Rizatriptan in the treatment of migraine

Migraine is a common, disabling disorder associated with considerable personal and societal burden. Current guidelines recommend triptans for the acute treatment of migraine unlikely to respond to less effective therapies. Rizatriptan is a second-generation triptan available in tablet or orally disintegrating tablet (wafer) formulations that offers several advantages over other members of its class. Rizatriptan is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and achieves maximum plasma concentrations more quickly than other triptans, providing rapid pain relief. Clinical trials have shown that rizatriptan is at least as effective or superior to other oral migraine-specific agents in the acute treatment of migraine, and has more consistent long-term efficacy across multiple migraine attacks. Rizatriptan has a favorable tolerability profile, and patients have reported greater satisfaction and a preference for rizatriptan over other migraine-specific agents. Improvements in quality of life reported with rizatriptan are consistent with its favorable efficacy and tolerability profiles. Notably, multi-attribute decision models that combine clinical data with patient- and physician-reported treatment preferences have identified rizatriptan as one of three triptans closest to a hypothetical “ideal”. The efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine have thus been well established.     

苯甲酸利扎曲普坦的高效液相色谱分析方法研究

目的:建立苯甲酸利扎曲普坦和有关杂质的HPLC测定方法.方法:采用高效液相色谱法,色谱柱为Zorbax-C18(250mm×4.6mm,5μm).流动相为乙腈-0.02mol·L-1磷酸二氢钾-三乙胺(25:75:0.5,用磷酸调pH 5),流速为1.0mL·min-1,在220nm波长处检测.含量测定采用外标法,杂质检查采用面积归一化法.结果:本品与有关物质能较好分离,苯甲酸利扎曲普坦在0.04～0.4mg·mL-1范围内呈直线关系,最低检测限4ng·mL-1.结论:本方法专属性强,重现性好,用于含量测定和杂质检查.     

高效液相色谱法测定苯甲酸利扎曲普坦片含量及含量均匀度

目的采用高效液相色谱法测定苯甲酸利扎曲普坦片含量及含量均匀度.方法色谱条件为Prodigy ODS C18硅烷键合硅胶填充柱(150 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm);流动相为乙腈-0.025%磷酸二氢钾-三乙胺(36∶264∶1),10%磷酸调pH 5.0;检测波长为225 nm;进样量为20 μL;流速为1.0 mL*min-1.结果在进样量为0.101～1.01 μg,样品浓度和峰面积成良好线性关系,r=0.999 9,平均回收率为101.20%,RSD为2.2%. 结论方法灵敏可靠,选择性高.     

Migraine Treatment With Rizatriptan and Almotriptan: A Crossover Study

Background.— Rizatriptan and almotriptan are effective and well-tolerated triptans that have not been compared directly. Objective.— To evaluate the effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine, in a real-world setting. Methods.— Of a large, multicenter, open-label, crossover study, we conducted a substudy to contrast the effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and almotriptan 12.5 mg for the acute treatment of 2 migraine attacks in a sequential, crossover manner. Time to outcome was assessed using stopwatches. Mean and median times to onset of pain relief (PR) and pain freedom (PF) for rizatriptan and almotriptan were compared. The effect of rizatriptan on times to onset of PR and PF, adjusting for potential confounding factors (treatment sequence, treatment order, and use of rescue medication), was computed via a Cox proportional hazard model. Results.— Out of the 146 patients taking almotriptan as their usual care medication, 79 used stopwatch for both attacks. Significantly more patients taking rizatriptan achieved onset of PR within 2 hours after dosing than those taking almotriptan (88.6% vs 73.4%, P = .007). A higher proportion of patients taking rizatriptan achieved PF within 2 hours after dosing than those taking almotriptan (55.7% vs 45.6%, P = .10). Times to onset of PR and PF were significantly shorter with those patients taking rizatriptan than with those taking almotriptan (median time to PR: 45 vs 60 minutes, P = .002; median time to PF: 100 vs 135 minutes, P = .004). The adjusted proportional hazard ratios (rizatriptan vs almotriptan) for times to onset of PR and PF were 1.51 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.88) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.76), respectively. More patients were very satisfied when treating their attacks with rizatriptan than with almotriptan. Rizatriptan was preferred by most patients. Conclusions.— Times to achieve PR and PF were significantly shorter for patients using rizatriptan, as compared with those using almotriptan.     

