Clinical and radiographic results from a 2-year comparison of once-weekly versus twice-weekly administration of etanercept in biologics-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Objectives The twice-weekly administration of 25 mg of etanercept (TW) has been shown to be effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the once-weekly administration of 25 mg of etanercept (OW) was tried in order to address the economic burden of anti-rheumatic biologics. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results from a 2-year follow-up study of patients receiving OW or TW.

Methods Sixty-three biologics-naive patients with RA were randomly assigned to receive either OW (n = 42) or TW (n = 21).

Results From baseline to year 2, rates of clinical remission, according to the Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS-28) (based on C-reactive protein; CRP)–with clinical remission being regarded as a DAS-28 (CRP) score of <2.3–were significantly improved in the OW group (from 1.6 to 39.0%) and in the TW group (from 9.5 to 47.6%), but no significant between-group difference was observed at year 2. Radiographic joint damage, quantified with the modified Sharp score, was significantly progressive in the OW group in contrast to findings in the TW group. Thus, among patients receiving TW therapy, the progression of joint damage may have been inhibited or may have shown remission.

Conclusions These results suggest that, in terms of DAS-28 remission, OW therapy can efficiently substitute for TW therapy in biologics-naive patients with RA. However, TW therapy was indispensable in preventing the worsening of joint damage.     

Pharmacokinetics,efficacy and safety profiles of etanercept monotherapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: review of seven clinical trials

Abstract

Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, may not be tolerated by all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and limited international data for etanercept (ETN) monotherapy are available. The aim of this review was to summarize the clinical program for ETN monotherapy in Japanese patients with RA, which has included a pharmacokinetic study, clinical trials for registration, long-term studies, and once-weekly dosing studies. Pharmacokinetic results showed that serum concentrations of ETN were linear with dose levels and were similar to other international studies. Across interventional studies, 652 Japanese patients with active RA were treated with ETN. In the registration studies, ETN treatment led to consistent improvement in American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 scores, European League Against Rheumatism Good Response, Disease Activity Score 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission, and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index. In the long-term studies, efficacy was maintained for up to 180 weeks. Similar results were seen in the once-weekly studies. Across the studies, more than 870 patient-years of exposure to ETN were recorded. Discontinuations owing to lack of efficacy or adverse events were modest and no new safety signals were recorded. These studies demonstrated that ETN monotherapy is efficacious and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with RA.     

Recurrent allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept and tocilizumab

Abstract

We report the case of a 68-year-old woman with Stage III and Class II rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that was resistant to prednisolone, methotrexate, and infliximab. After treatment with etanercept or tocilizumab, suspicious allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) repeatedly occurred and then rapidly improved after the withdrawal of each drug. We suspect that administration of etanercept and tocilizumab caused suspicious ABPA in this patient. The relevance to the pathogenesis of ABPA under these biological drugs is also discussed.     

Reevaluation of antibody titers 1 year after influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving TNF blockers

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the effective administration procedure of fondaparinux for prevention of venous thromboembolism after cemented total hip replacement (THR) in Japanese patients. The study included 471 Japanese patients. The dose regimens were 2.5 mg daily for 14 days (2.5 mg/14 day group) or 10 days (2.5 mg/10 day group), 1.5 mg daily for 10 days (1.5 mg group), 2.5 mg daily for the first 3 postoperative days and 1.5 mg daily for the subsequent 7 days (Mixed group), and no administration of fondaparinux (Control group). Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was diagnosed by ultrasonography on postoperative day 3 or 4 and day 14. The 2.5 mg/14 day, 2.5 mg/10 day and Mixed groups were regarded as one group in the assessment on postoperative day 3 or 4, and denoted as the 2.5 mg group. The incidence of DVT on postoperative day 3 or 4 in the 2.5 mg group was significantly lower than that in the Control and 1.5 mg groups. On postoperative day 14, the incidence of DVT in the 1.5 mg and Mixed groups was significantly lower than that in the Control group in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The incidence in the 2.5 mg/10 day and 2.5 mg/14 day groups was significantly lower than that in the Control group in only the per-protocol analysis. The results suggest that the administration protocol of the Mixed group is effective in preventing DVT in Japanese patients undergoing cemented THR.     

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis

Recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, aggressive treatment, and early detection of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have changed the clinical, pathologic, and functional outcomes in patients with RA. Early aggressive treatment of RA has now become the norm in clinical practice rather than the use of the traditional pyramid approach of the last half of the twentieth century. Early treatment with monotherapy of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics, combination traditional DMARD therapy and, especially, combination of biologic therapy and methotrexate, have revolutionized the treatment of RA, producing significant improvement in clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes not seen previously. For the individual patient, we still cannot determine which medication or combination of medications will give the most complete response. There have been a number of recent, well-designed clinical trials that have tried to answer this question. Herein we review the evidence-based medicine that addresses these issues.     

A randomized,placebo‐controlled,double‐masked clinical trial of etanercept for the treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Methods

Children who met the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for JIA with active uveitis, who had anterior chamber cells of ≥1+ or requiring topical corticosteroid ≥3 times daily, and who were on a stable regimen for arthritis treatment were eligible. Study participants received etanercept (0.4 mg/kg) or placebo administered subcutaneously twice weekly for 6 months. All participants received open‐label etanercept for an additional 6 months.

Results

Five patients received placebo and 7 received etanercept. Three of the 7 patients treated with etanercept and 2 of the 5 placebo‐treated patients were considered ophthalmic successes (P = 1.0). One patient in each treatment group was considered a treatment failure. Three of the 7 etanercept‐treated and 2 of the 5 placebo‐treated patients were neither successes nor failures by our definition. There were no serious adverse events for any patient during the entire study period. Reports of minor infections were comparable in each treatment group, 71% for etanercept and 60% for placebo (P = 0.58).

Conclusion

In this small pilot study there was no apparent difference in the anterior segment inflammation between patients treated with etanercept and placebo. The stringent criteria used to measure ophthalmic success of treatment and the small patient population limit the implications of our findings.