Comparison of Single and Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics Using Clinical Bioequivalence Data and Monte Carlo Simulations

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative performance and usefulness of single dose (SD) and multiple dose (MD) regimens for bioequivalence (BE) determination. Drugs such as indomethacin, procainamide, erythromycin, quinidine, nifedipine were tested for BE under SD and MD dose regimens. Drugs characterized by low accumulation indices (AI) showed virtually no change in the 90% confidence interval (CI) of AUC and CMAX upon multiple dosing. On the other hand, drugs with higher AI appeared to have smaller CI at steady-state. For example, the CI range of AUC and CMAX of quinidine (AI of 1.54) decreased from 26 to 12 and from 22 to 12, respectively, upon multiple dosing. A Monte Carlo simulation study of SD and MD bioequivalence trials was performed. The probability of failing the bioequivalence test was evaluated for several situations defined by different levels of variability and correlation in ka constants, presence or absence of inter- and/or intra-individual variability in clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V), and different degrees of accumulation. All the possible combinations of these factors were tested with SD and MD study designs. All simulations used 1000 data sets with 30 subjects in each data set for a total of 144 unique designs (total of 144,000 simulations of bioequivalence trials). Upon multiple dosing, narrowing of CI ranges was observed for drugs simulated to have high AI, high variability and a large difference in absorption constants (ka) between test and reference formulations. The mean AUC and CMAX CI ranges for this situation decreased from 15 to 6 and from 16 to 10, respectively, in going from SD to MD design. Thus, there was concordance between simulated and experimental data. The probability of failing the bioequivalence test is shown to dramatically decrease upon multiple dosing due to the changes (range and shift) in the confidence interval.     

Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Highly Variable Drugs Using Clinical Trial Simulations. II: Comparison of Single and Multiple-Dose Trials Using AUC and Cmax

Purpose. Evaluating of the effects of high intrasubject variability in clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V), on 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC (Area Under the concentration Curve) in single and multiple-dose bioequivalence studies. The main methodology was Monte Carlo simulation, and we also used deterministic simulation, and examination of clinical trials. The results are compared with those previously observed for Cmax (maximum concentration.) Methods. The time course of drug concentration in plasma was simulated using a one-compartment model with log-normal statistical distributions of intersubject and intrasubject variabilities in the pharmacokinetic parameters. Both immediate-release and prolonged-release products were simulated using several levels of intrasubject variability in single-dose and multiple-dose studies. Simulations of 2000 clinical bioequivalence trials per condition (138 conditions) with 30 subjects in each crossover trial were carried out. Simulated data were compared with data from actual bioequivalence trials. Results. The current simulations for AUC show similar probabilities of failure for single-dose and multiple-dose bioequivalence studies, even with differences in the rate of absorption or fraction absorbed. AUC values from prolonged-release scenario studies are more sensitive to changes in the first order absorption rate constant ka, and to variability in CL and V than AUC from studies of immediate-release studies. Conclusions. We showed that multiple-dose designs for highly variable drugs do not always reduce intrasubject variability in either AUC or Cmax, although the behavior of AUC differs from Cmax. Single dose AUC to the last quantifiable concentration was more reliable than either single dose AUC extrapolated to infinity, or multiple dose AUC during a steady-state interval. Multiple-dose designs may not be the best solution for assessing bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.     

Population pharmacokinetics of oxycodone in children 6 months to 7 years old

Young children are often undertreated for pain. One barrier to effective pain treatment is understanding the pharmacokinetic behavior of analgesics in this age group. Oxycodone is a commonly prescribed opioid for severe pain, yet little is known about its pharmacokinetics in young children. This article used population pharmacokinetic modeling to synthesize pharmacokinetic data from several studies into a model. A single population model that described the observed pharmacokinetics was developed. The combined data were best described with a 2-compartment linear model with different first-order absorption rates depending on route of administration. Weight was found to significantly influence both clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd). The following model adequately describes the population pharmacokinetic profile of oxycodone where absolute bioavailability (F) is estimated for each administration route: CL/F=55x(body weight/70)0.87; V/F=86x(body weight/70)1.16. The interindividual coefficients of variation in CL and Vd were 20.2 and 19.7%, respectively. This finding confirms that the allometric scaling using the above model explained most of the variability in exposure observed among children. This model confirms using a weight-based dose for oxycodone without adjustment for age between 6 months and 7 years and is valuable for evaluating dosing schedules and dosing routes.     

