Fungal mycobiome drives IL-33 secretion and type 2 immunity in pancreatic cancer

1. Download : Download high-res image (229KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

A MEK/PI3K/HDAC inhibitor combination therapy for KRAS mutant pancreatic cancer cells

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive, metastatic disease with limited treatment options. Factors contributing to the metastatic predisposition and therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer are not well understood. Here, we used a mouse model of KRAS-driven pancreatic carcinogenesis to define distinct subtypes of PDAC metastasis: epithelial, mesenchymal and quasi-mesenchymal. We examined pro-survival signals in these cells and the therapeutic response differences between them. Our data indicate that the initiation and maintenance of the transformed state are separable, and that KRAS dependency is not a fundamental constant of KRAS-initiated tumors. Moreover, some cancer cells can shuttle between the KRAS dependent (drug-sensitive) and independent (drug-tolerant) states and thus escape extinction. We further demonstrate that inhibition of KRAS signaling alone via co-targeting the MAPK and PI3K pathways fails to induce extensive tumor cell death and, therefore, has limited efficacy against PDAC. However, the addition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors greatly improves outcomes, reduces the self-renewal of cancer cells, and blocks cancer metastasis in vivo. Our results suggest that targeting HDACs in combination with KRAS or its effector pathways provides an effective strategy for the treatment of PDAC.     

HR‐MAS MRS of the pancreas reveals reduced lipid and elevated lactate and taurine associated with early pancreatic cancer

The prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer is extremely poor, as evidenced by the disease's five‐year survival rate of ~5%. New approaches are therefore urgently needed to improve detection, treatment, and monitoring of pancreatic cancer. MRS‐detectable metabolic changes provide useful biomarkers for tumor detection and response‐monitoring in other cancers. The goal of this study was to identify MRS‐detectable biomarkers of pancreatic cancer that could enhance currently available imaging approaches. We used ¹H high‐resolution magic angle spinning MRS to probe metabolite levels in pancreatic tissue samples from mouse models and patients. In mice, the levels of lipids dropped significantly in pancreata with lipopolysaccharide‐induced inflammation, in pancreata with pre‐cancerous metaplasia (4 week old p48‐Cre;LSL‐Kras^G12D mice), and in pancreata with pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, which precedes invasive pancreatic cancer (8 week old p48‐Cre LSL‐Kras^G12D mice), to 26 ± 19% (p = 0.03), 19 ± 16% (p = 0.04), and 26 ± 10% (p = 0.05) of controls, respectively. Lactate and taurine remained unchanged in inflammation and in pre‐cancerous metaplasia but increased significantly in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia to 266 ± 61% (p = 0.0001) and 999 ± 174% (p < 0.00001) of controls, respectively. Importantly, analysis of patient biopsies was consistent with the mouse findings. Lipids dropped in pancreatitis and in invasive cancer biopsies to 29 ± 15% (p = 0.01) and 26 ± 38% (p = 0.02) of normal tissue. In addition, lactate and taurine levels remained unchanged in inflammation but rose in tumor samples to 244 ± 155% (p = 0.02) and 188 ± 67% (p = 0.02), respectively, compared with normal tissue. Based on these findings, we propose that a drop in lipid levels could serve to inform on pancreatitis and cancer‐associated inflammation, whereas elevated lactate and taurine could serve to identify the presence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive tumor. Our findings may help enhance current imaging methods to improve early pancreatic cancer detection and monitoring. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Impact of spatio-temporal recurrence pattern on overall survival for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia – A comparison with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundResections for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) have increased dramatically during the last decade. Recurrence pattern and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for solid pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known, but not for invasive IPMN (inv-IPMN).ObjectivesTo elucidate the impact of spatio-temporal recurrence pattern and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival for inv-IPMN compared with PDAC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center observational study of consecutive patients ≥18 years of age who underwent resection for inv-IPMN or PDAC at Karolinska University Hospital, between 2009 and 2018. Different initial recurrence sites and time frames as well as predictors for death were assessed with multivariable Cox and logistic regressions. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier model and log rank test.ResultsOf 396 resected patients, 92 were inv-IPMN and 304 PDAC. Both recurrence rate and death rate within three-years were lower for inv-IPMN compared to PDAC (p = 0.006 and p = 0.007 respectively). Across the whole cohort, the most common recurrence patterns were multi-site (25%), single-site liver (21%) and single-site locoregional (10%) recurrence. The most prominent predictors for death in multivariable Cox regression, especially if occurred within the first year, were multi-site (HR 17.0), single-site peritoneal (HR 13.6) and single-site liver (HR 13.1) recurrence. These predictors were less common in inv-IPMN compared to PDAC (p = 0.007). The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy was similar in the two groups.ConclusionResected inv-IPMN exhibits a less aggressive recurrence pattern than PDAC that translates into a more favorable overall survival.     

