Gut Hormones in Health and Obesity: The Upcoming Role of Short Chain Fatty Acids

We are currently facing an obesity pandemic, with worldwide obesity rates having tripled since 1975. Obesity is one of the main risk factors for the development of non-communicable diseases, which are now the leading cause of death worldwide. This calls for urgent action towards understanding the underlying mechanisms behind the development of obesity as well as developing more effective treatments and interventions. Appetite is carefully regulated in humans via the interaction between the central nervous system and peripheral hormones. This involves a delicate balance in external stimuli, circulating satiating and appetite stimulating hormones, and correct functioning of neuronal signals. Any changes in this equilibrium can lead to an imbalance in energy intake versus expenditure, which often leads to overeating, and potentially weight gain resulting in overweight or obesity. Several lines of research have shown imbalances in gut hormones are found in those who are overweight or obese, which may be contributing to their condition. Therefore, this review examines the evidence for targeting gut hormones in the treatment of obesity by discussing how their dysregulation influences food intake, the potential possibility of altering the circulating levels of these hormones for treating obesity, as well as the role of short chain fatty acids and protein as novel treatments.     

Thinking Through Health Care Reform

Emotionality truly shapes critical thinking in the development of American health policy. President Obama has misgauged the emotions and thoughts of the Nation and Congress about the health care reform bill. Most Americans don??t approve of the design or impetus of health care legislation under the Obama administration. The enacted legislation provides health care insurance for all Americans. However, health care insurance for the lower class shows intense ??red lights?? for repeal of the legislation to members of the middle and upper classes. It violates their critical thinking processes and comes down to a kind of ??class warfare?? of poverty level and low income persons against the gut emotional feelings of the middle and upper classes to repeal the program. Sarah Palin and her Tea Party compatriots envision such ??class warfare?? with the implementation of the program, even ??death panels?? to mete out health care for those seriously or gravely ill.     

Eye rubbing-induced changes in intraocular pressure and corneal thickness measured at five locations, in subjects with ocular allergy

AIM: To assess the effects of eye rubbing on corneal thickness (CT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained 0-30min after habitual eye rubbing in symptomatic patients. METHODS: Measurements of IOP and CT were obtained at five locations (central, temporal, superior, nasal and inferior) before, and every 5min for 30min interval after 30s of eye rubbing, for 25 randomly selected eyes of 14 subjects with ocular allergy and 11 age-matched normals. Differences in measurements were calculated in each group [Baseline measurements minus measurements recorded at each time interval after eye rubbing (for IOP), and for each corneal location (for CT)] and comparison were then made between groups (allergic versus control) for differences in any observed effects. RESULTS: Within groups, baseline mean IOPs in the allergic patient-group (14.2±3.0 mm Hg) and in the control group (13.1±1.9 mm Hg) were similar at all times, after eye rubbing (P >0.05, for all). The maximum reduction in IOP was 0.8 mm Hg in the control subjects and the maximum increase was also 0.8 mm Hg in the allergic subjects. Between groups (allergic versus control), the changes in IOP remained under 1 mm Hg at all times (P=0.2) after 30min of eye rubbing. Between 0 and 30min of CT measurements after eye rubbing, the mean central CT (CCT), inferior CT (ICT), superior CT (SCT), temporal CT (TCT) and nasal CT (NCT) did not vary significantly from baseline values in the control and allergic-subject groups (P>0.05, for both). Between both groups, changes in CT were similar at all locations (P>0.05) except for the TC which was minimally thinner by about 4.4 μm (P=0.001) in the allergic subjects than in the control subjects, 30min following 30s of eye rubbing. CONCLUSION: IOP measured in allergic subjects after 30s of habitual eye rubbing was comparable with that obtained in normal subjects at all times between 0 and 30min. Although, CT in the allergic subjects were similar to those of the control subjects at all times, it varied between +10 and -7.5 μm following eye rubbing, with the temporal cornea showing consistent reductions in thickness in the subjects with allergy. However, this reduction was minimal and was considered to not be clinically relevant.     

The effect of orthodontic bands or tubes upon periodontal status during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment

Introduction

Orthodontic bands cause periodontal inflammation. In theory, the use of a buccal tube (bond) instead of a band should prevent or minimize periodontal changes because the bonds are positioned away from the gingival margins.

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the periodontal status of orthodontic bands compared with bonds in the first three months of orthodontic treatment.

Materials and methods

Twenty-four orthodontic patients (mean age = 12.6 years) were enrolled in this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Using the cross-mouth technique, bands and bonds were used in opposite quadrants. Periodontal parameters including the presence or absence of Bleeding On Probing (BOP) and Probing Depths (PDs) were taken at the start and three months into treatment.

