MAO-A inhibition in brain after dosing with esuprone, moclobemide and placebo in healthy volunteers: in vivo studies with positron emission tomography

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate whether or not esuprone binds substantially to MAO-A in the human brain. Methods: In a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study 16 male healthy volunteers were examined␣with positron emission tomography (PET) with [¹¹C]harmine. Eight of the volunteers were given daily doses of 800 mg esuprone, four were given bi-daily doses of 300 mg moclobemide, and four volunteers were given placebo tablets. PET was performed before initiation of a 7-day treatment period. On day 7, one investigation was made immediately before administration of the drug, representing 23 h after the previous day's treatment for esuprone and 11 h after the last tablets of moclobemide. Further investigations were made 4 h and 8 h after the morning dose on day 7. Results: PET showed a high degree of binding of [¹¹C]harmine, a high-affinity ligand for MAO-A, before the start of treatment, and a marked and similar reduction after treatment with esuprone and moclobemide. A slight tendency for normalisation of enzyme binding was observed at the last time point. In the placebo group no change was observed. Plasma kinetics of esuprone showed a rapid elimination with a half-life of about 4 h. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that esuprone was comparable to moclobemide in its effect on MAO-A inhibition in the brain at the doses given. This is an illustration of the potential of PET to monitor drug effects directly on target biochemical systems in the brain in human volunteers, and the possibility of using these data, rather than pharmacokinetic data, for the determination of dosing intervals. Received: 21 August 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 22 November 1996     

Selective inhibition of MAO-A,not MAO-B,results in antidepressant-like effects on DRL 72-s behavior

The effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) that selectively inhibit the MAO-A or MAO-B forms of MAO were studied in rats performing under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-s (DRL 72-s) schedule of reinforcement. Clorgyline and CGP11305A, irreversible and reversible MAO-A inhibitors, respectively, increased the reinforcement rate, decreased the response rate, and enhanced temporal discrimination. The irreversible MAO-B inhibitor (–)-deprenyl did not produce similar effects. Pargyline did not increase the reinforcement rate at low doses that selectively inhibit MAO-B, but did increase the reinforcement rate at doses that inhibit MAO-A by more than 90%. The present results are in accord with clinical data demonstrating that MAO-A inhibitors are effective therapeutic agents in treating depression while MAO-B inhibitors are of questionable antidepressant efficacy. The present findings provide further evidence that the DRL 72-s schedule may be useful both as a screen for identifying new antidepressants and for investigating the neurochemical effects of antidepressant drugs that are responsible for their therapeutic effects.     

In vivo comparison of the effects of inhibition of MAO-A versus MAO-B on striatal L-DOPA and dopamine metabolism

Summary Utilizing the cerebral microdialysis technique, we have compared in vivo the effects of selective MAO-A, MAO-B, and nonselective MAO inhibitors on striatal extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) and DA metabolites (DOPAC and HVA). The measurements were made in rats both under basal conditions and following L-DOPA administration. Extracellular levels of dopamine were enhanced and DA metabolite levels strongly inhibited both under basal conditions and following L-DOPA administration by pretreatment with the nonselective MAO inhibitor pargyline and the MAO-A selective inhibitors clorgyline and Ro 41-1049. The MAO-B inhibitor deprenyl had no effect on basal DA, HVA, or DOPAC levels. Nervertheless, deprenyl significantly increased DA and decreased DOPAC levels following exogenous L-DOPA administration, a finding compatible with a significant glial metabolism of DA formed from exogenous L-DOPA. We conclude that DA metabolism underbasal conditions is primarily mediated by MAO-A. In contrast, both MAO-A and MAO-B mediate DA formation when L-DOPA is administered exogenously. The efficacy of newer, reversible agents which lack the cheese effect such as Ro 41-1049 are comparable to the irreversible MAO-A inhibitor clorgyline. The possible relevance of these findings for the treatment of Parkinson's disease is discussed.     