苯甲酸利扎曲普坦片的溶出度考察

目的建立苯甲酸利扎曲普坦片的溶出度考察方法,以有效控制药品质量。方法以0.1 mol.L-1HCl为溶媒,搅拌浆转速75 r.min-1,20 min取样,在280 nm处测其吸收度计算溶出量。结果苯甲酸利扎曲普坦在5.28~52.7μg.mL-1吸收度与浓度呈良好线性关系,A=0.014 68C+0.001 629,r=0.999 9,平均加样回收率为99.8%,RSD=0.80%,3批样品的20 min溶出度均在93%以上。结论方法简便、准确,结果可靠。可用于苯甲酸利扎曲普坦片的溶出度测定。     

Rizatriptan 10-mg wafer versus usual nontriptan therapy for migraine: analysis of return to function and patient preference

BACKGROUND: More than half of patients with migraine suffer moderate to severe functional disability during migraine attacks. OBJECTIVE: To compare effects on functional disability at 2 hours after treating a migraine with rizatriptan 10-mg wafer versus usual nontriptan therapy for triptan-na?ve patients with migraine. DESIGN: Open-label, prospective, two-attack study conducted at 111 neurology clinics. METHODS: Adult patients with migraine treated two migraine attacks, the first with their usual nontriptan therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 57%; analgesics, 27%; or ergot derivatives, 16%) and the second with rizatriptan 10-mg wafer. Patients recorded pain intensity and functional disability at the start, and functional disability at 2 hours, as well as the time of return to normal function. RESULTS: A total of 1353 patients, 76% of them female, completed the study and were considered evaluable. During first and second migraine attacks, 55% and 63% of patients, respectively, reported severe disability or requiring bed rest. At 2 hours after treatment, the likelihood of experiencing any disability was more than five times greater after usual nontriptan therapy than after rizatriptan (odds ratio, 5.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.66 to 6.94; P < .001). Rizatriptan was twice as likely to return patients to normal function than usual nontriptan therapy after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.92 to 2.25; P < .001). Assessed over all time points up to 6 hours, the speed of return to normal function was 52% faster after rizatriptan therapy (P < .001). Significantly more patients preferred rizatriptan than usual nontriptan therapy (78.8% vs. 21.2%; P < .001). The most common reasons cited for preference for rizatriptan were faster relief of headache pain and faster return to normal function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in this study were more likely to experience a return to normal function at 2 hours after receiving rizatriptan than after their usual nontriptan therapy for migraine. The results of this study, using patient-oriented, clinically relevant endpoints such as functional disability and preference, will help to guide practitioners in making recommendations for acute migraine treatment.     

The effects of moclobemide on the pharmacokinetics of the 5-HT1B/1D agonist rizatriptan in healthy volunteers

AIMS: The new 5-HT1B/1D agonist rizatriptan (MK-0462) has recently been registered for the treatment of migraine. Its primary route of metabolism is via monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A). Antidepressants such as the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide may be used in patients with chronic headache syndromes. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the interactions between rizatriptan and moclobemide. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study 12 healthy, young volunteers (six males, six females) were treated with moclobemide (150 mg twice daily) or placebo for 4 days. On the fourth day, a single dose of rizatriptan (10 mg) was administered, and subsequently blood and urine samples were collected for assay of rizatripan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan. Plasma concentrates of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), a marker of MAO-A inhibition, were also assessed. Supine and standing blood pressure were measured regularly. RESULTS: Both treatments were well tolerated. During moclobemide, the increase in supine diastolic blood pressure following rizatriptan administration was augmented. Inhibition of MAO by moclobemide was inferred from a persistent decrease in DHPG level (43% on average). When rizatriptan was coadministered with moclobemide, the area under the plasma drug concentration-time profiles for rizatriptan and its N-monodesmethyl metabolite increased 2.2-fold (90% CI, 1.93-2.47) and 5.3-fold (90% CI, 4.81-5.91), respectively, when compared with placebo. Peak plasma drug concentrations for rizatriptan and its n-monodesmethyl metabolite increased 1.4-fold (90% CI, 1.11-1.80) and 2.6-fold (90% CI, 2.23-3.14), respectively, and half-lives of both were prolonged. CONCLUSIONS: Moclobemide inhibited the metabolism of rizatriptan and its active N-monodesmethyl metabolite through inhibition of MAO-A. Thus, moclobemide may considerably potentiate rizatriptan action. Concurrent administration of moclobemide and rizatriptan is not recommended.     

