复方醋酸环丙孕酮和罗格列酮序贯用药对氯米芬抵抗的多囊卵巢综合征患者内分泌及生育功能的影响

目的探讨复方醋酸环丙孕酮和罗格列酮序贯用药对改善多囊卵巢综合征（PCOS）患者生育功能的临床疗效。方法30例氯米芬抵抗的PCOS胰岛素抵抗患者，口服复方醋酸环丙孕酮3个月后，罗格列酮联合氯米芬用药6个月，比较用药前后体重指数、月经周期、生殖激素水平、排卵率、妊娠率、血糖和胰岛素水平的变化。结果与用药前相比，服用复方醋酸环丙孕酮后，雄激素水平和LH／FSH值明显降低（P〈0．05），服用罗格列酮后，胰岛素抵抗指数（Homa IR）、胰岛素分泌指数（Homa β）以及β细胞功能评定指数（MBCI）均较用药前降低（P〈0．05）。结论复方醋酸环丙孕酮和罗格列酮序贯用药可有效地抑制氯米芬抵抗的PCOS患者的高雄激素血症，改善胰岛素抵抗及生育功能。     

二甲双胍和罗格列酮对肥胖型PCOS治疗作用的对照性研究

目的观察罗格列酮和二甲双胍联合氯米芬治疗肥胖型多囊卵巢综合征患者的内分泌改善及生殖功能的临床疗效。方法50例肥胖型PCOS患者分别给予罗格列酮4mg/d和二甲双胍1500mg/d联合氯米芬100mg/d,治疗3个月,比较治疗前后体重指数、内分泌参数、腰臀比和Hom a IR的变化。结果用罗格列酮治疗后排卵率为88%,周期排卵率为64.29%,优势卵泡平均个数为1.8±0.8个,妊娠率为56%,而用二甲双胍治疗后分别为72%、54.84%、1.1±0.6个、48%。两者治疗后能使LH、LH/FSH、T的血清浓度明显下降,SHBG的浓度明显上升,Hom a IR明显改善。结论罗格列酮和二甲双胍联合氯米芬治疗肥胖型多囊卵巢综合征疗效可靠。二甲双胍有降低体重作用、价格便宜,适用于肥胖型P-COS伴胰岛素抵抗不严重者;罗格列酮在胰岛素增敏作用优于二甲双胍,适用于胰岛素抵抗较严重的PCOS患者。     

国产罗格列酮胶囊在健康人体的相对生物利用度

目的研究健康受试者口服罗格列酮胶囊的药代动力学。方法20名健康受试者随机服用罗格列酮受试和参比制剂各4mg,用HPLC-MS法测定血浆中罗格列酮的浓度。结果经3P97程序处理,主要药代动力学参数如下。罗格列酮胶囊剂:t1/2为(5.18±0.84)h,AUC0-24h为(2.13±0.21)μg·h·mL-1,Cmax为(305.31±38.21)ng·mL-1,tmax为(1.1±0.4)h;罗格列酮片剂:t1/2为(5.10±0.64)h,AUC0-24h为(2.20±0.20)μg·h·mL-1,Cmax为(318.84±38.38)ng·mL-1,tmax为(1.2±0.3)h。罗格列酮受试和参比制剂的相对生物利用度为(97.6±12.7)%。结论2制剂具有生物等效性。     

Rosiglitazone may reduce thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes

Abstract

Background. Whether rosiglitazone use in patients with type 2 diabetes may affect thyroid cancer risk has not been investigated.

Methods. The reimbursement databases of all diabetic patients under oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin from 1996 to 2009 were retrieved from the National Health Insurance of Taiwan. An entry date was set at 1 January 2006, and 887,665 patients with type 2 diabetes were followed for thyroid cancer incidence until the end of 2009 for ever-users, never-users, and subgroups of rosiglitazone exposure using tertile cut-offs for time since starting rosiglitazone, duration of therapy, and cumulative dose. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression.

Results. There were 103,224 ever-users and 784,441 never-users, with respective numbers of incident thyroid cancer of 84 (0.08%) and 764 (0.10%), and respective incidence of 23.12 and 28.09 per 100,000 person-years. The overall multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio was not significant. However, in dose-response analyses, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were significant for the third tertile of duration of therapy (≥ 14 months) and cumulative dose (≥ 1,800 mg) for age ≥ 50 years: 0.53 (0.31–0.89) and 0.50 (0.29–0.87), respectively.

Conclusions. This study suggests that rosiglitazone use in patients with type 2 diabetes may reduce the risk of thyroid cancer.     

