Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and mitomycin-C in head and neck carcinoma. A pilot study.

Seventeen patients were entered into a Phase I/II trial of concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy (7,440 cGy total dose; 120 cGy b.i.d.) combined with constant infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (1,000 mg/m2/24 hours for 72 hours) and cisplatin (DDP) (50 mg/m2) for a total of three cycles. Thirteen patients had Stage IV disease; three, Stage III disease; and one, Stage II hypopharyngeal disease. Thirteen of 17 patients had positive cervical lymph nodes, and the mean size of the largest lymph node was 5.5 x 5.1 cm. The patients were not treated with planned adjunctive surgery except for one patient who had a radical neck dissection for massive, rapidly growing cervical adenopathy, which recurred promptly within 1 month before the initiation of protocol therapy. After the initial six patients were entered, mitomycin-C (Mito 8 mg/m2) was added during the second cycle. All the patients completed the planned course of radiotherapy with a median dose of 7,440 cGy and a mean dose of 7,248 cGy except for two patients who died--one from toxicity and the other, suicide. The predominant toxicity was mucositis, which was grade 3/4 in 11 of 15 patients, resulting in an average interruption of radiation therapy of 12 days. Weight loss was significant and was on the average 12% of baseline weight. Hematological toxicity was mild in the 5-FU/DDP group (only one grade 3 toxicity of six) and severe in the 5-FU/DDP/Mito-treated patients (five of eight patients having grade 3/4 toxicity including one leukopenic pneumonitis death). Additional toxicity included one parapharyngeal cellulitis, which responded to antibiotics. Noncompliance with the complex regimen was only seen in three patients. One patient refused b.i.d. radiation therapy, and one patient refused further chemotherapy after the first cycle. Additionally, one patient who had a severe ethanol withdrawal reaction during the first cycle of 5-FU/DDP did not receive further chemotherapy. The complete response rate of both primary site and neck by the protocol regimen alone was 71%. However, two patients, one from each group, did undergo salvage neck dissection, and the locoregional control is currently 73%, with a mean follow-up time of 18.4 months. The feasibility of combining hyperfractionated radiation therapy with aggressive concurrent chemotherapy was demonstrated. The response and local control rate justifies the added toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery: dose-volume analysis of linear accelerator techniques.

Stereotactic radiosurgery of the brain may be accomplished with a linear accelerator by performing several noncoplanar arcs of a highly collimated beam focused at a point. The shape of the radiation distribution produced by this technique is affected by the beam energy, field size, and the number and size of the arcs. The influence of these parameters on the resulting radiation distributions was analyzed by computing dose volume histograms for a typical brain. Dose volume functions were computed for: (a) the energy range of 4-24 MV x rays; (b) target sizes of 1-4 cm; and (c) 1-11 arcs and dynamic rotation. The dose volume histograms were found to be dependent on the number of arcs for target sizes of 1-4 cm. However, these differences were minimal for techniques with 4 arcs or more. The influence of beam energy on the dose volume histogram was also found to be minimal.     

A rapid method for electron beam energy check.

Assessment of electron beam energy and its long term stability is part of standard quality assurance practice in radiation oncology. Conventional depth-ionization or depth-film density measurements are time consuming both in terms of data acquisition and analysis. A procedure is described utilizing ionization measurements at two energy specific depths. It is based on a linear relationship between electron beam energy and its practical range. Energy shifts within the range covered by the two measurement depths are easily resolved. Within a range of +/- 0.50 MeV (+/- 1.30 MeV) around the established mean incident energy of 5.48 MeV (20.39 MeV), the method accuracy is better than 0.10 MeV.