Rizatriptan (MAXALT) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine and Migraine Recurrence. A Placebo-Controlled, Outpatient Study

Rizatriptan is a novel 5-HT_1B/1D agonist which is rapidly absorbed after oral administration. The efficacy and tolerability of oral rizatriptan (5 mg and 10 mg) were examined in this multicenter, double-blind, outpatient study of 1473 migraineurs which featured randomized, placebo-controlled treatment of migraine recurrences. On experiencing moderate or severe migraine headaches, patients rated headache severity prior to dosing and at 30-minute intervals for 2 hours after dosing. Onset of effect was seen as early as 30 minutes after dosing with rizatriptan 10 mg. At 2 hours postdose, the percentage of patients with pain relief was significantly higher after rizatriptan 5 mg (62%) or 10 mg (71%) compared with placebo (35%). Complete relief was also significantly higher after rizatriptan 5 mg (33%) and 10 mg (42%) compared with placebo (10%). In patients experiencing headache recurrence after initial benefit, further relief was obtained in 71% with rizatriptan 5 mg (placebo 54%) and in 82% with rizatriptan 10 mg (placebo 44%). Complete relief of recurrent headache was obtained in 36% with rizatriptan 5 mg, 49% with rizatriptan 10 mg, and 15% with placebo ( P <0.05). The most common drug-related adverse experiences were dizziness, somnolence, asthenia/fatigue, and nausea (the incidences of which were low and dose related). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse experiences after use of up to three doses of rizatriptan within 24 hours. We conclude that both doses of rizatriptan are effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine and migraine recurrence, with the l0-mg dose preferred as it is more effective with a faster onset of action.     

Efficacy of rizatriptan for menstrual migraine in an early intervention model: a prospective subgroup analysis of the rizatriptan TAME (Treat A Migraine Early) studies

OBJECTIVE: A prospective subgroup analysis of the TAME (Treat A Migraine Early) studies examined the efficacy of rizatriptan in patients treating a menstrual migraine attack. METHODS: Both TAME studies were randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind. Adults with migraine were assigned (2:1) to either rizatriptan 10-mg tablet or placebo. Patients were instructed to treat within 1 hour of migraine onset and when the pain was mild. The primary endpoint was 2-hour pain freedom. The diagnosis of menstrual migraine was established according to the revised 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria. Data from both studies were pooled for logistic regression analyses. A test for interaction was performed to compare rates of 2-hour pain freedom between patients treating a menstrual and non-menstrual attack. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients (63 in the rizatriptan group and 31 in the placebo group) met IHS criteria for menstrual migraine and treated a menstrual attack. The percentage of patients reporting 2-hour pain freedom was significantly greater for rizatriptan than for placebo (63.5% vs 29.0%; odds ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 11.9; P = .002) in those treating a menstrual attack. In those treating with rizatriptan, the percentage of patients with 2-hour pain freedom did not statistically differ between those treating a menstrual or non-menstrual migraine attack (63.5% vs 57.5%; P = .454). CONCLUSION: Rizatriptan 10 mg was effective for the treatment of menstrual migraine in an early intervention model, as measured by 2-hour pain freedom. Rates of 2-hour pain freedom were comparable for patients treating menstrual and non-menstrual migraine attacks with rizatriptan.