Effects of the antimigraine compound zolmitriptan ('Zomig') on psychomotor performance alone and in combination with diazepam in healthy volunteers

Zolmitriptan (Zomig^TM) is a 5HT_1B/1D agonist which has the ability to cross the intact blood-brain barrier to access central as well as peripheral receptors. Because of the potential for central nervous system side effects, this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-period crossover study evaluated the effects of 2.5 and 5 mg doses of zolmitriptan on psychomotor performance and investigated any pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction with diazepam. Twelve healthy volunteers received the following "treatments" as single doses: zolmitriptan 2.5 mg, zolmitriptan 5 mg, diazepam 10 mg, zolmitriptan 2.5 mg+diazepam 10 mg, zolmitriptan 5 mg+diazepam 10 mg and placebo. Pre-dose and at 1, 4, 8, and 24 h post-dose, the following validated battery of psychomotor tests was performed: Bond-Lader visual analogue scales (calmness, contentedness, and alertness factors), critical flicker fusion test, choice reaction time (recognition, motor, and total reaction times), finger-tapping test, number cancellation test and digit symbol substitution test. Plasma concentrations of zolmitriptan, its active metabolite, and diazepam and its active metabolites were measured at the same timepoints. Zolmitriptan 2.5 and 5 mg had no effect on psychomotor function when given alone. In contrast, diazepam 10 mg had profound effects, consistent with its sedative properties, but there was no synergism on concomitant administration of either dose of zolmitriptan. Plasma concentrations of zolmitriptan, diazepam, and their respective active metabolites were similar when the two drugs were given alone or in combination.     

佐米曲普坦片剂在健康人体的药代动力学和相对生物利用度

目的研究佐米曲普坦片在中国健康志愿者体内的药代动力学及相对生 物利用度。方法用双周期随机交叉自身对照方法,18名健康男性志愿者单 剂量口服试验制剂或参比制剂各5 mg,用高效液相色谱／质谱连用法测定血药 浓度。结果试验及参比的佐米曲普坦片剂Cmax分别(9．92±2．62)和(9．99± 3．22)ng·mL-1;tmax分别为(1．78±1．24)和(2．14±1．74)h;t1／2分别为(3．51 ±0．52)和(3．33±1．17)h;AUC0-tn分别为(53．51±18．25)和(54．24±18．00) ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞分别为(56．573±19．738)和(57．549±17．685)ng·h· mL-1;佐米曲普坦片剂的相对生物利用度F0-tn、F0-∞分别为(100．80± 20．40)％,(98．98±17．78)％。结论试验制剂和参比制剂具有生物等效性。     

Patient preference for triptan formulations: a prospective study with zolmitriptan

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patterns of patient preference for 3 formulations of zolmitriptan, in a primary care study utilizing a naturalistic longitudinal design. BACKGROUND: Although differences in efficacy between individual triptans tend to be small, migraine patients show clear preferences for individual triptans and formulations. The groups of patients suitable for the different triptan formulations, and the reasons underlying individual preferences, are not clearly understood. METHODS: Migraine patients entered a prospective, randomized, open, crossover, longitudinal design study, with patients receiving zolmitriptan formulations according to UK prescribing recommendations. Patients na?ve to zolmitriptan received zolmitriptan 2.5-mg film-coated tablets or 2.5-mg Orally Disintegrating Tablets (ODT) for 1 month, before being crossed over to receive the alternative formulation for Month 2. All patients then received zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg for Month 3. Patients could then choose the formulation(s) of their choice for a further 7 months. Patients recorded their preferences for individual formulations, the reasons for their preferences, and also the headache-related disability (measured by the Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] score) at clinic visits. Primary endpoints were the individual preferences and changes in MIDAS scores. Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients took part in the study. At baseline, most patients expressed a preference for conventional tablets. After 4 months, 46.9% of patients preferred zolmitriptan ODT, 43.8% zolmitriptan nasal spray, and 6.3% the conventional tablet. The most common reasons given for preferring conventional tablets were personal reasons: for zolmitriptan ODT, convenience and, to a lesser extent, speed of onset: for zolmitriptan nasal spray, speed of onset, and overall efficacy. MIDAS scores decreased significantly following treatment with zolmitriptan. Zolmitriptan was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Patient experience of newer zolmitriptan formulations influenced a change in preference away from conventional tablets. Speed and efficacy were the key drivers of preference for zolmitriptan nasal spray, while convenience mostly drove preference for the ODT formulation. Open, longitudinal, naturalistic studies may, allowing for biases, sometimes be an appropriate way of conducting migraine studies in primary care.     

佐米曲普坦的合成及工艺改进

目的:改进佐米曲普坦的合成工艺.方法:以(L)-苯丙氨酸为原料,经硝化,酯化,还原(酯基),环合,还原(硝基),重氮化,还原(重氮盐)和费歇尔吲哚合成共八步反应制得佐米曲普坦.结果:改进了佐米曲普坦的合成工艺,总收率提高至16%.结论:改进后的合成工艺操作简便,成本低,收率高,适于工业化生产.     

