Capecitabine and vinorelbine in elderly patients (> or =65 years) with metastatic breast cancer: a phase I trial (SAKK 25/99).

BACKGROUND: Few chemotherapy regimens are suitable for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. With the aim of finding a regimen with a low burden of subjective non-overlapping toxic effects, vinorelbine and capecitabine were chosen to be investigated in a phase I dose-finding study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with advanced breast cancer were stratified for the presence of bone and non-bone involvement and treated at four dose levels from capecitabine 800 mg/m2 orally days 1-14 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 intravenously days 1 and 8, to capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally days 1-14 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously days 1 and 8, for a maximum of six cycles. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic/advanced disease. Fifty-three per cent of patients with bone metastases and 67% of patients without bone metastases had visceral disease. The median age was 70 years for the 15 with bone involvement patients and 73 years for the 21 without bone involvement patients. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were fully evaluable for hematological dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and all patients for other DLTs and for antitumor activity. One DLT with grade 3 venous thrombosis at dose level 2 and two dose-limiting neutropenia events at level 3 occurred in patients without bone involvement. Two dose-limiting neutropenia events were observed at dose level 2 for patients with bone involvement. Thus, the recommended dose was defined at level 1 (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1-14 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) for patients with bone involvement. For patients without bone involvement, the recommended dose was at level 2 (capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 days 1-14 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 days 1 and 8). For patients without bone involvement the overall response rate was 48% and the time to progression (TTP) was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-6.9]. For patients with bone involvement the overall response rate was 53% and TTP was 5.3 months (95% CI 2.7-7.8). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen of capecitabine and vinorelbine is well tolerated and effective in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. Toxicity was mainly hematological and was observed at a lower dose in patients with bone involvement. A phase II study with the two different dose levels for elderly patients with and without bone involvement is currently being conducted.     

Timing of CMF chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: role of endocrine responsiveness of the tumor.

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists about whether chemotherapy benefits all breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial VII, 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive disease were randomized to receive tamoxifen for 5 years or tamoxifen plus three concurrent courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil ('classical' CMF) chemotherapy, either early, delayed or both. In IBCSG trial IX, 1669 postmenopausal patients with node-negative disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone or three courses of adjuvant classical CMF prior to tamoxifen. Results were assessed according to estrogen receptor (ER) content of the primary tumor. RESULTS: For patients with node-positive, ER-positive disease, adding CMF either early, delayed or both reduced the risk of relapse by 21% (P=0.06), 26% (P=0.02) and 25% (P=0.02), respectively, compared with tamoxifen alone. There was no difference in disease-free survival when CMF was given prior to tamoxifen in patients with node-negative, ER-positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: CMF given concurrently (early, delayed or both) with tamoxifen was more effective than tamoxifen alone for patients with node-positive, endocrine-responsive breast cancer, supporting late administration of chemotherapy even after commencement of tamoxifen. In contrast, sequential CMF and tamoxifen for patients with node-negative, endocrine-responsive disease was ineffective.     

Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the BIG 1-98 trial.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors are considered standard adjuvant endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but it remains uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors should be given upfront or sequentially with tamoxifen. Awaiting results from ongoing randomized trials, we examined prognostic factors of an early relapse among patients in the BIG 1-98 trial to aid in treatment choices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analyses included all 7707 eligible patients treated on BIG 1-98. The median follow-up was 2 years, and the primary end point was breast cancer relapse. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five patients (3.7%) had an early relapse (3.1% on letrozole, 4.4% on tamoxifen). Predictive factors for early relapse were node positivity (P < 0.001), absence of both receptors being positive (P < 0.001), high tumor grade (P < 0.001), HER-2 overexpression/amplification (P < 0.001), large tumor size (P = 0.001), treatment with tamoxifen (P = 0.002), and vascular invasion (P = 0.02). There were no significant interactions between treatment and the covariates, though letrozole appeared to provide a greater than average reduction in the risk of early relapse in patients with many involved lymph nodes, large tumors, and vascular invasion present. CONCLUSION: Upfront letrozole resulted in significantly fewer early relapses than tamoxifen, even after adjusting for significant prognostic factors.     

The International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I-IV: 15 years follow-up

