Influence of rate of administration of raclopride on akathisia and prolactin response

The D₂-dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride was administered to eight healthy male subjects, who had previously experienced akathisia following antipsychotic drugs. The influence of administration rate on onset, severity and duration of akathisia and on prolactin response was studied. Raclopride 3,5 or 9 mg or placebo (P) was administered as single IV infusions during 10 min (R10 min/3 mg), 1 h (R1h/5 mg) or 4 h (R4h/9 mg) according to a randomized double-blind design. Despite a 24-fold difference in administration rate a similar peak raclopride concentration of about 350 nmol/l was obtained after all three infusions. Three of the eight subjects experienced akathisia following R10 min/3 mg and R1h/5 mg, respectively. After R4h/9 mg seven subjects experienced akathisia of longer duration but not more severe than after the short infusions. The incidence and duration of akathisia seem to be mainly related to the plasma raclopride concentrations over time, whereas the rate of administration might be more important for the severity. A maximal prolactin response was induced which was not markedly affected by the rate of administration.     

Effects of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists and catecholamine depleting agents on the locomotor stimulation induced by dizocilpine in mice

Low doses of the uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) induce locomotor stimulation in mice, whereas higher doses are associated with ataxia, stereotyped behaviors and catalepsy. We investigated the role of dopamine receptors and presynaptic dopamine neurons in the locomotor effects of dizocilpine. For comparison, we studied several other drugs that induce locomotor stimulation in mice. Pretreatment of male mice with haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) completely prevented the stimulation of normally coordinated locomotion induced by a non-intoxicating dose of dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.); haloperidol also attenuated the locomotor stimulation produced by phencyclidine (PCP, 1 and 2 mg/kg, i.p.), d-amphetamine (2 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) and diazepam (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Haloperidol (doses up to 2.5 mg/kg) did not attenuate the ataxia and decreased locomotion induced by higher doses of dizocilpine (1 and 2 mg/kg). The active cis isomer of flupenthixol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), an antagonist of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors, also diminished the stimulant actions of all of the test drugs, whereas its inactive trans form did not. The selective D1 antagonist R(±)-SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) and the selective D2 antagonist raclopride (1 mg/kg) had little effect on the stimulatory effect of dizocilpine, although they did reduce the stimulation produced by PCP, d-amphetamine and diazepam. However, pretreatment with a combination of R(±)-SCH 23390 and raclopride completely prevented dizocilpine-induced locomotor stimulation. Pretreatment with α-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT, 50 and 250 mg/kg), an inhibitor of tyrosine hydroxylase, or with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OH-DA, 50 μg, i.c.v.), a neurotoxin that destroys brain dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons, did not attenuate the locomotor stimulation induced by dizocilpine, although these treatments did reduce the stimulant effects of d-amphetamine. In AMPT or 6-OH-DA pretreated mice, haloperidol (0.125 mg/kg) prevented the stimulatory effect of dizocilpine. These results support a role for dopamine receptors in the stimulation of normally coordinated locomotion by dizocilpine. However, the locomotor stimulant effect of dizocilpine, unlike that of d-amphetamine, can be expressed in the presence of D1 or D2 dopamine receptor blockade and does not appear to be dependent on intact presynaptic mechanisms.     

Two selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, WAY-100 635 and NDL-249, stimulate locomotion in rats acclimatised to their environment and alter their behaviour: a behavioural analysis