Mutations in K-Ras linked to levels of osteoprotegerin and sensitivity to TRAIL-induced cell death in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a soluble receptor expressed in the serum of patients with diabetes, arthritis and pancreatic cancer. While OPG has been considered a tumor survival factor for bone metastasizing breast and prostate cancers, the role of OPG in pancreatic cancer, which itself rarely metastasizes to bone, is not known. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines were found to secrete OPG and the level of OPG production correlated with sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Silencing OPG sensitized cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, a positive correlation was noted between OPG production level and K-Ras mutation status. Earlier studies implicated K-Ras in conferring resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cells and this study demonstrates that K-Ras mediated TRAIL resistance in pancreatic cancer cells occurs due to increased OPG production. Silencing K-Ras in pancreatic cancer cells decreased OPG levels and increased sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. These observations indicate that OPG can play a role in both cell survival and in PDAC cell sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, which may contribute to metastasis. Targeted inhibition of OPG binding to TRAIL may represent a therapeutic approach in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.     

Oncogenic KRAS engages an RSK1/NF1 pathway to inhibit wild-type RAS signaling in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy with limited treatment options. Although activating mutations of the KRAS GTPase are the predominant dependency present in >90% of PDAC patients, targeting KRAS mutants directly has been challenging in PDAC. Similarly, strategies targeting known KRAS downstream effectors have had limited clinical success due to feedback mechanisms, alternate pathways, and dose-limiting toxicities in normal tissues. Therefore, identifying additional functionally relevant KRAS interactions in PDAC may allow for a better understanding of feedback mechanisms and unveil potential therapeutic targets. Here, we used proximity labeling to identify protein interactors of active KRAS in PDAC cells. We expressed fusions of wild-type (WT) (BirA-KRAS4B), mutant (BirA-KRAS4B^G12D), and nontransforming cytosolic double mutant (BirA-KRAS4B^G12D/C185S) KRAS with the BirA biotin ligase in murine PDAC cells. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that RSK1 selectively interacts with membrane-bound KRAS^G12D, and we demonstrate that this interaction requires NF1 and SPRED2. We find that membrane RSK1 mediates negative feedback on WT RAS signaling and impedes the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells upon the ablation of mutant KRAS. Our findings link NF1 to the membrane-localized functions of RSK1 and highlight a role for WT RAS signaling in promoting adaptive resistance to mutant KRAS-specific inhibitors in PDAC.

A total of 60,430 new cases of pancreatic cancer were estimated for 2021, and the 5-y relative survival rate has consistently remained below 11% (1). About 85% of these pancreatic cancer tumors are pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (2). Poor outcomes of PDAC cases result from late diagnoses leading to unresectable and heterogeneous tumors as well as ineffective therapies, which only prolong survival on the order of months (3–5). Mutations in the KRAS proto-oncogene are present in over 90% of PDAC cases and are associated with a poor prognosis (6). Furthermore, mice expressing mutant KRAS in the pancreas develop precursor lesions, which sporadically progress into frank PDAC. This progression is accelerated when combined with other mutations or deletion of tumor suppressor genes (7–11). Additionally, independent studies have shown that the maintenance of murine PDAC cells require KRAS (12–14).As a RAS GTPase, KRAS acts as a molecular switch at the plasma membrane that relays growth factor signaling from receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream pathways such as RAF/MEK and PI3K/AKT (15). GTP binding alters the conformation of the KRAS G domain, thereby creating binding sites for downstream effectors to trigger enzymatic cascades that promote cell transformation (16–19). Intrinsically, KRAS slowly hydrolyzes GTP into GDP to halt signaling; however, GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) such as neurofibromin 1(NF1) catalyze this process (20). In contrast, guanine nucleotide exchange factors, such as son of sevenless homolog 1 (SOS1), catalyze the exchange of GTP for bound GDP. In most PDAC cases, KRAS is mutated at the 12th residue located in the G domain from glycine to either a valine (G12V), or more commonly, aspartate (G12D). These mutations sterically prevent the “arginine finger domain” of GAPs from entering the GTPase site, thereby blocking extrinsic allosteric GTPase activation and stabilizing RAS-GTP (21, 22). Activating mutations in KRAS constitutively trigger RAF/MEK and PI3K/AKT pathways leading to increased cell proliferation as well as other prooncogenic behaviors (15). KRAS signaling not only relies on the G domain but also the C-terminal hypervariable domain (HVR), which is required to stabilize KRAS on membranes where signaling is most efficient (23–26). Independent studies suggest that specific biochemical and cellular consequences of KRAS activation are attributed to the unique properties of the HVR of the predominant splice form KRAS4B, namely the polybasic domain and the lipid anchor (27–30). Localization of RAS proteins to the plasma membrane requires the prenylation of the CAAX motif (23). Additionally, for KRAS4B, the hypervariable region contains a highly polybasic domain consisting of several consecutive lysines, which can interact with the negative charges on the polar heads of phospholipids and stabilize protein interactions (31). Structural and biochemical characterization of the HVR and G domain has contributed to a better understanding of the signaling outputs of KRAS and led to KRAS-targeting strategies.Various approaches to inhibit KRAS include direct inhibition, expression interference, mislocalization, and targeting of downstream effectors (32). Thus far, direct inhibitors against KRAS have only successfully targeted the G12C mutant, which comprises 2.9% of KRAS mutant PDAC (21, 33). For other KRAS mutants, targeting downstream effectors of KRAS in pancreatic cancer remains an alternative approach. Unfortunately, dual inhibition of MEK and AKT pathways was ineffective in PDAC patients (34). Difficulty in targeting KRAS due to adaptive resistance and feedback regulation motivates a better understanding of KRAS biology (35). For example, although PDAC typically features a mutant KRAS, there may be a role for its wild-type (WT) counterpart as well as WT RAS paralogs (HRAS and NRAS), which are GAP sensitive and subject to signaling feedback. While oncogenic KRAS has been shown to activate WT HRAS and NRAS via allosteric stimulation of SOS1 (36), WT KRAS has been proposed to be a tumor suppressor in some KRAS mutant cancers based on the commonly observed mutant-specific allele imbalance that occurs throughout tumor progression (37). Additionally, the reintroduction of WT KRAS abolished tumor T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia development and impaired tumor growth in KRAS mutant lung cancer cells in vivo (37–39). The discovery of novel KRAS protein interactors involved in downstream signaling or feedback and compensatory pathways may elucidate why inhibition of downstream pathways have had limited clinical impact in PDAC. Here, we perform proximity labeling experiments by expressing a fusion of BirA^R118G biotin ligase and KRAS in PDAC cells, which, in the presence of high concentrations of biotin, generates reactive biotinoyl-AMP that labels lysines of nearby proteins, such as interactors of its fusion partner KRAS (40–42). The biotinylated interactor proteins can be isolated by streptavidin pulldown and analyzed by proteomics to identify novel protein interactors (43–45). Because covalent labeling occurs in living cells, enzymatic labeling may potentially identify transient interactors and protein complexes.Two recent studies used proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) labeling methods to identify KRAS interactors in 293T and colon cancer cells (46, 47). These studies uncovered and validated the functional relevance of PIP5KA1 and mTORC2 in PDAC cells. However, BirA-KRAS screens in PDAC models have not yet been performed. Since the tumor context may determine protein expression and relevant interactions, we sought to perform a BirA-KRAS screen in PDAC cells. We hypothesize that proximity labeling with BioID presents a means for identifying new mutant KRAS-specific interactions in PDAC, which may unveil new insights into therapeutic design for this malignancy.     

