Planned lesbian families: their desire and motivation to have children

BACKGROUND: There is no information about the desire and motivation for children among planned lesbian families. The overall aim of this research was to examine whether planned lesbian families differ from heterosexual families in desire and motivation to have a child. The reason for studying this is that desire and motivation to have children are characteristics that are supposed to effect parenting and the parent-child relationship. METHODS: A total of 100 lesbian two-mother families were compared with 100 heterosexual families. All data were collected by means of questionnaires. RESULTS: Lesbian parents and heterosexual parents rank their parenthood quite similarly; however, happiness is significantly more important for lesbian mothers than it is for heterosexual parents and identity development is less important for lesbian mothers than it is for heterosexual parents. Furthermore, compared with heterosexual parents, lesbian parents had spent more time thinking about their motives for having children, and their desire to have a child was stronger. CONCLUSIONS: Lesbian parents especially differ from heterosexual parents in that their desire to have a child is much stronger. The study's findings may be helpful for counsellors in their work to inform and assist lesbian couples in their decision to have a child.     

The effects of pregnancy complications on the parental adaptation process

The current study examined the effects of high-risk pregnancies on the adaptation process of parents of full-term healthy infants. Gender similarities and differences were also addressed to determine the adaptation process of parents who experience a high-risk pregnancy. The sample consisted of 68 high-risk and 59 low-risk pregnancy couples, making a total of 254 new parents. Questionnaires measuring general issues related to the parental adaptation process as well as several specific components dealing with parental role attainment were administered. An effect of risk status and gender was detected on the parental adaptation process. The experience of high obstetrical risks also appeared to have an effect on the perception of life changes and on the development of a sense of competence among parents. Moreover, the findings demonstrated that the gender of the parent contributed to parental experience. Women experienced significantly more life changes than did men. Mothers also differed from fathers in the sense of satisfaction they experienced in their roles as parents.     

Reflections on fertility and postponed parenthood—interviews with highly educated women and men without children in Sweden

Background Different reasons influence the current low birth-rate and the postponement of the birth of the first child throughout Europe. The aim of this study was to explore how highly educated women and men in Sweden reflect on fertility and postponed parenthood.Methods We interviewed women (n = 22) and men (n = 18) who had started their professional careers and still had no children. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis.Results Fertility was perceived as an unconsidered capacity, sometimes unpredictable, and different for women and men, but nevertheless taken for granted. The participants were of the opinion that fertility could be restored by assisted reproductive technologies or replaced by alternatives to a biological child. Postponed parenthood was described as an adaptation to societal changes and current discourses about parenthood as well as a consequence of a contemporary lifestyle with many competing priorities.Conclusion Highly educated young women and men in contemporary Sweden have competing priorities when planning and setting goals for their lives, and having children is one of them. They describe fertility as an imperceptible and retrievable capacity and postponed parenthood as a rational adaptation to changes in society. These findings suggest that increased information about the limitations of human reproduction is needed, but also that societal support for younger parents is of utmost importance.     

Obligations of motherhood in shaping sex work,condom use,and HIV care among Swazi female sex workers living with HIV

Parental obligations influence sexual behaviour among female sex workers (FSW) and may serve as a risk or protective factor for HIV acquisition. How these obligations affect behaviours beyond HIV prevention, including HIV care, is understudied. We analysed 25 interviews conducted with 11 mothers who sell sex and are living with HIV, and 4 key informants as part of a larger study examining the positive health, dignity, and prevention needs of FSW in eSwatini. Despite awareness of HIV reinfection, FSW initiated sex work and engaged in condomless sex due to financial pressures of providing for children. While women attributed having condomless sex to their obligations as a provider, motherhood also served as motivation to engage in HIV care. Further, FSW described children as a source of support in HIV care. Children reminded mothers to take their medications, prepared food to take with medications, and assisted with travel to the clinic.     

