自体脾静脉移植在门静脉和肠系膜上静脉联合切除的胰十二指肠切除术中的应用

目的：探讨以自体脾静脉重建门静脉系统在联合PV/SMV切除的胰十二指肠切除术中临床应用的可行性。方法：回顾性分析3例胰头癌病人在胰十二指肠切除术中采用脾静脉替代门静脉系移植的应用及其效果。结果：手术均顺利,门静脉阻断时间分别为52min、38min和30min。术后B超随访无脾肿大、腹水等情况,门静脉流量均正常（分别为1450ml/min、1200ml/min和1500ml/min）,术后CTA复查显示重建的血管血流通畅,无血栓形成或狭窄,术后生活质量得到明显改善,黄疸消失,肝功能正常,均痊愈出院。结论：在联合PV/SMV切除的胰十二指肠切除术中采用自体脾静脉替代门静脉系的移植是可行的。     

Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: Results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (german advanced surgical treatment study group)

Despite decreasing mortality rates, morbidity is still high after pancreatic head resection. Comparative data in the United States and Europe show a relationship between hospital volume and mortality. Treatment strategies vary frequently, partially because of the lack of evidence-based data. We performed a multi-institutional analysis in Germany evaluating current numbers, indications, techniques, and complication rates of pancreatic head resection. Questionnaires were completed by seven high-volume surgical departments regarding quantitative and qualitative aspects of pancreatic head resections in the period from 1999 to 2004 (five prospective and two retrospective institutional databases). A total of 1454 pancreatic head resections (944 for malignancy) were reported. Mean annual hospital volume ranged from 14 to 52 (10 to 43 in malignancy). Mortality was between 1.1% and 4.8%, morbidity was between 24% and 46%, and pancreatic leakage was between 9% and 20%. In malignant disease, all centers perform standard lymphadenectomy and regard arterial infiltration as a contraindication for resection. However, the rate of portal vein resection varied from 0% to 28%. No consensus is seen on the type of surgery for malignancy and chronic pancreatitis. After resection for pancreatic cancer less than one fourth of the patients receive adjuvant therapy. The results of our analysis in Germany confirm that pancreatic head resection can be performed with low mortality in specialized units. Variations in indications, operative technique, and perioperative care may demonstrate the lack of evidence-based data and/or personal and institutional experience. The low number of patients receiving adjuvant therapy after resection of pancreatic cancer suggests that more efforts must be made to establish novel adjuvant therapies under randomized study conditions. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (oral presentation).     

预防胰十二指肠切除术后并发胰胆瘘的体会

目的　探讨胰十二指肠切除术后胰胆瘘的预防。方法　对 1994年 3月 - 2 0 0 1年 11月因恶性肿瘤施行胰十二指肠切除术的 81例病人 ,统一手术方式 ,在胆肠及胰肠吻合口处肠管内置引流管减压。结果　治愈 78例 ,死亡 3例 ,术后无一例胰胆瘘发生。结论　正确而精细的手术操作 ,确保吻合口血运 ,使各吻合口处无压力、无张力 ,是保证吻合口顺利愈合的关键。完善的术前准备及术后处理 ,也是减少胰胆瘘发生的重要因素。     

胰十二指肠切除术近期合并症及技术改进

目的:探讨如何提高壶腹周围肿瘤的切除率以及降低胰十二指肠切除术后的主要并发症-胰漏的发生.方法:1995年3月～2000年12月本院行胰十二指肠术126例,除经典的手术步骤,作者对手术方法进行了改进,完整切除胰腺钩突,在门静脉与胰头粘连时应仔细分离,受到浸润时可合并门静脉侧壁或部分切除,胰肠端侧吻合时,将胰腺残端确切地套入空肠,并在吻合口两角危险区及前壁覆盖一束大网膜.结果:胰十二肠切除技术的改进,提高了切除率和生存率,而且并发症并未增加,本组患者1、3年生存率分别为71.4%、48.6%;胰肠端端吻合胰漏的发生率为4.8%,端侧吻合加吻合口周围附以带蒂大网膜无胰漏发生.结论:随着外科学的进步,胰十二指肠切除及合并门静脉部分切除已是安全有效的手术方式,胰肠端侧吻合加吻合口周围覆盖大网膜能有效地避免胰漏的发生.     

