Effect of Zonisamide (CI-912) on a Synaptic System Model

The effect of the experimental antiepileptic drug zonisamide (1,2-benzisoxazole-3-methanesulfonamide, ZNS) on the trigeminal complex of cats was compared with the effect of established antiepileptic drugs. Intravenous administration of 10-40 mg/kg ZNS significantly depresses descending excitatory mechanisms, as well as segmental and descending inhibitory mechanisms, but has only a minor effect on segmental excitatory mechanisms. This spectrum of activity is similar to that of valproate, and suggests that ZNS should also be a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug. In agreement with our experimental observations, it has been found that ZNS is effective against complex partial, generalized tonic clonic, and myoclonic seizures. The antiepileptic profile of ZNS in conventional screening tests resembles that of carbamazepine (CBZ) and phenytoin. However, CBZ exacerbates rather than prevents myoclonic seizures. Our experimental model thus provides a more accurate prediction of ZNS's clinical spectrum of activity. The relationship of these findings to the mechanism of action of antiepileptic drugs is discussed.     

Preliminary Report on Teratogenic Effects of Zonisamide in the Offspring of Treated Women with Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: We wished to assess the risk of terato-genicity of zonisamide (ZNS) in humans.
Methods: Pregnant epileptic women treated with ZNS and their offspring were prospectively monitored from June 1989 to December 1994. The outcome of pregnancy and status of neonates were examined based on the same standardized protocol.
Results: Twenty-six offspring exposed to ZNS with or without other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were studied. Malformations were detected in 2 offspring (7·7%) exposed to ZNS polypharmacy. Anencephaly was detected in one case at 16 weeks of gestation (case 1, artificial abortion), and atrial septa1 defect was detected in another case at 37 weeks of gestation (case 2, delivery by cesarean section). Serum concentrations of ZNS during the first trimester of pregnancy were 6·1 μg/ml in case 1 and 6·3μ/ml in case 2; in both cases, the levels were below the therapeutic concentration range of ZNS.
Conclusions: Teratogenic effects of ZNS were not clearly defined from these results since malformations were detected in two polypharmacy cases but not in four monopharmacy cases. The present data do not indicate that the risk of ZNS teratogenicity is greater than that of other conventional AEDs. However, such risk cannot be neglected even at therapeutic dosages or concentrations of ZNS, especially in patients receiving polypharmacy.     

Safety,tolerability, and effectiveness of oral zonisamide therapy in comparison with intramuscular adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy in infants with West syndrome

West syndrome is a distinct, infantile onset, epileptic encephalopathy, associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcome. The present study was designed as a randomized, open-label, pilot study to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of oral zonisamide therapy in comparison with adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy in infants with West syndrome. Thirty infants with West syndrome were randomized to receive treatment with either synthetic, intramuscular adrenocorticotropic hormone (30–60 IU) or oral zonisamide (4–25 mg/kg/day). The study participants had a long treatment lag and preponderance of male sex (90%). The primary effectiveness outcome measure was the cessation of epileptic spasms at 2 weeks of initiation of therapy and persistent till 6 weeks as per West Delphi consensus statement recommendations. Comparison of efficacies of zonisamide versus adrenocorticotropic hormone was as following: the cessation of epileptic spasms (27% vs. 40%, p = 0.70), resolution of hypsarrhythmia at 14 days (20% vs. 33%, p = 0.68) and resolution of hypsarrhythmia at 6 weeks (36% vs. 71%, p = 0.14). Overall, the study observed a poor efficacy of both adrenocorticotropic hormone and zonisamide therapy, which is probably due to long treatment lag and a high proportion of structural aetiology. However, oral zonisamide appeared to be safe and tolerable in the study.     

Zonisamide and renal calculi in patients with epilepsy: how big an issue?

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of renal calculi in patients treated with zonisamide during randomized, controlled and open-label clinical trials, and from post-marketing surveillance data.