Limited potentiation of blood pressure response to oral tyramine by brain-selective monoamine oxidase A-B inhibitor,TV-3326 in conscious rabbits

TV-3326 is a novel cholinesterase inhibitor that produces irreversible brain-selective inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A and B and has antidepressant-like activity in rats after chronic oral administration. This study determined whether TV-3326 would cause less potentiation than other irreversible MAO-inhibitors of the blood pressure (BP) response to oral tyramine in conscious rabbits. Dose-response curves were established for the increase in BP induced by tyramine (5-200 mg/kg) administered orally via a naso-pharyngeal tube. From these, the dose that increased BP by 30 mmHg (ED(30)) was computed for each rabbit before and after oral administration of clorgyline, 1 mg/kg for one week, tranylcypromine 10 mg/kg, once, moclobemide, 20 mg/kg 3 times and TV-3326, 26 mg/kg for 2 weeks. Clorgyline, tranylcypromine and TV-3326 inhibited brain MAO-A by 90%; the former two inhibited intestinal MAO-A by 85-97% but TV-3326 had no effect. Tranylcypromine and clorgyline produced 6 and 20-fold increases in the pressor response to tyramine while TV-3326, like moclobemide, only potentiated it 2-fold. If TV-3326 is found to produce as little potentiation of the tyramine response in human subjects, it may be a potentially useful therapeutic agent for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease with depression.     

A new formulation of selegiline: improved bioavailability and selectivity for MAO-B inhibition

Summary. Seven randomised comparative studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of selegiline hydrochloride in a new formulation designed for buccal absorption Zydis Selegiline (1.25–10mg) with conventional selegiline hydrochloride tablets conventional selegiline tablets (10mg). A total of 156 healthy volunteers participated in these studies. Plasma concentrations of selegiline and its primary metabolites, N-desmethylselegiline (DMS), l-amphetamine (AMT), and l-methamphetamine (MET) were measured using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) and gas liquid chromatography (GLC) assays. Inhibition of monoamine-oxidase type B (MAO-B) and monoamine oxidase type A (MAO-A) activity was determined by measurement of as -phenylethylamine (PEA) by GCMS and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) assays. Almost a third (2.96mg) of a 10mg selegiline dose in Zydis Selegiline was absorbed pre-gastrically (predominantly buccally) within 1 minute. Mean [SD] area-under-the curve (AUC_0–) values following Zydis Selegiline 10mg (5.85 [7.31] ng·h/mL) were approximately five times higher than those following conventional selegiline tablets 10mg (1.16 [1.05] ng·h/mL). In contrast, plasma concentrations of metabolites were significantly (p<0.001) lower following Zydis Selegiline 10mg than following conventional selegiline tablets 10mg.Plasma concentrations of selegiline and its metabolites increased in a dose-dependent manner over the dose-range Zydis Selegiline 1.25–5mg. Bioavailability was determined using AUC and peak plasma concentrations (C_max). The C_max of selegiline was similar following administration of Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg (1.52ng/mL) or conventional selegiline tablets 10mg (1.14mg/mL). The range of values for AUC_0– and C_max following Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg were entirely contained within the range following conventional selegiline tablets 10mg, with a much higher variability of plasma selegiline concentrations occurring after conventional selegiline tablets than after Zydis Selegiline. As expected, peak plasma concentrations for DMS, AMT and MET were consistently lower after Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg (1.19, 0.34, 0.93ng/ml, respectively) than after conventional selegiline tablets 10mg (18.37, 3.60, 12.92ng/ml, respectively). A significant (r=0.0001) correlation between daily PEA excretion (a measure of brain MAO-B inhibition) and the log-transformed AUC_(0–t) for selegiline was demonstrated. Mean daily PEA excretion was similar following Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg and conventional selegiline tablets 10mg (13.0µg versus 17.6µg). In contrast, there was no correlation between PEA excretion and selegiline metabolites, indicating that selegiline metabolites do not significantly inhibit MAO-B. Urinary excretion of 5-HIAA (used as a marker for MAO-A inhibition) was unrelated to plasma concentrations of selegiline or DMS following single or repeat dosing of Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg or conventional selegiline tablets 10mg. However, comparison of treatment groups revealed a significantly lower excretion of 5-HIAA in the conventional selegiline tablets 10mg group than in the Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg group after repeated administration over 13 days.In summary, by reducing the opportunity for first-pass metabolism, the absorption of selegiline from Zydis Selegiline was more efficient and less variable than from conventional selegiline tablets. Compared with conventional selegiline tablets 10mg, Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg yielded similar plasma concentrations of selegiline and degree of MAO-B inhibition, but markedly reduced concentrations of the principal metabolites. Thus, the lower but equally MAO-B inhibitory dose of selegiline in Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg, which is associated with lower concentrations of potentially harmful metabolites, could offer a safer and more predictable treatment in the management of patients with Parkinsons disease.Present address: Cephalon UK Ltd., Surrey Research Park, Guildford, United KingdomPresent address: Biogen Ltd., Maidenhead, Berks, United KingdomPresent address: Safetymednet, Ruscombe, United KingdomPresent address: Oxford Glycosciences (UK) Ltd., Abingdon, United KingdomPresent address: Pfizer UK Ltd., High Wycombe, United KingdomReceived December 3, 2002; accepted June 30, 2003     

