儿科诊断性X线扫描家属知情与接受现状调查

目的:了解建德市基层医院儿科门诊进行X线扫描治疗中,家属对X射线检查的知情同意与接受现状。方法:随机抽取建德市属3家公立综合性医院共60位接受X线扫描的儿童患者家属为调查对象,发放自制调查问卷并统计分析。结果:55位(91.67%)患者表示治疗前主治医生只告知了X射线是诊断性检查,没有具体告知X射线的危害性;18位(30%)的患者家属不清楚辐射会对人体有损害,42位(70%)不清楚或不注意辐射警示标志,更不会主动要求防护措施,学历水平较高者及有从事医务工作背景者接受X射线检查的为12人(20%),明显低于学历水平低者或没有从事医务工作背景者的46人(76.67%),不知可否接受的有2人(3.33%)(P<0.001)。结论:基层医院儿科诊断性X射线扫描前的知情同意告知仍需加强,儿科放射检查偏多,应避免并加强宣传和教育。     

精神分裂症患者及家属、医生对知情同意具体程序态度的初步分析

目的分析精神科医生、精神分裂症患者及其家属对知情同意具体程序的态度，以指导今后知情同意的实施。方法所有样本均来自中南大学湘雅二医院，共计55名患者，46名家属，61名医生。采用知情同意态度问卷，来调查精神科医生、精神分裂症患者及其家属对知情同意具体程序的态度。结果患者、家属、精神科医生非参数检验结果表明，共计有17项条目存在显著性差异。比如条目4“签写一份接受医疗服务的知情同意书，其目的是”，67．4％的家属，59．2％的患者，90．2％的医生选择第3项“既保护医生又保护患者”，仅21．7％的家属，26．5％的患者，1．6％的医生选择第2项“保护患者”。结论目前精神分裂症患者、家属以及精神科医生对知情同意具体程序的态度存在明显差异。     

How communication about risk and role affects women’s decisions about birth after caesarean

Objective

This study investigated how health care provider communication of risk information, and women’s role in decision-making, influenced women’s preferences for mode of birth after a previous caesarean birth.

患者知情同意权代为行使的案例分析及启示

以医疗典型纠纷案例为例,通过厘清相关法律对患者知情同意权行使及代为行使的相关规定,探讨知情同意权代为行使行为的界定。启示如下:知情同意权代为行使应设前置条件进行限制和约束;代为行使主体包括近亲属或关系人、委托代理人;患者本人意见具有首要优先性,委托代理人意见应优先于近亲属意见。     

Determinants of information diffusion in online communication on vaccination: The benefits of visual displays

ObjectiveSocial media are an increasingly important source of information on the benefits and risks of vaccinations, but the high prevalence of misinformation provides challenges for informed vaccination decisions. It is therefore important to understand which messages are likely to diffuse online and why, and how relevant aspects—such as scientific facts on vaccination effectiveness—can be made more comprehensible and more likely to be shared. In two studies, we (i) explore which characteristics of messages on flu vaccination facilitate their diffusion in online communication, and (ii) whether visual displays (i.e., icon arrays) facilitate the comprehension and diffusion of scientific effectiveness information.MethodsIn Study 1, 208 participants each rated a random sample of 15 out of 63 messages on comprehensibility, trustworthiness, persuasiveness, familiarity, informativeness, valence, and arousal, and then reported which information they would share with subsequent study participants. In Study 2 (N = 758), we employed the same rating procedure for a selected set of 9 messages and experimentally manipulated how scientific effectiveness information was displayed.ResultsStudy 1 illustrated that scientific effectiveness information was difficult to understand and thus did not diffuse well. Study 2 demonstrated that visual displays improved the understanding of this information, which could, in turn, increase its social impact.ConclusionsThe comprehensibility of scientific information is an important prerequisite for its diffusion. Visual displays can facilitate informed vaccination decisions by rendering important information on vaccination effectiveness more transparent and increasing the willingness to share this information.     