From the Cover: Father's brain is sensitive to childcare experiences

Although contemporary socio-cultural changes dramatically increased fathers'' involvement in childrearing, little is known about the brain basis of human fatherhood, its comparability with the maternal brain, and its sensitivity to caregiving experiences. We measured parental brain response to infant stimuli using functional MRI, oxytocin, and parenting behavior in three groups of parents (n = 89) raising their firstborn infant: heterosexual primary-caregiving mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers), and primary-caregiving homosexual fathers (PC-Fathers) rearing infants without maternal involvement. Results revealed that parenting implemented a global “parental caregiving” neural network, mainly consistent across parents, which integrated functioning of two systems: the emotional processing network including subcortical and paralimbic structures associated with vigilance, salience, reward, and motivation, and mentalizing network involving frontopolar-medial-prefrontal and temporo-parietal circuits implicated in social understanding and cognitive empathy. These networks work in concert to imbue infant care with emotional salience, attune with the infant state, and plan adequate parenting. PC-Mothers showed greater activation in emotion processing structures, correlated with oxytocin and parent-infant synchrony, whereas SC-Fathers displayed greater activation in cortical circuits, associated with oxytocin and parenting. PC-Fathers exhibited high amygdala activation similar to PC-Mothers, alongside high activation of superior temporal sulcus (STS) comparable to SC-Fathers, and functional connectivity between amygdala and STS. Among all fathers, time spent in direct childcare was linked with the degree of amygdala-STS connectivity. Findings underscore the common neural basis of maternal and paternal care, chart brain–hormone–behavior pathways that support parenthood, and specify mechanisms of brain malleability with caregiving experiences in human fathers.Throughout human history and across cultures, women have typically assumed primary caregiving responsibility for infants (1, 2). Although humans are among the few mammalian species where some male parental caregiving is relatively common, father involvement varies considerably within and across cultures, adapting to ecological conditions (1, 3). Involved fathering has been linked with children''s long-term physiological and social development and with increases in mothers'' caregiving-related hormones such as oxytocin and prolactin (3–6). In addition, animal studies demonstrated structural brain alterations in caregiving fathers (7, 8). It has been suggested that, although maternal caregiving is triggered by neurobiological processes related to pregnancy and labor, the human father''s brain, similar to other biparental mammals, adapts to the parental role through active involvement in childcare (1–3). Despite growing childcare involvement of fathers (3, 5, 6), mechanisms for human fathers'' brain adaptation to caregiving experiences remain largely unknown, and no study to our knowledge has examined the brain basis of human fatherhood when fathers assume primary responsibility for infant care.For social species with lengthy periods of dependence, parental caregiving is key to survival and relies on brain structures that maximize survival (2, 9). Animal studies have demonstrated that mammalian mothering is supported by evolutionarily ancient structures implicated in emotional processing, vigilance, motivation, and reward, which are rich in oxytocin receptors, including the amygdala, hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, and ventral tegmental area (VTA), and that these regions are sensitive to caregiving behavior (9, 10). Imaging studies of human mothers found activation in similar areas, combined with paralimbic insula-cingulate structures that imbue infants with affective salience, ground experience in the present moment and enable maternal simulation of infant states (11–13). These structures implicate a phylogenetically ancient network of emotional processing that rapidly detects motivationally salient and survival-related cues (14) and enables parents to automatically identify and immediately respond to infant distress, thereby maximizing survival. In humans, this emotional processing network is complemented by a cortical mentalizing network of frontopolar-medial-prefrontal-temporo-parietal structures involved in social understanding, theory of mind, and cognitive empathy, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), frontopolar cortex, superior temporal sulcus (STS), and temporal poles (15). The mentalizing network plays an important role in individuals'' ability to infer mental states from behavior, is already activated during the parents'' first weeks of parenting, and enables parents to cognitively represent infant states, predict infant needs, and plan future caregiving (11–13).The few studies examining the human father''s brain showed activation in similar areas, including the STS, lateral and medial frontal regions, VTA, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) (16, 17). Only one study compared maternal and paternal brain response to infant cues, reporting mothers'' greater amygdala activation, fathers'' greater superior-temporal and medial-frontal activation, and maternal and paternal oxytocin''s different associations with amygdala vs. cortical activation (18). Oxytocin, a nine-amino acid neuropeptide that underpins the formation of affiliative bonds (19), supports the development of human parental caregiving (20). Research has shown that maternal and paternal oxytocin levels are associated with parent–infant synchrony, which is the parent''s careful adaptation of caregiving behavior to infant''s social signals (21). However, although oxytocin levels are similar in mothers and fathers, oxytocin is differentially linked with the parent-specific repertoire, for instance, with affectionate contact in mothers and stimulatory play in fathers (5, 20).Ethological perspectives emphasize the importance of studying the neurobiology of parenting in its natural habitat and of using a behavior-based approach to test parents'' brain adaptation to ecological pressures (22). Consistent with findings in other mammals (10), studies on brain–behavior associations in human mothers describe links between mother–infant synchrony and brain activation in the mother''s subcortical regions, including the amygdala, nucleus accumebens, and hippocampus (11, 13). In contrast, the one study testing human fathers'' brain–behavior associations showed correlations with cortical activation (17). Overall, these findings suggest that distinct brain–hormone–behavior pathways may underpin maternal and paternal care; therefore, oxytocin and parenting behavior may be associated with the emotional processing network in mothers but with the socio-cognitive circuit in fathers. Furthermore, animal studies indicate that active caregiving in biparental fathers leads to greater integration of multiple brain networks involved in nurturance, learning, and motivation (7). Hence, active involvement in caregiving may possibly facilitate integration of both parenting-related networks in human fathers, particularly among those who undertake the primary caregiver role.The present study sought to examine the brain basis of human fatherhood by using a “natural experiment,” afforded for the first time in human history, to our knowledge, by contemporary socio-cultural changes. Throughout history, infants without mothers were cared for by other women (2). Current social changes enable the formation of two-father families raising children with no maternal involvement since birth (3). Such a context provides a unique setting to assess changes in the paternal brain on assuming the traditionally maternal role. Moreover, understanding mechanisms of brain adaptation to caregiving experiences in primary-caregiving fathers may shed further light on processes that refine all fathers'' responses to childcare activities.We visited the homes of two-parent families rearing their firstborn child: heterosexual mother-father couples comprising primary-caregiving mothers (PC-Mothers) and secondary-caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers) and homosexual couples comprising two primary-caregiving fathers (PC-Fathers) (SI Materials and Methods). We videotaped parent–infant interaction in the natural habitat, measured parental oxytocin, and used the videotaped parent–child interactions as stimuli for functional MRI (fMRI) to test parental brain response to infant-related cues. Five hypotheses were proposed. First, we expected activation in both subcortical areas involved in vigilance and reward and cortical circuits implicated in social understanding in all parents raising a young infant. Second, we expected greater subcortical activation in mothers, particularly in the amygdala, which has been repeatedly linked with mammalian mothering (23, 24), and greater activation in cortical socio-cognitive circuits in fathers. Third, the brain–hormone–behavior constellation underpinning maternal care was expected to center around the emotional-processing network, whereas the brain–hormone–behavior links in fathers were expected to coalesce with the socio-cognitive network. Fourth, consistent with the context-specific evolution of human fathering (1), we expected greater variability in fathers'' brain response as mediated by actual caregiving experiences. Such variability would be particularly noted among the primary-caregiving fathers raising infants without mothers and may involve functional integration of the subcortical and cortical networks subserving parenting. Finally, we expected that the pathways leading from the parent''s primary caregiving role to greater parent–infant synchrony would be mediated by parental brain activation and oxytocin levels.     

