参附注射液对家兔心脏骤停-心肺复苏模型循环恢复的影响

目的观察参附注射液对家兔缺氧型心脏骤停-心肺复苏 (CA- CPR)模型循环恢复的影响.方法 30只家兔随机分为三组,每组 10只;夹闭气管复制缺氧型 CA- CPR模型.预防组 (A组 )夹管前 10min、自主循环恢复后 8、 15min分别静注参附注射液,治疗组 (B组 )自主循环恢复后 8、 15、 22min静注参附注射液,对照组 (C组 )静注生理盐水,时间同 A组;监测夹管前后家兔的心电图、平均动脉压 (PAP)的变化,并记录开始 CPR至自主循环恢复时间和自主呼吸恢复时间、肾上腺素用量、撤呼吸机时间;自主循环维持 4h,并计算 4h存活率.结果三组 CPR成功率、 4h存活率相近;在自主循环恢复时间方面 A组明显快于 C组,在自主呼吸维持时间、肾上腺素用量、撤呼吸机时间方面则两组相近.结论参附注射液可明显缩短家兔缺氧型 CA- CPR模型的自主循环恢复时间,对促进 CA的循环恢复具有积极意义.     

The Evolution of Abdominal Compression in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Objective: To review the history of external abdominal compression as an adjunct to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), tracking the development of five major themes over the course of the 20th century: 1) augmentation of peripheral resistance by physical means, 2) risk of hepatic injury with abdominal compression, 3) counterpulsation vs sustained compression, 4) the abdominal pump mechanism, and 5) contact compression techniques.
Methods: Literature retrieved from successive MEDLINE English-language searches was reviewed with a special emphasis on work and concepts highlighted by participants at the First Purdue Conference on Interposed Abdominal Compression-CPR, September 1992.
Results: External abdominal compression of one form or another has been studied as a means of resuscitation by many investigators throughout the 20th century. Experimental and clinical studies have shown generally consistent evidence of hemodynamic augmentation by abdominal compression during various forms of CPR. Recent advances include a modified theoretical understanding of hemodynamic mechanisms and demonstration of clinical potential in humans. Inconsistencies in published results may be due to differences in mechanical techniques of abdominal compression. Based on these studies, a modified manual technique for "contact compression" of the abdominal aorta is recommended.
Conclusions: A technique for left-of-center, angled compression of the abdominal aorta against the crest of the spine is recommended. Further well-supervised and controlled clinical trials using this standardized technique are warranted as a prelude to more widespread clinical application of abdominal compression in CPR.     

Abdominal Pumping

This article reviews the author's experience with a form of interposed abdominal compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IAC-CPR) in the United Kingdom. The development of the technique based upon animal resuscitation, including the use of phasic compression (abdominal pumping) for the resuscitation of rats from 30 minutes of cardiac arrest due to hypothermia, is reviewed. A simple technique for clinical use is described. The technique uses a hard-covered book or bean-shaped board applied to the abdomen below the umbilicus and compressed alternately with cardiac massage while respiration is assisted. Anecdotal clinical results suggest that further controlled clinical investigation is warranted.     

听骨链多层螺旋CT曲面重建及临床应用

目的研究听骨链的CT曲面重建(CPR)方法,评估其临床应用价值。方法165耳(122例)行颞骨轴位高分辨率CT检查,对听骨链行CPR。50例(80耳)为正常听骨链,72例(85耳)为病变组。主要扫描参数:准直0.5mm,螺距0.875,重建间隔0.2~0.3mm,重建矩阵1024×1024。结果(1)正常听骨链组:1幅图像上清晰显示3个听骨及其关节。(2)临床应用:39例颞骨外伤中,听骨链异常的18例;锤砧关节半脱位及脱位各5例,砧镫关节半脱位及脱位分别为5例及6例,锤骨柄骨折1例。16例外耳发育不良中,骨性外耳道闭锁13例,膜性3例。骨性外耳道闭锁最常见的伴随听骨畸形是锤骨柄发育不全(10例),中耳腔变窄、听骨缺如3例,锤砧融合伴砧骨长突缺如1例。不伴随先天性外耳发育不良的听骨畸形2例,1例为双耳砧骨长突缺如,另1例为砧骨长突发育不全伴砧镫关节不连。慢性中耳乳突炎15例,6例合并胆脂瘤者听骨均有不同程度的破坏,鼓室硬化症1例。结论听骨链的多层螺旋CT曲面重建是诊断传导性耳聋的有效方法。     