A new low-dose formulation of selegiline: clinical efficacy,patient preference and selectivity for MAO-B inhibition

Summary. Three studies were performed using a fast dissolving formulation of selegiline hydrochloride designed for buccal absorption Zydis Selegiline. The aim of the first study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Zydis Selegiline (1.25mg or 10mg) with conventional selegiline hydrochloride tablets conventional selegiline tablets (10mg) in patients with Parkinsons disease (PD) who were previously treated with conventional selegiline tablets as an adjunct to levodopa/dopamine agonist therapy. Patients were observed for 4 weeks to ensure that they were stable. Stable patients (n=197) were then randomised to continue with conventional selegiline tablets 10mg (n=68), or to treatment with Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg (n=64) or Zydis Selegiline 10mg (n=62) for 12 weeks in this randomised, parallel group study. A further aim was to establish the acceptability of Zydis Selegiline compared with conventional selegiline tablets. Patient preference for Zydis Selegiline was also evaluated in a second study, a single-dose, randomised, two-way crossover study conducted in patients with PD (n=148). Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of swallowing and salivation problems and were randomised to either Zydis Selegiline 5mg or a placebo fast-dissolving formulation. In a third study, the degree of potentiation of the tyramine pressor effect following Zydis Selegiline was compared with that following conventional selegiline tablets in healthy volunteers. A total of 24 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg or conventional selegiline tablets 10mg for 14–16 days in an open-label, randomised parallel group study.Both Zydis Selegiline (1.25mg and 10mg) treatments were shown to be therapeutically equivalent to conventional selegiline tablets 10mg based on comparison of mean total Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Therapeutic equivalence was defined a priori as the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in total UPDRS scores between groups to lie entirely within the range ±5. The difference (90% CI) in mean adjusted total UPDRS between Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg and conventional selegiline tablets 10mg was –2.50 (–4.84, –0.17), and for Zydis Selegiline 10mg and conventional selegiline tablets 10mg, 0.04 (–2.30, 2.38). For the motor subscores of the UPDRS, differences between adjusted means (90% CI) compared with the conventional selegiline tablets group were: Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg, –2.14 (–3.94, –0.33) and Zydis Selegiline 10mg, –0.90 (–2.70, +0.91). Patients who switched from conventional selegiline tablets to Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg showed a slight improvement in UPDRS scores following 12 weeks of treatment (standard error of difference 1.039; p=0.01).In the single-dose crossover study, most (61%) patients liked Zydis Selegiline 5mg; a significantly greater proportion than the null hypothesis of 50% (p<0.002). However, only 62 patients (46%) indicated that they liked the taste of Zydis Selegiline. Nevertheless, the proportion of patients who preferred Zydis Selegiline (65%) to their usual medication was significantly greater than the null hypothesis of 50% (p<0.001).Similar findings were demonstrated in the 12-week study where a higher proportion of patients who received up to 3 months of treatment indicated a preference for either Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg (90%) or Zydis Selegiline 10mg (86%) over conventional selegiline tablets 10mg. More than 90% of patients found Zydis Selegiline easy to take, with 61% rating it as extremely easy. Most (81%) patients taking Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg liked the taste compared with 45% taking Zydis Selegiline 5mg (in the previous study).Zydis Selegiline did not potentiate the tyramine effect: a pressor effect was elicited after 400mg tyramine both before and after 14 days of treatment with Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg. In contrast, after 14 days treatment with conventional selegiline tablets 10mg, the threshold dose required to elicit the tyramine pressor response was significantly (p<0.0001) reduced from 400mg to 200mg.In summary, Zydis Selegiline at doses of 1.25mg and 10mg was therapeutically equivalent to conventional selegiline tablets 10mg. The Zydis Selegiline formulation was well-liked by all patients, with most preferring Zydis Selegiline 1.25mg to their usual selegiline tablet. Furthermore, Zydis Selegiline was well tolerated and, unlike conventional selegiline tablets, appeared to retain specificity for inhibition of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B), since it did not potentiate the pressor response to tyramine.Present address: Cephalon UK Ltd., Surrey Research Park, Guildford, United KingdomPresent address: Safetymednet, Ruscombe, United KingdomPresent address: Oxford Glycosciences (UK) Ltd., Abingdon, United KingdomReceived December 3, 2002; accepted July 23, 2003     

The effects of moclobemide on the pharmacokinetics of the 5-HT1B/1D agonist rizatriptan in healthy volunteers

