Treatment of multiple adjacent RT 1 gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: 9-year results of a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Clinical Oral Investigations - To evaluate t he long-term outcomes following treatment of RT 1 multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR) using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) with...     

GTR with three different types of membranes in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: three-year results in sixty consecutive cases

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical results at 3 years following treating intrabony periodontal defects with different nonresorbable and bioabsorbable membrane barriers. Sixty intrabony periodontal defects were treated according to the principles of guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Twenty pockets were treated with Gore Resolut, a bioabsorbable membrane; 20 were treated with Gore-Tex, a titanium-reinforced membrane; and 20 with nonresorbable Gore-Tex membrane (all manufactured by Gore Regenerative Technologies, Flagstaff, AZ). The therapeutic results were evaluated by assessing probing pocket depth (PPD), recession of the gingival margin (GR), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at baseline, at 1 and at 3 years after therapy. The postoperative phase was uneventful in all cases. At 1 year after surgery, the results showed a mean PPD reduction from 9.42 mm to 3.35 mm (p < 0.0001) with Resolut; from 10.30 mm to 4.00 with titanium-reinforced Gore-Tex (p < 0.0001); and from 8.40 mm to 3.73 mm (p < 0.0001) with Gore-Tex membranes. The mean GR increased from 1.92 mm to 3.70 mm (p < 0.001) with Resolut; from 0.47 mm to 2.85 mm (p < 0.0001) with titanium-reinforced Gore-Tex; and from 0.73 mm to 2.15 mm (p < 0.0001) with Gore-Tex membranes. The mean CAL changed from 11.35 mm to 6.92 mm (p < 0.001) with Resolut; from 10.78 mm to 6.85 mm (p < 0.0001) with titanium-reinforced Gore-Tex; and from 9.13 mm to 5.87 mm (p < 0.0001) with Gore-Tex membranes. The clinical results at 3 years were not significantly different when compared with the 1-year results (p > 0.05). No significant differences existed between the mean changes in PPD, GR, and CAL in the three different test groups. Furthermore, one tooth scheduled for extraction for periodontal and prosthodontic reasons was treated with Resolut. Histological analysis 6 months after treatment demonstrated the neoformation of a connective tissue attachment and of new alveolar bone. This additional evidence thus proved that treatment with bioabsorbable membranes according to GTR principles delivers not only clinical improvement, but also histological periodontal regeneration.     

Animal models for peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis

The treatment of infectious diseases affecting osseointegrated implants in function has become a demanding issue in implant dentistry. Since the early 1990s, preclinical data from animal studies have provided important insights into the etiology, pathogenesis and therapy of peri‐implant diseases. Established lesions in animals have shown many features in common with those found in human biopsy material. The current review focuses on animal studies, employing different models to induce peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis.     

Healing of periodontal suprabony defects following treatment with open flap debridement with or without an enamel matrix derivative: A randomized controlled clinical study

Clinical Oral Investigations - To compare the healing of suprabony defects following treatment with either open flap debridement (OFD) and application of an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with OFD...     

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology: systematic review update

Clinical Oral Investigations - To update the findings of a systematic review from the year 2016 on the evidence for the accuracy and potential benefits of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in...     

Histological evaluation of healing after transalveolar maxillary sinus augmentation with bioglass and autogenous bone

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate histologically the outcome of a bioglass and autogenous bone (at 1 : 1 ratio) composite implantation for transalveolar sinus augmentation. Methods: In 31 patients, during implant installation ca. 4 months after sinus augmentation, biopsies were harvested through the transalveolar osteotomy by means of a trephine bur and non‐decalcified sections through the long axis of the cylinder were produced. After a strict selection process, taking into account the presurgical residual bone height and biopsy length, 8 and 15 biopsies representing the new tissues formed inside the sinus and the transalveolar osteotomy, respectively, qualified for analysis. The tissue fractions occupied by newly formed bone (mineralized tissue+bone marrow), soft connective tissue, residual biomaterial+empty spaces, and debris inside the sinus cavity or the transalveolar osteotomy were estimated. Results: Bone and connective tissue fraction in the newly formed tissues inside the sinus cavity averaged 23.4 ± 13.2% and 54.1 ± 23.5%, respectively. Residual biomaterial, empty spaces, and debris averaged 1.9 ± 3.5%, 10.5 ± 6.3%, and 8.4 ± 14.5%, respectively. In the transalveolar osteotomy, bone and connective tissue fraction averaged 41.6 ± 14.3% and 46.1 ± 13%, respectively, while the amount of residual biomaterial, empty spaces, and debris was 2.8 ± 5%, 4.7 ± 1.9%, and 3.2 ± 2.6%, respectively. Statistically significant differences between the sinus cavity and the transalveolar osteotomy were found only for bone and empty spaces' values (P=0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: Sinus augmentation with a bioglass and autogenous bone composite is compatible with bone formation that, in a short distance from the floor of the sinus, shows similar density as that reported previously for other commonly used bone substitutes. New bone fraction inside the transalveolar osteotomy was almost twice as much as in the sinus cavity, while the amount of residual biomaterial was much less than that inside the sinus. To cite this article :
Stavropoulos A, Sima C, Sima A, Nyengaard J, Karring T, Sculean A. Histological evaluation of healing after transalveolar maxillary sinus augmentation with bioglass and autogenous bone.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 125–131.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02161.x     

Effect of ozone on periodontopathogenic species—an in vitro study

The in vitro study was aimed to determine the effect of ozone on periodontopathogenic microorganisms. Ozone was generated for 6 s–2 × 24 s (corresponding to 0.56 mg–2 × 2.24 mg of ozone) against 23 mainly anaerobic periodontopathogenic species. Agar diffusion test was used as a screening method. Then, the killing activity was tested in a serum-free environment and with 25% v/v inactivated serum. Further, the effect of ozone on bactericidal activity of native serum was analyzed against Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Agar diffusion test showed a high efficacy of ozone against microorganisms, especially against Porphyromonas gingivalis. This result was confirmed by the killing tests; most of the strains in a concentration of 10⁵ were completely eliminated after twofold 18-s application of ozone. Only four of the six potentially “superinfecting” species (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacter cloacae, Candida albicans) survived in part. Addition of heat-inactivated serum reduced the killing rate of ozone by 78% after 6-s and by 47% after twofold 18-s exposures; no strain was completely eradicated after any application of ozone. The bactericidal effect of native serum was enhanced after application of ozone; no effect was visible on the included A. actinomycetemcomitans strain which was found to be completely resistant to the bactericidal action of serum. In conclusion, (a) ozone has a strong antibacterial activity against putative periodontopathogenic microorganisms, and (b) the bactericidal effect is reduced in the presence of serum. Ozone may have potential as an adjunctive application to mechanical treatment in periodontitis patients.