Distribution of intranasal C-zolmitriptan assessed by positron emission tomography

Nine healthy volunteers aged 18-28 years were recruited into this open, single-centre, two-phase trial. In phase 1, two volunteers received a single dose of 11C-zolmitriptan 2.5 mg administered as a nasal spray and then underwent positron emission tomography (PET) scanning to determine the most appropriate times for scanning in phase 2. In phase 2, six volunteers received two doses and an additional volunteer one dose of 11C-zolmitriptan 2.5 mg intranasally. Volunteers underwent PET scanning over sectors covering one of the nasopharynx, lungs or abdomen, for up to 1.5 h postdose. The brain was also scanned and plasma zolmitriptan levels were measured. Almost 100% of the administered dose was detected in the nasopharynx immediately after dosing. This declined thereafter to about 50% at 20 min and to 35% at 80 min after dosing. Radioactivity appeared slowly in the upper abdomen, with 25% of given radioactivity detected at 20 min and persisting until 80 min after dosing. Minimal radioactivity was detected in the lungs. Radioactivity was detectable within brain tissue suggesting central penetration of zolmitriptan. Zolmitriptan in plasma had approached its maximum concentration by 15 min postdose. The data indicate initial absorption across the nasal mucosa contributing to an early systemic availability. 11C-Zolmitriptan administered intranasally was well tolerated.     

治疗偏头痛药佐米曲普坦制剂的研究进展

佐米曲普坦是一种高选择性、强效5-羟色胺1B／1D（5-HT18/1D）受体激动剂，可透过血脑屏障，同时具有外周和中枢作用，是目前治疗偏头痛较理想的药物之一。现就佐米曲普坦普通片剂、口腔崩解片和鼻喷剂的药动学、临床疗效及安全性和耐受性等进行综述。     

A comparative trial of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan for the acute oral treatment of migraine

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, parallel group multicenter study compared response rates and tolerability of zolmitriptan with sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: A sample consisting of 1445 outpatients with an established diagnosis of migraine was randomized to zolmitriptan, 2.5 mg or 5 mg, or sumatriptan, 25 mg or 50 mg. Patients took 1 tablet for moderate/severe migraine and a second identical tablet, if necessary, for recurrent headache of moderate/severe intensity 4 to 24 hours after the initial dose. Up to six attacks were treated during a 6-month period. The primary outcome measure was headache response 2 hours after the initial dose. Secondary end points included 1-hour and 4-hour headache response and pain relief over 24 hours. RESULTS: A headache response at 2 hours was noted in 67.1% of patients taking zolmitriptan, 2.5 mg, and 64.8% of those taking zolmitriptan, 5 mg, versus 59.6% of patients taking sumatriptan, 25 mg, and 63.8% of those taking sumatriptan, 50 mg. At 2 and 4 hours, the differences between zolmitriptan, 2.5 mg, and sumatriptan, 25 mg, were statistically significant (odds ratio=1.49 and 1.67, respectively; both P<.001). Statistically significant differences between zolmitriptan, 2.5 mg, and sumatriptan, 50 mg, were seen at 2 and 4 hours post dose (odds ratio=1.21 and 1.23, respectively; both P<.05). At 1 hour post dose, the headache response rate for zolmitriptan, 2. 5 mg, was numerically higher than response rates for sumatriptan, 25 mg and 50mg (odds ratio=1.16, odds ratio=1.06, though they failed to reach statistical significance; P=.061, P=.461 respectively). Differences between zolmitriptan, 5 mg, and sumatriptan, 25 mg, were statistically significant at 1, 2, and 4 hours (odds ratio=1.43, 1. 46, and 1.78, respectively; all P<.001) and at 1 and 4 hours versus sumatriptan, 50 mg (odds ratio=1.28, P=.002; odds ratio=1.29, P=.012, respectively). Although not statistically significant at 2 hours, more patients responded to zolmitriptan, 5 mg, than to sumatriptan, 50 mg (odds ratio=1.16, P=.064). Patients receiving zolmitriptan, 2. 5 mg or 5 mg, achieved more pain relief over 24 hours than patients receiving sumatriptan, 25 mg (odds ratio=1.47, and 1.54 respectively, both P<.001) or sumatriptan, 50 mg (odds ratio=1.17, P=.021; odds ratio=1.22, P=.005, respectively). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Zolmitriptan, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, was at least as effective as sumatriptan, 25 mg or 50 mg, for all parameters studied. Zolmitriptan, 2.5 mg, was significantly more effective than sumatriptan, 50 mg, in terms of headache response at 2 and 4 hours. Patients taking zolmitriptan were significantly more likely to have pain relief over 24 hours than those taking sumatriptan.     

Comparison of rizatriptan 10 mg vs. zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in the acute treatment of migraine. Rizatriptan-Zolmitriptan Study Group

The efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan (MAXALT) and zolmitriptan (ZOMIG) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, stratified (on prior use of rizatriptan and/or zolmitriptan), placebo-controlled, single attack study in 766 patients. Rizatriptan tended to provide freedom from pain sooner than zolmitriptan (hazard ratio 1.26, P = 0.075), acting within 60 min following dosing. More patients were pain free at 2 h on rizatriptan than on zolmitriptan (43.2% vs. 35.6%, P=0.041), while headache relief at 2 h was similar (70.5% vs. 66.8%). At 2 h, fewer patients on rizatriptan had symptoms of photophobia (35.6% vs. 43.5%, P = 0.029) and nausea (25.2% vs. 32.5%, P=0.046), and more patients on rizatriptan had normal function (45.4% vs. 37.0%, P=0.025) than zolmitriptan. Headache recurred in 28% of patients taking rizatriptan, 29% taking zolmitriptan and 26% taking placebo. Both active treatments were effective compared to placebo and were well tolerated. The most common side-effects with rizatriptan were asthenia/fatigue, somnolence and dizziness, while the most common side-effects with zolmitriptan were asthenia/fatigue and dizziness.