Dose-escalating study of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fesoterodine in children with overactive bladder

ObjectiveTo determine the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine, and assess the utility of 3-day bladder diaries (exploratory objective) in pediatric subjects with neurogenic detrusor overactivity or idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB).MethodsIn this 8-week open-label study, subjects (8–17 years, >25 kg) received fesoterodine 4 mg for 4 weeks, then 8 mg for 4 weeks. Blood samples were obtained at weeks 4 and 8.ResultsOf 21 subjects enrolled, 11 had neurogenic detrusor overactivity and 10 had idiopathic OAB; 1 discontinued (personal reasons). Mean age and weight were 13.2 years and 54.0 kg for boys (n = 12) and 13.1 years and 49.2 kg for girls (n = 9). 5-Hydroxy-methyltolterodine plasma concentrations did not differ by diagnosis and were consistent with predictions based on adult data. Treatment-related adverse events (all mild or moderate) included 1 event each of dry mouth, constipation, dry eyes and blurred vision, and 2 events each of nausea and increased post-void residual volume. Three-day bladder diaries proved feasible.ConclusionsOral administration of fesoterodine in pediatric subjects (>25 kg) with idiopathic OAB or neurogenic detrusor overactivity produced steady-state plasma 5-hydroxy-methyltolterodine exposures similar to those in adults. The doses given were well tolerated.     

Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Highly Variable Drugs Using Monte Carlo Simulations. I. Estimation of Rate of Absorption for Single and Multiple Dose Trials Using Cmax

Purpose. A Monte Carlo simulation study was done to investigate the effects of high intrasubject variation in clearance (CL), and volume of distribution (V) on the calculation of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for Cmax for single dose and multiple dose studies. Methods. Simulations were done for both immediate release and sustained release scenarios. The simulated data were compared with clinical data from bioequivalence studies performed on indomethacin and verapamil. Results. Previous reviews and simulations have shown that the probability of failure for the Cmax for single dose studies was always greater than that for multiple dose studies. However, the results for the simulated scenarios currently investigated indicate that if intrasubject (period-to-period) variation in CL and V is high (% CV's above 25%, and 12%, respectively), multiple dose studies can exhibit a higher probability of failure for Cmax than do single dose studies. Furthermore, Cmax values from studies performed with a sustained release scenario are more sensitive to changes in Ka, CL, and V than are results of studies on immediate release products. As an example, the probability of failure for immediate release products in simulated single dose studies is about 11% and 21% when the mean difference in Ka is 10% and 20%, respectively; while, the probability of failure for multiple dose studies is about 36% regardless of the difference in Ka. The corresponding values for the probability of failure for sustained release products were 25%, 53% for single dose studies and 39% for multiple dose studies. The simulations also indicate that changes in the fraction absorbed have a greater effect on the estimation of Cmax in multiple dose regimens than in single dose studies. Conclusions. The results from these investigations indicate that multiple dose studies do not necessarily always reduce variability in Cmax.     

Modeling dose-response relationships of the effects of fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder

Background

Fesoterodine is an antimuscarinic for the treatment of overactive bladder, a syndrome of urgency, with or without urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), usually with increased daytime frequency and nocturia. Our objective was to develop predictive models to describe the dose response of fesoterodine.

Methods

Data from subjects enrolled in double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II and III trials were used for developing longitudinal dose-response models.

Results

The models predicted that clinically significant and near-maximum treatment effects would be seen within 3 to 4 weeks after treatment initiation. For a typical patient with 11 micturitions per 24 hours at baseline, predicted change was -1.2, -1.7, and -2.2 micturitions for placebo and fesoterodine 4 mg and 8 mg, respectively. For a typical patient with 2 UUI episodes per 24 hours at baseline, predicted change was -1.05, -1.26, and -1.43 UUI episodes for placebo and fesoterodine 4 mg and 8 mg, respectively. Increase in mean voided volume was estimated at 9.7 mL for placebo, with an additional 14.2 mL and 28.4 mL for fesoterodine 4 mg and 8 mg, respectively.

Conclusions

A consistent dose response for fesoterodine was demonstrated for bladder diary endpoints in subjects with overactive bladder, a result that supports the greater efficacy seen with fesoterodine 8 mg in post hoc analyses of clinical trial data. The dose-response models can be used to predict outcomes for doses not studied or for patient subgroups underrepresented in clinical trials.

Trial Registration

The phase III trials used in this analysis have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00220363 and NCT00138723).     

Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of once-daily hydromorphone hydrochloride extended-release capsules

Hydromorphone hydrochloride extended release (HHER) is a multiparticulate melt-extrusion pellet capsule formulation administered q24h. Study 1 investigated the bioavailability of 24-mg HHER fed, as well as 24-mg and 12-mg HHER and 8-mg hydromorphone hydrochloride immediate-release (HHIR) tablets fasting. No clinically significant food effect was observed on hydromorphone C(max) or AUC for the 24-mg HHER, and dose proportionality (AUC) was demonstrated between 12- and 24-mg HHER. Study 2 demonstrated dose strength proportionality for 3 x 12-mg HHER versus 1 x 32-mg HHER. Study 3 evaluated 12-mg HHER q24h versus 3-mg HHIR q6h at steady state. HHER produced relatively constant steady-state concentrations over 24 hours. HHER and HHIR were equivalent for AUC(ss). C(ssmax) was 26% lower for HHER than HHIR, C(ssmin) was 43% higher for HHER, and peak-to-trough fluctuation was 126% for HHER versus 328% for HHIR, which are ideal attributes of a once-daily oral extended-release dosage form. HHER administration resulted in fewer adverse events than HHIR in study 3.