A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study.

AIMS: Uncertainty exists as to which reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) is optimal. We evaluated whether optimal pharmacologic therapy at the earliest point of care, emphasizing pre-hospital randomization and treatment was non-inferior to expeditious primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy (WEST) was a four-city Canadian, open-label, randomized, feasibility study of 304 STEMI patients (> 4 mm ST-elevation/deviation) within 6 h of symptom onset, emphasizing pre-hospital ambulance treatment and participation of community and tertiary care centres. All received aspirin, subcutaneous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg), and were randomized to one of three groups: (A) tenecteplase (TNK) and usual care, (B) TNK and mandatory invasive study < or = 24 h, including rescue PCI for reperfusion failure, and (C) primary PCI with 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Time from symptom onset to treatment was rapid (to TNK for A = 113 and B = 130 min and for PCI in C = 176 min). The primary outcome, a composite of 30-day death, re-infarction, refractory ischaemia, congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and major ventricular arrhythmia, was 25% (Group A), 24% (Group B), and 23% (Group C), respectively. However, there was a higher frequency of the combination of death and recurrent MI in Group A vs. Group C (13.0 vs. 4.0%, respectively, P-logrank = 0.021), yet no difference between Group B (6.7%, P-logrank = 0.378) and C. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a contemporary pharmacologic regimen rapidly delivered, coupled with a strategy of regimented rescue and routine coronary intervention within 24 h of initial treatment, may not be different from timely expert PCI.     

扎鲁司特对儿童运动性哮喘疗效分析

目的 探讨扎鲁司特对儿童运动性哮喘的治疗作用。方法 选取40例运动性哮喘患儿，随机分为两组，治疗组予扎鲁司特口服。对两组分别进行运动激发试验．并监测FEV1变化。结果 运动激发后，两组患儿FEV1均有明显下降，但对照组降低幅度较治疗组显著，且运动激发后FEV1恢复时间较长。结论 扎鲁司特对儿童运动性哮喘有较好的治疗作用。     

Augmented Vector Right ST-Segment Elevation: Pearls and Pitfalls

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is characterized by ST-segment elevation in at least 2 contiguous leads, chest discomfort, and the release of biomarkers requiring emergent revascularization. In 2013, the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association revised STEMI guidelines to include augmented vector right (aVR) ST-segment elevation to be treated as a STEMI equivalent. However, aVR ST-segment elevation with multilead ST depression can occur in presentations other than occlusive myocardial infarctions. The purpose of this clinical feature is to provide a brief review of aVR ST-segment elevation, explore approaches to clinical decision making, and provide tools to support nurse practitioners caring for patients with cardiac issues.     

How to detect young athletes at risk of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction?

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a prevalent condition in elite athletes caused by transient airway narrowing during or after exercise. Young athletes nowadays start early to perform high level exercise, highlighting the need to screen for EIB in a younger population. The purpose of this review is to evaluate current evidence of pre-tests with high probability to predict a positive provocation test in young and adolescent athletes, aged 12–24 years and thus indicate whether a young athlete is at risk of having EIB. Up to now, there is no validated screening test available to increase the pre-test probability of a provocation test of EIB in young and adolescent athletes. We would recommend that a clinical guideline committee might consider the development of a flow chart to screen for EIB in adolescent athletes. It could be composed of a symptom-based questionnaire focusing on wheezing during exercise, atopic state, reversibility test (to exclude EIB with asthma) and completed with markers in blood/serum. However, more research is necessary.     

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in acute coronary syndrome

Compared with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to reduce the rates of death and recurrent ischemia in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In the current interventional era, both drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) have been widely used, despite the fact that the use of DES in the context of ACS was initially an “off-label” indication and that ACS has been associated with stent thrombosis (ST). In contrast to the wealth of data available for the use of DES in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, data regarding the performance of DES in non–ST-elevation ACS is restricted to a handful of registries with conflicting data. The aim of this review was to summarize the safety and efficacy of DES in the entire spectrum of ACS.