The impacts of breast conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients

The quality of life (QOL) in 55 early-stage breast cancer patients after surgery was prospectively assessed using a newly developed Japanese QOL questionnaire: The QOL Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs (QOL-ACD). The impacts of breast conserving treatment (BCT) (22 cases) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) (33 cases) on the QOL in those subjects were compared. The overall QOL scores were evaluated during four periods (before surgery, 0–2, 3–12, and 13–24 months after surgery). The mean scores of the four categories of the QOL-ACD (activity, physical condition, psychological condition, and social relationships) were also compared. The results demonstrated that a significant improvement was observed in the overall QOL scores among the three periods after surgery (0–2, 3–12, and 13–24 months) only in the BCT group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the overall QOL scores during any of the three periods after surgery, and the mean score of the ‘psychological condition’ during 0–2 months period in the BCT group was significantly lower than that in the MRM group (P< 0.05).     

COVID-19 vaccine and pregnancy: A safety weapon against pandemic

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is raising great concern all over the world. The recent introduction of vaccines has offered reason for optimism, however, new issues have arisen, such as vaccine reluctance. The safety of vaccines for pregnant women is one of the most serious of these concerns. The purpose of this review article is to provide updated international vaccine recommendations, results of ongoing studies and clinical trials, and the role of gynecologists in counseling the women to understand the risks versus benefits as well as form an informed decision towards vaccine acceptance for COVID-19.Although COVID-19 infection increases the risk of severe morbidity and mortality in pregnant women, pregnant women were not included in the initial vaccine trials. As a result, safety information is scarce. Nations have differing recommendations, though many have recently approved the COVID-19 immunization in pregnancy following a risk-benefit analysis. The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) of the United Kingdom recently approved an mRNA vaccination for pregnant women. Vaccination is recommended by the CDC, ACOG, ARFM, and WHO. India recently took a stand, with the ICMR and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare recommending vaccination during pregnancy and lactation.     

Challenges of ethical research in resource-poor settings.

The disparity in resources between economically developed and developing countries presents ethical concerns when commercial sponsors of studies and investigators propose to conduct them with subjects in developing countries. Vulnerable people may be recruited into studies of little health benefit to themselves or their communities and, under undue inducements, may accept disproportionate risks. Reproductive health studies may present women with undue risks. Guidelines have been developed to protect exploitable populations in resource-poor settings, although guarding their right to make informed and voluntary choices poses special challenges. Guidelines pay special attention to pregnant women as research subjects, and may approve and even require their enrollment in studies of products not known to be harmful. Placebo-controlled studies are addressed in contexts where no recognized treatments are routinely accessible. The structure and functions of research ethics review committees present difficult challenges, but they may be mitigated by enlightened international collaboration.     

脑外伤病人的临床伦理问题探讨

脑外伤病人占外科病人很大一部分比例,其治疗过程艰难而复杂,而且在治疗过程中涉及很多伦理学问题,值得探讨和研究.本文作者通过多年来诊治脑外伤病人的经验,从伦理学的角度对脑外伤治疗过程中的一些问题进行了探讨,以期更有利于保障患者和医务工作者的合法权益、减少医疗纠纷,摆正医生与患者位置关系,使脑外伤患者得到更好的治疗.     

植入前遗传学诊断"知情同意"的影响因素与对策

植入前遗传学诊断（Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis PGD）是辅助生育技术与分子生物学技术相结合而发展的孕前遗传学诊断技术,在植入子宫前淘汰了遗传异常的胚胎,是产前诊断技术的重大进展.但是,由于技术本身存在着一定局限性和不确定性,同时,受到病人认知能力等因素的影响,由此引发了系列伦理学争议.在进行PGD前,一个明了、详尽的患者知情同意过程是必须的.包括通俗全面告知PGD有关信息、手术和检测的局限性和可能结果;充分告知通过PGD所获得的利益和风险.在此基础上针对不同的遗传病检测签署详细的书面知情同意书.