Comparison of the bioavailability of dexibuprofen administered alone or as part of racemic ibuprofen

Two bioavailability studies of S(+)-ibuprofen (dexibuprofen) were conducted in healthy volunteers to define the relationship between the bioavailability of the drug after administration of dexibuprofen alone or as part of ibuprofen racemate. Enantioselective plasma drug analysis was used throughout. In the first study, the bioavailability of dexibuprofen from a 400 mg tablet formulation was compared with that from 400 mg in aqueous solution.The tablet formulation did not influence the bioavailability of the drug and dexibuprofen was well absorbed from the gastro-intestinal tract.The second study was divided into three identical parts. Bioavailability of dexibuprofen 200, 400 and 600 mg was compared with its bioavailability from ibuprofen racemate 400, 800 and 1200 mg.The second study showed that the mean relative bioavailability of dexibuprofen to ibuprofen racemate was 0.66, thus enabling the estimation of clinically useful dexibuprofen doses from the usual doses of the racemate. The 95% confidence interval limits did not include 0.5, leading to the conclusion that administering half of the racemate dose would not provide patients with an adequate amount of therapeutically active drug.     

Parental Opinions About Attending Parent Support Groups

Parent support groups are often a routine part of the services provided to families who have children with special health care needs. Often times, however, the groups are poorly attended, despite expressions of interest from parents. A survey of 45 families was conducted to examine who participates, why, and what factors encourage attendance. This article describes the survey responses and offers suggestions regarding utilization of the results for those planning parent support groups.     

Barrier function of the skin in a repetitive irritation model and influence of 2 different treatments*

Background/aims: The aim of this study was to develop and characterize an experimental model of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis using the repetitive application over 2 weeks of 2 different irritative stimuli, sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) in low concentration and toluene. Further, it was intended to look at the effect of 2 different treatments which could influence the regeneration of the skin barrier, as already investigated in preliminary short-term experiments. Methods: Occlusive short-time daily application of the irritants (SLS 30 min; toluene 10 min) was performed. After removal of the occlusive patch, the irritated areas were treated with 2 different preparations, Lotio Alba Aquosa and vaseline (white petroleum jelly). Bioengineering techniques were used to precisely measure the skin condition. Results: A mild irritation was obtained under these experimental conditions. The bioengineering measurements allowed us to differentiate both irritants through their different influences on trans-epidermal water loss and skin hydration. Treatment with vaseline did not significantly influence the course of the irritation, but Lotio Alba Aquosa clearly potentiated it, whereby different effects were noticed for both irritative stimuli. Conclusions: The use of bioengineering techniques in this model of mild cumulative irritation allowed us to differentiate the action of both irritants, showing that they act through different mechanisms. The results of the treatments pointed out the need to treat an irritation with the right product for the right time period.     

Stratum corneum dynamic function measurements after moisturizer or irritant application

Two simple tests were conducted which allowed the quantification of parameters that characterize the stratum corneum (SC) dynamic functions in vivo under physiological conditions after moisturizer applications for 1 h and after irritation with different concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS; 0.5–4%) applied under occlusion for 15 min or 24 h. Both tests, the sorption-desorption test (SDT) and the moisture accumulation test (MAT), were performed with a Nova Dermal Phase Meter 9003. The following parameters were quantified: prehydration state (SDT, MAT), hygroscopicity, water-holding capacity (SDT), water accumulation velocity and water accumulation (MAT). These procedures allowed the demonstration of the water-holding effect of urea contained in moisturizers. Differences between the long and the short application time of SLS were characterized by differences in SC dynamic functions while the hydration state was not changed. An effect on transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was noted only after the long application time, although the MAT clearly showed dynamic parameters to be changed after 15 min of treatment. These tests were simple in practice and allowed the demonstration of functional modifications of the SC while other parameters remained unchanged. They gave insight into possible action mechanisms of urea and SLS in the SC.     

The excretion of trace elements in rat urine after treatment with 2,3-dimercaptopropane sodium sulfonate.

Administration of various doses of the chelating agent 2,3-dimercaptopropane sodium sulfonate (Dimaval, DMPS) leads to a greatly enhanced excretion of Zn and Cu. The excretion of Co, Mn, Ni and Fe remains unchanged. The relevance of these findings to the toxicity of DMPS is discussed.     

Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes

The aim of this work is to advance knowledge of how to measure gist and verbatim understanding of risk magnitude information and to apply this knowledge to address whether graphics that focus on the number of people affected (the numerator of the risk ratio, i.e., the foreground) are effective displays for increasing (a) understanding of absolute and relative risk magnitudes and (b) risk avoidance. In 2 experiments, the authors examined the effects of a graphical display that used icons to represent the foreground information on measures of understanding (Experiments 1 and 2) and on perceived risk, affect, and risk aversion (Experiment 2). Consistent with prior findings, this foreground-only graphical display increased perceived risk and risk aversion; however, it also led to decreased understanding of absolute (although not relative) risk magnitudes. Methodologically, this work shows the importance of distinguishing understanding of absolute risk from understanding of relative risk magnitudes, and the need to assess gist knowledge of both types of risk. Substantively, this work shows that although using foreground-only graphical displays is an appealing risk communication strategy to increase risk aversion, doing so comes at the cost of decreased understanding of absolute risk magnitudes.     

Skin penetration and sun protection factor of five UV filters: effect of the vehicle

To gain information about efficacy and safety of sunscreens, we compared the skin penetration of ultraviolet (UV) filters from two vehicles, i.e. an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion gel and petrolatum jelly both in vitro and in vivo, as well as the corresponding pharmacological effect, i.e. the sun protection factor (SPF) in vivo. The UV filters studied were benzophenone-3 (BPH), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHM), butyl methoxydibenzoyl methane, ethylhexyl salicylate and homosalate. The human skin penetration of these five chemicals from the two vehicles was determined both in vitro using Franz cells and in vivo using a standardized tape-stripping method. The SPF of the two sunscreens was determined in vivo following the COLIPA guidelines. In vitro none of the filters permeated through the skin after 6 h of product application and very little could be found in the skin. BPH and EHM were the only UV filters found in the dermis (both after 30 min and 6 h). An effect of the vehicle could be noticed only for BPH after 30 min in the dermis and 6 h in both dermis and epidermis. In vivo, no differences in the amount of individual UV filters (in % of the applied dose) in the 15 first strips of the stratum corneum (SC) were found following 30 min of application of the formulations; however, the amount of UV filters that were retained in the SC was significantly higher (around 3 times) with the O/W emulsion gel than with the petrolatum jelly. This difference between the two vehicles was also of consequence for the SPF in vivo measured 30 min after application of the products (SPF congruent with 18 with the O/W emulsion gel compared to SPF congruent with 10 with the petrolatum jelly). By choosing the right vehicle or optimizing it, not only sunscreen products can be significantly improved in terms of pharmacological efficacy but the potential toxicological risk associated with the skin penetration of UV filters may be significantly reduced.