Zidovudine,Lamivudine, and Nelfinavir Concentrations in Amniotic Fluid and Maternal Serum

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (ZDV), nelfinavir (NFV), and its active nelfinavir metabolite (M8) concentrations in paired maternal plasma and amniotic fluid samples to determine antiretroviral penetration or accumulation in the fetal compartment. Method: Ten paired amniotic fluid and maternal plasma samples were obtained during caesarian section for pharmacokinetic analysis. Antiretroviral concentrations were measured in both matrices using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (LC/MS) methodologies. Results: Median maternal plasma concentrations for NFV, M8, 3TC, and ZDV were 456, 244, 176, and 794 ng/mL, respectively, while median amniotic fluid concentrations were 118, 21, 2537, and 1483 ng/mL, respectively. The median NFV amniotic fluid to maternal plasma ratio was 0.44; the median M8 ratio was 0.11. Median 3TC and ZDV amniotic fluid to plasma ratios were 11.9 and 1.5, respectively. Conclusions: NFV and M8 exhibited partial drug transfer and/or accumulation in the amniotic compartment, whereas ZDV and 3TC concentrations mostly exceeded that in maternal plasma. Overall, all drugs achieved exposures in the amniotic fluid in excess of their wild-type viral susceptibilities. Amniotic fluid is an important compartment in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission; a further understanding of protease inhibitor and other antiretroviral drug penetration into amniotic fluid is warranted.     

Resistance to HIV protease inhibitors

Summary. Resistance to the HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinavir involves the accumulation of multiple amino acid substitutions in the viral protease. A minimum of 11 amino acid positions have been identified as potential contributors to phenotypic resistance. Three or more amino acid substitutions in the protease are required before resistance becomes measurable (≥four-fold). Further losses in susceptibility follow the stepwise accumulation of additional amino acid substitutions, indicating that antiviral activity (selective pressure) is maintained despite the appearance of multiple amino acid substitutions in the viral protease. Importantly, the sequential nature of these changes indicates that the effects of these substitutions are additive, and that the evolution of resistance is driven by viral replication. This result has significant implications for therapy. It predicts that viral variants resistant to indinavir are unlikely to pre-exist in protease inhibitor-naive patients, and further, that high-level resistance can only develop if the virus is allowed to replicate in the presence of the drug. The use of indinavir in combination with other antiretroviral agents has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the incidence of resistance mutations, suggesting that with maximal suppression of viral replication, long-term control of HIV-1 infection may be achievable. Thus, the goal of therapy must be to never to allow the virus to replicate. This can be best accomplished by initiating therapy with a maximally suppressive regimen, to reduce viral replication as much as possible, and by imposing a high genetic barrier to resistance. Previous use of other protease inhibitors or inadequate adherence to therapy may compromise the long-term benefit of indinavir by allowing the virus to gain a foothold through the development of resistance. An understanding of these issues will be critical in realizing the full potential of this potent new drug for the control of HIV-1 infection.     

Effect of efavirenz treatment on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir boosted by ritonavir in healthy volunteers

AIMS: A once-daily (q.d.) nucleoside-sparing regimen can prevent mitochondrial toxicity, overcome viral resistance and improve compliance. In the present study the effect of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of once-daily nelfinavir/ritonavir was evaluated in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study in 24 healthy subjects. Each received from days 1-10 (period 1): 1875 mg nelfinavir plus 200 mg ritonavir q.d. with a 300-kcal snack. During days 11-20 (period 2) efavirenz 600 mg q.d. was added to the regimen. Blood samples were collected up to 24 h after dosing on days 10 (period 1) and 20 (period 2). High-performance liquid chromatography methods were used for the determination of the concentrations of all compounds. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. After the first period mean nelfinavir AUC(0-24 h), C(max) and C(24) were 49.6 mg h(-1) l(-1), 5.0 mg l(-1) and 0.37 mg l(-1), and the sum of nelfinavir plus its active metabolite M8 C(24) was 0.83 mg l(-1). The relative bioavailability, expressed as a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for nelfinavir AUC(0-24 h), C(max) and C(24) of period 2 compared with period 1 was: 1.30 (1.21, 1.40), 1.29 (1.19, 1.40) and 1.48 (1.32, 1.66). The sum of nelfinavir and M8 C(24) in period 2 was 0.99 mg l(-1), an increase of 19%. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The studied regimens were well tolerated. Nelfinavir/ritonavir given together with efavirenz resulted in a 48% higher mean C(24) concentration for nelfinavir, and the sum of nelfinavir and M8 C(24) concentrations was 0.99 mg l(-1). Efavirenz exposure in this study was similar to that reported previously, and therefore can be used effectively in combination with ritonavir and nelfinavir.     