Methods: Reports of renal calculi from four placebo-controlled double-blind trials of zonisamide, their long-term open-label treatment extension phases, and the US/European zonisamide clinical trial programme were reviewed. One double-blind study and its extension included routine ultrasound screening to identify asymptomatic calculi. Post-marketing surveillance data were also investigated, as was concomitant treatment with topiramate.

Results: No symptomatic renal calculi were reported during four randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving 848 subjects (including 498 zonisamide recipients) treated for up to 3 months. In long-term extension studies with treatment for up to 24 months, symptomatic renal calculi were reported in 9/626 (1.4%) patients. Pooled safety data from all US/European clinical trials identified 15/1296 (1.2%) patients with symptomatic renal calculi during treatment for up to 8.7 years. Post-marketing surveillance revealed nine cases from 59?667 patient-years of exposure in the USA, and 14 from 709?294 patient-years of exposure in Japan; only one case occurred during concomitant topiramate and zonisamide treatment. No imbalance in electrolyte levels was found from 35 patients receiving such co-treatment in clinical trials.

Conclusions: The available data suggest that the risk of developing renal calculi during zonisamide treatment is low. Data are insufficient to determine whether concomitant treatment with topiramate increases the risk of renal stones.     

Safety of 25- and 50-mg capsules in the initiation of zonisamide therapy in patients with epilepsy: an uncontrolled,open-label study

SUMMARY

Objective: This study was designed to assess the safety of 25- and 50-mg dosage strengths of zonisamide for initial titration in patients with epilepsy.

Research design and methods: This phase 3, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study conducted at 26 study sites in the United States included male and female patients with epilepsy ≥ 12?years of age. After a screening visit, subjects began zonisamide therapy at a dosage depending on their body weight. Zonisamide was titrated to 100?mg/day.

Main outcome measures: At the study's conclusion, information regarding adverse events (AEs) and body weight was recorded.

Results: One hundred forty-three subjects enrolled and received at least one zonisamide dose. Of these subjects, 125 reached at least the 100-mg dosage before terminating the study. Eighty-two subjects (57.3%) experienced at least one AE. Most commonly reported AEs included headache, somnolence, asthenia, rhinitis, nausea, and rash. No significant change in patient body weight was noted during the study (95% confidence interval: –0.1, 0.6).

Conclusions: Study limitations include the open-label design and the lack of direct comparison between lower (25- and 50-mg) and higher (100-mg) starting dosages. Despite these limitations, the 25- and 50-mg zonisamide dosage formulations were well tolerated in this study.     

Kidney stones,carbonic anhydrase inhibitors,and the ketogenic diet

PURPOSE: Because carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and the ketogenic diet are each known risk factors for kidney stones, simultaneous use of these therapies has been discouraged. The objective of this study was to establish the prevalence of nephrolithiasis in children in this combination-therapy population. METHODS: Since 1996, 301 children have been started on the ketogenic diet at our institution. A retrospective cohort study of renal calculi in ketogenic diet patients was performed to evaluate the increased risk with combined use of a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. RESULTS: In 15 (6.7%) of 221 children on the ketogenic diet without the use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, stones developed. In five (6.3%) of the 80 children on the diet in combination with topiramate or zonisamide, stones developed. There was no difference between these two groups (p = 0.82). No child was treated with either acetazolamide or more than one carbonic anhydrase inhibitor simultaneously. Prior ketogenic diet duration was shorter (10.4 vs. 22.4 months; p = 0.03), and more children had either a family history of renal stones or significant urologic abnormalities (80 vs. 27%; p = 0.04) in the combination-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and the ketogenic diet does not increase the risk of kidney stones. We recommend that all patients treated with combination therapy should be treated with increased hydration. Urine alkalinization should be considered for children with previous renal abnormalities, family histories of kidney stones, hematuria, or elevated urine calcium-to-creatinine ratios. If renal stones are found, we advocate discontinuation of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor.     