AIMS: The new 5-HT1B/1D agonist rizatriptan (MK-0462) has recently been registered for the treatment of migraine. Its primary route of metabolism is via monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A). Antidepressants such as the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide may be used in patients with chronic headache syndromes. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the interactions between rizatriptan and moclobemide. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study 12 healthy, young volunteers (six males, six females) were treated with moclobemide (150 mg twice daily) or placebo for 4 days. On the fourth day, a single dose of rizatriptan (10 mg) was administered, and subsequently blood and urine samples were collected for assay of rizatripan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan. Plasma concentrates of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), a marker of MAO-A inhibition, were also assessed. Supine and standing blood pressure were measured regularly. RESULTS: Both treatments were well tolerated. During moclobemide, the increase in supine diastolic blood pressure following rizatriptan administration was augmented. Inhibition of MAO by moclobemide was inferred from a persistent decrease in DHPG level (43% on average). When rizatriptan was coadministered with moclobemide, the area under the plasma drug concentration-time profiles for rizatriptan and its N-monodesmethyl metabolite increased 2.2-fold (90% CI, 1.93-2.47) and 5.3-fold (90% CI, 4.81-5.91), respectively, when compared with placebo. Peak plasma drug concentrations for rizatriptan and its n-monodesmethyl metabolite increased 1.4-fold (90% CI, 1.11-1.80) and 2.6-fold (90% CI, 2.23-3.14), respectively, and half-lives of both were prolonged. CONCLUSIONS: Moclobemide inhibited the metabolism of rizatriptan and its active N-monodesmethyl metabolite through inhibition of MAO-A. Thus, moclobemide may considerably potentiate rizatriptan action. Concurrent administration of moclobemide and rizatriptan is not recommended.     

Association of a Monoamine Oxidase-A Gene Promoter Polymorphism With ADHD and Anxiety in Boys With Autism Spectrum Disorder

The aim of the present study was to examine the association between a variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the MAO-A gene and severity of ADHD and anxiety in boys with ASD. Parents and teachers completed a DSM-IV-referenced rating scale for 5- to 14-year-old boys with ASD (n = 43). Planned comparisons indicated that children with the 4- versus 3-repeat allele had significantly (p < 05) more severe parent-rated ADHD inattention and impulsivity, and more severe teacher-rated symptoms of generalized anxiety. Our results support a growing body of research indicating that concomitant behavioral disturbances in children with ASD warrant consideration as clinical phenotypes, but replication with independent samples is necessary to confirm this preliminary finding.     

Monoamine oxidase inhibitory activities of novel 3,4-dihydroquinolin-(<Emphasis Type="Italic">1H</Emphasis>)-2-one derivatives

Summary Three 3,4-dihydroquinoline-(1H)-2-one derivatives were synthesized and their monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitory activities were evaluated. The calculated IC₅₀ values revealed that compound Q (N-amino-3,4-dihydroquinoline-(1H)-2-one), which carries a free amine group in the molecule, inhibited rat liver MAO-B competitively and reversibly suggesting that this relatively small compound may interact with the active site channel of the enzyme while the compounds QB (1-(benzlyden-amino)-3,4-dihydroquinoline-(1H)-2-one), PCN (2-(3-cyano-2-oxo-4-phenyl-2H-quinolin-1-yl-N-cyclohexyl-2-(4′-chlorophenyl) acetamide) and MG (tert-butyl-N-[cyclohexylcarbamoyl-(3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-N-(2-benzoylphenyl)-carbamate) inhibited rat liver MAO-B non-competitively and irreversibly, suggesting that these compounds may interact with another hydrophobic binding region outside of the active site of the enzyme.     

Metabolism of BW 1370U87 by crude liver homogenates from several species: An in vitro method for preliminary investigation of species differences in metabolism

We employed broken cell liver preparations in order to investigate potential species-specific differences in the metabolism of BW 1370U87, a new selective and reversible MAO-A inhibitor. The drug metabolizing capacity of crude liver homogenates from rat, dog, cat, monkey, and man was assessed based on the utilization of BW 1370U87 and the appearance of suspected metabolites. When incubated with liver homogenates (37° C) in the presence of a cofactor preparation designed to generate TPNH, BW 1370U87 (1 or 10 μM) was metabolized in a species and time dependent manner. The rate of disappearence of BW 1370U87 was more rapid in dog and cat preparations than those of rat, monkey and man. The appearance of metabolites coincided with the disappearance of BW 1370U87. Three metabolites, identified and synthesized as BW 183U88, BW 380U88, and BW 330U88 appeared in all five species. These metabolites were also found to be selective MAO-A inhibitors both in vitro and ex vivo and may contribute to the overall activity exhibited by the parent molecule.