Economic analysis of two structured treatment and teaching programs on asthma

The aims of the present study were as follows:

• 1). to evaluate the medical outcomes of two treatment and educational asthma programs
• 2). to determine by cost-analysis both cost and economic outcome of the programs
• 3). to perform a cost-benefit analysis (determining the net cost-benefit) and a cost-effectiveness analysis (determining the cost per unit of effect and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) from the perspective of health program policy makers (HPP; indirect costs, i.e., loss of productivity, excluded) and of society as a whole (Saw; all costs included).

Patients were randomly assigned to a complete (CP; n = 32) or reduced (RP; n = 33) program: the RP group received a reduced education (self-reading of an educational booklet on asthma), while the CP group attended an “asthma school”, consisting of six lessons based on the same booklet and including educational videotapes. Both programs included peak-flow monitoring and treatment according to international guidelines, and follow-up. The outcome variables (asthma attacks, urgent medical examinations, admission days, working days lost) did not differ significantly between CP and RP. Morbidity savings were $1894.70 (CP) and $1697.80 (RP) according to Saw, and $1349.50 and $1301.80, respectively, according to HPP. The net cost-benefit was $1181.50 for CP and $1028.00 for RP, and the cost-benefit ratio per dollar spent was 1:2.6 for CP and 1:2.5 for RP, according to Saw. One day of admission prevented had a cost of $110.20 (CP) and $94.10 (RP). CP gave slightly better results and was slightly more cost-effective than RP in improving patients' welfare. It cannot be excluded that the retrospective analysis used to determine baseline costs might have inflated differences for both groups. Sensitivity analysis was slightly in favor of RP when the outcome variables were tested at their upper and lower 95% CI.     

Chemohyperthermia for advanced abdominal malignancies: a new procedure with closed abdomen and previously performed anastomosis

ChemoHyperthermic Peritoneal Perfusion (CHPP) after cytoreductive surgery is a relatively new procedure in the treatment of abdominal carcinomatosis or sarcomatosis. An assessment of the CHPP technique performed on 20 patients suffering from abdominal malignancies was carried out. After surgical debulking and gastrointestinal anastomosis, two Tenckhoff catheters were positioned for the immediate performance of CHPP, which was carried out at 42-43°C for 1h, after closing the abdomen. In 19 assessable patients, 47.3% and 36.8% complete responses (CR) were recorded at 1 and 6 months, respectively, with responses of 37.5% in patients affected with gastrointestinal cancer and 50% in patients affected with ovarian cancer. CR were obtained only in patients who had undergone accurate peritoneal debulking. Survival rate for gastrointestinal and ovarian cancer was 68% at 12 months. Patients who underwent radical cytoreductive surgery are all alive at a follow-up median time of 17 months. Two anastomotic leakages with spontaneous recovery were observed, along with one hydrothorax, which was immediately drained during the procedure, three cases of chemotherapic gastrointestinal toxicity, one sepsis, one renal failure that required a transient dialysis, and one cholecystitis that required cholecystectomy. One patient died 30 days after CHPP of a cardiac ischaemia not strictly related to the surgical procedure. In the authors' experience, CHPP with closed abdomen after reconstructive gastrointestinal surgery is a safe and feasible treatment with acceptable side effects.     

Italian experience with rVIII-single chain: a survey of patients with haemophilia A and their physicians

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - rVIII-SingleChain is indicated for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A (HA). The safety and efficacy of rVIII-SingleChain...     

Empathy for social exclusion involves the sensory-discriminative component of pain: a within-subject fMRI study

Recent research has shown that experiencing events that represent a significant threat to social bonds activates a network of brain areas associated with the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain. In the present study, we investigated whether the same brain areas are involved when witnessing social exclusion threats experienced by others. Using a within-subject design, we show that an ecologically valid experience of social exclusion recruits areas coding the somatosensory components of physical pain (posterior insular cortex and secondary somatosensory cortex). Furthermore, we show that this pattern of activation not only holds for directly experienced social pain, but also during empathy for social pain. Finally, we report that subgenual cingulate cortex is the only brain area conjointly active during empathy for physical and social pain. This supports recent theories that affective processing and homeostatic regulation are at the core of empathic responses.     

