Anastomotic Recurrence of Colon Cancer—is it a Local Recurrence,a Second Primary,or a Metastatic Disease (Local Manifestation of Systemic Disease)?

The aim of this study is to review the literature to find out the exact etiology of anastomotic cancers of colon post resection and differentiate them between a recurrence, second primary, and metastatic disease (local manifestation of systemic disease). Web-based literature search was done, and datas collected. We searched PubMed for papers using the keywords colon cancer recurrence, anastomotic recurrence, and recurrent colon carcinoma. We also searched for systematic review in the same topic. In addition, we used our personal referrence archive. Anastomotic recurrences of colon are postulated to arise due to inadequate margins, tumor implantation by exfoliated cells, altered biological properties of bowel anastomosis, and missed synchronous lesions. Some tumors are unique with repeated recurrence after repeated resection. Duration after primary surgery plays a major role in differentiating recurrent and second primary lesions. Repeated recurrences after repeated resections have to be considered a manifestation of systemic disease or metastatic disease due to the virulence of the disease. A detailed analysis and study of patients with colonic anastomotic lesion are required to differentiate it between a recurrent, a second primary lesion, and a metastatic disease (local manifestation of a systemic disease). The nomenclature is significant to study the survival of these patients, as a second primary lesion will have different survival compared to that of recurrent lesions.     

Effect of epidural anesthesia on colorectal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Epidural anesthesia is believed to benefit colorectal anastomotic blood flow because of the sympathetic blockade it produces. Our purpose is to measure with tonometry the effect of epidural anesthesia on colorectal anastomotic oxygenation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients operated on for rectal cancer (radical anterior resection) were monitored postoperatively using tonometers placed in the stomach (celiac trunk), transverse colon (superior mesenteric artery), and the anastomotic area during the operation. An epidural catheter was placed at L1-2, and on the first postoperative day, 8 ml of bupivacaine (0.25 percent) was administered. The anesthetic effect extended up to T-4. Intramucosal pH (pHi) at the three locations was measured before, during, and after the epidural blockade. RESULTS: Gastric and transverse colon pHi increased during the epidural blockade from 7.35±0.01 to 7.41±0.01 and from 7.34±0.02 to 7.40±0.02, respectively. The anastomotic pHi decreased from 7.3±0.02 to 7.24±0.03 under the epidural and increased up to 7.34±0.02 after withdrawal of the effect on the following day. All pHi variations were statistically significant (P<0.05, paired Student'st-test and Wilcoxon's test), because it was the comparison between gastric and transverse colon pHi with the anastomotic pHi during the epidural (P<0.05, one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests). None of the patients developed anastomotic or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine causes a significant decrease in the oxygenation-perfusion state of colorectal anastomosis in comparison with the increase in other areas of the digestive tract. Further studies need to be done to see if other epidural anesthetic-analgesic protocols also worsen colorectal anastomotic blood flow.Supported in part by a grant from the Spanish Society of Digestive Diseases, Madrid, Spain. All tonometric catheters and drugs were donated by the Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Spain.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

带膜金属支架治疗食管癌术后胸内吻合口瘘的临床研究

目的探讨镍钛记忆合金带膜内支架在治疗食管癌术后胸内吻合口瘘中的应用价值。方法在X线电视透视下对22例食管癌术后胸内吻合口瘘患者进行镍钛记忆合金带膜内支架植入治疗。结果19例一次植入成功，成功率86％，恢复正常饮食；不完全封堵瘘口3例（14％）；16例术后出现轻度的胸骨后疼痛不适或胃液反流的症状；1例出现上消化道大出血。22例病人均治愈出院，治愈率100％。结论镍钛记忆合金带膜内支架植入治疗食管癌术后胸内吻合口瘘成功率高，治愈率高，操作简单，安全，见效快，并发症少，有效解除患者痛苦，宜在临床上推广使用。     

