Pathophysiology and management of sensitive skin: position paper from the special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI)

The special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch previously defined sensitive skin as a syndrome defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (stinging, burning, pain, pruritus and tingling sensations) in response to stimuli that normally should not provoke such sensations. This additional paper focuses on the pathophysiology and the management of sensitive skin. Sensitive skin is not an immunological disorder but is related to alterations of the skin nervous system. Skin barrier abnormalities are frequently associated, but there is no cause and direct relationship. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology of sensitive skin – as well as the inducing factors. Avoidance of possible triggering factors and the use of well-tolerated cosmetics, especially those containing inhibitors of unpleasant sensations, might be suggested for patients with sensitive skin. The role of psychosocial factors, such as stress or negative expectations, might be relevant for subgroups of patients. To date, there is no clinical trial supporting the use of topical or systemic drugs in sensitive skin. The published data are not sufficient to reach a consensus on sensitive skin management. In general, patients with sensitive skin require a personalized approach, taking into account various biomedical, neural and psychosocial factors affecting sensitive skin.     

Architecture of research in psychiatry, 1953 to 1983

Although there has been one report on the trends in study design in general medicine, we are aware of none for general psychiatry prior to this communication. Accordingly, articles from the American Journal of Psychiatry (N = 194) and the Archives (N = 109) were randomly sampled for the years 1953, 1963, 1973, and 1983. Two raters achieved reliability (kappa = .82) for recognizing the major types of study design (cohort, clinical trial, case control, cross sectional, case report, and review). There was a significant change in study architecture over time, with the percentage of review articles declining and the percentage of case-control and cross-sectional studies increasing. Another major finding was a large increase in use of inclusion and exclusion criteria for diagnosis in non-review article studies. The general trends are for increasingly sophisticated research designs to be used in psychiatry research. The quality of research designs in psychiatry for 1983 also compares favorably with research designs found in a respected medicine journal.     

Using jugular bulb oxyhemoglobin saturation to guide onset of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest does not affect post-operative neuropsychological function.

OBJECTIVES: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is commonly used during thoracic aortic surgery, and is initiated only after a sufficient degree of cerebral hypothermia is induced. The criteria for initiating DHCA vary among institutions: most centers use temperature criteria, some use electroencephalography, and a minority use jugular bulb oxyhemoglobin saturation SjO(2) criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of SjO(2) monitoring to guide the onset of DHCA was associated with better post-operative neuropsychological outcome. METHODS: Sixty-one thoracic aortic surgical patients underwent both pre- and post-operative neuropsychological testing. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) those with SjO(2)> or =95% at DHCA onset; (2) those with SjO(2)<95% at DHCA onset; and (3) those without SjO(2) monitoring. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post-operative decline in neuropsychological function among the three groups of patients. Patients in whom SjO(2) data were used to guide onset of DHCA had lower esophageal and bladder temperatures at that time compared with patients without SjO(2) monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of SjO(2) had no apparent effect upon post-operative neuropsychological outcome, and there were no trends in our small patient cohort suggesting differences that our study was not adequately powered to detect. Use of SjO(2) monitoring was associated with more profound hypothermia prior to DHCA due to more prolonged cooling in attempts to bring the SjO(2) above the 95% threshold. Using our institutional cooling protocol, SjO(2) monitoring does not appear to increase neuroprotection in patients undergoing DHCA for thoracic aortic repairs.