Frequent administration of Dabis Maleate, a phase I study.

Dabis Maleate (1,4-bis(2'-chloroethyl)-1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.1] Heptane dihydrogen dimaleate) (NSC 262666) is an alkylating quaternary nitrogen compound. In a previous phase I study using a once-every-3-weeks administration the dose-limiting toxicity was neurotoxicity and the recommended dose for phase II studies was 750 mg/m2 iv every 3 weeks. In vitro studies suggested a higher activity after more frequent administration, and in vivo studies a better therapeutic index with prolonged infusion. We studied 11 patients with solid tumors. Dose levels tested ranged from 250-750 mg/m2, either as a day 1-3 regimen or weekly, the latter as bolus administration or as prolonged infusion. The dose-limiting toxicity was neurotoxicity consisting of paresthesias and ataxia. Nausea and vomiting were moderate. No other major toxicity was observed. The dose recommended for phase II studies is 500 mg/m2/week as a 6-hour iv infusion for 6 weeks, followed by a 3-week rest period.     

Phase I/II study of a short course of weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumours were entered in a phase I/II study of six, weekly cycles of cisplatin. Nineteen patients were chemonaive and six were previously treated. The starting dose was 50 mg m-2 week-1. This dose could be escalated without major toxicity to 70 mg m-2 week-1. At a dose of 80 mg m-2 myelosuppression grade 3 occurred as well as grade 1 nephro- and neurotoxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg m-2 with dose limiting thrombocytopenia. Hypertonic saline was effective in preventing nephrotoxicity. Ondansetron was a very effective antiemetic in the first weeks of treatment but its efficacy waned later on. Responses were observed in head and neck cancer, melanoma and mesothelioma. At the dose level of 80 mg m-2 the optimal dose intensity was reached. This schedule will be tested further in phase II studies.     

Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.

The study was designed to investigate possible relationships between tumour response and exposure to cisplatin (area under the curve of unbound cisplatin in plasma, AUC) and DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes (WBC) in patients with solid tumours. Patients were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin at a dose of 70 or 80 mg m-2. The AUC was determined during the first course and DNA-adduct levels in WBC during all courses at baseline, 1 h (A(max)) and 15 h after a 3 h infusion of cisplatin. The area under the DNA-adduct-time curve (AUA) was calculated. The tumour response was determined after six courses. Forty-five evaluable patients received 237 courses of cisplatin. Sixteen patients with head and neck cancer received a dose of 80 mg m-2 and 29 with various other tumour types received 70 mg m-2 plus daily 50 mg oral etoposide. There were 20 responders (partial and complete) and 25 non-responders (stable and progressive disease). The AUC was highly variable (mean +/- s.d. = 2.48 +/- 0.51 micrograms h-1 ml-1; range 1.10-3.82) and was closely correlated with the AUA (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and A(max) (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001). The AUC, AUA and A(max) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders in the total population (P < 0.0001) and in the two subgroups treated at 70 or 80 mg m-2. In logistic regression analysis AUC, AUA and A(max) were important predictors of response. The magnitude of exposure to cisplatin is, through DNA-adduct formation, the major determinant of the response rate in this population. Hence, individualised dosing of cisplatin using AUC or DNA-adducts should lead to increased response rates.     

Docetaxel and paclitaxel inhibit DNA-adduct formation and intracellular accumulation of cisplatin in human leukocytes

 The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanism of the pharmacodynamic interaction between docetaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin. Cisplatin-induced DNA-adducts and cisplatin accumulation were quantitated in peripheral blood leukocytes (WBC). The WBC were obtained from patients treated with docetaxel or paclitaxel in phase I/II studies and were incubated in vitro with cisplatin. In addition, blank whole-blood samples were obtained from patients and healthy subjects and incubated in vitro with cisplatin or docetaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin. The cisplatin-induced DNA-adduct levels measured in WBC after treatment with docetaxel or paclitaxel were significantly lower than those determined in non-pretreated WBC. Docetaxel and paclitaxel reduced the intracellular accumulation of cisplatin in WBC by 46–47%. If the pharmacodynamic interaction between docetaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin also occurs in other normal tissues such as bone marrow, it may well contribute to the sequence dependent toxicity that has been observed in clinical studies. Received: 15 February 1995/Accepted: 6 June 1995     

Results of a randomised phase II study of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil with alpha-interferon in metastatic pancreatic cancer: an EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer group trial

A randomised phase II study of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin (CDDP) with or without alpha-interferon 2b was performed in patients with pancreatic cancer with measurable metastatic disease outside the pancreas. The treatment in arm A consisted of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2) for 4 days and in arm B the same treatment was given plus alpha-interferon 2b in a dose of 3 million Units/day subcutaneously (s.c.) from day 1 for 5 days. 36 patients were entered in the trial, 18 in each arm. In arm B only 15 patients were eligible. No responses were observed in the 5-FU/CDDP arm and only 2 partial responses were achieved in the interferon-arm, lasting 27 and 32 weeks, respectively. Both treatment arms showed considerable toxicity. It has to be concluded that both treatment regimens have little activity and cannot be recommended.     

