三种椎动脉型颈椎病动物模型的比较研究

目的:通过比较三种造模方法的科学性,以期为椎动脉型颈椎病的实验研究提供最合理的造模方法。方法:分别采用注射硬化剂造模法、力学平衡失调造模法、混合造模法制备3组椎动脉型颈椎病大鼠模型。通过X线影像分析各组大鼠颈椎退变情况;运用HE染色法进行小脑组织形态学观察;采用ELISA法测定各组大鼠血浆ET含量。结果:与空白组比较,三种模型的影像学评分、血浆ET含量均明显增加,差异有显著性(P0.01);力学平衡失调造模组与混合造模组组间影像学评分比较无统计学意义,但均高于注射硬化剂造模组(P0.05);三组模型大鼠的血浆ET含量比较无差异。结论:三种模型制作均成功;力学平衡失调造模法与混合造模方法要优于注射硬化剂造模法。     

理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的效果

目的：评价理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法将60例患者随机分为观察组和对照组各30例,观察组采用理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法,对照组采用单纯推拿手法,两组均隔日治疗1次,30 min／次,14次为1个疗程。分别于治疗前后采用VAS量表及压痛仪评估两组患者的疼痛程度,参考改良An和Morrey肘关节功能评分对患者的症状包括活动度、力量、稳定性、疼痛进行评分,并观察临床疗效。结果观察组总有效率为93.3％,对照组总有效率为83.3％,两组比较差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）;治疗后两组患者压痛程度、改良An和Morrey肘关节功能评分较本组治疗前明显改善（ P＜0.05）,且观察组以上各评价指标均明显优于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎可减轻患者的局部疼痛,改善临床疗效。     

踝关节扭伤的康复治疗

踝关节扭伤是一种常见的运动损伤,也是全身最常见的关节扭伤。扭伤后可引起踝关节的内外侧韧带及下胫腓韧带损伤。轻者为侧副韧带部分撕裂,重者为韧带断裂伤,甚至可出现撕脱性骨折、软骨面损伤等。踝关节扭伤可分为内翻型和外翻型,临床以内翻型多见。多因为足外缘着地、足部突然内收而引起。其临床症状主要表现为踝关节疼痛,活动功能受限,关节周围皮肤青紫且肿胀,伤足不敢用力着地,跛行步态,活动时疼痛加剧等。如果失治或者误治,易造成习惯性扭伤。踝关节扭伤后再次受伤的可能性比正常踝关节高40％-70％。     

Clinical observation of tendon-regulating manipulation plus core stability training for non-specific low back pain

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of tendon-regulating manipulation plus kinesiotherapy in treating low back pain.

Methods

Sixty patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group by using the random number table, 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was intervened by tendon-regulating manipulation plus kinesiotherapy, while the control group was by the tendon-regulating manipulation alone. The lumbar lordosis was measured by X-ray (side view), the pain was evaluated by analgesy meter, the lumbar range of motion was by using goniometer, and the function was judged by Oswestry disability index (ODI) before and after treatment, and the therapeutic efficacy was also observed.

Results

After treatment, the pain level was significantly reduced, lumbar lordosis was significantly increased, the lumbar range of motion was markedly improved, and the ODI score significantly dropped (all P<0.05) in both groups; the improvement of each item in the treatment group was more significant than that in the control group (all P<0.05). The total effective rate was 90.0% in the treatment group versus 63.3% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In the treatment of low back pain, tendon-regulating manipulation plus kinesiotherapy can mitigate topical pain, improve the motion of low back, enhance the quality of life, and produce a more significant therapeutic efficacy compared to tendon-regulating manipulation alone.