Fathers’ parenting self-efficacy during the transition to parenthood

Background: Little is known about the development of fathers’ parenting self-efficacy during the transition to parenthood.

Objectives: To analyse (1) fathers’ parenting self-efficacy developmental path and (2) the effects of anxious and depressive symptoms and coparenting support on fathers’ parenting self-efficacy developmental path, from the first trimester of pregnancy to 6 months postpartum.

Methods: Eighty-six fathers recruited at the first trimester of pregnancy completed self-report measures of anxious and depressive symptoms, coparenting support and parenting self-efficacy at the first and third trimesters of pregnancy, and at 1 and 6 months postpartum. Growth curve models were performed.

Results: An increase in fathers’ parenting self-efficacy was found from the first trimester of pregnancy to 6 months postpartum. The main effects of anxious symptoms and interaction effects of anxious symptoms and time were found on fathers’ parenting self-efficacy. Fathers with higher anxious symptoms revealed lower levels of parenting self-efficacy at the first trimester of pregnancy and a lower increase of parenting self-efficacy from this time to 6 months postpartum. The main effects of coparenting support were found in fathers’ parenting self-efficacy. At the first trimester of pregnancy, fathers who perceived more coparenting support revealed higher levels of parenting self-efficacy.

Conclusion: The present study may contribute to the literature by describing fathers’ parenting self-efficacy developmental path and the effects of anxious symptoms and coparenting support on fathers’ parenting self-efficacy developmental path during the transition to parenthood.     

Motives for parenthood and response to failed in vitro fertilization: Implications for counseling

The purpose of this investigation was to identify in vitro fertilization (IVF) candidates' motives for parenthood and hence for seeking treatment. The relationship among identified motives, pretreatment emotional adjustment, and reaction to treatment failure was then examined. Women as a group placed greatest emphasis on fulfilling gender-role requirements, and those strongly endorsing such motives showed the poorest adjustment before IVF and the most negative reaction to first-cycle failure. In contrast, men in general were more likely to stress a desire for marital completion, although this motive was not predictive of emotional status before or after IVF. However, men experiencing social pressures to have children were at greater risk when treatment failed. The results indicate that greater consideration of cognitive factors may enhance understanding of emotional reactions to IVF failure and provide important insights for therapeutic intervention.     

Quality of life in Japanese couples during the transition to parenthood

Objective: This study aimed to examine the quality of life (QOL) in Japanese couples during the transition to parenthood with their first child.

Background: Relevant literature suggests that the health status of women drop during pregnancy and the postpartum period. However, less is known about their partner’s well-being during the transition to parenthood and little research has addressed the relationship between couples’ QOL across multiple domains.

Method: Participants included 9216 married Japanese men and women, including 3729 couples, who were expecting or raising their first child under the age of three. They independently completed questionnaires on baseline demographics and on WHOQOL-BREF.

Results: Men showed higher scores for psychological QOL, while women had higher scores for social and environment QOL. A significant interaction between gender and stage of transition to parenthood was found. The moderating effect of age between the stage and QOL was found for men on the physical and psychological domains. Couples’ QOL scores were weakly to moderately correlated.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that both men and women had lower QOL, with the exception of women’s physical QOL, after childbirth, but they showed different trends during the transition to parenthood across different domains of QOL.