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant systemic therapy prolongs disease-free and overallsurvival in both pre- and postmenopausal patients. Availabledata shown benefit from multi-agent chemotherapy, prolongedtamoxifen treatment, and ovarian ablation, and that the combinationof chemo- and endocrine therapy might be advantageous. In 1978the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)initiated four complementary randomized controlled clinicaltrials to evaluate the roles of chemo-endocrine combinationsor endocrine therapy alone in specific populations defined byrisk (for pre- and perimenopausal patients) or by age (for postmenopausalpatients). The results at 10 and 13 years' median follow-upfor these trials are summarized in this report and are comparedto those of the Overview meta-anal-ysis with regard to chemo-endocrineor endocrine therapy combinations. Furthermore, types of firstrelapses by sites and second malignant diseases are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1601 evaluable patients with node positive disease were includedinto the studies I–IV. In Trial I (491 premenopausal patientswith 1–3 positive axillary nodes) we studied the additionof low-dose continuous prednisone (p) to a cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil(CMF) combination. In Trial n 327 premenopausal patients withfour or more positive axillary nodes were randomized to oneyear CMFp or to a surgical oophorectomy followed by CMFp. InTrial III (463 postmenopausal patients 65 years old or younger),combined chemoendocrine therapy (one year of CMFp plus tamoxifen(T)) was compared to endocrine therapy (1 year of p + T) orto surgery alone. In Trial IV 320 postmenopausal patients 66to 80 years old were treated either by surgery alone or by surgeryfollowed by 1 year prednisone and tamoxifen. RESULTS: In Trial I the addition of prednisone allowed a higher doseof cytotoxics to be administered compared with CMF alone. Despitethis increased dose intensity, 13-year disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for the two treatmentgroups (49% vs. 52% DFS, 59% vs. 65% OS for CMFp vs. CMF). InTrial II the addition of surgical oophorectomy to CMFp yieldedan improved outcome which approached statistical significancefor the subset of 107 patients known to have estrogen receptor-positivetumors (DFS, 23% vs. 15%, p     

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced nonpretreated and pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three nonpretreated patients and 26 patients who had experienced one fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen for advanced colorectal cancer were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) bid on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with good performance status (World Health Organization grade 0 to 1) were accrued onto two nonrandomized parallel arms of a phase II study. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 65%) for nonpretreated and 15% (95% CI, 4% to 35%) for pretreated patients. The main toxicity of this combination was diarrhea, which occurred at grade 3 or 4 in 35% of the nonpretreated and 50% of the pretreated patients. Grade 3 or 4 sensory neuropathy, including laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia, occurred in 16% of patients on both cohorts. Capecitabine dose reductions were necessary in 26% of the nonpretreated and 45% of the pretreated patients in the second treatment cycle. The median overall survival was 17.1 months and 11.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. On the basis of our toxicity experience, we recommend use of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) at an initial dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) bid in nonpretreated patients and at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) bid in pretreated patients.     

Decreased immunoreactivity for p27 protein in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma is correlated with HER-2/neu overexpression and with benefit from one course of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with negative lymph node status: results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to clarify the prognostic and predictive value of immunoreactivity for the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1) in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma and to investigate its relation with clinicopathologic features and other markers. METHODS: Immunoreactivity for p27 protein was analyzed on tumor slides from 461 patients who were enrolled in the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial V (median follow-up, 13 years), including 198 patients with lymph node negative disease and 263 patients with lymph node positive disease. Tumors with < 50% immunoreactive neoplastic cells were considered low expressors. Immunoreactivity for p27 was correlated with several clinicopathologic characteristics. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival were analyzed according to p27 immunoreactivity and treatment group. RESULTS: In the lymph node negative population, decreased p27 immunoreactivity was associated with higher tumor grade (P = 0.001) and HER-2/neu overexpression (P = 0.04). In the lymph node positive population, low p27 expression was associated with higher tumor grade (P = 0.01), low expression of thymidylate synthase (P = 0.001), and higher Ki-67 expression (P = 0.007). DFS was not significantly different according to p27 status in either lymph node negative patients (10-year DFS: low p27 expression, 53% +/- 5%; high p27 expression, 55% +/- 5%) or in lymph node positive patients (10 year DFS: low p27 expression, 33% +/- 4%; high p27 expression, 32% +/- 4%). However, in the lymph node negative population, the benefit of one course of perioperative chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil was confined exclusively to patients with tumors that showed reduced p27 immunoreactivity (P = 0.03; test for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that p27 immunoreactivity has little if any prognostic value in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. However, these findings suggest that, in patients with breast carcinoma who have negative lymph node status, reduced p27 immunoreactivity is associated with HER-2/neu overexpression and may be predictive of a benefit from the early administration of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Anemia during adjuvant non-taxane chemotherapy for early breast cancer: Incidence and risk factors from two trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group

Goal of the work Anemia is a common side effect of chemotherapy. Limited information exists about its incidence and risk factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of anemia and risk factors for anemia occurrence in patients with early breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and methods We evaluated risk factors for anemia in pre- and post/perimenopausal patients with lymph node-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in two randomized trials. All patients received four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF). Anemia incidence was related to baseline risk factors. Multivariable analysis used logistic and Cox regression. Main results Among the 2,215 available patients, anemia was recorded in 11% during adjuvant chemotherapy. Grade 2 and 3 anemia occurred in 4 and 1% of patients, respectively. Pretreatment hemoglobin and white blood cells (WBC) were significant predictors of anemia. Adjusted odds ratios (logistic regression) comparing highest versus lowest quartiles were 0.18 (P < 0.0001) for hemoglobin and 0.52 (P = 0.0045) for WBC. Age, surgery type, platelets, body mass index, and length of time from surgery to chemotherapy were not significant predictors. Cox regression results looking at time to anemia were similar. Conclusions Moderate or severe anemia is rare among patients treated with AC followed by CMF. Low baseline hemoglobin and WBC are associated with a higher risk of anemia. The authors represent the International Breast Cancer Study Group.