Change in quality of life of medically hospitalized patients – A one-year follow-up study

Objectives: To examine changes in quality of life (QOL) among elderly medically hospitalized patients one year after hospitalization, and to explore factors associated with the changes.

Methods: A one-year follow-up study included 363 (175 men) medical inpatients with age range 65–98 (mean 80.2, SD 7.5) years. Information was collected at baseline and follow-up using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire assessing the physical, psychological, social and environment domain of QOL as the dependent variable, and the Mini-Mental State Examination, Lawton and Brody's scales for physical self-maintenance and instrumental activities of daily living, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and assistance in living as the independent variables.

Results: The mean score of the physical domain of QOL had increased (mean change 0.6, SD 2.5; p?p? Conclusion: Good cognitive, physical and emotional health at baseline and follow-up were associated with improved QOL in previously hospitalized elderly patients independent of their need for assistance in living.     

贫困、疾病及精准健康扶贫政策:基于贫困居民生命质量评价

目的:将生命质量评价引入精准健康识别与干预政策中,通过比较不同类别贫困居民生命质量特征,揭示扶贫对象各维度现状,为完善精准健康扶贫政策提供参考。方法:评价工具采用WHOQOL-BREF量表,通过入户调查方式收集数据,采用t检验分析与中国常模数据进行比较。结果:贫困居民其人群分布表现为男性(71.7%)多于女性,年龄普遍偏大(平均55岁)。贫困居民与中国常模比较,健康组和疾病组的生命质量评价评分均显著低于中国常模的对照组,说明贫困对于居民生命质量评价的负面影响十分显著。不论处于何种收入水平,健康贫困居民总体评价均高于患病贫困居民。对于患病贫困居民而言,收入越高、其心理和总体评价越好;反之亦然。结论:健康对于贫困居民总体评价具有显著正影响、而患病对于贫困居民总体评价具有显著负影响。收入提高对于患病贫困居民的心理和总体评价改善有效。     

臭氧自血疗法联合药物治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效评价

 目的探讨臭氧自血疗法联合药物治疗带状疱疹后神经痛（PHN）的效果。方法纳入118例PHN患者并随机分为对照组和观察组,每组59例。对照组采用双氯芬酸、普瑞巴林和甲钴胺药物口服治疗,观察组在此基础上联合臭氧自血疗法,均治疗1个月。使用VAS评分、SF-MPQ评分及WHOQOL-BREF量表评估治疗前、治疗后1周、2周和1个月时所有PHN患者的症状改善情况,同时检测血浆β-内啡肽、P物质、IL-1β和TNF-α的水平。结果完成研究103例,其中对照组52例,治疗组51例。与对照组相比,观察组患者治疗后1个月时VAS评分(t=2.38）、SF MPQ评分(t=2.72)和WHOQOL BREF评分(t=2.54)均有统计学差异(均P<0.05),观察组血浆β-内啡肽水平(t=2.61)明显提高,P物质水平(t=2.48)、IL-1β(t=2.32)和TNF-α(t=2.40)水平明显下降(均P<0.05)。结论臭氧自血疗法联合药物治疗优于单纯药物治疗PHN。     

Health related quality of life among patients with chronic hepatitis C: a cross-sectional study of sociodemographic,psychopathological and psychiatric determinants

IntroductionChronic hepatitis C virus infection patients have higher rates of psychiatric disorders than the general population. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is known to be associated with impaired health related quality of life. To our knowledge, there is no previous research of health related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C patients that combined structured psychiatric interview and careful psychopathological evaluation, including depression, anxiety and fatigue instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate health related quality of life of chronic hepatitis C patients and to investigate the association with sociodemographic, psychopathological and psychiatric factors.Materials and methodsEighty-one individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receiving care at a Brazilian public university-based outpatient service for infectious diseases were enrolled in the study. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version was used to assess health related quality of life. Standard psychiatric interview (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus) was conducted to establish Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Axis I psychiatric diagnosis. Further instruments completed psychopathological investigation: Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Brief Fatigue Inventory, Hamilton Depression Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Pearson Chi-Square and Kruskal–Wallis were performed for categorical and continuous univariate analysis, respectively. Correlation between psychopathological and health related quality of life scores was performed according to Spearman's correlation. Multivariate analysis was performed according to stepwise forward ordinal logistic regression. The significance threshold was fixed at α = 0.05.ResultsDepressive disorders were associated with worse scores in overall health related quality of life and in all domains. Fatigue was associated with lower scores in physical and psychological domains, and married status with higher scores in psychological health related quality of life. We found strong correlation among scores of depression, fatigue and health related quality of life.ConclusionDepression and fatigue must be properly investigated and managed in HCV patients in order to improve HRQL. WHOQOL-BREF proved to be a useful instrument to assess HRQL in HCV patients.     

