氯米帕明和米氮平治疗抑郁症的疗效比较

目的比较氯米帕明和米氮平治疗抑郁症的疗效。方法80例门诊抑郁症患者随机分为氯米帕明和米氮平治疗组,疗程8周,用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD),临床疗效总评量表(CGI)和副反应症状量表(TESS)在治疗前及治疗后第2、4、8周末行评定。结果治疗8周后氯米帕明组和米氮平组HAMD减分率分别为71．89%和71．74%,两组治疗前、后比较差异均有显著性(P＜0．01),但两组间比较差异无显著性(P＞0．05)。氯米帕明副反应发生率33．25%,米氮平22．21%两组间比较差异有显著性(P＜0．05)。结论米氮平治疗抑郁症疗效与氯米帕明相当,副反应轻。     

米氮平与氯丙咪嗪治疗抑郁和焦虑共病的疗效对照

目的比较米氮平、氯丙咪嗪抗抑郁和焦虑的共病作用和不良反应。方法65例同时符合抑郁症与焦虑障碍诊断标准的门诊患者,HAMD17项评分总分≥17分,≤23分、HAMA总分≥14分, ≤29分。分别随机给予口服米氮平(简称A组)和氯丙咪嗪(简称B组)。研究全程为期4周。疗效评定按HAMD、HAMA得分≤7分为治愈,减分50％为有效。数据进行X2及t检验。结果入组时两组 HAMD、HAMA得分无显著性差异(t=0．32,P>0．05),治疗第1周A组HAMD得分下降比B组明显, HAMA得分下降更为明显。治疗第2周开始A组HAMD、HAMA得分下降均比B组来的显著。第4周末A组临床治愈18例(56．3％,18／32),临床有效28例(87．5％,28／32)。B组临床治愈15例(45．5％, 15／33)临床有效27例(81．9％,27／33)。米氮平组有效率87．5％,氯丙咪嗪组有效率81．9％,无显著性差异(X2分别为0．76、0．40,P>0．05)。B组的不良反应例数及严重程度均远高于A组。结论对具有抑郁和焦虑共病的患者可用米氮平治疗。     

米氮平对海洛因依赖者脱毒期及脱毒后焦虑抑郁及渴求的影响

目的:了解米氮平对海洛因依赖者脱毒期及脱毒后的焦虑抑郁及心理渴求影响的疗效.方法:对符合DSM-Ⅳ阿片类依赖诊断标准的患者在美沙酮(MTD)脱毒治疗时随机抽取50例MTD联合米氮平治疗(A组)和50例MTD加安慰剂治疗(B组),进行对比观察.使用HAMD,HAMA及心理渴求自评量表来评定两组病人治疗前后的焦虑抑郁及心理渴求的情况.结果:MTD联合米氮平治疗组较MTD联合安慰剂治疗组焦虑抑郁及心理渴求评分明显减少,且差异显著(P＜0.01).结论:米氮平可有效的减轻海洛因依赖者在脱毒期及脱毒后的焦虑抑郁及心理渴求.     

度洛西汀联合米氮平治疗肺癌化疗患者抑郁的临床研究

目的研究合并抑郁的肺癌化疗患者应用抗抑郁药物干预后的效果及不良反应。方法分别将经我院心理科医师协助诊断为抑郁的肺癌化疗患者90例随机分成4组:度洛西汀组(22例)、米氮平组(23例)、两药联合组(23例)及对照组(22例),均进行化疗4周期,3周为1个疗程,每个疗程化疗前采用《汉密尔顿抑郁量表》(HAMD)进行评分并比较。结果肺癌化疗患者抑郁患病率46.4%,米氮平组、度洛西汀组及两药联用组患者随治疗时间推移抑郁评分均有所减低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且两药联用组抑郁评分均小于同期其他三组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肺癌化疗患者抑郁患病率高,度洛西汀及米氮平均有缓解肺癌患者上述情绪的作用,且两药合用效果更显著。     

Rapid improvement in post-infectious gastroparesis symptoms with mirtazapine

We report the case of a 34-year-old woman with severe post-infectious gastroparesis who was transferred from an outside medical facility for a second opinion regarding management.This patient had no prior history of gastrointestinal symptoms.However,in the aftermath of a viral illness,she developed two months of intractable nausea,vomiting,and oral intake intolerance that resulted in numerous hospitalizations for dehydration and electrolyte disturbances.A solid-phase gastric emptying scan had confirmed delayed emptying,confirming gastroparesis.Unfortunately,conventional pro-kinetic agents and numerous anti-emetic drugs provided little or no relief of the patient’s symptoms.At our institution,the patient experienced a cessation of vomiting,reported a significant reduction in nausea,and toler-ated oral intake shortly after taking mirtazapine.Based on mirtazapine’s primary action as a serotonin(5-HT)1a receptor agonist,we infer that this receptor system mediated the clinical improvement through a combination of peripheral and central neural mechanisms.This report highlights the potential utility of 5-HT1a agonists in the management of nausea and vomiting.We conclude that mirtazapine may be effective in treating symptoms associated with non-diabetic gastroparesis that are refractory to conventional therapies.     