噻唑烷二酮类药物对氯米芬抵抗型的多囊卵巢综合征不孕患者治疗有效性的Meta分析

目的:系统评价罗格列酮、吡格列酮等噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZD)治疗氯米芬(CC)抵抗型多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不孕患者的疗效。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、维普、生物医学文献、万方等数据库,检索时间截止至2015年1月。由两名评价者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入4个随机对照研究,222例CC抵抗型PCOS不孕患者。Meta分析结果表明,TZD组在排卵率、妊娠率、成熟卵泡数、改善卵泡刺激素(FSH)、黄体生成素(LH)、睾酮(T)方面均优于对照组,其中提高排卵率[MD=2.14;95%CI(1.16,3.95),P=0.02]、妊娠率[MD=2.02;95%CI(1.14,3.58),P=0.02]、增加成熟卵泡数[MD=0.82;95%CI(0.61,1.04),P<0.01]及降低LH值[MD=-1.18;95%CI(-1.76,-0.60),P<0.01]等4个结局指标的两组间差异具有统计学意义。结论:对于生育要求较强、经济条件好且胰岛素抵抗较严重的CC抵抗型PCOS患者,可首选TZD预治疗。     

Initial treatment with fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone/glimepiride in patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes

Aim: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of fixed‐dose combination (FDC) rosiglitazone (RSG) plus glimepiride (GLIM) compared with RSG or GLIM monotherapy in drug‐naive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Drug‐naive subjects (n = 901) were enrolled into this 28‐week, double‐blind, parallel‐group study if their glycosylated haemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) was >7.5% but ≤12%. Subjects were randomized to receive either GLIM [4 mg once daily (OD) maximal], RSG (8 mg OD maximal) or RSG/GLIM FDC regimen A (4 mg/4 mg OD maximal) or RSG/GLIM FDC regimen B (8 mg/4 mg OD maximal). Patients were assessed for efficacy and safety every 4 weeks for the first 12 weeks of the study, and at weeks 20 and 28. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA_1c from baseline. Key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving recommended HbA_1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) targets; change from baseline in FPG, insulin, C‐reactive protein (CRP), adiponectin, free fatty acids and lipids; and percentage change in homeostasis model assessment‐estimated insulin sensitivity and β‐cell function. Safety evaluations included adverse‐event (AE) monitoring and clinical laboratory evaluations. Results: At week 28, both RSG/GLIM FDC regimens significantly reduced HbA_1c (mean ± s.d.: ?2.4 ± 1.4% FDC regimen A; ?2.5 ± 1.4% FDC regimen B) to a greater extent than RSG (?1.8 ± 1.5%) or GLIM (?1.7 ± 1.4%) monotherapy (model‐adjusted mean treatment difference, p < 0.0001 vs. both RSG and GLIM). Significantly more subjects achieved HbA_1c target levels of ≤6.5 and <7% with either RSG/GLIM FDC regimen compared with RSG or GLIM alone (model‐adjusted odds ratio, p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Similarly, a significantly greater reduction in FPG levels was observed in subjects treated with the RSG/GLIM FDC [mean ± s.d. (mg/dl): ?69.5 ± 57.5 FDC regimen A; ?79.9 ± 56.8 FDC regimen B) compared with RSG (?56.6 ± 58.1) or GLIM (?42.2 ± 66.1) monotherapy (model‐adjusted mean treatment difference, p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Improvement in CRP was also observed in subjects who were treated with a RSG/GLIM FDC or RSG monotherapy compared with GLIM monotherapy. RSG/GLIM FDC was generally well tolerated, with no new safety or tolerability issues identified from its monotherapy components, and a similar AE profile was observed across FDC regimens. The most commonly reported AE was hypoglycaemia, and the incidence of confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia (3.6–5.5%) was comparable among subjects treated with an RSG/GLIM FDC and GLIM monotherapy. Conclusions: Compared with RSG or GLIM monotherapy, the RSG/GLIM FDC improved glycaemic control with no significant increased risk of hypoglycaemia. RSG/GLIM FDC provides an effective and well‐tolerated treatment option for drug‐naive individuals with T2DM.     

Enhancement of insulin-stimulated myocardial glucose uptake in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with rosiglitazone.

