Asthma control and quality of life in a real-life setting: a cross-sectional study of adult asthma patients in Japan (ACQUIRE-2)

Objective: The level of asthma control in adult asthma patients receiving treatment in clinical practice from allergy and/or respiratory specialists in Japan remains unclear. We conducted the ACQUIRE-2 study (NCT02640742) to evaluate level of asthma control, asthma symptoms, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and reliever medication use in this setting. Methods: This observational study was undertaken between December 2015 and June 2016 in 58 medical institutions across Japan. We enrolled outpatients aged ≥20?years diagnosed with asthma for ≥1?year who were being managed by specialists. Criteria to evaluate the level of asthma control were based on modified definitions of the Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline 2015, Japan (JGL 2015) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2012. Asthma symptoms, HR-QoL, and reliever medication use were also evaluated. Results: Of 1250 enrolled patients, 1175 were analyzed, 62.9% of whom were women. Mean (± standard deviation) age and duration of asthma were 59.7?±?14.5?years and 16.9?±?14.0?years, respectively. Using JGL 2015-based criteria, 24.4%, 69.2%, and 6.5% of patients had well-controlled, insufficiently-controlled, and poorly-controlled asthma, respectively. Using GINA-based criteria, 35.1%, 49.8%, and 15.1% of patients had controlled, partly controlled, and uncontrolled asthma, respectively. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms were experienced by 51.5% and 44.9% of patients, respectively. The mean MiniAQLQ score was 5.8?±?1.0 (7-point scale). Conclusions: Asthma was not well-controlled in the majority of patients in this study. To achieve better asthma control, improvements in symptom monitoring and management may be required.     

A questionnaire validated using local treatment guidelines may better predict future asthma risk: MARGIN study

BackgroundAsthma patients often feel satisfied with their current treatment, even when they have been diagnosed as uncontrolled by physicians. The present study investigated the differences in the evaluation of asthma control levels between patients and physicians, and the prediction of future risks.MethodsAsthma patients receiving inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-2 agonists for 4 weeks or more were enrolled and followed-up for 24 weeks. Asthma control levels were evaluated using the following guidelines: Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline, Japan (JGL) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) by physicians, and the Japan Asthma Control Survey (JACS) and a 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6) by patients, at weeks 0 and 24. Analysis for predictive factors influencing exacerbation was performed using JGL, GINA, JACS, and ACQ6 at week 0.ResultsA total of 420 patients were enrolled. Comparison of the distribution of asthma control levels assessed by physicians and patients showed no statistically significant difference between JGL and JACS (P = 0.19), suggesting a symmetric distribution, while ACQ6 demonstrated a significant difference versus JGL and GINA (both P < 0.001). The predictive factors for exacerbation were unscheduled visits based on GINA (rate ratio; 0.25, 95% CI; 0.14, 0.44), and the use of oral steroids on 3 consecutive days based on JGL (rate ratio; 0.42, 95% CI 0.22, 0.82) and JACS (rate ratio; 0.22, 95% CI; 0.13, 0,40).ConclusionsOur study suggests that evaluation based on treatment guidelines and the questionnaire validated according to the local treatment guidelines is important for improved assessment of asthma control levels and the reduction of future risk.Clinical trial registration numberUMIN000030419.