Results

Bands caused a statistically significant change in the Bleeding On Probing (BOP) (P = 0.001 and 0.021) and bonds displayed a statistically insignificant change in the Bleeding On Probing (BOP) (P = 0.125 and 1.00) for the upper and lower arch. The difference in Probing Depths (PDs) between bands and bonds was also statistically significant (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Molar bands are associated with greater periodontal inflammation compared with molar bonds in the first three months of fixed orthodontic treatment.     

Health care services provided to type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia

Objectives:

To assess health care services provided to type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients and diabetes health care expenditure in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Methods:

This study was part of a nationwide, household, population based cross-sectional survey conducted at the University Diabetes Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between January 2007 and December 2009 covering 13 administrative regions of the Kingdom. Using patients’ interview questionnaires, health care services data were collected by trained staff.

Results:

A total of 5,983 diabetic patients were chosen to assess health care services and expenditure. Approximately 92.2% of health services were governmental and the remaining 7.8% were in private services. The mean annual number of visits to physicians was 6.5±3.9 and laboratories was 5.1±3.9. Diabetic patients required one admission every 3 years with a mean admission duration of 13.3±28.3 days. General practitioners managed 85.9% of diabetic cases alone, or shared with internists and/or endocrinologists. Health care expenditure was governmental in 90% of cases, while it was personal in 7.7% or based on insurance payment in 2.3%.

Conclusion:

Health services and its expenditure provided to diabetic citizens in Saudi Arabia are mainly governmental. Empowerment of the role of both the private sector and health insurance system is badly needed, aside from implementing proper management guidelines to deliver good services at different levels.The health care system (HCS) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is growing at an annual rate of 2% to meet the increasing demand for health care services caused by increased population growth, and a surge in chronic non-communicable diseases.1 This has resulted in an increase in the total health care budget by more than 2 times; from 30 billion Saudi Riyals (SR) (US$8 billion) in 2008 to approximately SR69 billion (US$18.4 billion US dollars) in the year 2011 with a cumulative allocation of SR113 billion (U$30.13 billion) in 2010 and 2011; which accounted for 3.7% of the estimated country’s gross domestic product (GDP), which is one of the highest among Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.2 The Saudi health care system, which is ranked 26th among 190 countries by the World Health Organization (WHO),3 has a lower percentage of average expenditure in relation to the country’s GDP than many developed and developing countries.4 The government HCS in KSA is structured to deliver free health care services to Saudi citizens through various public hospitals and primary health care centers (PHCCs) including government health sectors, such as the Ministry of Health (MOH), Military Health Services and University Health Institutions. In addition to this, the private health care sector, through its clinics and hospitals, provided 31.1% of the total health care services in KSA in 2013.5 The real challenge facing the Kingdom’s HSC is the increased demands for hospital beds and medical personnel to meet international standards.6 The population ratio of physician and nurses in the Kingdom is lower than the global ratio being 9.4 physicians and 21 nurses per 10,000 of population versus 13 physicians and 28 nurses globally.7 This explains the current imbalance between the growth in HCS and the real medical needs of Saudi citizens.Diabetes mellitus, being the most prevalent chronic non-communicable disease in the Kingdom, has a significant effect on the country’s HCS and overall economy.8,9 This is proved by the fact that 25.4% of Saudi citizens older than 30 years of age have diabetes, which implies that there are approximately 1.5 million Saudi citizens suffering from this chronic disease.10 This is aside from the fact that more than 70% of known diabetic patients in the Middle Eastern countries have poorly controlled diabetes,11 associated with high rates of chronic complications that place greater pressure on health services and expenditure, where in 2013, it was estimated that the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region spent US$13.6 billion on diabetes care with the spending per person with diabetes, where the spending in Saudi Arabia was US$934, which is far below other GCC such as United Arab Emirates (US$2,228), Qatar (US$2,199), and Kuwait (US$1,886),12 although we strongly believe that these figures are underestimated.Diabetic patients are currently managed at all health care levels, from primary to secondary and tertiary levels by general practitioners (GPs), internists, and endocrinologists.13 Since diabetes care involves many medical disciplines, such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology and so forth, specialized diabetes clinics, and diabetes centers are needed to function as liaising bodies. Although health care needs for diabetic patients’ management at a global level have witnessed a clear shift to the primary from secondary and tertiary health care levels,14 diabetic patients in the Kingdom are still receiving services at secondary or even tertiary levels. Since there are no studies so far that have looked into the health care services provided to diabetic patients in KSA, the current study, as a part of the Saudi Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Diabetes Impact (SAUDI-DM) survey,10 has investigated the current status of health care services provided to diabetic patients. This study aimed to assess the medical system providing care to diabetic patients, and methods of payment through a randomly selected cohort of diabetic patients at a country level.