xa levels, as well as ENOX Times, were assessed at baseline, at 2, 4 and 6 hours after the initial SC dose, and at 5 min, 1 and 2 hours after the IV booster dose. RESULTS: At 2 and 6 hours after the initial subcutaneous enoxaparin dose, thirty-five percent of patients had anti-Xa levels below 0.6 IU/mL; twenty percent and ten percent had anti-Xa levels below 0.5 IU/mL at 2 and 6 hours after the initial subcutaneous dose, respectively. After the IV booster dose, all patients had anti-Xa levels in the therapeutic range during the 5 minutes to 2 hours during which blood samples were obtained. There was no significant "overshoot" with this booster dose above what is considered to be the upper therapeutic range. ENOX times showed an overall moderate correlation with anti-Xa levels. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of administering a 0.3 mg/kg IV booster dose to patients who have received only one subcutaneous dose of enoxaparin and then undergo PCI within the first 2-6 hours of such treatment reliably leads to anti-Xa levels in the therapeutic range.     

硝苯地平联合依诺肝素钠对重度子痫前期术后患者妊娠期高血压的影响

目的探讨联合应用硝苯地平与依诺肝素钠治疗对重度子痫前期术后患者血压、凝血功能及对血清D-二聚体的影响。方法选取2015年6月-2017年10月期间行宫剖产术进行分娩的203例重度子痫前期孕妇,依据随机对照表分为对照组(101例)和观察组(102例)。对照组采用硝苯地平治疗,观察组采用硝苯地平联合依诺肝素钠治疗,比较2组患者采用不同方式治疗后血压、凝血功能的变化情况,以及对血清D-二聚体的影响,并统计不良妊娠结局。结果观察组总体有效率为95.10%,显著高于对照组(87.13%),具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后FIB、D-二聚体、PAI-1、HB、PLT显著降低,而PT、APTT、t-PA均显著增加,各指标水平显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后2组患者的收缩压、舒张压均显著降低,且治疗后观察组各血压水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后2组患者的血清vWF、PAPP-A水平均显著降低,其中观察组各水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组平均妊娠时间、胎儿体质量均显著优于对照组,24 h蛋白尿水平显著低于对照组,主要不良妊娠结局为胎儿窘迫、早产、产后出血、新生儿窒息,其中观察组不良妊娠发生率(9.80%)显著低于对照组(18.81%),具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论硝苯地平联合依诺肝素钠对重度子痫前期治疗效果显著,可有效降低患者术后血压,改善凝血功能,调节血清D-二聚体水平,从而降低不良妊娠结局发生率。     

Enoxaparin Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism in Asians Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BackgroundThe introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) shows promise for their role as a chemoprophylaxis agent after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, existing studies are largely based on Western populations that do not account for the different risk profiles and lower rates of VTE in Asians. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DOACs compared with enoxaparin in an Asian-based population study.MethodsThe review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies that compared outcomes between enoxaparin and DOACs as VTE prophylaxis after TKA in the Asian population were included.ResultsFive studies with 121,153 patients were included. DOACs demonstrated a convincing benefit over enoxaparin in overall VTE prevention (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.74). However, although the OR trended in favor of DOACs for the reduction of deep vein thrombosis events (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.20-1.48) and pulmonary embolism (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.07-8.20), statistical significance was not reached. In terms of bleeding complications, both arms had similar rates of major (0.91% vs 0.20%), clinically relevant nonmajor (3.28% vs 2.94%), and minor bleeding complications (12.8 vs 13.3%). A nonsignificance advantage of enoxaparin over DOACs was revealed in the OR for major bleeding (OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 0.81-12.43), whereas DOACs were favored to reduce risk of clinically relevant nonmajor (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.01-91.51) and minor bleeding (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.11-5.33).ConclusionDOACs confer a significantly reduced rate of overall VTE compared with enoxaparin in Asians after TKA. No significant differences in deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and rates of bleeding complications exist.     

Optimizing adjunctive antithrombotic therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a role for low-molecular-weight heparin

Thrombotic complications account for a large proportion of in-hospital deaths from acute myocardial infarction (MI). Although thrombolytic therapy has greatly improved clinical outcomes following MI, thrombin released during clot lysis has a prothrombotic effect, and the thrombolytic agents themselves may directly activate platelets. Antithrombotic therapy as an adjunct to thrombolysis improves the speed and extent of artery recanalization and reduces the incidence of secondary ischemic complications. The current treatment standard is unfractionated heparin (UFH) administered intravenously for 24-48 h. However, UFH has not been unequivocally shown to improve outcomes in large-scale, randomized clinical trials, and shows no evidence of benefit when used as an adjunct to streptokinase-based thrombolysis. Unfractionated heparin also has several clinical and practical disadvantages, such as the need for coagulation monitoring, difficulties attaining a stable and reliable anticoagulant effect, and the risk of hemorrhagic side effects. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) represents a safe and effective alternative antithrombotic therapy, with a stable and predictable anticoagulant effect, potential for use in combination with either fibrin-specific or streptokinase-based thrombolysis, no need for anticoagulation monitoring, and a low risk of hemorrhagic and other heparin-related complications. Several randomized clinical trials have shown that adjunctive LMWH is at least as effective as UFH in the acute phase of MI, is associated with fewer in-hospital recurrent ischemic events, and has an acceptable safety profile.