Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal adenomas

OBJECTIVE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for excision of selected benign and malignant rectal neoplasms. It is considered a safe and effective treatment but recurrence rates of 1-13% are reported for benign lesions. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal lesions and to evaluate mortality and morbidity following TEM. METHOD: Data were prospectively collected from all patients undergoing TEM for benign adenomas from January 1998 to March 2005. The procedure was performed by a single surgeon and patients were regularly followed up. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six procedures were included, with a median patient age of 74 years (range 22-92 years). The mean lesion area was 16 cm(2) (range 0.3-150 cm(2)) and the median distance from the dentate line was 9 cm (range 0-17 cm). Immediate complications included bleeding (six) and acute urinary retention (six). There has been one (0.68%) procedure-related death. After a median follow up of 39 months (range 4-89 months) there have been seven recurrences (4.8%), recurring at a mean time of 23.3 months (range 5-48 months). Only microscopic involvement of the circumferential resection margin was found to be significantly associated with recurrence (P = 0.0059). Recurrence was not associated with age, size of lesion, previous treatment, severity of dysplasia or use of the harmonic scalpel. CONCLUSION: TEM is a safe and effective treatment for benign rectal adenomas. Circumferential resection margin involvement is associated with recurrence, which tends to occur late. Therefore extended follow up is recommended.     

Staged anterior resection and TEM to preserve rectal function in synchronous malignant and benign rectal lesions

BACKGROUND: Traditionally patients with a high rectosigmoid carcinoma and a synchronous large distal rectal adenoma would be treated by low anterior resection with associated loss of rectal function. METHOD: Four patients with a carcinoma of the upper rectum or distal sigmoid colon and a synchronous distal rectal adenoma were treated by high anterior resection followed by staged Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) thus conserving the distal rectum. Preoperative and postoperative rectal function was assessed using the St. Mark's incontinence score. RESULTS: The proximal carcinomas and distal adenomas were 12-18 cms and 0.5-9 cms respectively from the dentate line. The mean surface area of the distal adenomas was 9.7 cms2. There were no deaths or major complications. There were no recurrences after a mean follow-up of 31.5 months. Rectal function was unchanged in three patients with a minor increase in the score in one. CONCLUSION: Staged high anterior resection and 'rEM offers effective treatment of synchronous rectosigmoid carcinoma and distal rectal adenoma with preservation of rectal function.     

Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: Is the future now?

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard surgical treatment for the curative radical resection of rectal cancers. Minimally invasive TME has been gaining ground favored by the continuous technological advancements. New procedures, such as transanal TME (TaTME), have been introduced to overcome some technical limitations, especially in low rectal tumors, obese patients, and/or narrow pelvis. The earliest TaTME reports showed promising results when compared with the conventional laparoscopic TME. However, recent publications raised concerns regarding the high rates of anastomotic leaks or local recurrences observed in national series. Robotic TaTME (R-TaTME) has been proposed as a novel technique incorporating the potential benefits of a perineal dissection together with precise control of the distal margins, and also offers all those advantages provided by the robotic technology in terms of improved precision and dexterity. Encouraging short-term results have been reported for R-TaTME, but further studies are needed to assess the real role of the new technique in the long-term oncological or functional outcomes. The present review aims to provide a general overview of R-TaTME by analyzing the body of the available literature, with a special focus on the potential benefits, harms, and future perspectives for this novel approach.     

Special surgical approaches during peri-COVID-19 pandemic: Robotic and transanal minimally invasive surgery

During the peri-coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the need of special care has raised, not only for our patients but also for health care workers. These needs are different regarding the procedure and the approach performed. This is a dynamic review in the use of robotics and transanal approaches for colorectal diseases. We searched PubMed and KSREvidence.com for studies related to coronavirus disease and robotic surgery/transanal mesorectal excision/transanal surgery(primary and systematic reviews). From 147 results in PubMed, 11 were selected for full text screening, and 11 were included in this paper. From 3 results in KSREvidence, no relevant systematic reviews were identified. We also checked the references in identified papers for further relevant studies. European Society of Coloproctology guidelines were including as part of the recommendations available. Robotic and transanal MIS can be performed safely during the pandemic, but particular characteristics of these procedure need to be taken into consideration.     

Colon perforation caused by transanal decompression tube after laparoscopic low anterior resection: A case report

IntroductionThe effectiveness of transanal decompression tube (TDT) to prevent anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery has been widely accepted in recent years. However, a rare complication of intestinal perforation due to TDT has been also reported.Presentation of caseA 88-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. An abdominal drainage tube adjacent to the colorectal anastomosis and a TDT were placed. The patient experienced abdominal pain, nausea and elevated inflammatory markers on postoperative day 6. Enema and computed tomography demonstrated colonic perforation due to the TDT, and emergency laparotomy was performed. Perforation of the anterior sigmoid colon located at the proximal side of the colorectal anastomosis was seen, and the TDT was exposed to the abdominal cavity. Therefore, primary closure of the perforation site, peritoneal lavage, drainage tube placement and transverse colostomy was performed.DiscussionIn our case, TDT seemed to compress the anterior wall of the colon and lead to perforation. The looseness of the remaining oral intestinal tract depressed in the pelvis was compressed by the TDT.ConclusionTDTs should be very carefully placed to avoid complication. The length and looseness of the oral intestine and the relationship between the TDT to be inserted might be important.     