Characterization of nelfinavir binding to plasma proteins and the lack of drug displacement interactions

OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics of the binding of nelfinavir and active M8 to alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) and human serum albumin (HSA), and to examine the displacement effects of drugs binding extensively to AAG (ritonavir and saquinavir) or to HSA (salicylic acid and valproic acid). METHODS: Free drugs were separated by equilibrium dialysis after incubation with human plasma or purified plasma proteins and after co-incubation with potential displacers. Association constants were estimated from double-reciprocal plots of the data. RESULTS: Nelfinavir and M8 free fractions [fractions of unbound drug (fus)] were 0.42+/-0.08% (mean+/-standard deviation) and 0.64+/-0.07%, respectively. For the two analytes, respectively, association constants were 7.25 x 10(7)/m and 3.33 x 10(7)/m for AAG and 1.11 x 10(6)/m and 7.92 x 10(5)/m for HSA. Nelfinavir fu in an AAG solution was significantly (P < 0.01) increased by the addition of ritonavir or saquinavir, whereas it was unaltered by addition of these drugs to whole plasma. Similarly, fu in an HSA solution was significantly increased (P < 0.01) by the addition of salicylic acid or valproic acid, whereas there was no difference in the free fraction in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: The affinity of nelfinavir for human plasma proteins was higher than that of M8, and both nelfinavir and M8 showed higher affinity to AAG than to HSA. The free fraction of nelfinavir was not affected by drugs that bind extensively to AAG or albumin when these drugs were added to whole plasma in combination, suggesting a compensatory effect of alternate binding proteins.     

Effect of nelfinavir on insulin metabolism, proteasome activity and protein degradation in HepG2 cells

HIV-1 protease inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of HIV infection, but their use has been associated with lipodystrophy and insulin resistance. One suggestion for this has been the inhibition of insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE). We have previously demonstrated that insulin, through IDE, can inhibit the proteasome, thus decreasing cytosolic protein degradation. We examined whether the protease inhibitor nelfinavir inhibited IDE and its effect on protein degradation both in vitro and in whole cells. 125I-Insulin degradation was measured by trichloroacetic acid precipitation. Proteasome activities were measured using fluorogenic peptide substrates. Cellular protein degradation was measured by prelabelling cells with 3H-leucine and determining the release of TCA-soluble radioactivity. Nelfinavir inhibited IDE in a concentration-dependent manner with 50% inhibition at the maximal concentration tested, 100 microm. Similarly, the chymotrypsin-like and trypsin-like activities of the proteasome were decreased with an IC50 of approximately 3 microm. The ability of insulin to inhibit the proteasome was abrogated by nelfinavir. Treatment of HepG2 cells with 50 microm nelfinavir decreased 125I-insulin degradation and increased cell-associated radioactivity. Insulin alone maximally decreased protein degradation by 15%. Addition of 50 microm nelfinavir inhibited cellular protein degradation by 14% and blunted the effect of insulin. These data show that nelfinavir inhibits IDE, decreases insulin's ability to inhibit protein degradation via the proteasome and provides another possible mechanism for the insulin resistance seen in protease inhibitor-treated HIV patients.     

Inhibition of intracellular hepatitis C virus replication by nelfinavir and synergistic effect with interferon-α

Summary.  Liver diseases associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have become the major cause of mortality in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection since the introduction of highly active anti-retroviral therapy. HCV-related liver disease is more severe in HIV-infected patients than in non-HIV-infected patients, but the standard therapies used to treat chronic hepatitis C in HCV/HIV coinfected patients are the same as those for patients infected with HCV alone. HIV protease inhibitors might have potential to down-regulate HCV load of HCV/HIV coinfected patients. In this study, we evaluated the effects of nelfinavir on intracellular HCV replication using the HCV replicon system. We constructed an HCV replicon expressing a neomycin-selectable chimeric firefly luciferase reporter protein. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induced by nelfinavir were assessed and synergism between nelfinavir and interferon (IFN) was calculated using CalcuSyn analysis. Nelfinavir dose-dependently repressed HCV replication at low concentrations (IC₅₀, 9.88 μmol/L). Nelfinavir failed to induce cytotoxicity or apoptosis at concentrations that inhibited HCV replication. Clinical concentrations of nelfinavir (5 μmol/L) combined with IFN showed synergistic inhibition of HCV replication in our replicon model. Our results suggest that the direct effects of nelfinavir on the HCV subgenome and its synergism with IFN could improve clinical responses to IFN therapy in HCV/HIV coinfected patients.     

