Initial experience with a new 8 French-compatible directional atherectomy catheter: immediate and mid-term results.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new Fox Hollow atherectomy device (FHT) designed for more efficient and easier plaque removal. The FHT has short rigid section and low-profile cutter mounted on a monorail catheter. The FHT catheter was utilized in 77 patients with 98 lesions. Mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 +/- 0.51 mm. Successful atherectomy with tissue retrieval was performed in 94 lesions (96%). Following atherectomy, mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 71.1% to 31.9% and further to 10.4% following adjunctive treatment. Angiographic complications were one coronary perforation and one adventitial staining, both successfully treated with prolong balloon inflation and stent implantation. Nine patients (11.7%) had in-hospital non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). One patient died (1.3%) for noncardiac reasons and one had MI (1.3%) at 6-month follow-up. Target lesion revascularization was required in 13 (13.8%) lesions and target vessel revascularization in 15 (20.3%) patients. There was target vessel failure in 17 (23.0%) patients. Plaque debulking with the FHT catheter can be performed safely and effectively in relatively small vessels and complex lesions located in mid-distal artery segments with 6-month clinical outcome similar to prior atherectomy devices.     

Oral Anticoagulant Type and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

ObjectivesThe purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of oral anticoagulation (OAC) type on clinical outcomes 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundNon–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), while their comparative performance among patients in need of OAC undergoing TAVR is underinvestigated.MethodsThe study enrolled 962 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR in 4 tertiary European centers and were discharged on either NOACs (n = 326) or VKAs (n = 636). By using propensity scores for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), the comparison of treatment groups was adjusted to correct for potential confounding.ResultsMean age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of the population were 81.3 ± 6.3 years and 4.5% (interquartile range: 3.0% to 7.3%); 52.5% were women and a balloon-expandable valve was used in 62.7% of cases. The primary outcome of interest, combined incidence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any cerebrovascular event at 1-year after TAVR, was 21.2% with NOACs versus 15.0% with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 2.07; p = 0.050, IPTW-adjusted). The 1-year incidence of any Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeds and all-cause mortality were comparable between the NOAC and VKA groups, 33.9% versus 34.1% (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.26; p = 0.838, IPTW-adjusted) and 16.5% versus 12.2% (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.90 to 2.06; p = 0.136, IPTW-adjusted), respectively.ConclusionsChronic use of both NOACs and VKAs among patients in need of OAC after TAVR are comparable regarding 1-year bleeding risk. The higher ischemic event rate observed with NOACs needs to be evaluated in large randomized trials.