Electrical impedance tomography to evaluate air distribution prior to extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES:

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is used as a standard of care after extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants. A pressure of 5 cmH₂O is usually applied regardless of individual differences in lung compliance. Current methods for evaluation of lung compliance and air distribution in the lungs are thus imprecise for preterm infants. This study used electrical impedance tomography to determine the feasibility of evaluating the positive end-expiratory pressure level associated with a more homogeneous air distribution within the lungs before extubation.

METHODS:

Ventilation homogeneity was defined by electrical impedance tomography as the ratio of ventilation between dependent and non-dependent lung areas. The best ventilation homogeneity was achieved when this ratio was equal to 1. Just before extubation, decremental expiratory pressure levels were applied (8, 7, 6 and 5 cmH₂0; 3 minutes each step), and the pressure that determined the best ventilation homogeneity was defined as the best positive end-expiratory pressure.

RESULTS:

The best positive end-expiratory pressure value was 6.3±1.1 cmH₂0, and the mean continuous positive airway pressure applied after extubation was 5.2±0.4 cmH₂0 (p = 0.002). The extubation failure rate was 21.4%. X-Ray and blood gases after extubation were also checked.

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrates that electrical impedance tomography can be safely and successfully used in patients ready for extubation to suggest the best ventilation homogeneity, which is influenced by the level of expiratory pressure applied. In this feasibility study, the best lung compliance was found with pressure levels higher than the continuous positive airway pressure levels that are usually applied for routine extubation.     

Prognosis in Women with Breast Cancer and Private Extra Insurance Coverage

Background

Many women covered by the Spanish public health system also have an extra private insurance policy for gynecological examinations and routine annual mammography. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term survival rates in these patients when diagnosed with breast cancer.

Methods

We analyzed the survival and prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with breast cancer who were referred to a medical oncology unit for multidisciplinary treatment covered by private health insurance.

Results

Between 1994 and 2009, a total of 434 patients with breast tumor were analyzed: 33 in situ and 401 infiltrating. Among the infiltrating carcinomas, 38 were stage IV and 363 were stage I, II, or III. With a median follow-up of 62 months, the 5-year global survival rate was 91 %: 97 % for stage I, 94 % for stage II, and 77 % for stage III tumors. In the patients diagnosed by routine mammography, the 5-year survival rate was 96 %, compared with 86 % in those consulting their gynecologist after breast self-examination or for other symptoms (p = 0.0159). Seventy-four percent were treated conservatively and experienced better survival than the 26 % who underwent mastectomy (p = 0.0024). Patients with disease with positive hormone receptors had a better survival rate (p = 0.0264); hormone receptor status was the only independent prognostic factor in the Cox multivariate analysis. Postmenopausal patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen plus exemestane had a better prognosis than those who received tamoxifen alone (p = 0.0203).

Conclusions

Long-term survival rate was high in breast cancer patients with extra private insurance coverage. This is probably because disease was diagnosed at an early stage.     

Multidrug regimens for treatment of older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Background and AimsOlder patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPDAC) are under-represented in clinical trials.MethodsOur single-center, retrospective study enrolled MPDAC patients ≥ 70 treated with chemotherapyResults105 patients were divided in groups based on the received treatments: 44 gemcitabine or capecitabine monotherapy (A), 34 nabpaclitaxel-gemcitabine (B) 27 4-drugs combinations (gemcitabine, cisplatin, capecitabine plus either nab-paclitaxel or epirubicin or docetaxel) (C). Group A: median age was 78 (70–87) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 was found in 84% of patients; Group B: median age 77 (71–84) and KPS ≥ 80 in 88% of patients; Group C: median age 73 (70–78) and KPS ≥ 80 in 93% of patients. Median OS was 7.9, 11.7 and 14.2 months in group A, B and C respectively; 1 and 2-year OS were 27% and 8% in group A; 44% and 5% in group B; 52% and 22% in group C. When lung metastatic only patients were excluded, patients <75 and ≥ 75 had similar OS in group A (6.4 vs 5.6 months) and in group B (12.3 vs 11.1 months). In group B grade 3 thrombocytopenia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent in patients ≥ 75.ConclusionsIn older patients, combination chemotherapy shows acceptable feasibility and promising efficacy.