完全腹腔镜下与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤近期疗效比较

目的探讨完全腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术(TLPD)与开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)治疗壶腹周围肿瘤的近期疗效。方法回顾性分析山西医科大学第一医院2016年6月至2019年3月收治的50例壶腹周围肿瘤患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为TLPD组(22例)及OPD组(28例),比较两组患者围术期及术后各项指标情况。结果两组患者均顺利完成手术,TLPD组手术时间[(665±213)min]长于OPD组[(447±215)min],差异有统计学意义(t=-0.356,P=0.001);TLPD组术中出血量[100 ml(50~325 ml)]少于OPD组[300 ml(100~500 ml)],差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.230,P=0.026)。TLPD组与OPD组术中输血者比例、淋巴结清扫数量、切除肿瘤长径、术后禁饮食时间、术后拔管时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论TLPD与OPD治疗壶腹周围肿瘤临床近期疗效相近,TLPD手术时间较OPD长,但可有效控制术中出血量。     

Prognostic impact of preoperative NLR and CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer

BackgroundRecently, several preoperative proinflammatory markers and nutritional factors such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) have been reported as significant predictor for poor prognosis of various malignant tumors. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic values of these preoperative parameters in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between 2007 and 2012. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this analysis. Preoperative parameters such as CRP, CA19-9, NLR and PNI at the time of presentation were recorded as well as overall survival. Cancer specific survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the prognostic relevance of preoperative parameters. The correlations between CA19-9 values, NLR and pathological findings, first recurrence site were respectively reviewed.ResultsIn multivariable analysis preoperative high NLR (≧2.7) and high CA19-9 (≧230) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival (P value: 0.03 and 0.025, respectively). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated the overall 2-year survival rate in patients with high NLR or high CA19-9 were 37.5% compared with 89.9% in patients with low NLR and low CA19-9.ConclusionPreoperative NLR and serum CA19-9 offer significant prognostic information associated with overall survival following PD in the patients with pancreatic head cancer.     

根治性胰十二指肠切除术后肠内营养的时机探讨

目的 探讨根治性胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者术后肠内营养给予的最佳时机。方法 回顾性分析中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)2019年5月至2020年4月行PD的86例患者临床资料。按照行肠内营养开始的时间,分为<24 h组(术后24 h内给予肠内营养)、24 h~组(术后24~48 h内给予肠内营养)及48 h~组(术后48 h后开始肠内营养),比较术前、术后第3天和第7天各组血红蛋白、白蛋白、前白蛋白水平及胃肠功能恢复和并发症发生情况。结果 3组患者不同时间点白蛋白、前白蛋白水平比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术前3组患者营养指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后第3、7天患者白蛋白、前白蛋白水平先下降后上升,且≤24 h组患者术后第3天和第7天白蛋白、前白蛋白水平均高于其他组(P<0.05)。<24 h组术后肛门排气时间、首次下床时间短于24 h~组及48 h~组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组胰瘘、胆漏、胃排空延迟、腹腔出血及肠内营养不耐受发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PD术后最佳肠内营养时间为术后24 h内给予。     