AIMS: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) activators have recently been identified as regulators of cellular proliferation, inflammatory responses and lipid and glucose metabolism. These agents prevent coronary arteriosclerosis and improve left ventricular remodelling and function in heart failure after myocardial infarction. Improvement in myocardial metabolic state may be one of the mechanisms behind these findings. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone on myocardial glucose uptake in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Placebo and metformin were used as control treatments. METHODS: Forty-four patients were randomized to treatment with rosiglitazone (4 mg b.i.d.), metformin (1 g b.i.d.) or placebo in a 26-week double-blinded trial. Myocardial glucose uptake was measured using [(18)F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([(18)F]FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET) during euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Rosiglitazone increased insulin-stimulated myocardial glucose uptake by 38% (from 38.7 +/- 3.4 to 53.3 +/- 3.6 micromol 100 g(-1) min(-1), P = 0.004) and whole body glucose uptake by 36% (P = 0.01), while metformin treatment had no significant effect on myocardial (40.5 +/- 3.5 vs. 36.6 +/- 5.2, NS) or whole body glucose uptake. Myocardial work as determined by the rate-pressure-product was similar between the groups. Neither treatment had any significant effect on fasting serum free fatty acids (FFA) but the FFA levels during hyperinsulinaemia were more suppressed in the rosiglitazone group (-47%, P = 0.02). Myocardial glucose uptake correlated inversely to FFA concentrations both before (r =-0.54, P = 0.002) and after (r = -0.43, P = 0.01) the treatment period in the pooled data. Furthermore, the increase in myocardial glucose uptake correlated inversely with interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations (r = -0.58, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the improvement in whole body insulin sensitivity, rosiglitazone treatment enhances insulin stimulated myocardial glucose uptake in patients with Type 2 diabetes, most probably due to its suppression of the serum FFAs.     

Attenuation of islet‐specific T cell responses is associated with C‐peptide improvement in autoimmune type 2 diabetes patients

The clinical efficacy of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPAR‐γ) agonists in cell‐mediated autoimmune diseases results from down‐regulation of inflammatory cytokines and autoimmune effector cells. T cell islet autoimmunity has been demonstrated to be common in patients with phenotypic type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and islet‐specific T cells (T⁺) to be correlated positively with more severe beta cell dysfunction. We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of the PPAR‐γ agonist, rosiglitazone, therapy in autoimmune T2DM patients is due, in part, to the immunosuppressive properties on the islet‐specific T cell responses. Twenty‐six phenotypic T2DM patients positive for T cell islet autoimmunity (T⁺) were identified and randomized to rosiglitazone (n = 12) or glyburide (n = 14). Beta cell function, islet‐specific T cell responses, interleukin (IL)‐12 and interferon (IFN)‐γ responses and islet autoantibodies were followed for 36 months. Patients treated with rosiglitazone demonstrated significant (P < 0·03) down‐regulation of islet‐specific T cell responses, although no change in response to tetanus, a significant decrease (P < 0·05) in IFN‐γ production and significantly (P < 0·001) increased levels of adiponectin compared to glyburide‐treated patients. Glucagon‐stimulated beta cell function was observed to improve significantly (P < 0·05) in the rosiglitazone‐treated T2DM patients coinciding with the down‐regulation of the islet‐specific T cell responses. In contrast, beta cell function in the glyburide‐treated T2DM patients was observed to drop progressively throughout the study. Our results suggest that down‐regulation of islet‐specific T cell autoimmunity through anti‐inflammatory therapy may help to improve beta cell function in autoimmune phenotypic T2DM patients.     

Bone Effects of Rosiglitazone in HIV-Infected Patients With Lipoatrophy

Abstract

Objectives: Thiazoledinediones increase limb fat in HIV+ patients with lipoatrophy. However, their use in the general population has been associated with bone loss and fracture. We sought to determine the effects of rosiglitazone on bone metabolism in HIV-infected patients. Methods: HIV+ patients with lipoatrophy were randomized to rosiglitazone versus placebo for 48 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Limb fat, bone mineral density (BMD), bone formation markers (procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide [P1NP], osteocalcin [OC]) and bone resorption markers (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX]) were measured, along with receptor activator for nuclear factor kappa β ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and inflammatory cytokines. Results: Seventy-one subjects were randomized to rosiglitazone or placebo: 17% female and 51% white. Total BMD did not change significantly in either group. In the rosiglitazone group, P1NP showed statistically significant decreases at 24 and 48 weeks; however, changes compared to placebo were only significant at 24 weeks. OC decreased significantly in the rosiglitazone group at 24 weeks, but there were no between-group differences. CTX, RANKL, or OPG did not change for either group. Multivariable regression within the rosiglitazone arm showed P1NP changes were inversely associated with limb fat changes, protease inhibitors, and tenofovir use. Conclusion: Rosiglitazone use was associated with decreased bone formation, but it did not alter bone resorption or total BMD. The increase in limb fat that accompanies rosiglitazone use appears to be associated with decreased osteoblast activity. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of thiazoledinediones on bone health in HIV-infected persons.