Phase II study of miltefosine 6% solution as topical treatment of skin metastases in breast cancer patients

Topical treatment of skin metastases with a cytotoxic agent is attractive for its easy self-administration and absence of major systemic interference. Miltefosine exerts its cytotoxicity by acting on cell membrane phospholipids and can be administered topically. Twenty breast cancer patients with progression of skin metastases were treated with a 6% solution of miltefosine, which was topically administered once daily during the first week and twice daily thereafter. Sixteen out of 20 patients also had metastatic disease at other sites. Concomitant systemic treatment when ongoing for at least 2 months prior to study entry was permitted, and consisted of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in seven and nine patients, respectively. Prior palliative cytotoxic and hormonal therapy had been administered to 11 and 19 patients, respectively. No grade 3 and 4 toxicity occurred. Miltefosine therapy was discontinued in two patients due to nausea and in one patient due to skin toxicity. Grade 1 and 2 adverse skin reactions, and nausea and vomiting were seen in 11 and two patients, respectively. In 18 patients evaluable for response, four partial responses were noted (response rate 22%), while seven patients had stable disease. Three partial responses were observed in patients in whom the skin lesions were smaller than 1.5 cm2. Median duration of response was 2.5 months and median time to progression for all patients was 1.9 months. In this study topically applied miltefosine for metastatic skin lesions of breast cancer showed modest activity in a relatively heavily pretreated patient population, without serious systemic toxicity.     

The potential of statins as part of anti-cancer treatment

Statins are known to reduce mortality related to cardiovascular diseases. In recent years, evidence has accumulated that statins also exert anti-tumour activity for which numerous potential underlying mechanisms of action have been suggested. Accordingly, several case-control studies showed a reduction in cancer incidence in patients treated with statins. Furthermore, statins interact synergistically with several anti-tumour treatments in preclinical studies. Until now, only a few clinical studies are available that explore the optimal dose, feasibility, and efficacy of statins applied as single agents to control the growth of existing tumours. Studies investigating statins as part of a multi-drug regimen are completely lacking. Nevertheless, the interesting pre-clinical anti-tumour activity of statins combined with a favourable toxicity profile warrant their further development as anti-tumour agents, in particular as part of multi-drug regimens.     

Adaptive intrapatient dose escalation of cisplatin in combination with low-dose vp16 in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

The objective of this phase II and pharmacologic study was to explore the feasibility, toxicity and activity of adaptive intrapatient dose escalation of cisplatin in a dose-intensive weekly schedule using predefined levels of exposure, with the ultimate aim to improve the antitumour activity of the therapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Platinum DNA-adduct levels in peripheral white blood cells during treatment were used as the primary parameter for adaptive dosing. If DNA-adduct levels were not available, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of unbound platinum in plasma was used for dose adaptation. Target levels for DNA-adducts and AUC have been defined in a previously performed pharmacologic study. The feasibility of adaptive dosing was tested in 76 patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, who were planned to receive 6 weekly courses of cisplatin at a starting dose of 70 mg m(-2), together with daily low oral dose of 50 mg VP16. In total, 37 patients (49%) who were given more than one course received a dose increase varying from 10 to 55%. The majority of patients reached the defined target levels by a dose increase during course two. Relevant grade 2 neurotoxicity was observed in eight (10%) patients and reversible ototoxicity grade 2 in 14 (18%) patients. The strategy of adaptive intrapatient dose adjustment of cisplatin is practically feasible in a research setting even when results for dose adaptation have to be reported within a short time-period of 1 week. The toxicity appeared to be manageable in this cohort of patients. In some patients, exposure after the standard dose was substantially lower than the defined target level and significant dose escalations of more than 50% had to be applied. The response rate (RR) was relatively high: overall 40% (29 out of 72 patients) partial remission (PR), in patients with stage IIIB the RR was 60% (15 out of 25 patients) and with stage IV 30% (14 out of 47 patients). Randomised studies are needed to determine whether the adaptive dosing strategy results in better efficacy than standard dosing.     

Adaptive intrapatient dose escalation of cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck cancer

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility and toxicity of intrapatient dose adjustment using predefined levels of exposure to cisplatin, with the ultimate goal to further improve the antitumor activity of the treatment. The primary parameter for adaptive dosing was the level of platinum DNA adducts in peripheral white blood cells (WBC) and the secondary parameter the area under the curve (AUC) of unbound platinum in plasma, which were determined during the applied courses. Target levels had been defined in a previously performed pharmacologic study. The concept of adaptive dosing was tested in 16 patients with locally advanced head and neck (H/N) cancer who would receive six weekly courses of cisplatin at a starting dose level of 80 mg/m(2), which was previously investigated in a phase II study. Forty-seven percent of patients received a dose increase varying from 10 to 40%. Only two patients had exposure levels significantly below the defined target levels for DNA adducts and AUC. The majority of patients reached the defined target levels by modest dose increases of 10-20% during course 2. Relevant but reversible ototoxicity (temporary grade 3 in two patients) and renal toxicity (temporary grade 2 in two other patients) were observed. The pattern and severity of the toxicity was comparable to that encountered in the previous phase II study in H/N cancer patients. We conclude that the strategy of intrapatient dose adjustment for cisplatin is practically feasible in a research setting even when a short turn around time of 1 week is the limit for reporting results. Although in some patients the dose increase that had to be applied to reach target levels was substantial (up to 40%), this approach in H/N cancer patients is not expected to improve the response rate significantly, because these significantly underdosed patients represented only a small percentage of the investigated population. The great majority of patients needed only limited (10-20%) dose increases which very likely will not improve the response rate to a clinically significant extent. The outlined concept is currently being explored in other tumor types and schedules of cisplatin.     

Phase II study of ACNU in non-small-cell lung cancer: EORTC study 08872

Summary A total of 62 patients with metastatic or locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were entered in a phase II study of ACNU. Initially, the drug was given i. v. at a dose of 100 mg/m² every 6 weeks, but due to observed haematological side effects in chemotherapy-pretreated patients, the dose was lowered in this group to 75 mg/m². We observed one complete response in a subject exhibiting multiple lung metastases and a partial response in two patients, one showing brain metastases and one who experienced local disease recurrence. The toxicity of ACNU mainly consisted of bone marrow suppression especially thrombocytopenia, with one toxic death occurring due to intracerebral haemorrhage. We concluded that at this dose and on this schedule, ACNU has limited activity in non-small-cell lung cancer.