深静脉高营养（TPN）预防食管癌切除术后吻合口瘘的临床研究

本研究收集食管癌行食管癌切除胃代食管术病例２６５例，分为未用深静脉高营养组（ＮＴＰＮ）和深静脉高营养组（ＴＰＮ）。分别对各组临床资料进行比较分析，结果显示：ＴＰＮ组葡萄糖供给量（８．３７±２．１２ｇ／ｋｇ／２４小时）显著高于ＮＴＰＮ组（２．７７±０．７１ｇ／ｋｇ／２４小时）（Ｐ＜０．０１），（０．３０±０．１４ｇ／ｋｇ／小时）Ｐ＜０．０５。吻合口瘘发生率ＴＰＮ组（２．１％）则显著低于ＮＴＰＮ组（１５．２％）Ｐ＜０．００１。结果提示ＴＰＮ组可明显降低吻合口瘘发生率。作者于ＴＰＮ促进吻合的愈合，预防吻合口瘘发生的有关机理进行了讨论。     

Colorectal anastomotic stenosis results of a survey of the ASCRS membership

Anastomotic stenosis is a poorly understood and underexamined complication of gastrointestinal surgery, reportedly most frequent in the coloproctostomy. In order to better define this problem, a questionnaire was sent to members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons regarding patients with gastrointestinal anastomotic stenosis. A total of 123 patients with intestinal anastomotic stenosis were analyzed. Eighty-two anastomoses were stapled and 41 were handsewn. Nearly all stenoses occurred in the distal bowel (70 rectal, 23 sigmoid colon). Preoperative risk factors identified were obesity (28 patients) and abscess (12 patients). Incomplete “doughnuts” were noted in 12 patients. Postoperative anastomotic leaks (15 patients), pelvic infection (13 patients), and postoperative radiation (7 patients) were believed to be contributing factors. Dilatation, using a variety of techniques, was the sole treatment for 65 patients, however, intra-abdominal surgery was necessary in 34 patients. Large intestinal anastomotic stenosis probably occurs most commonly following coloproctostomy (both with handsewn and stapled anastomoses). Dilatation alone resulted in adequate treatment in most patients in the study. Major surgery was required to correct this problem in a significant number of patients (28 percent) in this series. The true incidence of anastomotic stenosis in colorectal surgery is unknown and warrants further study. Poster presentation at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Anaheim, California, June 12 to 17, 1988.     

低位直肠癌保肛手术后发生吻合口漏的原因及处理

目的：探讨低位直肠癌保肛术后吻合口漏的原因及合理有效的防治方法。方法：对我院近10年来出现的低位直肠癌全系膜切除低位吻合手术后吻合口漏的发生及治疗情况进行回顾性分析。对吻合口漏的患者采用手术及保守治疗（骶前双腔管冲洗引流加肛管引流）。结果：共行低位保肛手术348例,术后发生吻合口漏11例,吻合口漏的发生率为3.2%。患者的年龄、吻合技术和肿瘤组织学分型与吻合口漏的发生无关。而患者的性别、肿瘤的大小与吻合口漏的发生密切相关（P〈0.05）。11例患者中有3例行手术治疗（HA手术）,8例采用保守治疗后均痊愈出院,吻合口漏发生至出院时间平均为10～15d。结论：充分的术前准备和良好的吻合技术是防止吻合口漏发生的关键。正确判断吻合口漏的发生及采用正确的处理方法是治疗的前提,双腔引流管加肛管引流是保守治疗吻合口漏的有效方法。     

食管癌切除术后不同重建途径吻合口瘘的原因及预防

目的了解食管癌切除术后经不同径路重建,发生吻合口瘘的情况;探讨系统性淋巴结清扫后,经胸骨后胃代食管颈部吻合口瘘发生率较高的原因及预防方法。方法1105例行食管癌切除术的患者,229例经左胸行胸内吻合(A组),716例经右胸食管床胃代食管行颈部吻合(B组),160例予以系统性淋巴结清扫术后经胸骨后行颈部吻合(C组)。分析比较不同手术径路的3组患者术后吻合口瘘发生的情况。结果吻合口瘘发生率分别为:A组5/229(2.2%)、B组85/716(11.9%)、C组31/160(19.4%),C组吻合口瘘发生率显著高于A、B组(P<0.01和P<0.05)。比较C组不同重建方式吻合口瘘发生率显示,手工吻合与器械吻合(22.2%与11.6%,P=0.133)、全胃重建与管状胃重建(25%与15.6%,P=0.146)间吻合口瘘发生率无明显差异,而延长胃肠减压管留置时间至术后7d,吻合口瘘发生率由23.3%降至9.1%(P<0.05)。结论胸骨后胃代食管吻合口瘘发生率较高的主要原因,是前纵隔内的胃体受压、冲击吻合口所致;通过延长胃肠减压管留置时间能有效减少瘘的发生。     