The aim was to study firstly, the motor effects of a new 5-HT_1A antagonist, NDL-249 [(R)-3-(N-cyclopentyl-N-propylamino)-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide hydrochloride] and of the reference 5-HT_1A antagonist WAY-100 635 [N-(2-(1-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazinyl))ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride], in comparison to the 5-HT_1A agonist (±)-8-OH-DPAT [(8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino) tetralin, hereafter 8-OH-DPAT], in rats acclimatised to the automated activity cages; secondly, to study whether the behavioural effects of NDL-249 and 8-OH-DPAT are sensitive to the 5-HT depleting effects of p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA); thirdly, to characterise the nature of the antagonist-induced activation seen in the automatic activity cages with the aid of a behavioural observation analysis; fourthly, to examine the interaction between the 5-HT_1Areceptors mediating the behavioural effects and dopamine (DA) receptors. NDL-249 was found to bind in vitro to rat hippocampal 5-HT_1A receptors with high affinity and selectivity. In second messenger studies, it was devoid of agonist-like effects. In the locomotor activity studies, each antagonist significantly increased the incidence of horizontal activity, peripheral activity and rearing. 8-OH-DPAT, while significantly increasing peripheral and horizontal activities, decreased the incidence of rearing. PCPA blocked the motor effects of NDL-249 but did not affect those of 8-OH-DPAT. Observational analyses indicated that NDL-249 induced significant increases at one or more doses in sniffing, rearing and locomotion together with a significant reduction in stillness. WAY-100 635 significantly increased the incidence of rearing, intense grooming and vacuous chewing. The significant increases in sniffing, grooming and intense grooming and the significant decrease in stillness induced by the DA D₁ agonist, SK&F 38393 [(±)-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride], were not altered by concomitant pre-treatment with NDL-249. Pre-treatment of rats with either the DA D₁ antagonist SCH-23390 (2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol) or the DA D₂ antagonist, raclopride, blocked the reduced stillness and increased sniffing and rearing induced by NDL-249. In conclusion, 5-HT_1A antagonists including the new selective antagonist, NDL-249, induce mild behavioural activation in rats, which is mediated probably indirectly via DA systems. Received: 3 April 1997/Final version: 23 February 1998     

An open label trial of raclopride in acute schizophrenia. Confirmation of D2-dopamine receptor occupancy by PET

Raclopride, a highly selective D2-dopamine receptor antagonist, was administered in doses up to 4 mg b.i.d. to ten schizophrenic patients in an open label non-comparative study lasting 4 weeks. Safety, tolerability, potential antipsychotic effect, prolactin response and drug effect on plasma homovanillic acid were evaluated. Central D2-dopamine receptor occupancy was determined by positron emission tomography (PET). No major deviations were found in biochemical and physiological safety parameters. Raclopride was well tolerated. The mean BPRS score was reduced by 55% at endpoint. In the global evaluation seven patients were very much or much improved. Extrapyramidal side effects were recorded in four patients and disappeared after dose reduction or single doses of biperiden. An increase in plasma prolactin of short duration was observed in both sexes. A significant decrease of plasma HVA was obtained after 4 weeks of treatment. In two of the patients the central D2-dopamine receptors occupancy was measured using PET. The receptor occupancy was 68 and 72% which is the same as that found in patients treated with conventional neuroleptics.     

Effects of D2 dopamine receptor blockade with raclopride on intracranial self-stimulation and food-reinforced operant behaviour

To examine the involvement of D2 dopamine receptors in the neural mechanism of reinforcement, raclopride tartrate, a D2 specific dopamine antagonist with a relatively fast central action, was injected into 32 rats. The D2 antagonist reduced bar-pressing responses reinforced with electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (ED₅₀=0.079 mol/kg) and those reinforced with food (ED₅₀=0.58 mol/kg) in 18–30 min after IP injection. The reduction in response rates could not be attributed to an interference with motor functions. An increase in the frequency of brain-stimulation pulses and a change in the schedule of food reinforcement, which respectively increased the baseline rate of responding, did not alter the effectiveness of raclopride. SCH 23390, a D1-specific dopamine antagonist, was sensitive to similar manipulation of reinforcement. These results seem to suggest that D1 and D2 antagonists may be acting at different locations in the neural mechanism underlying the reinforcement of operant behaviour.     

Differential role of dopamine in drug- and lithium-conditioned saccharin avoidance

Rats learn to avoid palatable saccharin solutions that predict the systemic administration of reinforcing drugs as well as malaise-inducing lithium chloride (conditioned saccharin avoidance, CSA). In the present study the involvement of dopamine (DA) transmission in the acquisition of morphine, nicotine and lithium-conditioned CSA was investigated in a two-bottle choice paradigm. Nicotine tartrate (0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg s.c.) administered 15 min after saccharin presentation induced CSA, with a maximum effect at 0.4 mg/kg. The DA D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 39166 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) and the DA D2 receptor antagonist raclopride (0.3 mg/kg s.c.), administered immediately after saccharin, prevented CSA induced by the lower but not by the higher dose of nicotine. However, combined administration of the two antagonists prevented CSA induced by the higher dose of nicotine. SCH 39166 prevented CSA induced by all morphine doses while raclopride prevented only CSA induced by the lowest dose of morphine (1.75 mg/kg). CSA induced by different doses of lithium given by the same schedule of drug-CSA (i.e. two pairings, 15 min after saccharin) was not affected by SCH 39166. However SCH 39166 impaired the acquisition of lithium-CSA when lithium was given 60 min after saccharin. In contrast, raclopride failed to affect lithium-CSA independently from the delay between saccharin and lithium. These results suggest that DA can play different roles in drug- and in lithium-CSA and are consistent with a different mechanism of drug- as compared to lithium-CSA.     