The role of older age and obesity in minimally invasive and open pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of older age (≥70 years) and obesity (BMI ≥30) on surgical outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR). Subsequently, open pancreatic resections or MIPR were compared for elderly and/or obese patients.MethodsA systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on MIPR (IG-MIPR). Study quality assessment was according to The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of MIPR or open pancreatic resections in elderly patients.ResultsAfter screening 682 studies, 13 observational studies with 4629 patients were included. Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) had less blood loss (117 mL, p < 0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (3.5 days p < 0.001) than elderly patients undergoing open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) B/C, major complication and reoperation rate were not significantly different in elderly patients undergoing either laparoscopic or open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). One study compared robot PD with OPD in obese patients, indicating that patients with robotic surgery had less blood loss (mean 250 ml vs 500 ml, p = 0.001), shorter operative time (mean 381 min vs 428 min, p = 0.003), and lower rate of POPF B/C (13% vs 28%, p = 0.039).ConclusionThe current available limited evidence does not suggest that MIPR is contraindicated in elderly or obese patients. Additionally, outcomes in MIPR are equal or more beneficial compared to the open approach when applied in these patient groups.     

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-Labeled nanoprobe enables real-time diagnosis of pancreatic juice activation due to postoperative pancreatic fistula

ObjectivesPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) subsequent to pancreatectomy often causes activation of pancreatic juice, resulting in serious complications. In POPF, the types of pancreatic juices found are active and inactive, and the identification of these two types of pancreatic juice greatly contributes to the development of postoperative management after pancreatectomy. This study reports favorable results of the clinical application of the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) nanoprobe that was independently developed to distinguish between the active and inactive types of pancreatic juice.MethodsThe FRET nanoprobe developed was a nanoprotein capsule. It exuded a red color when the capsule structure was maintained. When activated protease in the pancreatic juice acts on it, the capsules are reduced quantitatively and FRET is abolished, resulting in a change in color from red to green. Pancreatic juice activation can be measured by the FRET signal. A total of 117 drainage fluid samples from 16 postpancreatoduodenectomy cases were obtained and evaluated.ResultsThe diagnosis of pancreatic juice activation was possible using the FRET signal with a cut-off value of 1.6. Pancreatic juice activation was not associated with drainage fluid amylase (AMY) levels. The results demonstrated that pancreatic juice was activated when drainage fluid was infected.ConclusionThe use of a FRET nanoprobe enabled real-time detection of the presence or absence of pancreatic juice activation in pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. There was an adequate correlation between infection and pancreatic juice activation regardless of drain AMY levels.     

Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND Despite advancements in operative technique and improvements in postoperative managements,postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) is a life-threatening complication following pancreatoduodenectomy(PD).There are some reports to predict POPF preoperatively or intraoperatively,but the accuracy of those is questionable.Artificial intelligence(AI) technology is being actively used in the medical field,but few studies have reported applying it to outcomes after PD.AIM To develop a risk prediction platform for POPF using an AI model.METHODS Medical records were reviewed from 1769 patients at Samsung Medical Center who underwent PD from 2007 to 2016.A total of 38 variables were inserted into AI-driven algorithms.The algorithms tested to make the risk prediction platform were random forest(RF) and a neural network(NN) with or without recursive feature elimination(RFE).The median imputation method was used for missing values.The area under the curve(AUC) was calculated to examine the discriminative power of algorithm for POPF prediction.RESULTS The number of POPFs was 221(12.5%) according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula definition 2016.After median imputation,AUCs using 38 variables were 0.68 ± 0.02 with RF and 0.71 ± 0.02 with NN.The maximal AUC using NN with RFE was 0.74.Sixteen risk factors for POPF were identified by AI algorithm:Pancreatic duct diameter,body mass index,preoperative serum albumin,lipase level,amount of intraoperative fluid infusion,age,platelet count,extrapancreatic location of tumor,combined venous resection,co-existing pancreatitis,neoadjuvant radiotherapy,American Society of Anesthesiologists' score,sex,soft texture of the pancreas,underlying heart disease,and preoperative endoscopic biliary decompression.We developed a web-based POPF prediction platform,and this application is freely available at http://popfrisk.smchbp.org.CONCLUSION This study is the first to predict POPF with multiple risk factors using AI.This platform is reliable(AUC 0.74),so it could be used to select patients who need especially intense therapy and to preoperatively establish an effective treatment strategy.