The management of symptoms in advanced cancer: experience in a hospital-based continuing care unit.

The treatment received by 158 patients with advanced cancer admitted over one year to the Continuing Care Unit at the Royal Marsden Hospital has been reviewed. The unit is an integral part of the hospital and this is reflected in the fact that 46 patients (29%) received radiotherapy, hormone therapy, chemotherapy or surgery in addition to symptomatic treatment for palliation of troublesome symptoms. One hundred and thirty-one patients received oral morphine in doses ranging from 2.5 mg 4-hourly to 700 mg 4-hourly. Patients with renal or hepatic impairment required lower doses of morphine and there was a highly significant inverse relationship between morphine dose and age. Eighty-five patients (54%) received parenteral diamorphine at some time due to their inability to take oral morphine. One hundred and twenty-three patients (78%) received a co-analgesic drug and anti-emetics were required by 78 patients (49% overall; 56% of those receiving morphine). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture and relaxation were employed in selected patients, and graduated compression sleeves were used to treat lymphoedema. These data highlight the wide range of therapeutic options available to control the symptoms of advanced cancer and also indicate that tumoricidal treatments used in conjunction with symptomatic treatments may have a significant part to play.     

EFNS Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases: report of an EFNS Task Force

The objectives have been to establish evidence-based guidelines and identify controversies regarding the management of patients with brain metastases. The collection of scientific data was obtained by consulting the Cochrane Library, bibliographic databases, overview papers and previous guidelines from scientific societies and organizations. A tissue diagnosis is necessary when the primary tumor is unknown or the aspect on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is atypical. Dexamethasone is the corticosteroid of choice for cerebral edema. Anticonvulsants should not be prescribed prophylactically. Surgery should be considered in patients with up to three brain metastases, being effective in prolonging survival when the systemic disease is absent/controlled and the performance status is high. Stereotactic radiosurgery should be considered in patients with metastases of 3–3.5 cm of maximum diameter. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after surgery or radiosurgery is debated: in case of absent/controlled systemic cancer and Karnofsky Performance score of 70 or more, one can either withhold initial WBRT or deliver early WBRT with conventional fractionation to avoid late neurotoxicity. WBRT alone is the treatment of choice for patients with single or multiple brain metastases not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery. Chemotherapy may be the initial treatment for patients with brain metastases from chemosensitive tumors.     

MEASUREMENTS OF INTERFACE PRESSURE BETWEEN BODY SITES AND THE SURFACES OF FOUR SPECIALISED AIR MATTRESSES

SUMMARY Four specialised air mattresses had interface pressure measured under six body sites prone to pressure sores in 10 subjects, supine and sitting. The mattresses were the Clinirest (SSI) and FirstStep (KCI) continuous airflow mattress overlays, and Airwave (Pegasus) and Nimbus (Huntleigh) alternating pressure air mattresses. On the mattress overlays, average supine interface pressures were 2.33 kPa (scapula), 4.15 kPa (elbow), 1.94 kPa (sacrum) and 2.79 kPa (buttock), although they were higher at the occiput (7.97 kPa) and heel (11.7 kPa). The alternating pressure air mattresses had an average minimum interface pressure close to zero for three sites, rising to 4.28 kPa under the heel. Average maximum interface pressures were 8.61 kPa (occiput), 5.21 kPa (scapula), 4.90 (elbow), 4.85 kPa (sacrum), 4.61 kPa (buttock) and 13.2 kPa (heel). No accepted scientific method exists for comparing the two types of mattress. Our data suggest a clinical benefit at the occiput and heel (supine) in using an alternating pressure air mattress and a benefit in using a continuous airflow mattress overlay at other sites.     

Radiology and the Health Policy Agenda for the American People

Eleven radiologists appointed by the major radiological societies participated for the past 5 years in the development of the Health Policy Agenda for the American People. The Agenda is an action plan to address a wide variety of serious problems in medicine. The first phase involved establishment of 159 principles, broad value statements that were the foundation of the project. Phase 2 involved the development of policy proposals on 38 urgent issues for action in medical science; education; health resources; delivery mechanisms; evaluation, assessment, and control; and payment for services. These proposals are summarized in this report. The activities and recommendations of representatives for the field of radiology are described. The Agenda has been released, and an implementation phase has begun. It will likely be of great importance to the practice of radiology over the next decade. Important issues can be addressed by acting with the coalitions that are being formed from among the more than 150 participating organizations.     

Inhibition by sumatriptan of central trigeminal neurones only after blood-brain barrier disruption.

1. The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1)-like agonist, sumatriptan, is highly efficient in the relief of migraine headache and its accompanying symptoms. 2. Experimental evidence has indicated that its site of action may be on the cranial vessels or on the trigeminal innervation of the cranium, or both, since sumatriptan does not pass the blood-brain barrier easily under normal circumstances. It is, however, not clear whether the blood-brain barrier is normal or abnormal during a migraine attack. 3. In this study, single unit activity and trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials in central trigeminal neurones were monitored during electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus. 4. Intravenous administration of sumatriptan (100 micrograms kg-1) did not alter trigeminal evoked activity unless the permeability of the blood-brain barrier had been increased by infusion of an hyperosmolar mannitol solution. After blood-brain barrier disruption, sumatriptan decreased the peak-to-peak amplitude of evoked potentials by 40 +/- 6% and the probability of firing of single units by 30 +/- 9%. Mannitol infusions alone in control animals caused no changes in evoked potentials or single unit activity. 5. The data suggest that in normal circumstances sumatriptan does not have sufficient access to trigeminal neurons to alter their function.