排序方式: 共有60条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Melissa C. Caughey PhD Muthiah Vaduganathan MD MPH Sameer Arora MD MPH Arman Qamar MD MPH Robert J. Mentz MD Patricia P. Chang MD MHS Clyde W. Yancy MD Stuart D. Russell MD Sanjiv J. Shah MD Wayne D. Rosamond PhD Ambarish Pandey MD MSCS 《Journal of the American Geriatrics Society》2021,69(5):1309-1318
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Timothy W. Farrell MD AGSF Leslie Francis PhD JD Teneille Brown JD Lauren E. Ferrante MD MHS Eric Widera MD Ramona Rhodes MD MPH MSCS AGSF Tony Rosen MD MPH Ula Hwang MD MPH Leah J. Witt MD Niranjan Thothala MD MRCP MBA Shan W. Liu MD SD Caroline A. Vitale MD AGSF Ursula K. Braun MD MPH Caroline Stephens PhD RN GNP-BC Debra Saliba MD MPH AGSF 《Journal of the American Geriatrics Society》2020,68(6):1143-1149
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact older adults disproportionately with respect to serious consequences ranging from severe illness and hospitalization to increased mortality risk. Concurrently, concerns about potential shortages of healthcare professionals and health supplies to address these issues have focused attention on how these resources are ultimately allocated and used. Some strategies, for example, misguidedly use age as an arbitrary criterion that disfavors older adults in resource allocation decisions. This is a companion article to the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) position statement, “Resource Allocation Strategies and Age-Related Considerations in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.” It is intended to inform stakeholders including hospitals, health systems, and policymakers about ethical considerations that should be considered when developing strategies for allocation of scarce resources during an emergency involving older adults. This review presents the legal and ethical background for the position statement and discusses these issues that informed the development of the AGS positions: (1) age as a determining factor, (2) age as a tiebreaker, (3) criteria with a differential impact on older adults, (4) individual choices and advance directives, (5) racial/ethnic disparities and resource allocation, and (6) scoring systems and their impact on older adults. It also considers the role of advance directives as expressions of individual preferences in pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1143–1149, 2020. 相似文献
7.
Samir Gupta MD MSCS Gloria D. Coronado PhD Keith Argenbright MD Alison T. Brenner PhD MPH Sheila F. Castañeda PhD Jason A. Dominitz MD MHS Beverly Green MD MPH Rachel B. Issaka MD MAS Theodore R. Levin MD Daniel S. Reuland MD MPH Lisa C. Richardson MD MPH Douglas J. Robertson MD MPH Amit G. Singal MD MS Michael Pignone MD MPH 《CA: a cancer journal for clinicians》2020,70(4):283-298
Uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) offers promise for increasing screening rates, but optimal strategies for implementation have not been well synthesized. In June 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a meeting of subject matter experts and stakeholders to answer key questions regarding mailed FIT implementation in the United States. Points of agreement included: 1) primers, such as texts, telephone calls, and printed mailings before mailed FIT, appear to contribute to effectiveness; 2) invitation letters should be brief and easy to read, and the signatory should be tailored based on setting; 3) instructions for FIT completion should be simple and address challenges that may lead to failed laboratory processing, such as notation of collection date; 4) reminders delivered to initial noncompleters should be used to increase the FIT return rate; 5) data infrastructure should identify eligible patients and track each step in the outreach process, from primer delivery through abnormal FIT follow-up; 6) protocols and procedures such as navigation should be in place to promote colonoscopy after abnormal FIT; 7) a high-quality, 1-sample FIT should be used; 8) sustainability requires a program champion and organizational support for the work, including sufficient funding and external policies (such as quality reporting requirements) to drive commitment to program investment; and 9) the cost effectiveness of mailed FIT has been established. Participants concluded that mailed FIT is an effective and efficient strategy with great potential for increasing colorectal cancer screening in diverse health care settings if more widely implemented. 相似文献
8.
9.
Natasha C. Zacher MD Kaci L. Pickett MS Sarah J. Schmiege PhD Christina A. Olson MD Anna L. Bruckner MD MSCS Lucinda L. Kohn MD MHS 《Pediatric dermatology》2023,40(4):651-654
Pediatric teledermatology rapidly expanded with the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impacts of this expansion on patients' access to care have not yet been entirely defined. In this retrospective study of 3027 patients in an academic pediatric dermatology practice, patients who identified as having a primary language other than English were less likely to access pediatric dermatology care during the COVID lockdown. This study did not identify a significant or meaningful difference in age, geography, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or race between patients who were offered pediatric dermatology care that was either in-person or via synchronous telehealth. These findings are overall reassuring that there were not major disparities in telehealth utilization during the COVID shelter-in-place mandate, although highlight the need for institutions to ensure systems are in place to enhance telehealth access for patients with non-English primary language. 相似文献