Centrally mediated antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of zonisamide following partial nerve injury in the mouse

Some antiepileptic drugs are used clinically to relieve neuropathic pain. We have evaluated the effects and investigated the possible mechanisms of action of zonisamide, an antiepileptic drug, on thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in a murine chronic pain model that was prepared by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve. Subcutaneously administered zonisamide (10 and 30 mg/kg) produced antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects in a dose-dependent manner; these effects were manifested by elevation of the withdrawal threshold in response to a thermal (plantar test) or mechanical (von Frey) stimulus, respectively. Similar analgesic effects were obtained in both the plantar and von Frey tests when zonisamide was injected either intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v., 10 and 30 μg) or intrathecally (i.t., 10 and 30 μg). It is thought that this elevation of the thermal and mechanical withdrawal thresholds after local injection of zonisamide is not generated secondarily via impaired motor activity, since zonisamide (30 μg, i.c.v. or i.t.) did not affect locomotor activity, as assessed in sciatic-nerve-ligated mice. Moreover, the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME, when injected either i.c.v. or i.t., potentiated the analgesic effects of zonisamide. In contrast, neither i.c.v. nor i.t. zonisamide produced antinociceptive effects against acute thermal and mechanical nociception in non-ligated mice. Together, following peripheral nerve injury, it appears that zonisamide produces centrally mediated antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects partly via the blockade of nitric oxide synthesis.     

Central nervous system adverse effects of new antiepileptic drugs: A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies

OBJECTIVE: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the most frequent treatment-emergent central nervous system adverse events (CNS AEs) of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) from double-blind, add-on, placebo-controlled studies conducted in adult epileptic patients and identification of dose-adverse effect relationships. METHODS: Trial reports found by searching Medline and journals. Outcome was the number of patients complaining of treatment-emergent CNS AEs. Sixteen predefined CNS AEs were considered. Risk differences (RDs) were calculated for individual studies and summary statistics estimated using the random effect model. Predefined CNS AEs in patients treated with active drug (broken down into dose levels) or placebo were extracted and the RDs (95% CI) for CNS AEs were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-six suitable studies identified. No meta-analysis was possible for oxcarbazepine and tiagabine (only one study each included). For these drugs RDs were calculated from single studies. Gabapentin was significantly associated with somnolence 0.13 (0.06-0.2) and dizziness 0.11 (0.07-0.15); lamotrigine with dizziness 0.11 (0.05-0.17), ataxia 0.12 (0.01-0.24) and diplopia 0.12 (0.00-0.24); levetiracetam with somnolence 0.06 (0.01-0.11); pregabalin with somnolence 0.11 (0.07-0.15), dizziness 0.22 (0.16-0.28), ataxia 0.10 (0.06-0.14) and fatigue 0.04 (0.01-0.08); topiramate with somnolence 0.09 (0.04-0.14), dizziness 0.06 (0.00-0.11), cognitive impairment 0.14 (0.06-0.22) and fatigue 0.06 (0.01-0.12); zonisamide with somnolence 0.06 (0.02-0.11) and dizziness 0.06 (0.00-0.12). The dose-response relationship was analysed only for those CNS AEs significantly associated with the AED. CONCLUSIONS: No comparison between drugs was possible. One CNS AE was significantly more frequent for levetiracetam, two for zonisamide and gabapentin, three for lamotrigine and four for pregabalin and topiramate.     

Effect of antiepileptic drug polytherapy on urinary pH in children and young adults

Objects  The relationship between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) polytherapy and urinary pH was studied to demonstrate the effect and difference of AED polytherapy compared to monotherapy. Materials and methods  A total of 271 urine samples from patients receiving AED polytherapy aged from 7 months to 35 years were enrolled. Two AEDs were co-administered to 215 patients, three AEDs to 45 patients, four AEDs to ten patients, and five AEDs to one patient. Results  The distribution of urinary pH shifted to the alkaline range with increasing numbers of co-administered AEDs (p < 0.0001). The distribution of urinary pH shifted to the alkaline side with AED polytherapy that included valproate (p < 0.05) or acetazolamide (p < 0.03). The distribution of urinary pH did not change with or without zonisamide, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or clonazepam. Conclusions  Urinary pH should be monitored in patients receiving AED polytherapy, particularly those receiving valproate, acetazolamide, or various AEDs in combination.