An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD

AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects' lung functions. RESULTS: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (alpha > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (alpha = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). CONCLUSION: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.     

Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect

A quality of life questionnaire is rarely adapted to an interview mode for people who mainly use spoken language in daily life. In Taiwan, the WHOQOL-BREF (Mandarin Chinese version) has been developed, as a self-administered questionnaire, but it cannot be applied to the majority of the elderly in Taiwan, who speak only Taiwanese (a dialect). This study adopted the audio player-assisted interview mode to develop a Taiwanese version of the WHOQOL-BREF specifically for Taiwanese-speaking elderly people, and followed with examinations of the reliability and validity of this version. Initially, the WHOQOL-BREF (English version) was translated into colloquial Taiwanese, and field tests confirmed the equivalence and appropriateness of the translation. A total of 228 Taiwanese-speaking elderly people were assessed using the Taiwanese interview version, of which 144 subjects were re-assessed two weeks later. Interviewers assessed each subject aided by an audio player on which all the translated WHOQOL-BREF contents were recorded. The Taiwanese interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF, except for the item related to dependence on medication, showed acceptable reliability (internal consistency, corrected item-domain correlation, and test–retest reliability) and validity (criterion-related, convergent, and discriminant validity). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the four-factor model of the Taiwanese interview version, providing evidence for construct validity. The results suggest that the Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF was reliable and valid in assessing quality of life of elderly Taiwanese.     

Quality of life in caregivers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: Use of WHOQOL-BREF survey

The present study based on World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) scale to examine quality of life of the caregivers caring for their children/adolescents with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan, and the factors contributing to their quality of life. Structured interviews were conducted with 597 caregivers of children/adolescents with intellectual disabilities. The results found that the mean scores in each domain of WHOQOL-BREF of the caregivers as the followings: physical capacity (PC) was 13.71 ± 2.35, psychological well-being (PW) was 12.21 ± 2.55, social relationship (SR) was 12.99 ± 2.43 and environment (EN) was 12.32 ± 2.38. These mean scores were lower than the general population and slight higher than the caregivers of adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. Finally, multiple stepwise regressions were conducted to examine the characteristics of caregiver and children/adolescents with intellectual disabilities will more likely explained the WHOQOL-BREF mean scores. The study found the following three factors: self-perceived health status, household income and stress from insufficient family support were significantly correlated to all four domains in multiple stepwise regression analyses. The results highlights that caregivers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities seem to display a lower WHOQOL-BREF mean score than the general population, probably for a combination of stress, health and household income factors. These finding must be taken into account in policy making to provide better and more specific supports and interventions for the caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities.     

Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF

The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean version of World Health Organization Quality of Life study assessment instrument (WHOQOL) and WHOQOL-BREF, an abbreviated version of WHOQOL and to identify contributing factors in the quality of life of Koreans. The WHOQOL and WHOQOL-BREF were translated into colloquial Korean according to instructions of the WHOQOL study group. Then the Korean questionnaire was applied to 538 subjects, composed of 171 medical patients and 367 healthy subjects who volunteered to rate the scale. Finally, 486 subjects completed the rating. Collected data were analyzed statistically. The Korean version of WHOQOL and WHOQOL-BREF domain scores demonstrated good test–retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion validity, content validity and discriminant validity. The physical, psychological, social and environmental domains made a significant contribution to explaining the variance in the quality of life while the independence and spiritual domains made a lesser contribution. The domain scores produced by the WHOQOL-BREF correlated highly with the WHOQOL. The physical health domain contributed most in overall quality of life, while the social domain made the least contribution. These results suggest that the Korean version of WHOQOL and WHOQOL-BREF are valid and reliable in the assessment of quality of life and that physical domain is contributing most and social and spiritual factors are contributing least to the quality of life in Koreans.     

Using WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate quality of life among Turkish elders in different residential environments

Objective  This study used the Brief Version of The World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) to assess and compare the quality of life in older people who live at home and older people who live in public assisted-living facilities for the elderly. Design  Cross-sectional. Setting  Data were collected by a research nurse in each home and in the assisted living facility. Participants  Participants were 60 years old and older. The sample included 37 people who were living in a public assisted-living facility and 37 elderly people living in their own homes. Measurement  The WHOQOL-BREF was used to measure participants’ quality of life. Results  The groups were similar according to gender, literacy, existence of chronic diseases, and general perceived health. However, quality of life scores for social relationships and environment domains were lower in those living in an assisted living facility than those living in their own homes. The scores for elderly females staying in the assisted living facility were lower compared to the scores of males in the facility. Conclusion  The results suggest that social and environmental domains of life quality are low in elderly assisted living facilities. Social activities should be diversified for elderly people staying in assisted living facilities to improve social relationships. Physical and psychological health of females in assisted living facilities should be comprehensively supported by professionals. Alternatively, elderly people may be professionally supported to live in their own homes.