Increased in vivo [C]raclopride binding to brain dopamine receptors in amphetamine-treated rats

The hypothesis that repeated daily doses of amphetamine increases the number of available dopamine D₂ receptors in vivo in rat striatum, and may enhance the response to subsequent amphetamine challenge doses, was examined. The in vivo binding potentials of [¹¹C]raclopride, a D₂ receptor antagonist, were determined in male CD-1 rats under five conditions: (1) drug-naïve with saline challenge, (2) drug naïve with 5 mg/kg amphetamine challenge, (3) amphetamine-dosed (five daily repeated s.c. doses of 5 mg/kg amphetamine) and saline challenge, (4) amphetamine-dosed and amphetamine challenge, and (5) saline treated (five daily repeated s.c. doses) and saline challenged. Radiotracer studies in amphetamine-dosed animals were done after a 10-day drug free interval. In the amphetamine-dosed group the baseline [¹¹C]raclopride binding was increased by 63% compared to saline-treated controls. The response to an amphetamine challenge, evidenced by a reduction of [¹¹C]raclopride binding, was doubled in amphetamine-dosed animals (40%) compared to drug-naïve controls (20%). These results support increased baseline in vivo dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist radioligand binding after repeated amphetamine administration in rats.     

Effects of DA D1 and D2 antagonists on the sensitisation to the motor effects of morphine in mice

Acute morphine administration produces hyperactivity in mice and repeated treatment induces an enhancement of this effect. In this experiment, we study the sensitisation to the hyperactivity induced by intermittent morphine administration (40 mg/kg) and the effects of dopamine (DA) antagonists on this phenomenon. Animals received three injections, separated by 48 h, and after each injection, their activity was registered between 30 and 60 min. In Experiment 1, animals were divided into two groups, which received saline and morphine (S–S–M) or only morphine (M–M–M). In Experiment 2, animals were divided into 12 groups. Half, which was designed to study the effects of DA antagonists on the acquisition of morphine sensitisation, received morphine plus 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg SCH 23390 or raclopride in the two first administrations and only morphine in the third (M+SCH–M+SCH–M; M+R–M+R–M). The other groups, designed to study the effects of DA antagonists on the expression of morphine sensitisation, received morphine in the two first administrations and morphine plus DA antagonists in the last injection (M–M–M+SCH; M–M–M+R). Intermittent morphine administration produces greater hyperactivity than acute morphine. DA D1 antagonists reduce acquisition and block expression of sensitisation, while DA D2 antagonists only affect expression with the intermediate and high dose. These results support the implication of DA in the behavioural sensitisation of morphine in mice.     

Dopamine D<Subscript>2</Subscript> receptor plays a role in memory function: implications of dopamine–acetylcholine interaction in the ventral hippocampus

Rationale The role of the hippocampal dopaminergic system in mnemonic function has not been clarified yet. Objective We previously reported that the dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) is involved in the regulation of acethylcholin (ACh) release in the hippocampus. In this study, we further investigated ACh–dopamine (DA) interaction in the hippocampus and its involvement in mnemonic function. Methods For experiment 1, rats fed with Cholin (Ch)-deficient chow were used. We examined the effects of D₂R antagonist, raclopride, on cognitive performance using a passive avoidance task. We further carried out in vivo microdialysis to assess the effect of infusion of D₂R agonist, quinpirole, into the ventral hippocampus on its capacity to release ACh. For experiment 2, rats fed with normal chow were used. The performance of a radial arm maze task was assessed to examine the effects of hippocampal injection of D₂R agonist, quinpirole, on memory impairment induced by scopolamine, a muscarinic ACh antagonist. Results In experiment 1, rats fed with Ch-deficient chow showed impaired performances indicated by prolonged latency on retention trials of a passive avoidance task following the hippocampal injection of D₂R antagonist, and showed reduced capacity to release ACh following the injection of D₂R agonist compared with rats fed with normal chow. In experiment 2, memory impairment induced by the intraperitoneal injection of scopolamine was ameliorated by the injection of D₂R agonist into the ventral hippocampus. Conclusion These results indicate the possible involvement of hippocampal ACh–DA interaction in mnemonic processing.