Serum Interferon (IFN)-Neutralizing Antibodies and Bioactivities of IFNs in Patients with Severe Type II Essential Mixed Cryoglobulinemia

The efficacy of alpha interferon (IFN-α) in the treatment of severe type II essential mixed cryoglobulinemia (EMC) has been reported previously. In some patients, the development of neutralizing antibodies to recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α) can affect the clinical response achieved with rIFN-α; a second treatment with natural IFN-α preparations may reinduce the clinical response. In the present study the ability of leukocyte IFN (LeIFN) to restore the response was investigated from a pharmacodynamic viewpoint. Specifically, the pharmacodynamic profiles of different IFN-α preparations were studied by measuring the serum neopterin levels and the levels of expression of protein MxA mRNA in in vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells in two patients with EMC whose resistance to rIFN-α2a treatment increased concomitantly with the development of neutralizing antibodies. These markers were measured before injection and at 24 and 48 h after a single injection of rIFN-α2a, consensus IFN [(C)IFN], or LeIFN. No increase or only a slight increase in MxA mRNA levels was detectable after administration of rIFN-α2a or (C)IFN, whereas a significant increase (≥10-fold) in MxA mRNA expression was recorded following administration of LeIFN. The neutralizing antibodies to rIFN-α2a cross-react with (C)IFN. Sera from these patients neutralized most but not all of the subtypes present in the natural IFN-α (LeIFN) mixture, and no significant increase in neopterin levels was observed after these patients were switched to LeIFN treatment. In summary, the data demonstrate that the problem of neutralizing antibodies still exists and that LeIFN may induce an increase in the level of MxA mRNA expression but not an increase in neopterin levels in patients who are resistant to treatment with rIFN-α2a or (C)IFN.     

Evidence for the involvement of SDF-1 and CXCR4 in the disruption of endothelial cell-branching morphogenesis and angiogenesis by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma

Vigorous inflammatory responses are associated with tissue damage, particularly when toxic levels of inflammatory cytokines are produced. Despite proangiogenic factors being present early at sites of inflammation, vascular repair occurs toward the end of the inflammatory response, suggesting modulation of the proangiogenic response. Endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis induced during acute inflammation are poorly characterized. Here, we looked for endothelial cell-derived modulators of angiogenesis that may account for delayed neovascularization during inflammation. Gene profiling of endothelial cells showed that the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) selectively promote expression of the antiangiogenic molecules, IFN-inducible protein-10, monokine induced by IFN-gamma, tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase, and tissue inhibitor of metalmetalloproteinase-1, and inhibit expression of the proangiogenic molecules, platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), collagen type IV, endothelial cell growth factor-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule-1. Reduced endothelial cell expression of SDF-1 protein by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma disrupts extracellular matrix-dependent endothelial cell tube formation, an in vitro morphogenic process that recapitulates critical steps in angiogenesis. Replacement of SDF-1 onto the endothelial cell surface reconstitutes this morphogenic process. In vivo, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma inhibit growth factor-induced angiogenesis and SDF-1 expression in endothelial cells. These results demonstrate that SDF-1/CXC chemokine receptor-4 constitutes a TNF-alpha- and IFN-gamma-regulated signaling system that plays a critical role in mediating angiogenesis inhibition by these inflammatory cytokines.     

Neutralizing and binding antibodies to IFN-beta: relative frequency in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with different IFN-beta preparations.

The frequencies of anti-interferon-beta (IFN-beta) antibody development reported to date in patients treated with different IFN-beta preparations are not readily comparable mainly because of differences in underlying diseases and assay methods. Thus, the frequency of neutralizing antibody (NAb) and binding antibody (BAb) development was analyzed in a sample of sera derived from a homogeneous group of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with different IFN-beta preparations. The frequency of developing NAb and BAb to IFN-beta varied according to the IFN-beta given. Specifically, the NAb seroconversion frequency was significantly higher in patients treated with Betaferon, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany (31.3%) than in patients treated with both preparations of recombinant IFN-beta 1a (Rebif, Serono, Geneva, Switzerland [7.4%] or Avonex, Biogen, Cambridge, MA [6.3%]). Analysis of BAb seroconversion frequency in the same patients revealed that different IFN-beta preparations may also have different capability to induce BAb development and that BAb are produced during IFN-beta therapy at a significantly higher rate than NAb. Our main conclusion is that different human IFN-beta preparations may possess different immunogenicities, leading to varying frequency of development of antibody to IFN-beta in RRMS.     

The Use of Oral Amino-Bisphosphonates and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outcomes

The determinants of the susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifestations are yet not fully understood. Amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) have anti-inflammatory properties and have been shown to reduce the incidence of lower respiratory infections, cardiovascular events, and cancer. We conducted a population-based retrospective observational cohort study with the primary objective of determining if oral N-BPs treatment can play a role in the susceptibility to development of severe COVID-19. Administrative International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical ModificationI (ICD-9-CM) and anatomical-therapeutic chemical (ATC) code data, representative of Italian population (9% sample of the overall population), were analyzed. Oral N-BPs (mainly alendronate and risedronate) were included in the analysis, zoledronic acid was excluded because of the low number of patients at risk. Incidence of COVID-19 hospitalization was 12.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.61–15.04) and 11.55 (95% CI, 8.91–14.20), of intensive care unit (ICU) utilization because of COVID-19 was 1.25 (95% CI, 0.38–2.11) and 1.42 (95% CI, 0.49–2.36), and of all-cause death was 4.06 (95% CI, 2.50–5.61) and 3.96 (95% CI, 2.41–5.51) for oral N-BPs users and nonusers, respectively. Sensitivity analyses that excluded patients with prevalent vertebral or hip fragility fractures and without concomitant glucocorticoid treatment yielded similar results. In conclusion, we found that the incidence of COVID-19 hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and COVID-19 potentially related mortality were similar in N-BPs–treated and nontreated subjects. Similar results were found in N-BPs versus other anti-osteoporotic drugs. We provide real-life data on the safety of oral N-BPs in terms of severe COVID-19 risk on a population-based cohort. Our results do not support the hypothesis that oral N-BPs can prevent COVID-19 infection and/or severe COVID-19; however, they do not seem to increase the risk. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).     

Rheumatoid arthritis and myasthenia gravis: a case-based review of the therapeutic options

Clinical Rheumatology - Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction, often associated with other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. Patients...