肝外胆管梗阻病变MSCT曲面重建胆管成像与MRCP的比较研究

目的比较多层螺旋CT（MSCT）曲面重建（CPR）胆管成像与磁共振胰胆管成像（MRCP）对肝外胆管梗阻病变的诊断价值。方法66例经B超检查提示有肝外胆管梗阻病变的患者，采用单次激发快速自旋回波（SSFSE）序列，行MRCP检查，同期采用10mm层厚层距，使用血管对比剂，行MSCT增强扫描，将门静脉期图像采用2．5mm层厚、1．25mm层距重建，获得轴面源像（ASI），数据传输至图像工作站，作CPR胆管成像。比较CPR胆管成像、MRCP对肝外胆管梗阻病变的定位、定性诊断价值。结果CPR胆管成像、MRCP成功率为100％；CPR胆管成像、MRCP均对肝外胆管梗阻部位做出明确诊断，定位诊断率为100％；CPR胆管成像、MRCP定性诊断率分别为95．5％和80．9％。结论CPR胆管成像、MRCP对肝外胆管梗阻病变均能明确定位，CPR胆管成像定性诊断率明显高于MRCP，CPR胆管成像显示胆管及其周围病变与扩张胆管的关系更直观。     

235例院前急救分析

目的　探讨院前急救的特点。方法　回顾性分析 2 35例院前急救的疾病分类及心肺复苏(CPR)成功率状况。结果　需现场急救的疾病前 3位是脑血管疾病、外科急症、心血管疾病 ,分别占 2 6 38%、2 3 38%和 17 4 5 % ;现场需CPR者 5 3例 ,4 0～ 4 5岁以下以车祸、坠楼、中毒、意外居多 ,6 0岁以上以心、脑血管疾病为主 ,CPR成功率低 ,仅 5 6 6 % ,主要与CPR开始时间延迟相关。结论　院前急救的重点是心、脑血管疾病和外伤 ;缩短CPR开始时间 ,提高CPR抢救成功率     

Evaluating Barriers to Bystander CPR among Laypersons before and after Compression-only CPR Training

Objective: Bystander CPR is an essential part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. EMS and public safety jurisdictions have embraced initiatives to teach compression-only CPR to laypersons in order to increase rates of bystander CPR. We examined barriers to bystander CPR amongst laypersons participating in community compression-only CPR training and the ability of the training to alleviate these barriers. The barriers analyzed include fear of litigation, risk of disease transmission, fear of hurting someone as a result of doing CPR when unnecessary, and fear of hurting someone as a result of doing CPR incorrectly. Methods: Laypersons attending community compression-only CPR training were administered surveys before and after community CPR training. Data were analyzed via standard statistical analyses. Results: A total of 238 surveys were collected and analyzed between September 2015 and January 2016. The most common reported motivation for attending CPR training was “to be prepared/just in case” followed by “infant or child at home.” Respondents reported that they were significantly more likely to perform CPR on a family member than a stranger in both pre-and post-training responses. Nevertheless, reported self-confidence in and likelihood of doing CPR on both family and strangers increased from pre-training to post-training. There was a statistically significant decrease in reported likelihood of all four barriers to prevent respondents from performing bystander CPR when pre-training responses were compared to post-training responses. Previous CPR training and history of having witnessed a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) were both associated with decreased barriers to CPR, but previous training had no effect on reported likelihood of or confidence in performing CPR. Conclusion: The training initiative studied significantly reduced the reported likelihood of all barriers studied to prevent respondents from performing bystander CPR and also increased the reported confidence in doing CPR and likelihood of doing CPR on both strangers and family. However, it did not alleviate the pre-training discrepancy between likelihood of performing CPR on strangers versus family. Previous CPR training or certification had no impact on likelihood of or confidence in performing CPR.