Risk of hypoglycaemia with oral antidiabetic agents in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

In patients with Type 2 diabetes, the appropriate intensity of glucose control is determined by age, life expectancy, and the presence of concomitant disease. Geriatric patients are especially susceptible to hypoglycaemia and therefore particular care should be taken in this group characterized by polypharmacy, renal or hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular multimorbidity and malnutrition. As hypoglycaemia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, treatment regimens for diabetes should minimize the occurrence of hypoglycaemic episodes and be tailored to the patient's individual needs. The pharmacological options for treating Type 2 diabetes have increased considerably and the risk of hypoglycaemia of the currently available drugs varies considerably. Metformin, thiazolidinediones, and acarbose, oral antidiabetic drugs that decrease insulin resistance or postprandial glucose absorption, are associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. These drugs can also be used effectively in various combination regimens; however, by improving insulin sensitivity, combinations of metformin and thiolidinediones with sulphonylureas or meglitinides may considerably increase the risk of hypoglycaemia. On account of its complex pharmacoprofile glibenclamide is a problematic substance carrying a high risk of hypoglycaemia. There are limited preliminary data indicating that, under routine conditions, glimepiride may be associated with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia than glibenclamide and is no more likely to cause hypoglycaemia than other shorter-acting agents such as gliclazide and glipizide. Nateglinide and repaglinide as short-acting insulin secretagogues may be associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia compared with glibenclamide, in particular when dosed flexibly. Repaglinide might be beneficial in individuals with renal impairment.     

Notfallversorgung eines seltenen malignen Nervenscheidentumors

BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral epineurial tumours are a group of tumours that derive histomorphologically from peripheral nerve sheaths. They occur sporadically, with an incidence of approximately 0.001%, and very rarely require emergency operation. PATIENT AND PROCEDURE: An athletic 19-year-old man presented to an orthopaedic outpatient clinic with lumboischialgia and weakness of the third and fourth left toes. A 12 x 10 x 8-cm paravertebral/retroperitoneal tumour was diagnosed by CT, and the patient was referred to our clinic. For classification, CT-assisted puncture of the tumour was carried out. A haemorrhage into the tumour resulted from the puncture, with consequently lower Hb level and progressive peripheral sensomotoric deficits demanding emergency surgery on a weekend. On this occasion, the tumour was resected together with the L5 and S1 nerve roots through cooperation between the general surgical and neurosurgical departments and was classified as a malignant peripheral epineurial tumour in the rapid stage. Due to the spinal R2 resection, after-loading probes were inserted and the tumour bed was clip-marked. Percutaneous radiotherapy and brachytherapy followed postoperatively. Shortly afterwards, relaparotomy had to be performed due to an adhesive ileus, from which the patient recovered quickly. Chemotherapy was carried out due to a G2 tumour classification. The patient is currently undergoing rehabilitation, during which the peripheral neurological deficits are improving gradually. CONCLUSION: This rare case of a malignant peripheral epineurial tumour with acute symptoms demonstrates the ability of hospitals with maximum care facilities to maintain services even in times of financial cuts in health care services.     

EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE DISTINCT MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS I LINEAGES IN TELEOSTEAN FISH*

In the context of studies on the expression of MhcCyca-Z sequences of the common carp, PCR amplifications of exon 4 were performed on cDNA obtained from pooled thymi of 20 carp F1 individuals. Five recombinant clones (Cyca-TC3, -TC13, -TC15, -TC17 and -TC18) were found to be 96% similar to the exon 4 region of Cyca-ZA1. Each of the five sequences was unique, and differed in a few positions in both the nucleotide and the derived amino acid sequences from any of the Cyca-Z sequences known to date. These data suggest that multiple Z genes per locus are present in the carp, which are transcribed in the thymus. In the course of analysing the amplified Cyca-Z sequences, serendipity yielded a clone, Cyca-TC16, containing a class I-like sequence substantially different from any other carp class I sequence. The predicted amino acid sequence of Cyca-TC16 was most similar to the class I genes (Lach-U) from the coelacanth (42–46% amino acid identity). Cyca-TC16 contains three conserved β2-microglobulin contact residues, and the secondary structure was predicted by computer algorithms to be similar to that of the α3 domain of HLA-A2. Phylogenetic analysis shows that carp class I sequences reside in four distinct clusters: (i) Cyca-Z, Cyca-TC3, -TC13, -TC15, -TC17 and -TC18 together with Caau-Z from ginbuna crucian carp, (ii) Cyca-U with Bree-U (zebrafish) and Sasa-p30 (Atlantic salmon), (iii) Cyca-TC16 with Lach-U (coelacanth), and (iv) Cyca-C4.     

Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients A comparison of doctors, nurses and patients as sources of reports

Objective: This study investigated the relative value of adverse drug events reported by doctors, nurses and patients. Methods: The study was conducted on a total of four wards: the paediatric and internal medicine wards (including geriatric patients) of two peripheral hospitals in the Netherlands. Adverse drug events were collected by spontaneous reporting (doctor and nurse reports) and by daily ward visits, during which the patients were interviewed by a hospital pharmacist (patient reports). Criteria for relative value of the reported adverse drug events were the number of potentially serious reactions, the number of reactions not mentioned in the patient information leaflet and the number of reactions reported to new drugs (5 years or less on the Dutch market). No formal causality assessment was applied. Results: Over a period of 2 months in 1996 (Hospital I) and 2 months in 1997 (Hospital II) a total of 620 patients were included in the study and adverse drug events were reported in 179 (29%) of these cases. Doctors reported a statistically significant larger number of serious (26% of all doctor reports; odds ratio (OR) 3.2; confidence interval (CI) 1.2–8.7) and unknown (39%; OR 2.5; CI 1.0–6.0) adverse drug events than patients themselves during the daily ward visit. Doctors also reported more serious and unknown adverse drug events than nurses. Adverse reactions to new drugs were reported during the daily ward visit only (8% of all daily ward visit reports). Conclusion: This study reconfirms that doctors are the main source for reports of serious and unknown adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. However, patients themselves seem to report more adverse reactions to new drugs (during the daily ward visit). By focusing on patients using new drugs, the daily ward visit might become cost-effective. This needs to be explored in future studies. Received: 10 September 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 30 November 1998     

Association of risk of abnormal bleeding with degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition by antidepressants

BACKGROUND: Serotonin plays a role in platelet aggregation. Because antidepressants influence blood serotonin levels, their use may be associated with an increased risk of abnormal bleeding. However, previous studies were inconclusive regarding this association. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of abnormal bleeding associated with the use of antidepressants and to establish the relationship between serotonin reuptake inhibition and the risk of bleeding. METHODS: We used data collected from 1992 through 2000 to conduct a nested case-control study of a cohort of more than 64 000 new antidepressant users. Cases were identified as all patients hospitalized for a primary diagnosis of abnormal bleeding, and they were matched with controls for age and sex. We classified exposure according to the degree (high, intermediate, or low) of serotonin reuptake inhibition and performed logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios. RESULTS: There were 196 cases of abnormal bleeding. The risk of hospitalization increased with the use of inhibitors providing intermediate (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5) and high degrees of serotonin reuptake inhibition (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.8). CONCLUSIONS: In a large population of new antidepressant users we found a significant association between degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition by antidepressants and risk of hospital admission for abnormal bleeding as the primary diagnosis. An increased risk of abnormal bleeding was strongly associated with the degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition.     

Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach—report of a single-center experience

Aim

Robotic surgery allows for a better visualization and more precise dissection especially in the narrow male pelvis and mid and lower third of the rectum. However, superiority to laparoscopic TME has yet to be proven. We therefore analyzed short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer.

Patients and methods

From 2011 to 2016, 44 robotic (RTME) and 41 laparoscopic (LTME) low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision were performed at a single institution. Specimen quality was assessed and reported by an independent pathologist following international guidelines.

Results

The groups did not differ significantly regarding gender, age, ASA stage, BMI, and distance of the lower tumor margin from the anal verge. More patients in the RTME group underwent preoperative chemoradiation (43.2 vs. 19.5%, p?=?0.019). The quality of the TME specimen was significantly better in the RTME group (complete/nearly complete/incomplete for RTME 97/0/3% and for LTME 78/17/5%, p?=?0.03). The conversion rate tended to be lower in the RTME group (7 vs. 17%, p?=?0.143). There was no difference in CRM positivity between the groups.

Conclusion

Robotic surgery is safe and can improve the quality of TME for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopy. Any effect on long-term survival remains to be established.