米氮平联合奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊治疗难治性腹泻型肠易激综合征的疗效观察

目的：观察米氮平联合奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊治疗难治性腹泻型肠易激综合征（RIBS-D）的临床疗效。方法：82例RIBS-D患者随机分为试验组（43例）与对照组（39例）,两组均给奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊,试验组加服米氮平,对照组加服安慰剂,疗程4周。结果：试验组与对照组的总有效率分别为95.35％、12.82％（P＜0.01）;试验组焦虑及抑郁评分较对照组显著降低,生活质量评分较对照组显著升高,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。结论：米氮平联合奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊治疗RIBS-D患者,能明显改善症状、焦虑抑郁状态及生活质量,十分安全。     

米氮平与舍曲林治疗抑郁症对照研究

目的：评价米氮平与舍曲林治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法90例抑郁症患者随机分为研究组和对照组,每组45例,研究组给予米氮平治疗,对照组给予舍曲林治疗。于治疗前及治疗1、2、4、6周末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)及临床总体印象量表(CGI-SI)评定临床疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果研究组总有效率为86.7%,对照组总有效率为84.4%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组CGI-SI评分较治疗前均有显著下降(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组HAMD评分均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),且研究组治疗第1、2周末HAMD总分和对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他时点评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组不良反应较对照组更少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论米氮平与舍曲林,总体疗效相当,米氮平起效更快,不良反应更少。     

九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平治疗对功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者的疗效及安全性分析

目的 探讨九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平治疗功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法 收集2017年7月～2018年12月于台州市第二人民医院精神科就诊的112例功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者作为观察对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组56例。对照组予米氮平治疗,观察组予九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平治疗。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项目(HAMD)进行抑郁临床疗效评价。8周疗程结束后,比较两组的临床疗效、HAMD评分、消化不良症状积分及不良反应。结果 8周疗程结束后,临床疗效显示,观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组(91.1%vs 76.8%,P0.05)。治疗前,对照组和观察组患者HAMD评分比较无统计学差异[(26.5±4.7)分vs (27.3±4.2)分,P0.05)]。治疗后,与对照组比较,观察组患者HAMD评分降低(10.9±2.4分vs 15.8±3.1分),消化不良症状程度积分和频次积分降低[(1.14±0.41)分vs (1.92±0.60)分,(1.02±0.39)分vs (1.83±0.55)分],差异有统计学意义(P均0.05)]。治疗过程中,两组患者均未出现严重不良反应病例。对照组和观察组患者不良反应发生率比较,无统计学差异(21.4%vs 28.6%,P0.05)。结论 九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平是功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者的有效治疗方案,抑郁治疗有效率高,能够明显改善消化不良症状,且药物安全性好。     

Mirtazapine versus paroxetine in panic disorder: an open study

Introduction

Open studies suggest that mirtazapine has efficacy in panic disorder treatment. We designed an open study that evaluates changes induced by mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in panic disorder.

Methodology

Patients 18–65 years old consecutively referred to a psychiatry liaison service with panic disorder (DSM-IV criteria) were offered either mirtazapine or paroxetine treatment.

Results

There were statistically significant reductions from baseline to week 3 and from week 3 to 8 for mirtazapine and paroxetine groups for: number of panic attacks, Beck Anxiety or Depression Inventory (BAI, BDI) Clinical Global Impresion (CGI) of panic disorder severity and CGI of panic disorder response (these variables were evaluated by the patient, the clinician or a blind evaluator). Responders at week 3 (BAI decrease of 50%) were 83% for the mirtazapine group and 84% for the paroxetine group. Responders at week 8 (number of panic attacks equal to 0) were 77% for the mirtazapine group and 73% for the paroxetine group Statistically significant differences between mirtazapine and paroxetine were found for number of panic attacks at weeks 3 and 8 and BAI at week 3, suggesting a faster response for mirtazapine. Responders at week 8 maintained a no recurrence figure of 95% at follow-up 6 months later. Panic disorder either with or without comorbid depression improved in both groups of treatment.

Discussion

Our study supports the hypothesis that mirtazapine has efficacy in the treatment of panic disorder either with or without comorbid depression.     

米氮平早期干预对轻度胰腺癌恶液质模型进食和营养状况的影响

目的:探讨抗抑郁药米氮平早期干预对轻度胰腺癌恶液质模型进食量和营养状况的影响.方法:21只胰腺癌裸鼠皮下移植瘤模型随机分为对照组(A组)、米氮平早期干预组(B组)、米氮平后期治疗组(C组),每组7只.B、C组分别在术后第1天和第10天开始以米氮平10mg/(kg.d),灌胃,术后第10、13、16天,3组动物分别腹腔注射吉西他滨(50mg/kg).术后第28天处死裸鼠,比较3组动物体质量、进食量、肿瘤体积、皮下脂肪和臂围的变化.结果:3组胰腺癌移植瘤体积、皮下脂肪和臂围无明显差异(P>0.05).第4周B组进食量显著高于A组和C组(P<0.05);第25天B组体质量(18.05g±0.68g)显著高于A组(17.24g±0.53g,P<0.05),稍高于C组(17.65g±0.60g,P>0.05).结论:米氮平早期干预能显著改善轻度胰腺癌相关恶液质模型的进食量,并能在一定程度上延缓恶液质进程.