食管癌颈部吻合术中前壁单层吻合术的应用

目的　探讨食管癌颈部吻合术中前壁单层吻合的临床应用价值 ,并与同期荷包状食管胃吻合法 (前壁双层吻合法 )相比较。方法　对 32 1例食管癌行根治性切除及食管胃颈部吻合术 ,其中前壁双层吻合 16 1例 ,前壁单层吻合16 0例。结果　双层吻合术中 ,吻合口瘘 5例 (3.13% ) ,随访 137例 ,吻合口直径 <0 .5 cm者占 5例 (3.5 % ) ,0 .5 - 1cm者70例 (5 0 .9% ) ,1cm以上者 6 2例 (4 5 .6 % ) ,单层吻合术中 ,吻合口瘘 7例 (4 .38% ) ,随访 131例 ,吻合口直径 <0 .5 cm者无 1例发生 ,0 .5 - 1cm者 5 3例 (4 0 .8% ) ,>1cm以上者 78例 (5 9.2 % )。结论　食管癌颈部吻合术中 ,前壁单层吻合能减少吻合口狭窄 ,改善术后病人的生活质量 ,而吻合口瘘发生率无明显增加。     

急诊内镜诊疗在结直肠癌根治术后吻合口出血中的应用

目的探讨结直肠癌根治术后吻合口出血病人使用急诊内镜检查及止血的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院2014年1月至2019年11月结直肠癌根治术后吻合口出血行急诊内镜检查以及内镜下治疗的28例病人资料。结果28例病人包括直肠癌术后15例、左半结肠癌术后3例及右半结肠癌术后10例。上述病例均完成急诊内镜检查并接受内镜下止血治疗。仅1例直肠癌术后吻合口出血病人因合并吻合口漏经内镜下止血效果不佳,最终接受外科手术治疗;其余27例吻合口出血病人均经过内镜止血成功。所有病例住院期间无再发出血,内镜诊疗并未导致术后吻合口漏及穿孔。结论结直肠癌根治术后吻合口出血急诊内镜检查及止血的方案,不增加吻合口出血、穿孔及漏等风险。术后急诊内镜下止血是安全有效的治疗手段,能明显提高止血成功率,降低再手术率。在病人出血后8 h内行急诊内镜是非常关键的诊治措施。     

造瘘口切口辅助技术在腹腔镜膀胱根治性切除及回肠通道术中的应用

目的：探讨造瘘口切口辅助技术（通过造瘘口切口取标本,行肠吻合及输尿管吻合）在腹腔镜膀胱根治性切除及回肠通道术中的安全性、实用性。方法：将60例需行膀胱根治性切除及回肠通道术的患者随机分为造瘘口切口辅助技术组（试验组）及传统下腹正中切口辅助技术组（对照组）,比较2组患者尿流改道手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率、术后住院日、术后疼痛评分的差异。结果：试验组尿流改道手术时间少于对照组[（105.0±18.9） min vs.(117.0±17.7) min,P<0.05];术后疼痛评分低于对照组（4.03±1.50 vs. 5.40±1.69,P<0.05）;术后住院时间少于对照组[（8.27±1.86） d vs.(9.70±1.87) d,P<0.05];术中出血量2组间差异无统计学意义[试验组：（260±155） mL,对照组：（271±154） mL,P=0.784]。试验组并发症发生4例,其中2例为肠梗阻,1例造瘘口旁疝,1例尿路感染;对照组并发症发生6例,其中肠梗阻3例,切口感染2例,尿路感染1例。组间总体并发症发生率无明显统计学差异。结论：造瘘口切口辅助技术...