Nelfinavir mesylate

Nelfinavir is an inhibitor of the HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease, with good in vivo activity in HIV-infected patients. Nelfinavir is used in combination with other antiretroviral medications as part of a potent antiretroviral regimen. When used in this manner, 50 - 75% of patients who are naïve to antiretroviral therapy have plasma HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection (<< 400 copies) after 12 months of treatment. This use of nelfinavir in combination regimens is associated with an increase of almost 200/mm³ CD4+ lymphocytes at 12 months of therapy. Initial trials and clinical experience indicate that nelfinavir is equipotent to other potent protease inhibitors (PIs). The drug is well-tolerated, with mild diarrhoea being the most common side effect in 12 - 20% of patients. Virologic failure of nelfinavir is associated with genotypic and phenotypic changes that have a unique pattern that may retain susceptibility to other PIs. The results of small, non-controlled trials suggest these failures can be rescued with a second protease-based regimen. Due to the above characteristics, nelfinavir has become the most frequently prescribed first line PI.     

Effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on nelfinavir to M8 biotransformation in HIV patients

Aims

To evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on nelfinavir and M8 pharmacokinetic variability in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and to study the link between pharmacokinetic exposure and short-term efficacy and toxicity.

Methods

Nelfinavir (n = 120) and M8 (n = 119) concentrations were measured in 34 protease inhibitor-naïve patients. Two weeks after initiating the treatment, blood samples were taken before, 1, 3 and 6 h after drug administration. Genotyping for CYP3A4, 3A5, 2C19 and MDR1 was performed. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe nelfinavir-M8 concentration time-courses and to estimate interpatient variability. The influence of individual characteristics and genotypes were tested using a likelihood ratio test. Estimated mean (C_mean), maximal (C_max) and trough (C_trough) nelfinavir and M8 concentrations were correlated to short-term virological efficacy and tolerance using Spearman nonparametric correlation tests.

Results

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption, elimination and metabolism to M8 best described nelfinavir data. M8 was modelled by an additional compartment. Mean pharmacokinetic estimates and the corresponding intersubject variabilities were: absorption rate 0.17 h⁻¹ (99%), absorption lag time 0.82 h, apparent nelfinavir total clearance 52 l h⁻¹ (49%), apparent nelfinavir volume of distribution 191 l, M8 elimination rate constant 1.76 h⁻¹ and nelfinavir to M8 0.39 h⁻¹ (59%) in *1/*1 patients and 0.20 h⁻¹ in *1/*2 or *2/*2 patients for CYP2C19*2. Nelfinavir C_mean was positively correlated to glycaemia and triglyceride increases (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively).

Conclusions

The rate of metabolism of nelfinavir to M8 was reduced by 50% in patients with *1/*2 or *2/*2 genotype for CYP2C19 compared with those with *1/*1 genotype.

What is already known about this subject

• Nelfinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor, substrate of the transporter P-glycoprotein and metabolized via CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 enzymes.
• Pharmacokinetic studies have shown wide interindividual variability of nelfinavir concentrations, some of this variability perhaps caused by variant drug metabolism or transporter genes.
• For CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 polymorphism, results from three studies are in agreement, showing no difference in nelfinavir concentrations between patients with these different genotypes.
• However, for MDR1 and CYP2C19 polymorphism, there have been contradictory studies, showing either no impact on nelfinavir concentration or modified concentrations which could influence virological response.

What this study adds

• Patients with an *1/*2 or *2/*2 genotype for CYP2C19 had a nelfinavir to M8 biotransformation divided by 2 compared with *1/*1 patients.
• No evidence of any influence of MDR1 polymorphism on nelfinavir absorption could be detected.