Modulation of c-kit expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A novel stem cell marker responsible for the progression of the disease

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers because of late symptoms and resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We have investigated the appearance of c-kit, a stem cell marker, in both normal adult pancreatic tissue and in cancerous tissue. Apart from some very pale staining of islets of Langerhans, normal pancreas was devoid of staining with antibodies to c-kit. In contrast, in cancerous tissue that still preserves the overall integrity of the pancreatic tissue, there was a clear labeling in islets of Langerhans, which seemed to be co-localized with insulin containing β cells. In other cases, where the pancreatic tissue was completely deteriorated, intensive labeling was clearly evident in remnants of both the exocrine and the endocrine tissues. The duct cells of the adenocarcinoma were moderately but clearly labeled with antibodies to c-kit. In contrast, in metastasis of PDAC, very intensive labeling of c-kit was evident. The location of KRAS, which is strongly associated with PDAC, was also analyzed at the initial stages of the disease, when islets of Langerhans still preserve their integrity to a large extent. KRAS was found exclusively in islets of Langerhans and overlapped in its location with insulin and c-kit expressing cells. It is suggested that the modulation of the expression of c-kit, visualized by antibodies to the oncogene molecule, may play an important role in the formation and progression of PDAC. The absence of c-kit in normal pancreas and its appearance in PDAC is probably due to a mutational event, which probably allows conversion of the β cells into cancer stem cells (CSC). Co-expression of both c-kit and KRAS, typical markers for CSC with overlapping with insulin in islets of Langerhans, strongly support the notion that β-cells play a central role in the development of PDAC. The use of specific drugs that can attenuate the kinase activity of c-kit or target KRAS expressing cancer cells should be tested in order to attenuate the progression of this lethal disease.     

Indocyanine green loaded hyaluronan-derived nanoparticles for fluorescence-enhanced surgical imaging of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is highly lethal and surgical resection is the only potential curative treatment for the disease. In this study, hyaluronic acid derived nanoparticles with physico-chemically entrapped indocyanine green, termed NanoICG, were utilized for intraoperative near infrared fluorescence detection of pancreatic cancer. NanoICG was not cytotoxic to healthy pancreatic epithelial cells and did not induce chemotaxis or phagocytosis, it accumulated significantly within the pancreas in an orthotopic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma model, and demonstrated contrast-enhancement for pancreatic lesions relative to non-diseased portions of the pancreas. Fluorescence microscopy showed higher fluorescence intensity in pancreatic lesions and splenic metastases due to NanoICG compared to ICG alone. The in vivo safety profile of NanoICG, including, biochemical, hematological, and pathological analysis of NanoICG-treated healthy mice, indicates negligible toxicity. These results suggest that NanoICG is a promising contrast agent for intraoperative detection of pancreatic tumors.