经肛三联术治疗三度直肠脱垂的临床效果分析

目的：探究分析经肛三联术来治疗患有三度直肠脱垂患者的临床疗效。方法采用回顾性分析的方法,分析了78例患有三度直肠脱垂患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法的不同,将其分为对照组和实验组（n=39）,对照组选择常规手术进行治疗,实验组选择经肛三联术式予以治疗,观察2组患者的治疗情况以及术中术后情况。结果实验组的治疗总有效率达97.44%,明显高于对照组的治疗总有效率79.49%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;且实验组术中出血量明显比对照组少（P<0.05）,并发症出现概率也明显减少。结论经肛三联手术可以有效治疗三度直肠脱垂,减轻患者的痛苦,提高治疗有效率,减少术中出血量,降低并发症等危险发生,应值得临床广泛推广应用。     

Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing rate of transsphincteric perianal fistulas after transanal advancement flap repair and to examine the impact of this procedure on fecal continence. METHODS: Between January 1992 and January 1997, 44 consecutive patients with a transsphincteric perianal fistula passing through the middle or upper third of the external anal sphincter underwent transanal advancement flap repair. There were 34 male patients, and the median age was 44 (range, 19–72) years. Twenty-four patients (55 percent) had previously undergone one or more prior attempts at repair. With the patient in prone jackknife position, the internal opening of the fistula was exposed using a Parks retractor. The crypt-bearing tissue around the internal opening and the overlying anoderm was excised. A layer of mucosa, submucosa, and internal sphincter fibers was mobilized 4 to 6 cm proximally. The base of the flap was approximately twice the width of its apex. The flap was advanced and sutured to the anoderm below the level of the internal opening. The median follow-up was 12 months. Fecal continence was evaluated in 43 patients by means of a questionnaire. RESULTS: Transanal advancement flap repair was successful in 33 patients (75 percent). Success was inversely correlated with the number of prior attempts. In patients with no or only one previous attempt at repair the healing rate was 87 percent. In patients with two or more previous repairs the healing rate dropped to 50 percent. In 15 patients (35 percent) continence deteriorated after transanal advancement flap repair. Twenty-six patients (59 percent) had a completely normal continence preoperatively. Ten of these patients (38 percent) encountered soiling and incontinence for gas after the procedure, whereas three subjects (12 percent) complained of accidental bowel movements. Eighteen patients (41 percent) had continence disturbances at the time of admission to our hospital. In two of these patients (11 percent), incontinence deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS: The results of transanal advancement flap repair in patients with no or only one previous attempt at repair are good. In patients who have undergone two or more previous attempts at repair the outcome is less favorable. Remarkably, the number of previous attempts did not adversely affect continence status.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.     

Recurrence After Transanal Excision of T1 Rectal Cancer: Should We Be Concerned?

PURPOSE Transanal excision is an appealing treatment for low rectal cancers because of its low morbidity, mortality, and better functional results than transabdominal procedures. However, controversy exists about whether it compromises the potential for cure. Several, recent reports of high recurrence rates after local excision prompted us to review our results of transanal excision alone in patients with T1 rectal cancers.METHODS All patients with T1 low rectal cancer undergoing local excision alone between 1980 through 1998 were reviewed for local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free interval, results of salvage surgery, and overall and disease-free survival. Demographics, tumor size, distance from anal verge, and preoperative endoluminal ultrasound results also were recorded. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors, perineural or lymphovascular invasion, or with mucinous component were excluded.RESULTS Fifty-two patients underwent transanal excision during the study period. Five-year recurrence was estimated to be 29.38 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15.39–43.48). For 52 patients, five-year, cancer-specific and overall survival rates were 89 and 75 percent respectively. Fourteen of 15 patients with recurrence underwent salvage treatment with 56.2 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 35.2–90) five-year survival rate. Gender, preoperative staging by endorectal ultrasound, distance from the anal verge, tumor size, location, and T1 status discovered after transanal excision of a villous adenoma did not influence local recurrence or tumor-specific survival.CONCLUSIONS Transanal excision for T1 rectal tumors with low-grade malignancy has a high rate of recurrence. Although overall cancer survival rates might be regarded as satisfactory, this high recurrence and low salvage rate raises the issue about the role of transanal excision alone for early rectal cancer and the possible need for adjuvant therapy or increased role of resective surgery.Presented at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, June 3 to 7, 2002.